Deep learning-based automated detection of the dental crown finish line: An accuracy study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The marginal fit of dental prostheses is a clinically significant issue, and dental computer-aided design software programs use automated methods to expedite the extraction of finish lines. The accuracy of these automated methods should be evaluated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a new hybrid method with existing software programs that extract finish lines using fully automated and semiautomated methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 182 jaw scans containing at least 1 natural tooth abutment were collected and divided into 2 groups depending on how the digital data were created. Group DS used desktop scanners to scan casts trimmed for improved finish line visibility, while Group IS used intraoral scans. The method from Dentbird was compared using 3 software packages from 3Shape, exocad, and MEDIT. The Hausdorff and Chamfer distances were used in this study. Three dental laboratory technicians experienced in the digital workflow evaluated clinical finish line acceptance and its Hausdorff and Chamfer distances. For statistical analysis, t tests were performed after the outliers had been removed using the Tukey interquartile range method (α=.05). RESULTS: Outliers identified by using the Tukey interquartile range method were more numerous in the semiautomatic methods than in the automatic methods. When considering data without outliers, the software performance was found to be similar for desktop scans of the trimmed casts. However, the method from Dentbird demonstrated statistically better results (P<.05) for the posterior tooth with finish lines in concave regions than the 3Shape, exocad, and MEDIT software programs. Furthermore, thresholds coherent with clinical acceptance were determined for the Hausdorff and Chamfer distances. The Hausdorff distance threshold was 0.366 mm for desktop scans and 0.566 mm for intraoral scans. For the Chamfer distance, the threshold was 0.026 for desktop scans and 0.100 for intraoral scans. CONCLUSIONS: The method from Dentbird demonstrated a comparable or better performance than the other software solutions, particularly excelling in finish line extraction for intraoral scans. Using a hybrid method combining deep learning and computer-aided design approaches enables the robust and accurate extraction of finish lines.

Trueness and surface characteristics of 3-dimensional printed casts made with different technologies.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Three-dimensional (3D) printers should be capable of fabricating products with high accuracy for potential use in a wide range of dental applications. The trueness and surface characteristics of 3D-printed casts made with different technologies remain unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the trueness and surface characteristics of 4 types of dental casts printed using 6 different 3D printers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four dental casts prepared for intracoronal and extracoronal restorations were printed using 6 different 3D printers-2 printers of each printing technology (FDM: Creator, Lugo; DLP: D2, ND5100; SLA: Form 2, Form 3). The printed casts were scanned to obtain standard tessellation language (STL) data sets that were superimposed onto the reference to evaluate their trueness (n=15). Trueness was measured based on overall deviations for each cast and for sectional deviations within the cavities. For qualitative evaluation, the surface characteristics of the 3D-printed casts were analyzed by using a digital camera, stereomicroscope, and scanning electron microscope. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by multiple Mann-Whitney U tests for pairwise comparisons among groups (α=.05). RESULTS: The overall median trueness values were lowest with the Form 3 (27.9 µm), followed by the ND5100 (30.0 µm), Lugo (37.1 µm), D2 (41.4 µm), Form 2 (46.9 µm), and Creator (83.3 µm) (P<.05). Sectional deviations within the cavity were generally greater than overall deviation. Macroscopic and microscopic images showed that the reproduced casts had the smoothest surface with the SLA, followed by the DLP and FDM printers. Horizontal layers were more discernible with the FDM printer. CONCLUSIONS: The trueness of the 3D-printed casts was influenced by the type of tooth preparation and was printer dependent. Among the tested 3D printers, the Form 3 produced the most accurate casts, while the Creator produced the least accurate casts.

Comparative assessment of marginal and internal gaps of cast-free monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated from 2 intraoral scanners: A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Despite the introduction of intraoral scanners (IOSs) with dual camera triangulation, only a few comparative clinical studies have evaluated their clinical performances in the digital workflow for cast-free restorations. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical trial was to assess the clinical efficacy of 2 different technology-based IOSs by evaluating the marginal and internal gaps of cast-free monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using a fully digital workflow. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted in 35 participants requiring a single-unit restoration. One crown was fabricated from the scan data obtained with a confocal microscopy-based IOS (Group T), while the other was made with the scan data obtained from an IOS using dual camera triangulation (Group I). A replica technique was used to assess the marginal and internal gaps. The buccolingual and mesiodistal cross-sections were measured, and noninferiority trials were performed. RESULTS: A total of 39 teeth from 35 participants were restored with a single-unit crown. The marginal and axial wall gaps of the crowns in Group I was not inferior to that of the crowns in Group T (upper limit confidence interval [CI] <30). In contrast, the gap of the crowns at the line angle in Group T was inferior to that of the crowns in Group I (lower limit CI <-30). From an occlusal space perspective, the gap of the crowns in Group I was inferior to that of the crowns in Group T (upper limit CI >30). Twenty-five crowns were selected from Group I, and 14 crowns were selected from Group T for definitive placement. CONCLUSIONS: The marginal gap of the crown fabricated by using the scan data obtained from the dual camera triangulation-based IOS was noninferior to that obtained from the confocal microscopy-based IOS and was within the clinically applicable limit.

