Bone cement distribution may significantly affect the efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating symptomatic Schmorl's nodes.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP) has been widely used in treating symptomatic Schmorl's nodes(SNs). However, there were still some patients with poor pain relief. At present, there is a lack of research to analyze the reasons for poor efficacy. METHODS: Review the SNs patients treated with PVP in our hospital from November 2019 to June 2022, collect their baseline data. Reverse reconstruction software was used to calculate the filling rate of bone edema ring(Rf). NRS score was used to evaluate pain and ODI to evaluate function. The patients were divided into remission group(RG) and non remission group(n-RG) according to symptom. In addition, according to the Rf, they were divided into excellent, good and poor groups. Differences between groups were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 26 vertebrae were included in 24 patients. When grouped according to symptoms, patients in n-RG were older, and surgical segments were tend to locate in lower lumbar spine. The proportion of Poor distribution was significantly higher. When grouped according to the cement distribution, the preoperative NRS and ODI of the three groups were comparable, but the NRS and ODI of Poor group were significantly worse than the Excellent and Good groups postoperatively and at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The cement distribution may significantly affect the efficacy of PVP in treating symptomatic SNs. We suggest that the bone edema ring should be filled as fully as possible to ensure the efficacy. In addition, advanced age and low lumbar lesions are also adverse factors for clinical outcomes.

Biomechanical comparison of vertebral augmentation and cement discoplasty for the treatment of symptomatic Schmorl's node: a finite element analysis.

Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) and percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD) are two relatively new minimally invasive surgeries for symptomatic Schmorl's reported in recent decade. However, the clinical evidence for the effectiveness of these two surgeries is insufficient. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical benefits and risks of the two surgeries in order to analyze their biomechanical differences and effectiveness. We reconstructed Five lumbar finite element models via computed tomography data, including control model, PVA-ideal model, PVA-nonideal model, PCD-ideal model, and PCD-nonideal model. The stress and strain of Schmorl's nodes, bone marrow edema zone (BMEZ), affected endplate, and the overall stability of segment were analyzed and compared. The validity of our models was confirmed. As a result, the PVA-ideal model can significantly reduce the stress of Schmorl's node and the strain of BMEZ, while this effect is inappreciable in PVA-nonideal model. The PCD-ideal model significantly reduced the strain of Schmorl's nodes and BMEZ, and significantly improve segmental stability, but also resulted in a significant increase in the stress of Schmorl's nodes, BMEZ and endplates. The PCD-nonideal model not only lacks blocking effect, but also sharply increases the strain of Schmorl's nodes and BMEZ. Thus, We recommend that both PVA and PCD surgeries in ideal distribution facilitated a more stable paranodular biomechanical microenvironment. However, due to the possibility of poor biomechanical outcomes caused by the non-ideal cement distribution, the non-ideal distribution of bone cement needs to be remedied in practice.

Mineralized Collagen Modified Polymethyl Methacrylate Bone Cement for Osteoporotic Compression Vertebral Fracture at 1-Year Follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical effects and imaging features of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement with and without mineralized collagen (MC) in percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PKP with PMMA is widely performed for OVCF. However, numerous complications have also been reported about the PMMA bone cement. Moreover, PMMA bone cement with and without MC have not been compared with respect to their postoperative efficacy and long-term follow-up. METHODS: From July 2016 to July 2017, 105 OVCF patients were randomly divided into two groups based on their PKP treatment: MC-PMMA group and PMMA group. Clinical operation, cement leakage, Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale, height of the fractured vertebrae, Cobb angle, refracture of the adjacent vertebra, recompression, and computed tomography values of the injured vertebra were compared between the two groups postoperatively and after 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Clinical operation showed no differences between the two groups. Visual analog scale scores, Oswestry Disability Index scores, and Cobb angles showed statistically significant differences between the two groups after 1-year follow-up. The height of the vertebral body showed significant difference at 3 days postoperatively and preoperatively in each group and significant difference after 1 year between the two groups. The rate of refracture and leakage of the MC-PMMA group was lower than that of the PMMA group. The computed tomography value of the MC-PMMA group was obviously higher than that of the PMMA group after 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: MC-modified PMMA did not change the beneficial properties of PMMA. This new bone cement has better biocompatibility, can form a stable structure in the vertebral body, and improve the prognosis of patients by reducing pain and reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.