Significant increase in quantity and quality of knee arthroplasty related research in KSSTA over the past 15 years.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate both publication and authorship characteristics in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy journal (KSSTA) regarding knee arthroplasty over the past 15 years. METHODS: PubMed was searched for articles published in KSSTA between January 1, 2006, and December 31st, 2020, utilising the search term 'knee arthroplasty'. 1288 articles met the inclusion criteria. The articles were evaluated using the following criteria: type of article, type of study, main topic and special topic, use of patient-reported outcome scores, number of references and citations, level of evidence (LOE), number of authors, gender of the first author and continent of origin. Three time intervals were compared: 2006-2010, 2011-2015 and 2016-2020. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2020, publications peaked at 670 articles (52%) compared with 465 (36%) published between 2011 and 2016 and 153 articles (12%) between 2006 and 2010. While percentage of reviews (2006-2010: 0% vs. 2011-2015: 5% vs. 2016-2020: 5%) and meta-analyses (1% vs. 6% vs. 5%) increased, fewer case reports were published (13% vs. 3% vs. 1%) (p < 0.001). Interest in navigation and computer-assisted surgery decreased, whereas interest in perioperative management, robotic and individualized surgery increased over time (p < 0.001). There was an increasing number of references [26 (2-73) vs. 30 (2-158) vs. 31 (1-143), p < 0.001] while number of citations decreased [30 (0-188) vs. 22 (0-264) vs. 6 (0-106), p < 0.001]. LOE showed no significant changes (p = 0.439). The number of authors increased between each time interval (p < 0.001), while the percentage of female authors was comparable between first and last interval (p = 0.252). Europe published significantly fewer articles over time (56% vs. 47% vs. 52%), whereas the number of articles from Asia increased (35% vs. 45% vs. 37%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Increasing interest in the field of knee arthroplasty-related surgery arose within the last 15 years in KSSTA. The investigated topics showed a significant trend towards the latest techniques at each time interval. With rising number of authors, the part of female first authors also increased-but not significantly. Furthermore, publishing characteristics showed an increasing number of publications from Asia and a slightly decreasing number in Europe. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The effect of locally applied vascular endothelial growth factor on meniscus healing: gross and histological findings.

INTRODUCTION: Tears in the peripheral part of the menisci have a better healing potential than tears in the central part, because the central two-thirds of the menisci are avascular. We hypothesized that healing of meniscus tears in the avascular zone can be promoted by the local application of the angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A tear was created in the avascular zone of the medial meniscus in 18 merino sheep. The tear was then repaired with an uncoated suture (group 1), a suture coated with PDLLA (group 2), and by a suture coated with PDLLA/VEGF (group 3). RESULTS: After 6 weeks, we observed increased immunostaining for factor VIII in the VEGF-treated group 3. However, in this treatment group no meniscus healed completely. In the uncoated suture group and in the PDLLA-coated-suture group, partial healing was observed in three animals and complete healing in three animals, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this experiment the local application of VEGF via PDLLA-coated sutures did not promote meniscus healing. Growth factors might not always be a promising tool for tissue repair.