Assessment of tooth displacement during the cast-free digital processing of milled dentures.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Denture tooth displacement may have a significant impact on denture occlusion. This aspect has seldom been investigated, especially for digital denture processing techniques. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the accuracy of tooth position with milled digital dentures processed without physical casts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten maxillary and 10 mandibular dentures designed from intraoral scans, milled, and processed without physical casts were investigated. The standard tessellation language (STL) files of the digitally designed dentures were compared with the scan of the dentures after processing (milling the denture base, milling teeth in a complete arch, and then bonding teeth into the base). The STL files were superimposed by using a surface-matching software program. After a preliminary alignment, the STL meshes were trimmed and reoriented; then, the final alignment was carried out by using the cameo surface. Six reference points (the mesiobuccal cusp on the most distal molar, the canine cusp, the middle of the incisal edge of the central incisor on both the left and the right side) were selected to measure tooth displacements along the X-, Y-, and Z-axes, corresponding (from the preliminary reorientation) to anteroposterior, mediolateral, and occlusal displacement, respectively. Tooth position accuracy was assessed by using median and interquartile range values. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were used to investigate the significance of the extent of displacements, as well as differences among displacement directions, reference teeth, side, and denture arch type (α=.05). RESULTS: Only the median (0.2 mm; interquartile range: 0.27 mm) occlusal displacement was significantly different from zero. A generalized estimated equation model addressing occlusal displacement as a dependent variable showed no significant effect of tooth type, side, or denture arch type, either alone or in combination. CONCLUSIONS: The tooth position of both maxillary and mandibular milled digital dentures processed without physical casts was accurate in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions. Occlusal displacement seemed to be within the range of clinical acceptability; its consistency throughout the arch allowed optimization or compensation at the design or manufacturing step.

Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using customized three-dimensionally printed polycaprolactone mesh in atrophic posterior maxillae: a case report.

Polycaprolactone has exhibited expediency as a biomaterial for bone regenerative procedures preclinically. The present report of the two clinical cases in the posterior maxilla is the first to describe clinical application of a customized 3D printed polycaprolactone mesh for alveolar ridge augmentation. Two patients needing extensive ridge augmentation procedures for dental implant therapy were selected. Polycaprolactone meshes were virtually designed, 3D printed and applied in combination with a xenogeneic bone substitute. Cone-beam computed tomography was taken pre-operatively, immediately after the surgery, and 1.5 to 2 years after the delivery of implant prostheses. The serial cone-beam computed tomography images were superimposed to measure the augmented height and width at 1 mm increments from the implant platform to 3 mm apically. After 2 years, the mean [maximum, minimum] bone gain was 6.05 [8.64, 2.85] mm vertically and 7.77 [10.03, 6.18] mm horizontally at 1 mm below the implant platform. From immediately postoperative to 2 years, there was 14 % reduction of augmented ridged height and 24 % reduction of augmented width at 1 mm below the platform. All implants placed in augmented sites were successfully maintained until 2 years. The customized Polycaprolactone mesh might be a viable material for ridge augmentation in the atrophic posterior maxilla. This needs to be confirmed through randomized controlled clinical trials in future studies.

