Three-year follow up of biodegradable polymer cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stent (EXCROSSAL) in treating de novo coronary artery disease: Pooled analysis of CREDIT II and CREDIT III trials.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the 3-year outcomes of the biodegradable polymer cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stent (EXCROSSAL) in CREDIT II AND III TRIALS. BACKGROUND: Though approved by CFDA, the long-term safety and efficacy of EXCROSSAL is still unknown. METHODS: CREDIT II was a randomized trial comparing the EXCROSSAL versus EXCEL stents in patients with up to two de novo coronary lesions, and CREDIT III was a prospective, single-arm study evaluating the efficacy and safety of EXCROSSAL in broad types of de novo coronary artery lesions. We pooled the 3-year follow-up data of the EXCROSSAL arm of the CREDIT II and CREDIT III Trials. The primary outcome was 3-year target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR). The patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) (all-cause death, all MI, or any revascularization) and stent thrombosis (ST) were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 833 patients were included in this study. The incidence of TLF and PoCE in the 3-year follow-up were 7.6% and 12.5%, respectively. ST occurred in 0.6% of patients. In the subgroup analyses, TLF was significantly higher in small target vessels, multi-lesion PCI, and multi-vessel disease. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-year follow-up analysis confirmed low rates of TLF and ST in EXCROSSAL, which is similar to the most widely used new generation durable polymer drug-eluting stent.

Safety and efficacy of the novel sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary artery disease: One-year results from a prospective patient-level pooled analysis of NeoVas trials.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective, patient-level analysis assessed the safety and efficacy of NeoVas sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) in patients with coronary lesions. Furthermore, to meet China Food and Drug Administration requirements, we conducted an objective performance criterion study by pooling all patients implanted with the NeoVas BRS in a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) and registry trial. BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stent-related permanent vessel caging by metallic struts may lead to several complications associated with percutaneous coronary intervention. BRSs reportedly result in more stent thromboses (ST) in comparison to everolimus-eluting stents. The NeoVas (Lepu Medical, Beijing, China) is a novel sirolimus-eluting poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA)-based BRS whose safety and efficacy remains to be fully elucidated. METHODS: Patient-level data derived from 1,103 patients with de novo native coronary lesions in the NeoVas RCT (n = 278) and NeoVas registry (n = 825) were prospectively collected, pooled, and analyzed. The primary outcome was 12-month target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven-target lesion revascularization. The patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) of all-cause death, all MI, or any revascularization was also analyzed. RESULTS: The 12-month rate of TLF in 1,103 patients (follow-up rate, 99.8%) was 3.0%, significantly lower than the performance goal of 8.5% (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, 50 (5.4%) PoCEs and five definite/probable ST (0.5%) were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: This pooled, patient-level analysis indicates that the NeoVas BRS has promising 1-year efficacy and safety profiles.

Clinical efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus insight from the 4-year results of the create study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is an independent predictor of adverse clinical events after drug-eluting stent implantation. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients. METHODS: A total of 2077 "all comers," including 440 (21.2%) diabetic patients and 1637 (78.8%) non-diabetic patients, were prospectively enrolled in the CREATE study at 59 centers in four countries. The recommended antiplatelet regimen was clopidogrel and aspirin for 6 months followed by chronic aspirin therapy. The primary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: Diabetic patients had higher risks of all-cause death (8.2% vs. 3.4%, P < 0.001) and cardiac death (4.1% vs. 1.4%, P < 0.001) compared with non-diabetic patients at 4 years. The rates of non-fatal MI (0.2% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.218), TLR (2.0% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.357), MACE (5.9% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.227), and overall stent thrombosis (1.6% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.932) were not significantly different between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. A landmark analysis showed that prolonged clopidogrel therapy (>6 months) was not beneficial in reducing the cumulative hazards of MACE either in diabetic or non-diabetic patients (log rank P = 0.810). CONCLUSIONS: Biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of diabetic patients had a similar clinical event rate at 4 years compared with non-diabetic patients, except for a higher mortality rate.

Sustained clinical safety and efficacy of a biodegradable-polymer coated sirolimus-eluting stent in "real-world" practice: three-year outcomes of the CREATE (Multi-Center Registry of EXCEL Biodegradable Polymer Drug Eluting Stents) study.

BACKGROUND: The CREATE is a post-marketing surveillance multicenter registry that demonstrated satisfactory angiographic and clinical (at 18 months) outcomes of a biodegradable polymer based sirolimus-eluting stent (EXCEL, JW Medical System, Weihai, China) for the treatment of patients in routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the three-year clinical safety and efficacy outcomes in patients enrolled in the CREATE study. METHODS: A total of 2077 all comers have been enrolled in the CREATE study at 59 centers from four countries. Recommended antiplatelet regimen was clopidogrel and aspirin for six months followed by chronic aspirin therapy. The prespecified primary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12, 18, and 36 months. RESULTS: Clinical follow-up was completed in 2025 (97.5%) patients at three years. The average duration of clopidogrel treatment was 199.8 ± 52.7 days and 80.5% of discharged patients discontinued clopidogrel at six months. The cumulative rate of MACE was 4.5% and the rate of stent thrombosis was 1.53% at three years. At six months to three years, prolonged clopidogrel therapy (>6 months) was not beneficial in reducing cumulative hazards of MACE (3.4% vs. 3.1%, log rank P = 0.725) or stent thrombosis (1.5% vs. 0.6%, log rank P = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates sustained three-year clinical safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents when used with six months of dual antiplatelet therapy in a "real-world" setting.

A Randomized Trial Comparing the NeoVas Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stents.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the NeoVas bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) compared with metallic drug-eluting stents. BACKGROUND: BRS have the potential to improve very late outcomes compared with metallic drug-eluting stents, but some BRS have been associated with increased rates of device thrombosis before complete bioresorption. NeoVas is a new poly-l-lactic acid BRS that elutes sirolimus from a poly-D, l-lactide coating. METHODS: Eligible patients with a single de novo native coronary artery lesion with a reference vessel diameter 2.5 to 3.75 mm and a lesion length ≤20 mm were randomized 1:1 to NeoVas BRS versus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES). Angiographic follow-up was performed in all patients at 1 year. The primary endpoint was angiographic in-segment late loss (LL), and the major secondary endpoint was the rate of angina. Baseline and follow-up optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve were performed in a pre-specified subgroup of patients. RESULTS: The authors randomized 560 patients at 32 centers to treatment with NeoVas (n = 278) versus CoCr-EES (n = 282). One-year in-segment LL with NeoVas and CoCr-EES were 0.14 ± 0.36 mm versus 0.11 ± 0.34 mm (difference 0.03 mm; upper 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval 0.09 mm; pnoninferiority < 0.0001; psuperiority = 0.36). Clinical outcomes at 1 year were similar in the 2 groups, as were the rates of recurrent angina (27.9% vs. 32.1%; p = 0.26). Optical coherence tomography at 1 year demonstrated a higher proportion of covered struts (98.7% vs. 96.2%; p < 0.001), less strut malapposition (0% vs. 0.6%; p <0.001), and a smaller minimal lumen area (4.71 ± 1.64 vs. 6.00 ± 2.15 mm2; p < 0.001) with NeoVas compared with CoCr-EES respectively, with nonsignificant differences in fractional flow reserve (0.89 ± 0.08 vs. 0.91 ± 0.06; p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The NeoVas BRS was noninferior to CoCr-EES for the primary endpoint of 1-year angiographic in-segment LL, and resulted in comparable 1-year clinical outcomes, including recurrent angina. (NeoVas Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold Randomized Controlled Trial; NCT02305485).

Five-year outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents: Insights from the CREATE trial.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcome of drug-eluting stents (DES) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) versus non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) remains unclear. This study sought to compare the long-term outcomes of biodegradable polymer-coated DES in patients with STEMI versus NSTE-ACS. METHODS: We explored a post hoc analysis of the 5-year outcome of the CREATE trial in the subgroup of patients with STEMI (n=318) versus NSTE-ACS (n=1223) who were implanted with biodegradable polymer-coated DES. The primary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 5 years. Clopidogrel and aspirin for 6 months followed by chronic aspirin therapy were recommended. RESULTS: STEMI patients showed a trend of increase in MACE (8.7% vs. 6.8%, log rank p=0.289) compared to NSTE-ACS patients at 5 years, and a greater risk of cardiac death (5.4% vs. 2.1%, log rank p=0.003), mainly driven by the higher cardiac death rate within the first month after stent placement (log rank p=0.003) and the last year of follow-up (log rank p=0.001). No significant difference in stent thrombosis was found between them (3.1% vs. 2.5%, log rank p=0.653). Prolonged clopidogrel therapy (>6 months) showed no effect on risk of MACE or stent thrombosis between the two groups (both p for interaction >0.1). CONCLUSIONS: STEMI patients have a higher risk of cardiac mortality compared with NSTE-ACS patients after biodegradable polymer-coated DES placement, primarily attribute to more cardiac deaths that happened within the first month after the event and the last year of follow-up.

A randomised comparison of biodegradable polymer- and permanent polymer-coated platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting coronary stents in China: the EVOLVE China study.

AIMS: The EVOLVE China randomised study sought to evaluate the clinical safety and effectiveness of the SYNERGY bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent (EES) for the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease in China. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions were randomised (1:1) to receive the SYNERGY or PROMUS Element Plus stent. The primary endpoint was in-stent late loss at nine months. Secondary endpoints included death, MI, revascularisation, and stent thrombosis up to 12 months. A total of 412 subjects were randomised (205 SYNERGY; 207 PROMUS Element Plus) at 14 sites in China from October 2013 to July 2014. SYNERGY was non-inferior to PROMUS Element Plus for the primary endpoint of nine-month in-stent late loss: SYNERGY 0.20±0.33 mm vs. PROMUS Element Plus 0.17±0.38 mm with an upper one-sided 97.5% confidence interval of the difference (0.10 mm), significantly less than the non-inferiority margin (0.15 mm; p<0.0008). Clinical adverse event rates were low and not significantly different between groups at nine and 12 months (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the EVOLVE China trial, the SYNERGY bioabsorbable polymer-coated EES was noninferior to the PROMUS Element Plus permanent polymer-coated EES for the primary endpoint of late loss at nine months.

