Results from EuCliD (European Clinical Dialysis Database): impact of shifting treatment modality.

BACKGROUND: The use of biocompatible high-flux membranes is more efficient than low-flux membranes in controlling a number of hemodialysis-related diseases. The aim of this cooperative study was to evaluate the 6-month effect of a switch from low- to high-flux dialysers on patients treated in 39 Spanish dialysis centres. METHODS: The clinical data used in this analysis were prospectively collected by the EuCliD database, developed to monitor the quality of treatment delivered in a large network of European Dialysis Centres. Inclusion criteria for the study were the condition of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on chronic hemodialysis and low-flux dialysis for at least six months before the switch to high-flux dialysis. Of 1,543 patients enrolled in the study between 2000 and 2001, 1,046 patients were considered for the analysis. 497 patients were excluded because they did not complete the follow-up. Outcome measures were the reduction of pre-dialysis beta-2 microglobulin, the improvement of anemia or reduction in rHu-EPO dose required to maintain best correction of anemia, reduction of inflammatory parameters (CRP), improvement in lipid profile (Total and HDL cholesterol, tryglycerides), maintenance of nutritional status. Albumin and "dry" (post-hemodialysis) body weight were both evaluated as nutritional indexes. RESULTS: During the six months of high-flux hemodialysis, there was a significant increase in hemoglobin (from 11.55 +/- 1.41 to 11.88 +/- 1.43 g/L; p < 0.001). Considering the temporarily untreated patients on a 0 U/week dose, erythropoietin remained stable (from 5,670 +/- 4,199 to 5,657 +/- 4,411 U/week). During the second part of the follow-up, the lipid profile significantly improved (Fig. 3). Total cholesterol and triglycerides decreased significantly (p < 0.001), while HDL cholesterol increased (p = 0.006). Calculated levels of LDL cholesterol also significantly decreased (p = 0.001). Dry body weight remained stable (64.7 +/- 11.9 vs. 64.7 +/- 12.0 kg) as well as in albumin levels (3.93 +/- 0.43 vs. 3.94 +/- 0.43 g/dL) between the two modalities of treatment. The level of beta2-microglobulin significantly decreased during high-flux dialysis (33.5 +/- 14.4 vs. 26.3 +/- 8.6 mg/dL, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: All above mentioned results may have as a common denominator an improved blood purification from uremic toxins and a reduced level of chronic sub-clinical inflammation. All together, these results seem to confirm the superiority of high-flux dialysis in terms of clinical and physiological outcomes.

Effects of different membranes and dialysis technologies on patient treatment tolerance and nutritional parameters. The Italian Cooperative Dialysis Study Group.

There is increasing evidence that the biochemical and cellular phenomena induced by blood/ membrane/dialysate interactions contribute to dialysis-related intradialytic and long-term complications. However, there is a lack of large, prospective, randomized trials comparing biocompatible and bioincompatible membranes, and convective and diffusive treatment modalities. The primary aim of this prospective, randomized trial was to evaluate whether the use of polysulfone membrane with bicarbonate dialysate offers any advantage (in terms of treatment tolerance, nutritional parameters and pre-treatment beta-microglobulin levels) over a traditional membrane (Cuprophan). A secondary aim was to assess whether the use of more sophisticated methods consisting of a biocompatible synthetic membrane with different hydraulic permeability at different ultrafiltration rate (high-flux hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration) offers any further advantages. Seventy-one Centers were involved and stratified according to the availability of only the first two or all four of the following techniques: Cuprophan hemodialysis (Cu-HD), low-flux polysulfone hemodialysis (LfPS-HD), high-flux polysulfone high-flux hemodialysis (HfPS-HD), and high-flux polysulfone hemodiafiltration (HfPS-HDF). The 380 eligible patients were randomized to one of the two or four treatments (132 to Cu-HD, 147 to LfPS-HD, 51 to HfPS-HD and 50 to HfPS-HDF). The follow-up was 24 months. No statistical difference was observed in the algebraic sum of the end points between bicarbonate dialysis with Cuprophan or with low-flux polysulfone, or among the four dialysis methods under evaluation. There was a significant decrease in pre-dialysis plasma beta 2-microglobulin levels in high-flux dialysis of 9.04 +/- 10.46 mg/liter (23%) and in hemodiafiltration of 6.35 +/- 12.28 mg/liter (16%), both using high-flux polysulfone membrane in comparison with Cuprophan and low-flux polysulfone membranes (P = 0.032). The significant decrease in pre-dialysis plasma beta 2-microglobulin levels could have a clinical impact when one considers that beta 2-microglobulin accumulation and amyloidosis are important long-term dialysis-related complications.