Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Crit Care Med ; 45(7): 1208-1215, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28448318

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Ventilator-associated events are associated with increased mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and longer ICU stay. Given strong national interest in improving ventilated patient care, the National Institute of Health and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality funded a two-state collaborative to reduce ventilator-associated events. We describe the collaborative's impact on ventilator-associated event rates in 56 ICUs. DESIGN: Longitudinal quasi-experimental study. SETTING: Fifty-six ICUs at 38 hospitals in Maryland and Pennsylvania from October 2012 to March 2015. INTERVENTIONS: We organized a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence with evidence-based practices, unit teamwork, and safety culture. Evidence-based interventions promoted by the collaborative included head-of-bed elevation, use of subglottic secretion drainage endotracheal tubes, oral care, chlorhexidine mouth care, and daily spontaneous awakening and breathing trials. Each unit established a multidisciplinary quality improvement team. We coached teams to establish comprehensive unit-based safety programs through monthly teleconferences. Data were collected on rounds using a common tool and entered into a Web-based portal. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: ICUs reported 69,417 ventilated patient-days of intervention compliance observations and 1,022 unit-months of ventilator-associated event data. Compliance with all evidence-based interventions improved over the course of the collaborative. The quarterly mean ventilator-associated event rate significantly decreased from 7.34 to 4.58 cases per 1,000 ventilator-days after 24 months of implementation (p = 0.007). During the same time period, infection-related ventilator-associated complication and possible and probable ventilator-associated pneumonia rates decreased from 3.15 to 1.56 and 1.41 to 0.31 cases per 1,000 ventilator-days (p = 0.018, p = 0.012), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted intervention was associated with improved compliance with evidence-based interventions and decreases in ventilator-associated event, infection-related ventilator-associated complication, and probable ventilator-associated pneumonia. Our study is the largest to date affirming that best practices can prevent ventilator-associated events.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/prevención & control , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Drenaje/métodos , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Salud Bucal , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración
2.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med ; 38(3): 381-390, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28578560

RESUMEN

Daily oral care with chlorhexidine for mechanically ventilated patients is ubiquitous in contemporary intensive care practice. The practice is predicated upon meta-analyses suggesting that adding chlorhexidine to daily oral care regimens can reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) rates by up to 40%. Close analysis, however, raises three concerns: (1) the meta-analyses are dominated by studies in cardiac surgery patients in whom average duration of mechanical ventilation is < 1 day and thus their risk of VAP is very different from other populations, (2) diagnosing VAP is subjective and nonspecific yet the meta-analyses gave equal weight to blinded and nonblinded studies, potentially biasing them in favor of chlorhexidine, and (3) there is circularity between diagnostic criteria for VAP and chlorhexidine; as an antiseptic, chlorhexidine may decrease the frequency of positive respiratory cultures but fewer cultures does not necessarily mean fewer pneumonias. It is therefore important to look at other outcomes for corollary evidence on whether or not oral chlorhexidine benefits patients. An updated meta-analysis restricted to double-blinded studies in noncardiac surgery patients showed no impact on VAP rates, duration of mechanical ventilation, or intensive care unit length of stay. Instead, there was a possible signal that oral chlorhexidine may increase mortality rates. Observational data have raised similar concerns. This article will review the theoretical basis for adding chlorhexidine to oral care regimens, delineate potential biases in randomized controlled trials comparing oral care regimens with and without chlorhexidine, explore the unexpected mortality signal associated with oral chlorhexidine, and provide practical recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Higiene Bucal/métodos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Antiinfecciosos Locales/efectos adversos , Clorhexidina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
3.
JAMA Intern Med ; 184(2): 131-142, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38109100

RESUMEN

Importance: Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is the most common and morbid health care-associated infection, but limited data on effective prevention strategies are available. Objective: To determine whether daily toothbrushing is associated with lower rates of HAP and other patient-relevant outcomes. Data Sources: A search of PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Scopus, and 3 trial registries was performed from inception through March 9, 2023. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials of hospitalized adults comparing daily oral care with toothbrushing vs regimens without toothbrushing. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed in duplicate. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of this systematic review and meta-analysis was HAP. Secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and use of antibiotics. Subgroups included patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation vs those who did not, toothbrushing twice daily vs more frequently, toothbrushing provided by dental professionals vs general nursing staff, electric vs manual toothbrushing, and studies at low vs high risk of bias. Results: A total of 15 trials met inclusion criteria, including 10 742 patients (2033 in the ICU and 8709 in non-ICU departments; effective population size was 2786 after shrinking the population to account for 1 cluster randomized trial in non-ICU patients). Toothbrushing was associated with significantly lower risk for HAP (risk ratio [RR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56-0.81]) and ICU mortality (RR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.69-0.95]). Reduction in pneumonia incidence was significant for patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (RR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.57-0.82) but not for patients who were not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (RR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.05-2.02]). Toothbrushing for patients in the ICU was associated with fewer days of mechanical ventilation (mean difference, -1.24 [95% CI, -2.42 to -0.06] days) and a shorter ICU length of stay (mean difference, -1.78 [95% CI, -2.85 to -0.70] days). Brushing twice a day vs more frequent intervals was associated with similar effect estimates. Results were consistent in a sensitivity analysis restricted to 7 studies at low risk of bias (1367 patients). Non-ICU hospital length of stay and use of antibiotics were not associated with toothbrushing. Conclusions: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that daily toothbrushing may be associated with significantly lower rates of HAP, particularly in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, lower rates of ICU mortality, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, and shorter ICU length of stay. Policies and programs encouraging more widespread and consistent toothbrushing are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Respiración Artificial , Cepillado Dental , Adulto , Humanos , Cepillado Dental/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Antibacterianos , Incidencia
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(8): 991-996, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34103108

RESUMEN

In 2020 a group of U.S. healthcare leaders formed the National Organization to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (NOHAP) to issue a call to action to address non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia (NVHAP). NVHAP is one of the most common and morbid healthcare-associated infections, but it is not tracked, reported, or actively prevented by most hospitals. This national call to action includes (1) launching a national healthcare conversation about NVHAP prevention; (2) adding NVHAP prevention measures to education for patients, healthcare professionals, and students; (3) challenging healthcare systems and insurers to implement and support NVHAP prevention; and (4) encouraging researchers to develop new strategies for NVHAP surveillance and prevention. The purpose of this document is to outline research needs to support the NVHAP call to action. Primary needs include the development of better models to estimate the economic cost of NVHAP, to elucidate the pathophysiology of NVHAP and identify the most promising pathways for prevention, to develop objective and efficient surveillance methods to track NVHAP, to rigorously test the impact of prevention strategies proposed to prevent NVHAP, and to identify the policy levers that will best engage hospitals in NVHAP surveillance and prevention. A joint task force developed this document including stakeholders from the Veterans' Health Administration (VHA), the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), The Joint Commission, the American Dental Association, the Patient Safety Movement Foundation, Oral Health Nursing Education and Practice (OHNEP), Teaching Oral-Systemic Health (TOSH), industry partners and academia.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/prevención & control , Hospitales , Humanos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
JAMA Intern Med ; 176(9): 1277-83, 2016 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27428482

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Ventilator bundles, including head-of-bed elevation, sedative infusion interruptions, spontaneous breathing trials, thromboprophylaxis, stress ulcer prophylaxis, and oral care with chlorhexidine gluconate, are ubiquitous, but the absolute and relative value of each bundle component is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations between individual and collective ventilator bundle components and ventilator-associated events, time to extubation, ventilator mortality, time to hospital discharge, and hospital death. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included all 5539 consecutive patients who underwent mechanical ventilation for at least 3 days from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2013, at Brigham and Women's Hospital. EXPOSURES: Head-of-bed elevation, sedative infusion interruptions, spontaneous breathing trials, thromboprophylaxis, stress ulcer prophylaxis, and oral care with chlorhexidine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hazard ratios (HRs) for ventilator-associated events, extubation alive vs ventilator mortality, and hospital discharge vs hospital death. Effects were modeled using Cox proportional hazards regression and Fine-Gray competing risk models adjusted for patients' demographic characteristics, comorbidities, unit type, severity of illness, recent procedures, process measure contraindications, day-to-day markers of clinical status, and calendar year. RESULTS: Of 5539 consecutive patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, 3208 were male (57.9%), 2331 female (42.1%), and the mean (SD) age was 61.2 (16.1) years. Sedative infusion interruptions were associated with less time to extubation (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.54-2.12; P < .001) and a lower hazard for ventilator mortality (HR, 0.51, 95% CI, 0.38-0.68; P < .001). Similar associations were found for spontaneous breathing trials (HR for extubation, 2.48; 95% CI 2.23-2.76; P < .001; HR for mortality, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.20-0.38; P = .001). Spontaneous breathing trials were also associated with lower hazards for ventilator-associated events (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.76; P < .001). Associations with less time to extubation were found for head-of-bed elevation (HR, 1.38, 95% CI, 1.14-1.68; P = .001) and thromboembolism prophylaxis (HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.80-3.66; P < .001) but not ventilator mortality. Oral care with chlorhexidine was associated with an increased risk for ventilator mortality (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.15-2.31; P = .006), and stress ulcer prophylaxis was associated with an increased risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia (HR, 7.69; 95% CI, 1.44-41.10; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Standard ventilator bundle components vary in their associations with patient-centered outcomes. Head-of-bed elevation, sedative infusion interruptions, spontaneous breathing trials, and thromboembolism prophylaxis appear beneficial, whereas daily oral care with chlorhexidine and stress ulcer prophylaxis may be harmful in some patients.


Asunto(s)
Control de Infecciones/métodos , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Extubación Traqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Higiene Bucal , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Respiración , Terapia Respiratoria , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Úlcera/prevención & control
7.
Intensive Care Med ; 44(7): 1153-1155, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29808343
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA