Clinical Studies Reporting on Vascular Graft Coatings for the Prevention of Aortic Graft Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of vascular graft coatings used in the aortic position to prevent vascular graft infection (VGI). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using a pre-registered protocol (CRD42020206436). Eligible studies used a vascular graft coating in the aortic position and reported on VGI. A search was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Primary outcome parameters were VGI, patency, and mortality. Pooled estimates of VGI were calculated using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) wherever possible. Quality assessment was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale and the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials. RESULTS: In total, 6 873 papers were identified. Only eight studies were included. Six of eight studies (75%) reported on known antimicrobial coating strategies such as antibiotics (n = 3) and silver (n = 3). In the other two studies, polymer coated grafts were used. Only three of eight studies compared coated with uncoated grafts (two antibiotic and one silver). Two randomised controlled trials reported on the effect of rifampicin soaked (1 mg/mL) grafts and showed no significant effect in the early (2 months; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.29 - 1.62) or late (2 years; OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.23 - 2.32) post-operative periods. A retrospective cohort study focusing on the effect of silver coated grafts did not reveal any advantage (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.02 - 1.64). Two polymer coated grafts were not considered to have a potential benefit in the prevention of VGIs. CONCLUSION: Clinical studies reporting on the antibacterial effect of vascular graft coatings in the aortic position to prevent VGI are scarce. For silver and antibiotic coatings, no significant protection for VGI was observed. New types of grafts or long acting coating strategies are mandatory to prevent this complication in the future.

Pre-clinical In Vitro Models of Vascular Graft Coating in the Prevention of Vascular Graft Infection: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular graft infection (VGI) is a feared complication. Prevention is of the utmost importance and vascular graft coatings (VGCs) could offer a potential to do this, with in vitro research a first crucial step. The aim of this study was to summarise key features of in vitro models investigating coating strategies to prevent VGI in order to provide guidance for the setup of future translational research. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. For each database, a specific search strategy was developed. Quality was assessed with the Toxicological data Reliability Assessment Tool (ToxRTool). In vitro models using a VGC and inoculation of the graft with a pathogen were included. The type of graft, coating, and pathogen were summarised. The outcome assessment in each study was evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 4 667 studies were identified, of which 45 papers met the inclusion criteria. The majority used polyester grafts (68.2%). Thirty-one studies (68.9%) included antibiotics, and nine studies (20%) used a commercial silver graft in their protocol. New antibacterial strategies (e.g., proteolytic enzymes) were investigated. A variety of testing methods was found and focused mainly on bacterial adherence, coating adherence and dilution, biofilm formation, and cytotoxicity. Ninety-three per cent of the studies (n = 41) were considered unreliable. CONCLUSION: Polyester is the preferred type of graft to coat on. The majority of coating studies are based on antibiotics; however, new coating strategies (e.g., antibiofilm coating) are coming. Many in vitro setups are available. In vitro studies have great potential, they can limit the use, but cannot replace in vivo studies completely. This paper can be used as a guidance document for future in vitro research.

A systematic review of preclinical data regarding commercial silver-coated vascular grafts.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular graft infection (VGI) is a serious complication with high mortality and morbidity rates. Several measures could be taken to decrease this risk, including the use of silver-containing vascular grafts. However, to date, no clinical advantages have been reported. This study reviews the outcome of preclinical studies focusing on the role of commercially available silver-coated grafts in the prevention of VGI. METHODS: A systematic review was performed with a focus on the preclinical role of commercially available silver-coated vascular grafts in the prevention and treatment of VGI. A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science. RESULTS: Nine in vitro and five in vivo studies were included. Two commercial grafts were used (INTERGARD SILVER and Silver Graft). In vitro studies used both gram-positive and gram-negative strains. A positive antimicrobial effect was observed in seven of nine studies (77.8%). A delayed antifungal effect against Candida species was observed in vitro, but disappeared when adding serum proteins. In vivo studies witnessed a microbicidal effect in two out of five studies (40%), but only tested a single causative pathogen (ie, Staphylococcus aureus). CONCLUSIONS: Both in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated conflicting and mixed results concerning the antimicrobial efficacy of commercially available silver-containing grafts in the prevention of VGI. In general, the study setup was heterogeneous in the different articles. Given the lack of convincing preclinical evidence and their poor performance in clinical studies, more data are needed at this time to guide the appropriate use of silver grafts.

Adjuvant antibiotic-loaded bone cement: Concerns with current use and research to make it work.

Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is broadly used to treat orthopaedic infections based on the rationale that high-dose local delivery is essential to eradicate biofilm-associated bacteria. However, ALBC formulations are empirically based on drug susceptibility from routine laboratory testing, which is known to have limited clinical relevance for biofilms. There are also dosing concerns with nonstandardized, surgeon-directed, hand-mixed formulations, which have unknown release kinetics. On the basis of our knowledge of in vivo biofilms, pathogen virulence, safety issues with nonstandardized ALBC formulations, and questions about the cost-effectiveness of ALBC, there is a need to evaluate the evidence for this clinical practice. To this end, thought leaders in the field of musculoskeletal infection (MSKI) met on 1 August 2019 to review and debate published and anecdotal information, which highlighted four major concerns about current ALBC use: (a) substantial lack of level 1 evidence to demonstrate efficacy; (b) ALBC formulations become subtherapeutic following early release, which risks induction of antibiotic resistance, and exacerbated infection from microbial colonization of the carrier; (c) the absence of standardized formulation protocols, and Food and Drug Administration-approved high-dose ALBC products to use following resection in MSKI treatment; and (d) absence of a validated assay to determine the minimum biofilm eradication concentration to predict ALBC efficacy against patient specific micro-organisms. Here, we describe these concerns in detail, and propose areas in need of research.

Injectable gentamicin-loaded thermo-responsive hyaluronic acid derivative prevents infection in a rabbit model.

UNLABELLED: Despite the use of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, the surgical fixation of open fractures with osteosynthesis implants is associated with high infection rates. Antibiotic-loaded biomaterials (ALBs) are increasingly used in implant surgeries across medical specialties to deliver high concentrations of antibiotics to the surgical site and reduce the risk of implant-associated infection. ALBs which are either less or not restricted in terms of spatial distribution and which may be applied throughout complex wounds could offer improved protection against infection in open fracture care. A thermo-responsive hyaluronic acid derivative (hyaluronic acid-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (HApN)) was prepared by a direct amidation reaction between the tetrabutyl ammonium (TBA) salt of hyaluronic acid and amine-terminated poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pN). The degree of grafting, and gelation properties of this gel were characterized, and the composition was loaded with gentamicin. The rheological- and release properties of this gentamicin-loaded HApN composition were tested in vitro and its efficacy in preventing infection was tested in a rabbit model of osteosynthesis contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus. The gentamicin-loaded HApN composition was able to prevent bacterial colonization of the implant site as shown by quantitative bacteriology. This finding was supported by histopathological evaluation of the humeri samples where no bacteria were found in the stained sections. In conclusion, this gentamicin-loaded HApN hydrogel effectively prevents infection in a complex wound, simulating a contaminated fracture treated with plating osteosynthesis. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Fracture fixation after trauma is associated with high infection rates. Antibiotic loaded biomaterials (ALBs) can provide high local concentrations without systemic side effects. However, the currently available ALBs have limited accessibility to contaminated tissues in open fractures because of predetermined shape. Thus, a novel thermo-responsive hyaluronan based hydrogel with control over gelation temperature is reported. The efficacy of this gentamicin loaded hyaluronan derivative is demonstrated in an in vivo fracture model in the presence of fracture fixation hardware. The bacterial burden is cleared in all of the inoculated rabbits in the presence of the ALB. Thus, the proposed injectable thermo-responsive hyaluronan presents an effective ALB for the prevention of infection.

A doxycycline-loaded polymer-lipid encapsulation matrix coating for the prevention of implant-related osteomyelitis due to doxycycline-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Implant-associated bone infections caused by antibiotic-resistant pathogens pose significant clinical challenges to treating physicians. Prophylactic strategies that act against resistant organisms, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), are urgently required. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of a biodegradable Polymer-Lipid Encapsulation MatriX (PLEX) loaded with the antibiotic doxycycline as a local prophylactic strategy against implant-associated osteomyelitis. Activity was tested against both a doxycycline-susceptible (doxy(S)) methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) as well as a doxycycline-resistant (doxy(R)) methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). In vitro elution studies revealed that 25% of the doxycycline was released from the PLEX-coated implants within the first day, followed by a 3% release per day up to day 28. The released doxycycline was highly effective against doxy(S) MSSA for at least 14days in vitro. A bolus injection of doxycycline mimicking a one day release from the PLEX-coating reduced, but did not eliminate, mouse subcutaneous implant-associated infection (doxy(S) MSSA). In a rabbit intramedullary nail-related infection model, all rabbits receiving a PLEX-doxycycline-coated nail were culture negative in the doxy(S) MSSA-group and the surrounding bone displayed a normal physiological appearance in both histological sections and radiographs. In the doxy(R) MRSA inoculated rabbits, a statistically significant reduction in the number of culture-positive samples was observed for the PLEX-doxycycline-coated group when compared to the animals that had received an uncoated nail, although the reduction in bacterial burden did not reach statistical significance. In conclusion, the PLEX-doxycycline coating on titanium alloy implants provided complete protection against implant-associated MSSA osteomyelitis, and resulted in a significant reduction in the number of culture positive samples when challenged with a doxycycline-resistant MRSA.