Nine-month angiographic and 2-year clinical outcomes of the RECOVERY trial: A randomized study of the biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting COMBO dual-therapy stent versus a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent in Chinese patients.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the novel dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) capture COMBO stent. BACKGROUND: (Very) late stent thrombosis (ST) and neo-atherosclerosis limit the performance of drug-eluting stents. The capture of EPCs accelerates stent re-endothelialization, thereby potentially decreasing the risk of restenosis and ST. METHODS: In total, 440 patients with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries were randomized (1:1) to either receive the COMBO stent (n = 220) or Nano polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent (n = 220). The primary endpoint was the 9-month angiographic in-segment late lumen loss (LLL). Secondary endpoints included target lesion failure (TLF), a patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE), and ST. RESULTS: At 9 months, the COMBO in-segment LLL (0.29 ± 0.46 mm) was non-inferior to that of the Nano comparator stent (0.31 ± 0.44 mm; pnon-inferiority < .0001). Clinical outcomes were also similar between the COMBO and Nano stents, with TLF rates of 9.3% and 7.9% (p = .61) at 12 months, and 9.4% and 8.0% (p = .62) at 24 months, respectively. The PoCE rate was 14.8% and 10.6% (p = .19) at 12 months, and 16.0% and 11.3% (p = .16) at 24 months, respectively. Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization rates were 6.0% and 3.7% (p = .26) at 12 months, and 6.2% and 3.8% (p = .26) at 24 months, respectively. No case of ST occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The RECOVERY trial has shown the COMBO stent was effective, meeting the primary non-inferiority angiographic endpoint, and safe, with an overall low rate of clinical events in both stent groups, including no ST for up to 2 years.

Two-year safety evaluation of a biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with increased drug elution and polymer absorption kinetics in complex patient and lesion cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present report was to compare 2-year safety outcomes of two biodegradable polymer (BP) sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) with different drug eluting and polymer absorption kinetics in a subgroup of complex patients and lesions. BACKGROUND: The previously published PANDA III study showed the BuMA BP SES, with faster drug elution and polymer absorption, was non-inferior to the Excel SES in target lesion failure (TLF). METHODS: In PANDA III trial, patients who fulfilled one or more of the following criteria were included: Small vessel disease (reference vessel diameter ≤ 2.5 mm); long lesion (lesion length ≥ 20 mm); chronic total occlusion lesion; and diabetic patients. RESULTS: Among 2,348 patients randomly assigned to treatment with BuMA (n = 1,174) or Excel SES (n = 1,174) in the PANDA III study, 858 in the BuMA group and 855 in the Excel group satisfied the inclusion criteria. At 2-year follow-up, the incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) was significantly lower with BuMA SES as compared with Excel SES (0.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.03). This difference was mainly caused by decreased subacute stent thrombosis rate (0% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.03). In patients who did not fulfill the complex patient and lesion criteria, there were no between-group difference in ST (0.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.50). Myocardial infarction and TLF rates were similar (5.7% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.79 and 8.8% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.34, respectively), whereas patient-oriented composite endpoint was higher with BuMA SES mainly due to high risk of revascularization (15.6% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.01; 8.4% vs. 4.6%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Two-year subgroup analysis of the all-comer PANDA III trial revealed the increased safety benefit of the BuMA SES is more prominently seen in complex patient and lesion population. CLINICAL TRIAL: ClinicalTrial.gov, Identifier-NCT02017275.

