Accuracy of trial restorations from virtual planning: A comparison of two fabrication techniques.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Different technologies have been used to fabricate trial restorations. However, studies investigating the accuracy of trial restorations fabricated with different techniques in comparison with the initial 3-dimensional virtual design are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate completely digital workflows for managing the esthetic outcome through the production of trial restorations with 2 different technologies: stereolithography apparatus (SLA 3D) and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM). The aim was to determine which of them provided trial restorations more similar to those of the 3D virtual design. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty participants who did not meet ideal esthetic proportions for the anterior maxillary teeth were enrolled. For each, 2 intraoral and extraoral frontal photographs and intraoral digital scans were made. The digital images were processed by using the Digital Smile System (DSS) software program to have a smile preview after the treatment. Virtual designs were matched with the surface tessellation language (STL) files from the intraoral scans and edited by exocad DentalCAD to create custom trial restorations using SLA 3D and CAD-CAM technologies. Two independent examiners measured the virtual restorations by using virtual calipers in the software program and then the trial restorations by using digital calipers. The measurements were carried out from the incisal edge to the gingival margin, mesial-distal widths of the central incisors, and the distance from the distal margins of maxillary right and left canines. The trial restorations were evaluated intraorally for fit. The participants approved the definitive treatment outcome after the evaluation. The normality of data was verified with the Shapiro-Wilk test, and the Friedman test for matched groups with the Bonferroni and Dunn tests for multiple comparisons were used (α=.05). RESULTS: Comparing the 3D designs with the printed trial restorations, a significant increase was only found in the mesial-distal width of central incisors (P<.05), while the milled trial restorations showed a significant increase (P<.05) of all measurements except for the maxillary right and left canines. Comparing printed trial restorations with the milled ones, the only significant difference was found in height measures of maxillary right central incisor, with the milled trial restorations exhibiting higher values than the printed ones (P<.05). The printed trial restorations showed good clinical fit, and the milled restorations had poor clinical adaptation. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of printed trial restorations was higher than that of milled trial restorations, except for the canine to canine width of maxillary anterior teeth. However, this difference did not compromise the fit of the printed trial restorations. The milled trial restorations had increased dimensions in comparison with the measurements made in 3D designs, and consequently, their clinical fit was compromised. SLA 3D- printing technology provided the best fit.

The step further smile virtual planning: milled versus prototyped mock-ups for the evaluation of the designed smile characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Mock-up based approach allows the preview of the aesthetic rehabilitation, however, it is crucial that the mock-up does not differ from the expected aesthetic outcomes. With CAD-CAM technologies, it is possible to directly create mock-ups from virtual planned smile project, with greater accuracy and efficiency compared to the conventional moulded mock-ups. In this study, we investigated the trueness of mock-ups obtained with milling and 3D printing technology and a full digital work-flow system. METHODS: Ten adults subjects were included and digital smile design/digital wax-up were performed to enhance the aesthetic of maxillary anterior region. Ten milled mock-ups and 10 prototyped mock-ups were obtained from the original .stl file and a digital analysis of trueness was carried out by superimposing the scanned-milled mock-ups and the scanned-prototyped mock-ups to the digital wax-up, according to the surface-to-surface matching technique. Specific linear measurements were performed to investigate and compare the dimensional characteristics of the physical manufactures, the 3D project and the scanned mock-ups. All data were statistically analyzed. A clinical test was also performed to assess the fitting of the final manufacture. RESULTS: The prototyped mock-ups showed a significant increment of the transversal measurements (p < 0.001) while the milled mock-ups showed a significant increment of all vertical and transversal measurements (p < 0.001). The prototyped mock-ups showed good fitting after clinical tests while none of the milled mock-ups showed good adaptation (no fitting or significant clinical compensation required). Deviation analysis from the original 3D project reported a greater matching percentage for the scanned-milled mock-ups (80,31% ± 2.50) compared to the scanned-prototyped mock-ups (69,17% ± 2.64) (p < 0.001). This was in contrast with the findings from linear measurements as well as from the clinical test and may have been affected by a reductive algorithmic computation after digitization of physical mock-ups. CONCLUSION: Both prototype and milled mock-ups showed a slight dimensional increment comparing to the original 3D project, with milled-mock-ups showing less fitting after clinical tests. Caution must be taken when assessing the trueness of scanned manufacture since an intrinsic error in the system can underestimate the dimensions of the real object.

