Repeat Pediatric Trisomy 21 Radiographic Exam: Does Atlantoaxial Instability Develop Over Time?

BACKGROUND: Atlantoaxial instability (AAI) is common in pediatric patients with Trisomy 21 and can lead to spinal cord injury during sports, trauma, or anesthetized neck manipulation. Children with Trisomy 21 therefore commonly undergo radiographic cervical spine screening, but recommendations on age and timing vary. The purpose of this study was to determine if instability develops over time. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review for all pediatric Trisomy 21 patients receiving at least 2 cervical spine radiographic series between 2008 and 2020 at our institution. Atlantodens interval (ADI) and space available for the cord at C1 (SAC) were measured; bony abnormalities such as os odontoidium, and age and time between radiographs were noted. AAI was determined by ADI ≥6 mm or SAC ≤14 mm based on our groups' prior study. Those who developed instability were compared with those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 437 cervical spine radiographic series from 192 patients were evaluated, with 160 included. Mean age at first radiograph was 7.4±4.4 years, average ADI was 3.1 mm (±1.2), and SAC was 18.1 mm (±2.6). The average time between first and last radiographs was 4.3 years (±1.8), with average final ADI 3.2 mm (±1.4) and SAC 18.9 mm (±2.9). Seven patients (4%) had instability: 4 were unstable on their initial studies and 3 (1.6%) on subsequent imaging. Os odontoideum was found in 5 (71%) unstable spines and 3 (2%) stable spines (P<0.0001); only 1 patient that became unstable on subsequent radiograph did not have an os. There was no specific age cut-off or surveillance time period after which one could be determined no longer at risk. CONCLUSIONS: Trisomy 21 patients have a 4.4% overall rate of AAI in our series with a 1.6% rate of progression to instability over ∼4 years. Given this nearly 1 in 23 risk of instability, we recommend initial surveillance radiograph for all children over 3 years with Trisomy 21; repeat asymptomatic surveillance should continue in those with os odontoideum given their high instability risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-diagnostic study.

Results of Conservative and Surgical Management in Children with Idiopathic and Nonidiopathic Os Odontoideum.

OBJECTIVE: The outcomes of conservative and operative treatment of os odontoideum in children remain unclear. Our objective was to study the outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment of idiopathic os odontoideum in children and compare these outcomes in age- and treatment-matched nonidiopathic children with os odontoideum. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter review identified 102 children with os odontoideum, of whom 44 were idiopathic with minimum 2-year follow-up. Ten patients were treated conservatively, and 34 underwent spinal arthrodesis. Both groups were matched with nonidiopathic patients by age and type of treatment. Cervical arthrodesis was recommended for patients with increased atlantoaxial distance or reduced space available for the cord in flexion-extension radiographs. RESULTS: All 20 children undergoing conservative treatment remained asymptomatic during follow-up, but 1 nonidiopathic patient developed cervical instability. The idiopathic group had significantly less severe radiographic cervical instability and less neurologic complications than the nonidiopathic group (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Thirty-three (97%) patients in the idiopathic group and 32 (94%) patients in the nonidiopathic group (94%) had spinal fusion at final follow-up (P = 0.55). The risk of complications (15% vs. 41%; odds ratio 0.234, 95% confidence interval 0.072-0.757, P = 0.015) and nonunion (6% vs. 24%; odds ratio 0.203, 95% confidence interval 0.040-0.99, P = 0.040) were significantly lower in the idiopathic than in the nonidiopathic group. Idiopathic children undergoing rigid fixation achieved spinal fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Idiopathic patients with stable atlantoaxial joint at presentation remained asymptomatic and intact during conservative treatment. Idiopathic children with os odontoideum undergoing spinal arthrodesis had significantly fewer complications and nonunion than nonidiopathic children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

