Gene mutations and chromosomal abnormalities in syndromes with tooth agenesis.

This study aims to review the pathogenic mechanisms and clinical manifestations in syndromes with tooth agenesis (TA). Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man and PubMed databases were searched for a comprehensive review. Previous publications reported complicated aetiologies of syndromic TA. Gene mutations in conserved signalling pathways (WNT, EDA, SHH, FGF, and TGF-ß/BMP) and crucial molecules (PAX9, PIXT2, IRF6, the p53 family, and subunits of RNA polymerase III) are the main causes of syndromic TA. In the process of odontogenesis, antagonistic or synergistic interactions are demonstrated in patients and murine models. Mutations in some genes (WNT10A, WNT10B, AXIN2, ANTXR1, MSX1, EDA, EDAR, and EDARADD) can result in both syndromic and isolated TA. In addition, chromosomal anomalies are also responsible for syndromic TA (Down syndrome, Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome, Williams syndrome, and Pierre Robin sequence). The causes and manifestations of syndromic TA are highly complex, and this constitutes a clinical challenge. Mutations in signalling pathways and crucial molecules as well as chromosomal anomalies are responsible for syndromic TA. And there are overlaps between the causative genes of syndromic and isolated TA.

Exploring training dental implant placement using static or dynamic devices among dental students.

BACKGROUND: Static computer-assisted surgery (s-CAIS) and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (d-CAIS) are the main digital approaches in guiding dental implant placement. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore and compare the learning curves for s-CAIS and d-CAIS by beginners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three dental students used each dental model for drilling five positions with missing teeth. Operators performed the drilling test for five sets of dental models with an interval of 7 ± 1 days assisted by the d-CAIS system. After a six-month break, the same students performed the drilling test again in the same way but with the s-CAIS system. A total of thirty models were used, and 150 implants were inserted. The operation time and relative deviations were recorded and calculated. Correlations between various deviation parameters and attempts were tested with independent-samples Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: A significant difference between the two groups was found in the operation time (p < .001). For accuracy, the difference was found in the first attempt of coronal and apical deviations but disappeared as the training went on. As the practice progressed, improvement was evident in the d-CAIS group but not in the s-CAIS group. When reaching the plateau stage of the learning curve of the d-CAIS group (after five attempts), the influence of different methods of guidance was limited between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A learning curve effect was found in d-CAIS but not in s-CAIS in vitro tests by beginners. The operating procedure of dynamic navigated and static template-guided implant placement was easy to master.

Fever and neck pain after pacemaker lead extraction: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Venous thrombosis (VT) is one of the minor complications of pacemaker lead extraction. It is often found due to the swelling of the limbs after the extraction. It is easy to be neglected or even misdiagnosed in the absence of typical clinical symptoms. The incidence, risk factors, and long-term impact of this complication are still unclear. Herein, we report a case of deep VT caused by transvenous lead extraction, which is easily misdiagnosed. CASE SUMMARY: A 66-year-old woman underwent a pacemaker lead extraction at our hospital because of a pacemaker pocket infection. After the extraction, she began to experience intermittent fever accompanied by sweating. The highest body temperature recorded was 37.9 °C. Additionally, she reported migratory pain that made her uncomfortable. The pain was mistakenly thought to be caused by operation trauma. At first, the pain radiated from the left chest to the mandible. Then, the pain in the left chest was alleviated, but pain in the left neck and throat appeared. Finally, the pain was confined to the mandible and a submandibular mass was palpated with no other abnormalities upon physical examination. Computed tomography venography and angiography finally indicated that the fever and pain were the symptoms of thrombophlebitis caused by lead extraction. The patient was then treated with rivaroxaban for more than three months and has shown no symptoms since she left the hospital. CONCLUSION: The possibility of thrombosis should be considered when pain and recurrent fever occur after pacemaker lead extraction.