Quality of life in patients in South Korea requiring special care after fixed implants: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The study on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of disabled patients is rare but critical for welfare of patients. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of fixed implants in edentulous areas on OHRQoL in Korean disabled patients. METHODS: The OHRQoL of 63 disabled individuals was evaluated using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14 questionnaires and studied by potential affecting variables such as age, sex, disability severity, and time of disability acquisition. Wilcoxon-signed rank tests were used to examine the OHIP-14 scores for those who had pre/post-fixed implants. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between factors and OHIP-14 scores before and after implants. A partial correlation analysis was also performed to determine which variables influenced OHIP-14 scores before and after treatment. The Mann-Whitney test was employed for sex and time of disability acquisition analysis (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Significant improvement was found in OHIP-14 post-implant treatment scores (P < .001). After implant treatment, the severity of disability produced significantly different results (P = .009). Pearson's correlation coefficient between severity of disability and pre/post-implant OHIP-14 scores was 0.265 (P = .030). After controlling for severity of disability, the results showed older patients had lower OHIP-14 scores (P = .032). No differences were found for sex or time of disability acquisition (congenital vs. acquired). CONCLUSIONS: Fixed implant treatment improved OHRQoL for disabled patients, and the severity of disability was positively correlated with improvement of OHRQoL. For patients with a similar level of disability, the OHRQoL decreased with age.

Evaluation of different registration methods and dental restorations on the registration duration and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral scans: a retrospective clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the accuracy and duration of registration for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans differ according to the method of registration and ratio of dental restorations to natural teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT data and intraoral scans of eligible patients were grouped as follows according to the ratio of the number of dental restorations to the number of natural teeth (N): group 1, N = 0%; group 2, 0% < N < 50%; group 3, 50% ≤ N < 100%; and group 4, 100% ≤ N. Marker-free registration was performed with a deep learning-based platform and four implant planning software with different registration methods (two point-based, one surface-based, and one manual registration software) by a single operator, and the time consumption was recorded. Registration accuracy was evaluated by measuring the distances between the three-dimensional models of CBCT data and intraoral scans. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients, one jaw per patient, were enrolled. Although registration accuracy was similar, the time consumed for registration significantly differed for the different methods. The deep learning-based registration method consumed the least time. Greater proportions of dental restorations significantly reduced the registration accuracy for semi-automatic and deep learning-based methods and reduced the time consumed for semi-automatic registration. CONCLUSIONS: No superiority in registration accuracy was found. The proportion of dental restorations significantly affects the accuracy and duration of registration for CBCT data and intraoral scans. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: KCT0006710 CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Registration accuracy for virtual implant planning decreases when the proportion of dental restorations increases regardless of registration methods.

Application of additive and subtractive manufacturing technology for a digitally fabricated removable partial denture after a partial maxillectomy: A clinical report.

This clinical report describes the treatment of a patient with a large defect area in the maxillary central incisor, left lateral incisor, canine, and first premolar area after a partial maxillectomy. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) techniques including rapid prototyping and milling were applied together to fabricate a removable partial denture.

An in vitro comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of ultrathin occlusal veneers made of 3D-printed zirconia, milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Whether additively produced zirconia could overcome problems with conventional computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) such as milling inaccuracies and provide accurate occlusal veneers is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed zirconia occlusal veneers with CAD-CAM-fabricated zirconia or heat-pressed lithium disilicate ceramic (LS2) restorations on molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The occlusal enamel in 60 extracted human molars was removed, with the preparation extending into dentin. Occlusal veneers at a thickness of 0.5 mm were designed and manufactured according to their group allocation: 3DP, 3D-printed zirconia; CAM, milled zirconia; and HPR, heat-pressed LS2. The prepared teeth and restorations were scanned and superimposed, and the marginal and internal adaptation were measured 2- and 3-dimensionally; the production accuracy (trueness) was also measured. The comparisons of the group medians were performed with nonparametric methods and a pairwise group comparison (α=.05). RESULTS: Three-dimensionally printed zirconia revealed median outcomes of 95 µm (margin), 252 µm (cusp), 305 µm (fossa), and 184 µm (3D internal adaptation). CAM showed median values of 65 µm (margin), 128 µm (cusp), 203 µm (fossa), and 120 µm (3D internal adaptation). The respective values for the group HPR were 118 µm (margin), 251 µm (cusp), 409 µm (fossa), and 180 µm (3D internal adaptation). Significant differences (P<.001) between CAM and 3DP (cusp, fossa, 3D internal adaptation) and between CAM and HPR (all regions) were found, with the former group showing higher accuracies. The trueness showed median discrepancies of 26 µm (3DP), 13 µm (CAM), and 29 µm (HPR) with significant differences (P<.001) for the comparisons 3DP-CAM and CAM-HPR. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensionally printed zirconia occlusal veneers produced by means of lithography-based ceramic manufacturing exhibit a marginal adaptation (95 µm) and a production accuracy (26 µm) similar to those of conventional methods.