Gender difference on five-year outcomes of EXCEL biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents implantation: results from the CREATE study.

BACKGROUND: The gender difference on long-term outcome in unselected patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not yet been fully investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the gender difference on five-year outcomes following EXCEL biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stenting in patients with coronary disease. METHODS: A total of 2077 "all comers", consisting of 1528 (73.6%) men and 549 (26.4%) women, who were exclusively treated with EXCEL coronary stents were enrolled in the prospective CREATE study at 59 centers from four countries. After propensity score matching, the baseline characteristics of the two groups were well matched. Recommended antiplatelet regimen was clopidogrel and aspirin for six months followed by chronic aspirin therapy. The primary outcome that was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis (ST) at five years were compared between the two gender groups. RESULTS: In the two groups, women had higher proportions of clinical risk factors, such as being elderly, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hyperlipidemia, compared to men. Besides, the mean target vessel number per patient was higher and the mean reference vessel diameter smaller for women. Men had higher risks of cardiac death (3.7% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.021) and MACE (8.4% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.004) at five years compared with women. However, the cumulative hazards of non-fatal MI and TLR were similar between men and women. The incidence of Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definite or probable stent thrombosis was similar between the two groups (1.3% vs. 1.0%, P = 0.639). Prolonged clopidogrel therapy (>6 months) did not reduce the cumulative hazards of ST from six months to five years in both men (χ(2) = 0.098, log rank P = 0.754) and women (χ(2) = 2.043, log rank P = 0.153) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Women had a lower MACE and cardiac death rate than men after biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stenting in long term follow-up. Effects of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in preventing stent thrombosis was similar with six-month DAPT after EXCEL stent implantation in both men and women groups.

A new generation of biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary artery disease: final 5-year clinical outcomes from the CREATE study.

AIMS: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the five-year safety and efficacy of a biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent with six months dual antiplatelet therapy in daily practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two thousand and seventy-seven daily practice patients, exclusively treated with biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents (EXCEL; JW Medical Systems, Weihai, China), were prospectively enrolled in the multicentre CREATE study. Clinical follow-up was completed in 1,982 patients (95.4%) at five-year follow-up. The rates of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularisation and overall major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at five-year follow-up were 3.0%, 1.5%, 3.7% and 7.4%, respectively. The rates of definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) at five years and definite ST from one to five years were 1.1% and 0.3%, respectively. Heart failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.324, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.729-6.391, p<0.001) and prior MI (HR: 2.664, 95% CI: 1.358-5.227, p=0.004) were independent predictors of ST. Landmark analysis of a propensity score matched patient cohort showed that patients with or without clopidogrel treatment after six months had similar clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates satisfactory and sustained five-year clinical safety and efficacy profiles as evidenced by the low rates of MACE and ST for the EXCEL, a biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent, when patients were treated with six months dual antiplatelet therapy in daily practice.

Safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents in "real-world" practice: 18-month clinical and 9-month angiographic outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent (Excel, JW Medical System, Weihai, China) with 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy in daily practice. BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that persistent presence of polymer may compromise the safety of drug-eluting stents, and that therefore biodegradable polymer coatings might reduce late adverse events. METHODS: Between June and November 2006, 2,077 patients, exclusively treated with Excel stents at 59 centers from 4 countries, were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter registry. Recommended antiplatelet regimen included clopidogrel and aspirin for 6 months followed by chronic aspirin therapy. RESULTS: The average duration of clopidogrel treatment was 199.8 +/- 52.7 days and 80.5% of discharged patients discontinued clopidogrel at 6 months. The cumulative rates of major adverse cardiac events were 0.9% at 30 days, 2.7% at 1 year, and 3.1% at 18 months. Overall rate of stent thrombosis was 0.87% at 18 months. The rates of acute, subacute, late, and very late stent thrombosis were 0.1%, 0.38%, 0.34%, and 0.05%, respectively. Angiographic follow-up, performed in 974 (31.6%) lesions from 653 patients (31.7%), revealed a mean in-stent late lumen loss of 0.21 +/- 0.39 mm. Binary restenosis rates were 3.8% in-stent and 6.7% in-segment. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter registry documents satisfactory safety and efficacy profiles, as evidenced by low rates of major adverse cardiac events and stent thrombosis up to 18 months, for the Excel biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent when used with 6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in a "real-world" setting. (Multi-Center Registry Trial of EXCEL Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent [CREATE]; NCT00331578).