Comparison of two biodegradable-polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents with varying elution and absorption kinetics in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A subgroup analysis of the PANDA III trial.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of early-generation metallic drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with poor vessel wall healing. Use of biodegradable polymer (BP) DES might improve safety outcomes; however, the impact of varying drug elution and polymer absorption kinetics of BP-DES on clinical outcomes in the AMI population is unknown. METHODS: This subgroup analysis of the randomized PANDA III trial included 732 patients (366 in each group) presenting with recent (<1 month) AMI. Primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Secondary endpoints included a patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) of all-cause death, all MI, or any revascularization; individual TLF and PoCE components; and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between-groups in baseline clinical, angiographic, or procedural characteristics other than the proportion of post-dilatation, which was performed more frequently with the BuMA stent (53.9% vs. 44.5%; P = 0.004). After 1 year, compared to Excel SES implantation in patients with AMI, BuMA was associated with similar incidences of TLF and PoCE (5.5% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.14; 8.8% vs. 9.9%, P = 0.61, respectively) but lower incidences of MI (2.5% vs. 6.1%, P = 0.02), target vessel MI (2.2% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.01), and definite/probable ST (0.3% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: BuMA SES, with faster drug elution rate and polymer absorption kinetics, might improve safety outcomes compared to Excel SES in the high-risk AMI population. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloon and Drug-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Small Vessel Disease (from the Dissolve SVD Randomized Trial).

The Dissolve drug-coated balloons (DCBs) is a new-generation DCB coated with paclitaxel of balloon surface, with midchain triglyceride excipient. Although the use of DCBs is a promising technique, little is known about the the clinical efficacy of the novel Dissolve DCB in coronary small vessel disease. This study was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, noninferiority trial comparing the Dissolve DCB with the Resolute drug-eluting stent (DES) in patients with a reference vessel diameter ≥2.25 and ≤2.75 mm. Patients with a reference vessel diameter ≥2.00 and <2.25 mm were enrolled in the very small vessel registry. The angiographic and clinical follow-up were planned at 9 months and 1 year in all patients, respectively. The primary end point was 9-month in-segment percentage diameter stenosis. A total of 247 patients with small vessel disease from 10 Chinese sites were included (Dissolve DCB, n = 118; Resolute DES, n = 129); 30 patients were treated with the DCB in the very small vessel cohort. The 9-month in-segment percentage diameter stenosis was 31.2 ± 2.0% with Dissolve DCB versus 26.1 ± 2.1% with Resolute DES; the 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 10.3% (p for noninferiority = 0.0002). At 12 months, the DCB and DES groups were associated with similar rates of target lesion failure (8.5% vs 6.1%, p = 0.28) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (20.9% vs 13.6%, p = 0.12). In conclusion, the Dissolve DCB was noninferior to the Resolute DES for the primary end point of 9-month in-segment percentage diameter stenosis in this multicenter, head-to-head, randomized trial (a safety and efficacy study of Dissolve In Treatment Of Coronary Small Vessel Disease; NCT03376646).

A Randomized Comparison of 2 Different Drug-Coated Balloons for In-Stent Restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Although use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) is a promising technique, little is known about the clinical efficacy of the Dissolve DCB in drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Dissolve DCB in patients with DES ISR. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial comparing Dissolve DCB with SeQuent Please DCB in patients with DES ISR. Angiographic and clinical follow-up was planned at 9 months in all patients. The primary endpoint was 9-month in-segment late loss. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients with ISR from 10 Chinese sites were included (Dissolve DCB, n = 128; SeQuent Please DCB, n = 132). Nine-month in-segment late loss was 0.50 ± 0.06 mm with Dissolve DCB vs 0.47 ± 0.07 mm with SeQuent Please DCB; the 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.18 mm (P for noninferiority = 0.03). Rates of target lesion failure and binary restenosis were numerical higher in the Dissolve DCB cohort compared with the SeQuent Please DCB cohort at 9 months (17.5% vs 10.7%; P = 0.12; 23.4% vs 16.4%; P = 0.19, respectively). At 9 months, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred in 36 patients (28.3%) vs 30 patients (22.9%) in the Dissolve DCB and SeQuent Please DCB groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this head-to-head randomized trial, the Dissolve DCB was noninferior to the SeQuent Please DCB for 9-month in-segment late loss. However, Dissolve DCB with its numerical increase in target lesion failure and binary restenosis warrants assessment in larger clinical trials (A Safety and Efficacy Study of Dissolve™ in Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis; NCT03373695).

Sustained clinical safety and efficacy of a biodegradable-polymer coated sirolimus-eluting stent in "real-world" practice: three-year outcomes of the CREATE (Multi-Center Registry of EXCEL Biodegradable Polymer Drug Eluting Stents) study.

