GTPases RhoA and Rac1 are important for amelogenin and DSPP expression during differentiation of ameloblasts and odontoblasts.

Morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation are distinct processes in tooth development. Cell proliferation predominates in morphogenesis; differentiation involves changes in form and gene expression. The cytoskeleton is essential for both processes, being regulated by Rho GTPases. The aim of this study was to verify the expression, distribution, and role of Rho GTPases in ameloblasts and odontoblasts during tooth development in correlation with actin and tubulin arrangements and amelogenin and dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) expression. RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 were strongly expressed during morphogenesis; during cytodifferentiation, RhoA was present in ameloblasts and odontoblasts, Rac1 and its effector Pak3 were observed in ameloblasts; and Cdc42 was present in all cells of the tooth germ and mesenchyme. The expression of RhoA mRNA and its effectors RockI and RockII, Rac1 and Pak3, as analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction, increased after ameloblast and odontoblast differentiation, according to the mRNA expression of amelogenin and DSPP. The inhibition of all Rho GTPases by Clostridium difficile toxin A completely abolished amelogenin and DSPP expression in tooth germs cultured in anterior eye chamber, whereas the specific inhibition of the Rocks showed only a partial effect. Thus, both GTPases are important during tooth morphogenesis. During cytodifferentiation, Rho proteins are essential for the complete differentiation of ameloblasts and odontoblasts by regulating the expression of amelogenin and DSPP. RhoA and its effector RockI contribute to this role. A specific function for Rac1 in ameloblasts remains to be elucidated; its punctate distribution indicates its possible role in exocytosis/endocytosis.

Photobiomodulation and Mandibular Advancement Modulates Cartilage Thickness and Matrix Deposition in the Mandibular Condyle.

Objective: We evaluated the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM), mandibular advancement (MA), and the combination of both treatments (PBM+MA) on condylar growth, by the analysis of cartilage and bone formation, fibrillar collagen deposition, proteoglycan content, cell proliferation, and clastic cell index (CCI). Methods: Forty male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to CONTROL, PBM, positive control-MA, and PBM+MA groups. The appliance was worn 10 h/day. Laser was irradiated bilaterally on mandibular condyles in 8 alternate days (1 irradiation point per condyle) using the following parameters: 780 nm, 10 J/cm2, 40 mW, 1 W/cm2, 10 sec/point, 0.4 J/point, and cumulative dose per point: 3.2 J. PBM+MA received both treatments simultaneously. After 15 days, the animals were euthanized and the condyles dissected and embedded in paraffin. Histological sections from the intermediate portion of the condyle were used for morphometric analysis. The relative frequency (%) of fibrillar collagens was determined in sections stained with picrosirius red-hematoxylin under polarized light or Gömöri's method for reticular fibers. Proteoglycan content was evaluated by computerized photocolorimetric analysis. CCI was determined by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was detected by immunohistochemistry. Results: PBM and MA influenced condylar cartilage thickeness and matrix deposition, but none of the treatments affected significantly the area of the condyle. CCI were not influenced by the treatments, but clastic cells distribution was influenced by MA and PBM+MA treatments. There was no significant difference in proliferating cells among the groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that PBM and MA stimulates matrix deposition and cartilage thickening in the mandibular condyle, but was not able to demonstrate a synergistic effect between the treatments. Additional studies should be conducted to evaluate the possible synergistic effect between PBM and MA.

A mandibular propulsive appliance modulates collagen-binding integrins distribution in the young rat condylar cartilage.

We have previously shown that a mandibular propulsive appliance (MPA) stimulates cell proliferation and the synthesis of growth factors in the rat condylar cartilage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a MPA in the distribution of the integrin subunits alpha1 and alpha2 in this cartilage. Twenty eight days-old male Wistar rats were divided into treated (T) and age-matched control groups (C). Treated rats wore the appliance during 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 20, 30 and 35 days. The condyles were fixed, decalcified and paraffin-embedded. The distribution of alpha1 and alpha2 was studied by immunohistochemistry. Alpha1 distribution was uniform along the cartilage, increasing in 48 days-old rats (C20). Treated animals anticipated this increase to the age of 36 days (T9). The number of alpha2-positive cells was increased in C9 in the anterior condylar region, in C9 and C20 in the middle region and showed no differences in the posterior region. The MPA apparently abolished all variations, leading to a single increase at T30 in all regions. These results suggest that integrins containing the alpha1 and alpha2 subunits are modulated by forces promoted by the MPA, participating of the biological response to this therapy.