An Updated Algorithm for Radiographic Screening of Upper Cervical Instability in Patients With Down Syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of cervical spine images from 2006-2012 for the purposes of "screening" children with Down syndrome for instability. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a full series of cervical spine images including flexion/extension lateral (FEL) radiographs was needed to avoid missing upper cervical instability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The best algorithm, measurements, and criteria for screening children with Down syndrome for upper cervical instability are controversial. Many authors have recommended obtaining flexion and extension views. We noted that patients who require surgical stabilization due to myelopathy or cord compression typically have grossly abnormal radiographic measurements on the neutral upright lateral (NUL) cervical spine radiograph. METHODS: The atlanto-dental interval, space available for cord, and basion axial interval were measured on all films. The Weisel-Rothman measurement was made in the FEL series. Clinical outcome of those with abnormal measurements were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of NUL and FEL radiographs for identifying clinically significant cervical spine instability were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 240 cervical spine series in 213 patients with Down syndrome between the ages of 4 months and 25 years were reviewed. One hundred seventy-two children had an NUL view, and 88 of these patients also had FEL views. Only one of 88 patients was found to have an abnormal atlanto-dental interval (≥6 mm), space available for cord at C1 (≤14 mm), or basion axial interval (>12 mm) on an FEL series that did not have an abnormal measurement on the NUL radiograph. This patient had no evidence of cord compression or myelopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining a single NUL radiograph is an efficient method for radiographic screening of cervical spine instability. Further evaluation may be required if abnormal measurements are identified on the NUL radiograph. We also propose new "normal" values for the common radiographic measurements used in assessing risk of cervical spine instability in patients with Down syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Os Odontoideum in Children: Treatment Outcomes and Neurological Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Treatment outcomes and risk factors for neurological deficits in pediatric patients with an os odontoideum are unclear. METHODS: We reviewed the data for 102 children with os odontoideum who were managed at 11 centers between 2000 and 2016 and had a minimum duration of follow-up of 2 years. Thirty-one children had nonoperative treatment, and 71 underwent instrumented posterior cervical spinal arthrodesis for the treatment of C1-C2 instability. Nonoperative treatment consisted of observation (n = 29) or immobilization with a cervical collar (n = 1) or halo body jacket (n = 1). Surgical treatment consisted of atlantoaxial (n = 50) or occipitocervical (n = 21) arthrodesis. One patient also underwent transoral odontoidectomy. RESULTS: Thirty children (29%) presented with neurological deficits, 28 of whom had radiographic atlantoaxial instability (atlantoaxial distance >5 mm) or limited space (≤13 mm) available for the spinal cord (risk ratio, 7.8 [95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 31] compared with children with no radiographic risk factors). The 27 children without neurological deficits or atlantoaxial instability at presentation underwent nonoperative treatment and remained asymptomatic. Of the initial nonoperative cohort, one child developed atlantoaxial instability, and another had a persistent neurological deficit; both children underwent spinal arthrodesis during the study period. One child with cervical instability declined surgery and remained asymptomatic. Spinal fusion occurred in 68 patients in the surgical group by the end of the study period (mean, 3.7 years; range, 2.0 to 11.8 years). Surgical complications occurred in 21 children, including nonunion in 12, new neurological deficits in 4, cerebrospinal fluid leak in 2, symptomatic instrumentation requiring removal 2, and vertebral artery injury in 1. Nine children underwent revision surgery. In the surgical group, Japanese Orthopaedic Association neurological function scores improved significantly from preoperatively to the latest follow-up for the upper extremities (p = 0.026) and lower extremities (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing a neurological deficit was strongly associated with atlantoaxial instability and limited space available for the spinal cord in children with os odontoideum. Nonoperative treatment was safe for asymptomatic patients without atlantoaxial instability. Spinal arthrodesis resolved the neurological deficits of children with symptomatic os odontoideum. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Complex pediatric cervical spine surgery using smaller nonspinal screws and plates and intraoperative computed tomography.

OBJECT: The treatment of craniocervical instability in children is often challenging due to their small spine bones, complex anatomy, and unique syndromes. The authors discuss their surgical experience with 33 cases in the treatment of 31 children (≤ 17 years of age) with craniocervical spine instability using smaller nontraditional titanium screws and plates, as well as intraoperative CT. METHODS: All craniocervical fusion procedures were performed using intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging and electrophysiological monitoring. Nontraditional spine hardware included smaller screw sizes (2.4 and 2.7 mm) from the orthopedic hand/foot set and mandibular plates. Twenty-three of the 33 surgical procedures were performed with intraoperative CT, which was used to confirm adequate position of the spine hardware and alignment of the spine. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 9.5 years (range 2-17 years). Eleven children underwent a posterior C1-2 transarticular screw fusion, 17 had an occipitocervical fusion, and 3 had a posterior subaxial cervical fusion. The follow-up duration ranged from 9 to 72 months (mean 53 months). All children demonstrated successful fusion at their 3-month follow-up visit, except 1 patient whose unilateral C1-2 transarticular screw fusion required a repeat surgery before proper fusion was achieved. Of the 47 C1-2 transarticular screws that were placed, 13 were 2.4 mm, 15 were 2.7 mm, 7 were 3.5 mm, and 12 were 4.0 mm. Eighteen of the 47 C1-2 transarticular screws were suboptimally placed. Eleven of these misplaced screws were removed and redirected within the same operation because these surgeries benefitted from the use of intraoperative CT; 6 of the 7 remaining suboptimally placed screws were left in place because a second surgery for screw replacement was not warranted. The other suboptimally placed C1-2 screw was replaced during a repeat operation due to failure of fusion. Use of intraoperative CT was invaluable because it enabled the authors to reposition suboptimal C1-2 transarticular screws without necessitating a second operation. CONCLUSIONS: Successful craniocervical fusion procedures were achieved using smaller nontraditional titanium screws and plates. Intraoperative CT was a helpful adjunct for confirming and readjusting the trajectory of the screws prior to leaving the operating room, which decreases overall treatment costs and reduces complications.