BACKGROUND: The CREATE is a post-marketing surveillance multicenter registry that demonstrated satisfactory angiographic and clinical (at 18 months) outcomes of a biodegradable polymer based sirolimus-eluting stent (EXCEL, JW Medical System, Weihai, China) for the treatment of patients in routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the three-year clinical safety and efficacy outcomes in patients enrolled in the CREATE study. METHODS: A total of 2077 all comers have been enrolled in the CREATE study at 59 centers from four countries. Recommended antiplatelet regimen was clopidogrel and aspirin for six months followed by chronic aspirin therapy. The prespecified primary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12, 18, and 36 months. RESULTS: Clinical follow-up was completed in 2025 (97.5%) patients at three years. The average duration of clopidogrel treatment was 199.8 ± 52.7 days and 80.5% of discharged patients discontinued clopidogrel at six months. The cumulative rate of MACE was 4.5% and the rate of stent thrombosis was 1.53% at three years. At six months to three years, prolonged clopidogrel therapy (>6 months) was not beneficial in reducing cumulative hazards of MACE (3.4% vs. 3.1%, log rank P = 0.725) or stent thrombosis (1.5% vs. 0.6%, log rank P = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates sustained three-year clinical safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents when used with six months of dual antiplatelet therapy in a "real-world" setting.

Validation of the long-term prognostic capability of the SYNTAX score II in patients undergoing biodegradable polymer-based Sirolimus-eluting stents: 2-year outcomes from the PANDA III trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the prognostic ability of SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) Score II (SS-II) in LM and/or TVD patients undergoing biodegradable polymer-based drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) in the multi-central randomized PANDA III trial. METHODS: A total of 723 patients in PANDA III population were enrolled in this study. According to SS-II tertiles, patients were stratified as follow: SS-II ≤ 23 (n = 224), 23 < SS II ≤ 31 (n = 255), SS II > 31 (n = 244). The predictive abilities for 2-year cardiac death were compared between angiographic scores and scores combining both angiographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: Mean anatomic SS was 20.6 ± 9.4, SS-II for PCI was 28.7 ± 8.6. During 2-year follow up, cardiac death (0.00% vs. 1.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.003) and target lesion failure (5.9% vs. 9.1% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.020) was significantly higher in the upper tertile group than in intermedian and low tertile. At multivariate analysis, SS-II for PCI was an independent risk factor of cardiac death (Hazard ratio: 2.41, 95%CI: 1.47-3.97, p < 0.005) and TLF (Hazard ratio: 1.29, 95%CI: 1.01-1.65, p = 0.040). The ROC curve analysis showed that SS-II for PCI had better ability than other SYNTAX scoring systems to predict cardiac death (AUC: 0.746, 95%CI:0.63-0.87, p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: The SS-II had superiority than other SYNTAX scoring systems in predicting 2-year cardiac death in LM and/or TVD patients undergoing PCI with biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents.

Comparison between two biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents with differing drug elution and polymer absorption kinetics: two-year clinical outcomes of the PANDA III trial.

AIMS: In the PANDA III trial, the novel poly-lactide-co-glycolide polymer-based BuMA sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) was non-inferior to the polylactide polymer-based Excel SES for the primary endpoint of one-year target lesion failure (TLF), with a lower incidence of stent thrombosis. We sought to investigate whether the effectiveness profile of BuMA SES, with more rapid drug elution and polymer absorption kinetics, would persist at two years. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2,348 patients (mean age, 61.2±10.6 years; 24.3% diabetics; 31.2% with acute myocardial infarction within one month) were randomly assigned to receive either BuMA SES (n=1,174) or Excel SES (n=1,174) in the "all-comer" PANDA III trial. Two-year clinical follow-up was available for 2,262 (96.3%) patients. The incidence of TLF and the patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) was low and similar between the BuMA and Excel groups (7.4% vs. 6.9%, p=0.67, and 13.1% vs. 10.9%, p=0.11, respectively). The rate of any revascularisation was significantly higher with the BuMA SES (6.8% vs. 4.6%, p=0.03). Definite and probable thrombosis occurred in 0.7% and 1.4% of patients in the BuMA and Excel groups, respectively (p=0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Two-year rates of TLF and PoCE events were low and similar between the two biodegradable polymer-based SES.

