The relationship between sociodemographic factors and oral health-related quality of life in dentate and edentulous community-dwelling older adults.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the associations between sociodemographic factors and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in dentate and edentulous community-dwelling older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a 54-item OHRQoL questionnaire. SETTING: Five counties in central Alabama: Jefferson and Tuscaloosa (urban), and Hale, Bibb, and Pickens (rural). PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-eight participants (Dental Study subjects) aged 65 and older were recruited from participants in the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging, a longitudinal study of mobility in older African Americans and non-Hispanic whites. MEASUREMENTS: Dental Study subjects were queried on their OHRQoL and sociodemographic status and classified into two categories: dentate and edentulous. Bivariate analyses were used to quantify associations between sociodemographic variables and OHRQoL after excluding participants with severe depression. Variables included age, sex, race, marital status, veteran status, residence, income, education, and transportation difficulties. RESULTS: Dentate and edentulous subjects had similar OHRQoL across age, sex, marital status, veteran status, and residence. Analyses suggested a strong association between OHRQoL and race, education, income, and transportation difficulties in dentate subjects. Sociodemographic factors were less strongly associated with OHRQoL in edentulous participants. CONCLUSION: OHRQoL decrements were prevalent in dentate and edentulous subjects. Of dentate persons, African Americans and those with a 6th-grade education or less, with income less than 16,000 dollars/year, and with transportation difficulties were more likely to have decrements in OHRQoL. In edentulous persons, these associations were not statistically significant or were weaker. These findings suggest differential associations between sociodemographic factors and OHRQoL when stratified according to dentate status.

Factors associated with long-term dysphagia after definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer.

PURPOSE: The use of altered fractionation radiotherapy (RT) regimens, as well as concomitant chemotherapy and RT, to intensify therapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer can lead to increased rates of long-term dysphagia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 122 patients who had undergone definitive RT for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer, after excluding those who had been treated for a second or recurrent head-and-neck primary, had Stage I-II disease, developed locoregional recurrence, had <12 months of follow-up, or had undergone postoperative RT. The patient, tumor, and treatment factors were correlated with a composite of 3 objective endpoints as a surrogate for severe long-term dysphagia: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube dependence at the last follow-up visit; aspiration on a modified barium swallow study or a clinical diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia; or the presence of a pharyngoesophageal stricture. RESULTS: A composite dysphagia outcome occurred in 38.5% of patients. On univariate analysis, the primary site (p = 0.01), use of concurrent chemotherapy (p = 0.01), RT schedule (p = 0.02), and increasing age (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with development of composite long-term dysphagia. The use of concurrent chemotherapy (p = 0.01), primary site (p = 0.02), and increasing age (p = 0.02) remained significant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The addition of concurrent chemotherapy to RT for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer resulted in increased long-term dysphagia. Early intervention using swallowing exercises, avoidance of nothing-by-mouth periods, and the use of intensity-modulated RT to reduce the dose to the uninvolved swallowing structures should be explored further in populations at greater risk of long-term dysphagia.

Association between aspects of oral health-related quality of life and body mass index in community-dwelling older adults.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether underweight, normal-weight, overweight, and obese older adults differ in aspects of their oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a 54-item OHRQoL questionnaire. SETTING: Five counties in central Alabama: Jefferson and Tuscaloosa (urban), and Hale, Bibb, and Pickens (rural). PARTICIPANTS: The 291 subjects were recruited from participants in the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging, a longitudinal study of mobility. Participants ranged in age from 65 to 90 (60.5% women, 50.5% non-Hispanic white, and 50.5% rural). MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed an in-home interview about their OHRQoL using a 54-item questionnaire and were classified into four categories of body mass index (BMI) (<20.0 (underweight), 20.0-24.9 (normal), 25.0-29.9 (overweight), and >/=30.0 (obese)). Multivariate analyses were used to examine associations between BMI and OHRQoL, adjusting for age, race, sex, depression, education, perceived income, comorbidity score, life-space mobility, and physical activity level. RESULTS: The results suggested that a parabolic effect existed, with strongest associations occurring in the underweight and obese categories. With the normal BMI group as the reference group, obese participants were more likely to avoid eating foods they would like to eat, overweight participants were less likely to cook foods differently and reported better chewing ability, and underweight persons were more likely to limit foods they eat because of mouth dryness. CONCLUSION: Objective measures may not accurately reflect peoples' perceptions; therefore, OHRQoL determined according to response to subjective questions is important to properly assess a patient's overall health status. Older adults who are under- or overweight should be evaluated for oral health conditions that may affect their nutritional status.