Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Virol ; 163(6): 1455-1461, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29429036

RESUMEN

Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is a serious public health problem, and coxsackievirus A6 (CVA6) and coxsackievirus A10 (CVA10) are two of the major causative pathogens, in addition to enterovirus 71 (EV71) and coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16). A simple and rapid reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification assay (RT-RAA) was developed for the detection of CVA10 and CVA6 in this study. The analytical sensitivity for detection of CVA10 and CVA6 at 95% probability by probit regression analysis was 35 copies per reaction and 38 copies per reaction, respectively, with 100% specificity. Compared with commercial RT-qPCR assays, when testing 455 fecal specimens, the kappa value of the RT-RAA assay for CVA10 and CVA6 was 0.920 (p < 0.001) and 0.952 (p < 0.001), respectively. Moreover, four samples that were positive for CVA10 and five that were positive for CVA6 by RT-RAA but negative by RT-qPCR were further determined to be true positives. These results demonstrate that the proposed RT-RAA assays are very valuable tools for the detection of CVA10 and CVA6 and have potential for use in resource-limited settings.


Asunto(s)
Enterovirus/genética , Enfermedad de Boca, Mano y Pie/diagnóstico , ARN Viral/genética , Recombinasas/química , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Cartilla de ADN/química , Cartilla de ADN/genética , Enterovirus/clasificación , Enterovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Heces/virología , Femenino , Enfermedad de Boca, Mano y Pie/virología , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Plásmidos/química , Plásmidos/metabolismo , Recombinasas/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/normas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
World J Clin Cases ; 10(16): 5297-5305, 2022 Jun 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35812655

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dentition defect, a common clinical oral disease developed in humans, not only causes masticatory dysfunction and articulation difficulties but also affects facial appearance and increases the burden on the intestinal tract. Restorative treatment is the primary option for this disease. However, traditional restorations have many drawbacks, such as mismatch with the body, low reliability, and incomplete occlusal function recovery. AIM: to analyze the efficacy of orthodontics combined with 3D printing guide plate implant restoration in treating patients with dentition defects and its influence on masticatory and phonic functions. METHODS: A prospective study was carried out in 86 patients with dentition defects who received implant prosthesis after orthodontic treatment in our hospital between January 2018 and January 2019. Those patients were divided into a control group and an intervention group with 43 patients in each group using a random number table. The control group received traditional implant restoration, whereas the intervention group received 3D printing guide plate implant restoration. Treatment outcomes, cosmetic appearance, dental function, implant deviation, and quality of life were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The overall response rate in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (95.35% vs 81.40%, χ 2 = 4.071, P = 0.044). The number of cases with neatly trimmed cosmetic appearance (χ 2 = 4.497, P = 0.034), complete coverage (χ 2 = 4.170, P = 0.041), and normal occlusion (χ 2 = 5.512, P = 0.019) in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group. After treatment, mastication, swallowing, and articulation were significantly improved in both groups. Masticatory (t = 2.980, P = 0.004), swallowing (t = 2.199, P = 0.031), and phonic functions (t = 3.950, P = 0.004) were better in the intervention group than those in the control group. The deviation value and the deviation angle (t = 5.440, P = 0.000) at the top (t = 6.320, P = 0.000) and middle parts of the implants (t = 22.295, P = 0.000) in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group after treatment. Functional limitations, psychosocial and physical pain and discomfort, and total scores decreased in both groups. The functional limitation (t = 2.379, P = 0.020), psychosocial (t = 2.420, P = 0.000), physical pain and discomfort (t = 6.581, P = 0.000), and total scores (t = 2.140, P = 0.035) were lower in the intervention group than those in the control group. CONCLUSION: Orthodontic treatment combined with 3D printing guide plate implant restoration can significantly improve the masticatory and phonic functions, quality of life, and psychological health of patients with dentition defects. Therefore, it is highly recommended in clinic application.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA