Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 17(5): e0263700, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35550622

RESUMEN

From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the demand for diagnostic and screening tests has exceeded supply. Although the proportion of vaccinated people has increased in wealthier countries, breakthrough infections have occurred amid the emergence of new variants. Pooled-sample COVID-19 testing using saliva has been proposed as an efficient, inexpensive, and non-invasive method to allow larger-scale testing, especially in a screening setting. In this study, we aimed to evaluate pooled RT-qPCR saliva testing and to compare the results with individual tests. Employees of Philips Japan, Ltd. were recruited to participate in COVID-19 screening from October to December 2020. Asymptomatic individuals (n = 824) submitted self-collected saliva samples. Samples were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR in both 10-sample pools and individual tests. We also surveyed participants regarding their thoughts and behaviors after the PCR screening project. Two of the 824 individuals were positive by RT-qPCR. In the pooled testing, one of these two had no measurable Ct value, but showed an amplification trend at the end of the PCR cycle. Both positive individuals developed cold-like symptoms, but neither required hospitalization. Of the 824 participants, 471 responded to our online questionnaire. Overall, while respondents agreed that PCR screening should be performed regularly, the majority were willing to undergo PCR testing only when it was provided for free or at low cost. In conclusion, pooled testing of saliva samples can support frequent large-scale screening that is rapid, efficient, and inexpensive.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Saliva , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Keio J Med ; 70(2): 35-43, 2021 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33746151

RESUMEN

The year 2020 will be remembered for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which continues to affect the whole world. Early and accurate identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is fundamental to combat the disease. Among the current diagnostic tests, real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is the most reliable and frequently used method. Herein, we discuss the interpretation of RT-qPCR results relative to viral infectivity. Although nasopharyngeal swab samples are often used for RT-qPCR testing, they require collection by trained medical staff. Saliva samples are emerging as an inexpensive and efficient alternative for large-scale screening. Pooled-sample testing of saliva has been applied for mass screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Current policies recommend isolating people with borderline cycle threshold (Ct) values (35

Asunto(s)
Infecciones Asintomáticas , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Saliva/virología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA