RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The combination of chemotherapy and L-asparaginase (L-ASP) treatment significantly increased survival rate in an adult patient with extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL). However, hypersensitivity reactions of L-ASP in some patients limited its application. Polyethylene glycol-conjugated asparaginase (PEG-ASP) has a lower immunogenicity and longer circulating half-life than unconjugated L-ASP, and has been reported to be effective and well-tolerated in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin (doxorubicin), oncovin (vincristine), and prednisolone (CHOP) is the most common chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In this report, we sought to study the efficacy and safety of PEG-L- CHOP in NKTCL in adult Chinese patients. METHODS: Our study is a prospective, multi-center, open-label clinical trial. Patients with newly diagnosed adult NKTCL and an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 were eligible for enrollment. Treatment included six cycles of PEG-L-CHOP regimen. Radiotherapy was scheduled after 2-4 cycles of PEG-L-CHOP regimen, depending on the stage and primary anatomic site. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 33 eligible patients. All 33 patients completed 170 cycles of chemotherapy combined with radical radiotherapy. The overall response rate was 96.9% (32/33) with 75.8% (25/33) achieving complete responses and 21.2% (7/33) achieving partial responses. The overall survival (OS) at 1, 2, 3-year were 100, 90.61 and 80.54%, respectively. The major adverse effects were bone marrow suppression, reduction of fibrinogen level, liver dysfunction, and digestive tract toxicities. No allergic reaction and no treatment-related mortality or severe complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: PEG-L-CHOP chemotherapy in combination radiotherapy is safe and durably effective treatment for adult extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma with fewer allergic reactions. This study was approved by the Peking University Beijing Cancer Hospital Ethics Review Committee (reference number: 2011101104). The clinical trial registration number ChiCTR1800016940 was registered on July 07, 2018 at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx ). The clinical trial was registered retrospectively.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Linfoma Extranodal de Células NK-T/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Asparaginasa/administración & dosificación , Biomarcadores , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Linfoma Extranodal de Células NK-T/diagnóstico , Linfoma Extranodal de Células NK-T/radioterapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/efectos adversos , Vincristina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a single subcutaneous injection of pegylated filgrastim with daily filgrastim as a prophylaxis for neutropenia induced by commonly used chemotherapy regimens. Fifteen centers enrolled 337 chemotherapy-naive cancer patients with normal bone marrow function. All patients randomized into AOB and BOA arms received two cycles of chemotherapy. Patients received a single dose of pegylated filgrastim 100 µg/kg in cycle 1 (AOB) or cycle 2 (BOA) and daily doses of filgrastim 5 µg/kg/day in cycle 1 (BOA) or cycle 2 (AOB). Efficacy and safety parameters were recorded. The primary end point was the rate of protection against grade 4 neutropenia after chemotherapy [defined as the rate at which the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) remained >0.5×10(9)/l throughout the entire cycle]. Ninety-four percent of patients receiving pegylated filgrastim or filgrastim did not develop grade 4 neutropenia. The incidence of ANC<1.0×10(9)/l was 16.0% (50/313) after support with either pegylated filgrastim or filgrastim. The incidences of febrile neutropenia and antibiotic administration were similar in both groups. Notably, faster ANC recovery was observed with pegylated filgrastim support. The ANC nadir was also earlier with pegylated filgrastim (day 7) support than with filgrastim support (day 9), although the depth of nadir was not significantly different. A single subcutaneous injection of pegylated filgrastim 100 µg/kg provided adequate and safe neutrophil support comparable with daily subcutaneous injections of unmodified filgrastim 5 µg/kg/day in patients receiving commonly used standard-dose mild-to-moderate myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Filgrastim , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of daily administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), and a single subcutaneous injection of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), a sustained-duration rhG-CSF, in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. METHODS: In the present randomized, open-label, match and cross-over study, enrolled 104 patients with previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and with normal bone marrow function from 13 centers were randomly divided into 2 matched groups, AB and BA group. Each patient received two cycles of chemotherapy of identical regimen. In the study cycle, the patients received a single subcutaneous injection of PEG-rhG-CSF 100 microg/kg on day 3; and in control cycle, daily subcutaneous infection of rhG-CSF 5 microg x kg(-1) x d(-1) began on day 3 and continued for 14 days or until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) became > or = 5.0 x 10(9)/L twice after it decreased to the nadir. Efficacy and safety parameters were monitored. RESULTS: The incidence rates of ANC < 1.5 x 10(9)/L in the 103 evaluable study cycles and 100 evaluable control cycles were 30.00% and 20.00% with the duration of 2.39 days and 2.35 days respectively. The incidence rates of grade 3 neutropenia were 7.77% and 7.00%; and that of grade 4 neutropenia were 5.80% and 4.00% respectively in the trial and control cycles. However, all the difference mentioned above did not reached statistical significance. None of the patients experienced febrile neutropenia. The ANC nadir was (7.55 +/- 5.25) x 10(9)/L and (8.42 +/- 5.57) x 10(9)/L (P = 0.257) respectively after receiving PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF. Compared with that of rhG-CSF group, the ANC profile of PEG-rhG-CSF group exhibited limited "overshoot" of neutrophils after the nadir. Subgroup analysis according to disease type yielded similar results. The safety profiles of the PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF groups were similar. Musculoskeletal pain or arthralgia occurred in 16.5% of the study cycles and 26.00% of the control cycles (P = 0.963), mostly mild or moderate. Other adverse effects such as fever, fatigue, dizziness, gastrointestinal effects and injection-site pain, were transient and easily manageable. CONCLUSION: A single subcutaneous injection of PEG-rhG-CSF 100 microg/kg provides neutrophil support and a safety profile comparable to regimen of daily subcutaneous injection of rhG-CSF 5 microg x kg(-1) x d(-1) in Chinese patients receiving a variety of myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens.