Comparison of Risks of Late Effects From Radiation Therapy in Children Versus Adults: Insights From the QUANTEC, HyTEC, and PENTEC Efforts.

Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) seeks to refine quantitative radiation dose-volume relationships for normal-tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) in survivors of pediatric cancer. This article summarizes the evolution of PENTEC and compares it with similar adult-focused efforts (eg, Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic [QUANTEC] and Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic [HyTEC]) with respect to content, oversight, support, scope, and methodology of literature review. It then summarizes key organ-specific findings from PENTEC in an attempt to compare NTCP estimates in children versus adults. In brief, select normal-tissue risks within developing organs and tissues (eg, maldevelopment of musculoskeletal tissue, teeth, breasts, and reproductive organs) are primarily relevant only in children. For some organs and tissues, children appear to have similar (eg, brain for necrosis, optic apparatus, parotid gland, liver), greater (eg, brain for neurocognition, cerebrovascular, breast for lactation), less (ovary), or perhaps slightly less (eg, lung) risks of toxicity versus adults. Similarly, even within the broad pediatric age range (including adolescence), for some endpoints, younger children have greater (eg, hearing and brain for neurocognition) or lesser (eg, ovary, thyroid) risks of radiation-associated toxicities. NTCP comparisons in adults versus children are often confounded by marked differences in treatment paradigms that expose normal tissues to radiation (ie, cancer types, prescribed radiation therapy dose and fields, and chemotherapy agents used). To add to the complexity, it is unclear if age is best analyzed as a continuous variable versus with age groupings (eg, infants, young children, adolescents, young adults, middle-aged adults, older adults). Further work is needed to better understand the complex manner in which age and developmental status affect risk.

Impact of Oral Cavity Dosimetry on Patient Reported Xerostomia and Dysgeusia in the Setting of Deintensified Chemoradiotherapy.

Purpose: To determine the relationship between mean oral cavity (OC) dose (treated as a singular organ at risk) to patient reported xerostomia and dysgeusia. In addition, we will examine the relationship between oral cavity substructure doses to patient reported xerostomia and dysgeusia. All patients were treated in the setting of deintensification (60 Gy). Methods and Materials: In the study, 184 and 177 prospectively enrolled patients for de-escalated chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer submitted PROs at 6 and 12 months, respectively using Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events questionnaire. Patient's OC consisting of the following substructures were segmented: oral tongue, base of tongue, floor of mouth, hard and soft palate, cheek mucosa, and upper and lower lip mucosa. Ordinal logistic regression (no/mild vs moderate vs severe/very severe symptoms) was used to compare organs at risk dosimetry to patient reported xerostomia and dysgeusia at 6 and 12 months. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression models were generated. Results: Mean dose to the contralateral parotid (P = .04), OC (P = .04), and baseline patient reported xerostomia (P = .009) were significantly associated with xerostomia severity at 6 months. Only baseline xerostomia (P = .02) and mean dose to the contralateral submandibular gland (P = .0001) were significantly associated with xerostomia severity at 12 months. The only significant factor related to dysgeusia at either time point was mean dose to the OC at 12 months (P = .009). On examining substructures, the mean dose to the floor of mouth was implicated for the dose relationship to 6-month xerostomia (P = .04), and the oral tongue was found to be implicated for the relationship for 12-month dysgeusia (P = .04). Conclusions: The mean dose to the OC was found to relate to xerostomia symptoms at 6 months post-CRT and dysgeusia symptoms at 12 months post-CRT. The mean dose to the floor of mouth and oral tongue appeared to drive this relationship for xerostomia and dysgeusia symptoms, respectively. This work suggests the floor of mouth and oral tongue should be prioritized during planning over the rest of the OC. The effect of OC dose relative to other salivary structures for xerostomia appeared to depend on time post-CRT.

Clinical Use of A Priori Knowledge of Organ-At-Risk Sparing During Radiation Therapy Treatment for Oropharyngeal Cancer: Dosimetric and Patient Reported Outcome Improvements.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to prospectively assess dosimetric and clinical effects of treatment planners having a priori knowledge of the maximum achievable dose sparing for organs at risk (OARs) for patients with oropharynx cancer receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We examined patients with oropharynx cancer who were treated in prospective clinical trials between February 2012 and April 2019 at our institution. A tool generating estimates of maximum achievable dose sparing for OARs (feasibility dose-volume histogram [FDVH]) was used clinically starting July 2016. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: Before (ie, baseline) and after (ie, FDVH-guided) FDVH. Doses received by various OARs were compared with those estimated to be achievable per FDVH, and that difference was defined as the excess of feasible dose (EFD). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires were completed at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The baseline and FDVH-guided cohorts were compared in terms of EFD, plan quality metrics, and post-RT PRO assessments. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were included in the analysis (60 in the baseline cohort, 79 in the FDVH-guided cohort). The FDVH-guided cohort had lower EFD to the contralateral parotid by 4.1 Gy, the ipsilateral parotid by 10.6 Gy, the larynx by 4.3 Gy, the oral cavity by 1.5 Gy, and the contralateral submandibular gland by 0.4 Gy. Plan quality metrics were similar between the cohorts. Less variation of EFD was seen in the FDVH-guided cohort for the parotid glands and contralateral submandibular gland (P < .05). The average post-RT PROs were better in the FVHD cohort versus baseline (particularly at the 6-month timepoint for dry mouth frequency, sticky saliva, meal enjoyment, severity of pain, and Eating Assessment Tool 10 composite [swallowing]; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Use of FDVH was associated with improved and less variable OAR sparing for clinically delivered plans. FDVH-guided patients had improved PROs compared with baseline with a variety of outcomes significantly improved at 6 months after treatment.

Prospective assessment of sparing the parotid ducts via MRI sialography for reducing patient reported xerostomia.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of prospectively sparing the parotid ducts via MRI sialography on patient reported xerostomia for those receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-eight patients with oropharynx cancer to be treated with definitive RT underwent pre-treatment MRI sialograms to localize their parotid ducts. The parotid ducts were maximally spared during treatment planning. Patients reported symptoms (PRO-CTCAE and QLQ-H&N35) were collected at 6 and 12 months post-RT and compared to a historical cohort who underwent conventional parotid gland mean dose sparing. Regression models were generated using parotid and submandibular gland doses with and without incorporating the dose to the parotid ducts to determine the impact of parotid duct dose on patient reported xerostomia. RESULTS: At 6 months post-RT, 12/26 (46%) patients reported ≥moderate xerostomia when undergoing parotid ductal sparing compared to 43/61 (70%) in the historical cohort (p = 0.03). At 12 months post-RT, 8/22 (36%) patients reported ≥moderate xerostomia when undergoing parotid ductal sparing compared to 34/68(50%) in the historical cohort (p = 0.08). Using nested logistic regression models, the mean parotid duct dose was found to significantly relate to patient reported xerostomia severity at 6 months post-RT (p = 0.04) and trended towards statistical significance at 12 months post-RT (p = 0.09). At both 6 and 12 months post-RT, the addition of mean parotid duct dose significantly improved model fit (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MRI sialography guided parotid duct sparing appears to reduce the rates of patient-reported xerostomia. Further, logistic regression analysis found parotid duct dose to be significantly associated with patient reported xerostomia. A significant improvement in model fit was observed when adding mean parotid duct dose compared to models that only contain mean parotid gland dose and mean contralateral submandibular gland dose.

Prospective Assessment of Patient-Reported Dry Eye Syndrome After Whole Brain Radiation.

PURPOSE: Dry eye is not typically considered a toxicity of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). We analyzed dry eye syndrome as part of a prospective study of patient-reported outcomes after WBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients receiving WBRT to 25 to 40 Gy were enrolled on a study with dry mouth as the primary endpoint and dry eye syndrome as a secondary endpoint. Patients received 3-dimensional WBRT using opposed lateral fields. Per standard practice, lacrimal glands were not prospectively delineated. Patients completed the Subjective Evaluation of Symptom of Dryness (SESoD, scored 0-4, with higher scores representing worse dry eye symptoms) at baseline, immediately after WBRT (EndRT), and at 1 month (1M), 3 months, and 6 months. Patients with baseline SESoD ≥3 (moderate dry eye) were excluded. The endpoints analyzed were ≥1-point and ≥2-point increase in SESoD score at 1M. Lacrimal glands were retrospectively delineated with fused magnetic resonance imaging scans. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled, 70 were eligible for analysis, and 54 were evaluable at 1M. Median bilateral lacrimal V20Gy was 79%. At 1M, 17 patients (32%) had a ≥1-point increase in SESoD score, and 13 (24%) a ≥2-point increase. Lacrimal doses appeared to be associated with an increase in SESoD score of both ≥1 point (V10Gy: P = .042, odds ratio [OR] 1.09/%; V20Gy: P = .071, OR 1.03/%) and ≥2 points (V10Gy: P = .038, OR 1.15/%; V20Gy: P = .063, OR 1.04/%). The proportion with increase in dry eye symptoms at 1M for lacrimal V20Gy ≥79% versus <79% was 46% versus 15%, respectively, for ≥1 point SESoD increase (P = .02) and 36% versus 12%, respectively, for ≥2 point SESoD increase (P = .056). CONCLUSIONS: Dry eye appears to be a relatively common, dose/volume-dependent acute toxicity of WBRT. Minimization of lacrimal gland dose may reduce this toxicity, and patients should be counseled regarding the existence of this potential side effect and treatments for dry eye.

Incidence of, and risk factors for, mandibular osteoradionecrosis in patients with oral cavity and oropharynx cancers.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of, and risk factors associated with, mandibular osteoradionecrosis (MORN) following radiation therapy (RT) for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient and treatment records of 252 consecutive patients with oral cavity or oropharynx cancers treated with RT by a single radiation oncologist at a high volume academic institution from August 2009 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. A Cox regression model was used to assess factors associated with the development of MORN. RT dosimetry was compared between patients with MORN and a matched cohort of patients without MORN. RESULTS: MORN developed in 14 patients (5.5%), occurring 3-40 (median 8) months post-RT. Factors associated with MORN on univariable analysis included primary diagnosis of oral cavity vs oropharynx cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.0, p=0.04), smoking at the time of RT (HR: 3.1, p=0.04), mandibular invasion of the primary (HR: 3.7, p=0.04), pre-RT tooth extraction (HR: 4.52, p=0.01), and treatment with 3D-conformal RT vs intensity-modulated RT (HR: 5.1, p=0.003). On multivariable analysis, pre-RT tooth extractions and RT technique remained significant. A dosimetric comparison between patients with and without MORN showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The incidence of MORN is low in the modern era at a high volume academic center. Modifiable risk factors including pre-RT tooth extractions, smoking, and RT technique are associated with MORN, and the risk should be minimized with appropriate dental evaluation and treatment, smoking cessation efforts, and the use of intensity-modulated RT.