Biodegradable Polymer-Based Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Differing Elution and Absorption Kinetics: The PANDA III Trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether the rate of drug elution and polymer absorption affects clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer-based drug-eluting stents (DES) is unknown. The widely used polylactide polymer-based Excel stent (JW Medical, Weihai, China) elutes sirolimus within 180 days, and the polylactide polymer is completely absorbed within 6 to 9 months. In contrast, the poly-lactide-co-glycolide polymer-based BuMA stent (Sino Medical, Tianjin, China) elutes sirolimus within 30 days, and the poly-lactide-co-glycolide polymer is completely absorbed within 3 months. Thus, both metallic DES elute sirolimus, isolating major differences to the polymer and elution kinetics. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness between the BuMA sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and Excel SES in an "all-comers" population. METHODS: PANDA III was a multicenter trial with few exclusion criteria, powered for sequential noninferiority and superiority testing. The primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: Between December 2013 and August 2014, 2,348 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with BuMA (n = 1,174) or Excel SES (n = 1,174). The 1-year primary endpoint of TLF occurred in 6.4% of patients in each group (difference: 0.06%; 95% confidence interval: 1.93% to 2.04%; pnoninferiority = 0.0003; psuperiority = 0.95). There were no significant between-group differences in any of the secondary endpoints other than the incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis, which occurred less frequently with the BuMA stent (0.5% vs. 1.3%; log-rank p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: The BuMA SES was demonstrated to be noninferior to the Excel SES for 1-year TLF, with a lower incidence of stent thrombosis. (Comparison of BuMA eG Based BioDegradable Polymer Stent With EXCEL Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent in "Real-World" Practice [PANDA-III]; NCT02017275).

A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of paclitaxel-coated balloon versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis: results from the PEPCAD China ISR trial.

OBJECTIVES: The intention of the PEPCAD China ISR (A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel-Coated versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis) was to demonstrate the efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty in a non-European patient population with coronary drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (DES-ISR). BACKGROUND: The treatment of DES-ISR is still challenging with no established best strategy. Moreover, there is no study on the effect of PCB in the treatment of ISR in the Chinese population. METHODS: PEPCAD China ISR was a 220-patient randomized (1:1), single-blind prospective multicenter trial conducted in China. Patients with coronary DES-ISR received either PCB (SeQuent Please, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) or paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus Liberté, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) treatment. The primary endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss at 9 months. RESULTS: There were no significant baseline differences between both treatment groups in terms of patient, lesion, or procedural characteristics. At 9 months, in-segment late lumen loss in the PCB group was noninferior to that of the paclitaxel-eluting stent group (0.46 ± 0.51 mm vs. 0.55 ± 0.61 mm; difference: -0.06 mm with 95% confidence interval: -0.23 to 0.10; p for noninferiority = 0.0005). The 9-month rate of binary restenosis and 12-month composite clinical event rates were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized trial of 220 patients, angioplasty with a PCB was noninferior to paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation when used to treat DES-ISR. On the basis of these, as well as previous randomized trial data, PCB angioplasty offers an effective treatment for DES-ISR without the necessity of implanting additional metal layers for drug release. (A Safety and Efficacy Study of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon to Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent [PEPCAD]; NCT01622075).

Novel completed biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in de novo lesions: nine-month angiographic and three-year clinical outcomes of HOPE trial.