Fracture strength of 3-units fixed partial dentures fabricated with metal-ceramic, graphene doped PMMA and PMMA before and after ageing: An in-vitro study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the fracture strength and linear elongation at break of three-units fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated with traditional and new materials for fixed prosthodontics before and after ageing. METHODS: Sixty models of three-units FPDs were fabricated and cemented onto a Co-Cr model simulating the replacement of a maxillary second premolar. The samples were randomly divided into 3 groups: metal-ceramic (MCR), graphene-doped polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA-GR) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Half of the samples were directly subjected to fracture test, while the remaining half underwent an ageing process and then a fracture loading test using an electrodynamic testing machine. Fracture load and elongation at break values were taken and statistically analysed. RESULTS: Significant differences were detected between the different materials (p<0.05). All groups showed a reduction of the fracture load and elongation at break values after ageing, but not statistically significant, except for PMMA group (p = 2.012e-19) (p = 3.8e-11). CONCLUSIONS: MCR and PMMA-GR three-units FPDs showed higher fracture strength and lower elongation at break compared to PMMA. MCR and PMMA-GR had higher resistance to ageing processes compared to PMMA. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: PMMA-GR could be considered a material for long-term provisional restorations as its mechanical behaviour and ageing resistance are more like MCR than PMMA.

Peri-Implant Bone Augmentation by the Sub-Periosteal Peri-Implant Augmented Layer Technique and a Bovine-Derived Bone Block: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: When used with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) delivered as a particulate, the sub-periosteal peri-implant augmented layer (SPAL) technique was effective in completely correcting up to 92% of peri-implant buccal bone dehiscences. The use of a DBBM block (bDBBM), however, may result in an improvement of the peri-implant bone dehiscence as well as a relevant lateral bone augmentation since its mechanical properties may ensure a better dimensional stability at flap manipulation than particulate DBBM. The aim of the present a proof-of-principle case report is to investigate if SPAL may be successfully used to obtain bone augmentation at peri-implant dehi scence sites when used with bDBBM. CASE PRESENTATION: Lateral bone augmentation was performed using the SPAL technique at two implants showing a buccal peri-implant bone dehiscence immediately after their placement. A partial-thickness flap was elevated, leaving the periosteal layer on the buccal cortical bone plate. The periosteal layer was, in turn, elevated to create a pouch, which was used to stabilize a bDBBM graft at the peri-implant buccal bone dehiscences. At re-entry, exposed implant surfaces were completely covered by new thick hard tissue up to their most coronal portion. A free epithelial-connective tissue graft was used to augment the peri-implant soft tissue phenotype. CONCLUSION: When used to accommodate bDBBM over the most coronal portion of an exposed implant, SPAL may successfully lead to an increase in peri-implant buccal tissue thickness.

Digital planning of composite customized veneers using Digital Smile Design: Evaluation of its accuracy and manufacturing.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the production of customized composite veneers starting from a two-dimensional (2D) digital preview using the Digital Smile System (DSS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A photographic examination of 30 patients was performed by taking two digital pictures of the face and a digital preview through the DSS. Moreover, optical scans of the dental arches were obtained and the data were entered into a three-dimensional (3D) software to prepare a virtual preview. The standard tessellation language files were sent for production using CAD-CAM technology. The Friedman test, Bonferroni, and Dunn post hoc tests were used, comparing the linear measurements of the 2D and 3D plans and the final veneers (α = .05). RESULTS: Significant differences emerged between the pictures and digital scans on the mesial-distal widths of the lateral incisors and canine. Linear measurements in the 2D plan were significantly different from those of the 3D plan, except for the height measures of incisors. No significant changes were found on comparing the parameters of the 2D and 3D plans with those of the final pieces. CONCLUSIONS: The customized veneers were clinically adequate and similar to 2D and 3D plans, although significant differences emerged between the picture and digital scans as well as between the 2D and 3D plans.

A comparison of accuracy between three different facial detection systems for prosthodontic esthetic preview: a single-blinded in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of 3 different devices for facial images acquisition, useful for prosthodontic esthetic preview. METHODS: Bidimensional extraoral photographs (Nikon D300), facial scans (Bellus3D) and 3D digital stereophotogrammetry photos (3dMD Face System) were acquired from 15 patients. The intraoral impressions of all subjects were digitally taken through a scanner (i500; Medit). Files obtained from each acquisition method were transferred on Exocad Software, and the measurements of the frontal teeth were performed and compared with those of the intraoral scans, assumed as reference. The data were statistically analyzed (Friedman and Dunn tests) with P<0.05. RESULTS: As for central and lateral incisors, no significant difference emerged between 2D digital photography and intraoral scans, both in height and width. Measures obtained with Bellus3D significantly differed from the reference data in width of all teeth, except for central incisors. Values referred to canines were those more subjected to significant distortions in width for all devices. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this study, measures of frontal teeth acquired by 2D digital photography were similar to those of intraoral scans both in height and width, while those obtained with 3D facial scanners were more subjected to distortions in mesial-distal dimension.