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents (DES) with durable polymer have significantly reduced restenosis and target vessel revascularization compared with bare metal stents. Durable polymer has been linked with persistent inflammation of vessel wall and delayed endothelial healing that may increase the risk of late and very late stent thrombosis. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HELIOS completed biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in de novo coronary lesions. METHODS: Totally, 287 patients with one or two de novo coronary lesions (lesion length ≤ 38 mm and reference vessel diameter 2.5-4.0 mm) were enrolled in the HOPE study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomized to treatment either with HELIOS completed biodegradable polymer SES (n = 142) or PARTNER durable polymer SES (n = 145). The primary endpoint was angiographic in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at 9-month follow-up. The secondary endpoint included stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: The 9-month in-stent LLL in the HELIOS group was similar to the PARTNER group, (0.16 ± 0.22) mm vs. (0.19 ± 0.30) mm (P = 0.28). The difference and 95% confidence interval were -0.03 (-0.09, 0.04), and the P value for non-inferiority <0.01. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) occurred in 7.9% vs. 8.2%, MI in 2.4% vs. 3.0%, TLR in 5.5% vs. 3.0%, and stent thrombosis in 0 vs. 1.5%; and events were comparable between the HELIOS group and PARTNER group at three-year follow-up (all P > 0.05). The three-year cardiac death was lower in the HELIOS group, but with no significant difference, 0 vs. 3.0% (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: In the HOPE trial, the novel completed biodegradable polymer SES HELIOS was non-inferior to the durable polymer SES PARTNER with respect to nine-month in-stent LLL in de novo coronary lesions. The incidence of other clinical endpoints was low for both of the stents in three-year follow-up.

Nine-month angiographic and 2-year clinical follow-up of the NOYA biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions: the NOYA I trial.

AIMS: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the NOYA stent which is a cobalt chromium-based sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with DL-polylactide biodegradable polymer (Medfavour Medical, Beijing, China) in treating de novo coronary artery lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: The NOYA I trial was designed to compare the NOYA stent with the FIREBIRD2™ stent, a durable polymer SES widely used in China (MicroPort Medical, Shanghai, China); the trial was a non-inferiority trial with a primary angiographic endpoint of the in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at nine-month follow-up. The secondary endpoints were binary restenosis rates within nine months, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target lesion revascularisation (TLR), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) at 24-month follow-up. A total of 300 patients (n=150 in each group) were enrolled in the study from 16 Chinese centres. The LLL in the NOYA group at nine-month follow-up was similar to the FIREBIRD2 group (0.11±0.18 mm vs. 0.14±0.23 mm, p=0.16; non-inferiority p<0.001). The rates of MACE, death, MI and TLR at 24-month follow-up were comparable between these two devices (p>0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The biodegradable polymer NOYA stent was non-inferior to the FIREBIRD2 durable polymer stent with respect to the primary non-inferiority endpoint of in-stent LLL at nine-month follow-up. Clinical outcomes at 24-month follow-up were comparable between the two stents. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01226355).

Safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents in "real-world" practice: 18-month clinical and 9-month angiographic outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent (Excel, JW Medical System, Weihai, China) with 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy in daily practice. BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that persistent presence of polymer may compromise the safety of drug-eluting stents, and that therefore biodegradable polymer coatings might reduce late adverse events. METHODS: Between June and November 2006, 2,077 patients, exclusively treated with Excel stents at 59 centers from 4 countries, were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter registry. Recommended antiplatelet regimen included clopidogrel and aspirin for 6 months followed by chronic aspirin therapy. RESULTS: The average duration of clopidogrel treatment was 199.8 +/- 52.7 days and 80.5% of discharged patients discontinued clopidogrel at 6 months. The cumulative rates of major adverse cardiac events were 0.9% at 30 days, 2.7% at 1 year, and 3.1% at 18 months. Overall rate of stent thrombosis was 0.87% at 18 months. The rates of acute, subacute, late, and very late stent thrombosis were 0.1%, 0.38%, 0.34%, and 0.05%, respectively. Angiographic follow-up, performed in 974 (31.6%) lesions from 653 patients (31.7%), revealed a mean in-stent late lumen loss of 0.21 +/- 0.39 mm. Binary restenosis rates were 3.8% in-stent and 6.7% in-segment. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter registry documents satisfactory safety and efficacy profiles, as evidenced by low rates of major adverse cardiac events and stent thrombosis up to 18 months, for the Excel biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent when used with 6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in a "real-world" setting. (Multi-Center Registry Trial of EXCEL Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent [CREATE]; NCT00331578).