Effects of postpolymerization conditions on the physical properties, cytotoxicity, and dimensional accuracy of a 3D-printed dental restorative material.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Although the introduction of high-speed 3-dimensional (3D) printing technology has significantly reduced printing time, the time required for postpolymerization is a speed-determining step because of the long wait time. How postpolymerization conditions affect material properties is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the physical properties, accuracy, and biosafety of a 3D-printed dental restorative material according to postpolymerization conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specimens were prepared by 3D printing with a digital light processing 3D printer with 1 interim dental material (C&B MFH). All printed specimens underwent a postpolymerization process with 5 different postpolymerization devices and were designated as groups D1 (D102H), FO (Form Cure), LC (LC-3DPrintBox), ME (Medusa), and MP (MP100). The light intensity and temperature of each device were measured, and the Vickers hardness, flexural strength and modulus, degree of conversion (DC), cytotoxicity, and polymerization shrinkage were analyzed. Statistical analyses were conducted with 1-way analysis of variance, the Tukey post hoc test, and regression testing (α=.05). Scanning electron microscopy was used to assess the fracture surface characteristics of the specimens. RESULTS: Light intensity was strongest with the ME device, and the temperature inside the device during postpolymerization showed the highest increase with the LC device and the lowest increase with the D1 device. The LC group specimens showed the highest mean Vickers hardness, and the MP group showed the lowest. The flexural strength was ≥100 MPa in all groups, with a flexural modulus ranging from 1.17 to 1.5 GPa. The DC results were similar to the physical properties test results. The D1, FO, LC, and ME groups all showed ≥70% cell viability, indicating no toxicity. The FO group showed the highest shrinkage rate of 0.52%. CONCLUSIONS: When the light intensity was strong, the surface was sufficiently hard, and toxic substances were not eluted even after a short postpolymerization time, suggesting that light intensity modulation and time management can be used to improve the postpolymerization process.

Dental students' perceptions on a simulated practice using patient-based customised typodonts during the transition from preclinical to clinical education.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Dental students experience difficulties during the transition from preclinical to clinical curriculum. In order to help the students to adapt to the clinical education programme, a simulated practice using patient-based customised models was introduced in this study to prepare for their first clinical practice. METHODS: This study included 45 third-year predoctoral students (D3 students) who were about to perform the preparation of a single crown abutment on their first patient. After practicing abutment preparation using simulated models and providing the actual treatment to their own patient, the students were surveyed to investigate their perceptions on the simulated practice using the 3D-printed customised typodont model. The statistical analysis of the quantitative data and the thematic analysis of the qualitative data were conducted. RESULTS: Regarding this simulation, more than 80% of the students gave positive feedback on their practice of (a) operative positions and postures, (b) finger rest, (c) occlusal reduction, (d) axial reduction and (e) proximal reduction. Student responses on the open-ended questions about how they perceived the usefulness of this simulation were categorised as "First clinical case," "Patient-based model" and "Realistic simulation environment." In addition, a number of improvements of the simulation were also suggested by the students including the typodont and the manikin. CONCLUSIONS: This study gives insights into the significance of simulated practice using patient-based customised typodonts as a transitional education tool and its direction of development in the field of restorative treatments accompanied by irreversible tooth preparations.

Trueness of intraoral scanners in digitizing specific locations at the margin and intaglio surfaces of intracoronal preparations.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Studies evaluating the trueness of intraoral scanners (IOSs) at anatomic locations within an intracoronal preparation are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the trueness of digital scans obtained by IOSs at the margin and intaglio surfaces of intracoronal preparations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six IOSs (CEREC Omnicam, E4D, FastScan, iTero, TRIOS, Zfx IntraScan) were used to obtain digital scans of various intracoronal preparations. Standard tessellation language (STL) data sets obtained from a reference scanner and each IOS were superimposed, and the deviation of the digital casts was assessed at multiple measuring points along the margin and intaglio surfaces of each preparation. The Kruskal-Wallis test and multiple Mann-Whitney tests were used to detect differences in trueness (α=.05). RESULTS: The overall median trueness values were lowest for TRIOS (23.9 µm), followed by Zfx IntraScan (24.6 µm), iTero (25.4 µm), FastScan (26.1 µm), CEREC Omnicam (26.9 µm), and E4D (77.5 µm). The greatest deviation was generally observed at the line angles between the preparation surfaces. The axiogingival line angle was the most error-prone location in the cavity preparations. An increased tendency to produce a more accurate impression was observed when the cavity had a greater width and more divergent walls. CONCLUSIONS: The trueness of digital scans was influenced by the type of IOS and the location within a prepared cavity. The trueness decreased at the line angles between the preparation surfaces, particularly at the axiogingival line angle. Among the tested IOSs, E4D produced the least accurate digital scans.

Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Although studies have reported the accuracy of 3D-printed dental casts, studies addressing cast distortion throughout the complete-arch range are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of different areas in complete-arch casts made with various 3D printing methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A computer-aided design (CAD) reference cast was modified from a mandibular cast by adding 6 cylinders in the canine, second premolar, and second molar locations and 3 spheres to define a coordinate system. A total of 50 casts were printed with 5 group materials, which included fused deposition modeling (FDM), digital light processing (DLP1 and DLP2), photopolymer jetting (Polyjet), and stereolithography (SLA). After scanning the 3D printed casts, the overall consistency was examined by superimposing them on the CAD reference cast and measuring the deviations. For dimensional accuracy, cylinder top coordinates were extracted from each printed cast, and X-, Y-, and Z-deviations and the 3D deviation were calculated by subtracting the coordinates of the CAD reference cast from the cast values. Statistical analyses were conducted by the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney post hoc test (α=.05). Surface characteristics were examined with photographs and scanning electron micrographs. RESULTS: FDM showed more systemic deviations than DLP, Polyjet, and SLA from superimposing analysis (P<.01). In the X-axis, FDM and DLP showed contraction, while Polyjet and SLA showed expansion (P<.01). In the Y-axis, FDM showed forward deviations on the right side and DLP showed contraction (P<.01). Three-dimensional deviation at each cylinder location was lowest in the left canine region, and deviations increased with distance from this site in all groups. The qualitative features of casts varied among 3D printers in terms of shape, surface smoothness, and edge sharpness. CONCLUSIONS: FDM and DLP casts tended to contract, whereas casts in the Polyjet and SLA groups expanded buccolingually and anterioposteriorly. Vertically, deviations were smaller than those in the other directions.

Changes in mucogingival junction after an apically positioned flap with collagen matrix at sites with or without previous guided bone regeneration: A prospective comparative cohort study.

AIM: To assess changes in the position of the mucogingival junction (MGJ) after an apically positioned flap (APF) with collagen matrix performed at sites with or without previous guided bone regeneration (GBR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental implants were placed with or without GBR (group GBR or non-GBR) depending on the available ridge width in 30 patients with a limited width of keratinized mucosa (MGJ placed more coronally than the expected prosthetic margin). An apically positioned flap with collagen matrix was performed in both groups. Changes in the position of the MGJ from the day of an apically positioned flap up to 1, 3, and 12 months thereafter were assessed on digital scans (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints were the width and thickness of the keratinized mucosa, and the position of the mucosal margin. RESULTS: The position of the MGJ changed significantly from baseline to the first month, by 5.25 ± 2.10 and 4.40 ± 1.41 mm in groups GBR and non-GBR, respectively. Thereafter, the position remained stable in both groups up to 1 year (changes from baseline of 5.46 ± 2.28 and 4.58 ± 1.92 mm, respectively; p = .34). The position of the mucosal margin did not differ between groups GBR and non-GBR (-1.57 ± 2.04 and -1.75 ± 2.08 mm, respectively; p = .84), nor did the width of the keratinized mucosa (1.20 ± 1.03 and 0.99 ± 0.66 mm, p = .91) or its thickness (1.28 ± 0.44 and 1.40 ± 0.78 mm, p = .87). CONCLUSION: Apically positioned flap combined with a collagen matrix results in a more apical position of the MGJ at sites with or without GBR. Following a coronal shift during the first month after the apical positioning of the flap, the level of the MGJ remained stable.

Clinical factors influencing implant positioning by guided surgery using a nonmetal sleeve template in the partially edentulous ridge: Multiple regression analysis of a prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the positional accuracy of implants placed with a three-dimensionally printed template having nonmetal sleeves and to determine the contributing factors to observed deviations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty-seven implants placed in 72 patients were analyzed. Presurgical intraoral scans and cone-beam computed tomography images obtained before and after surgery were superimposed, and vertical, angular, platform, and apex deviations were measured between the virtually planned and actually placed positions. A multiple linear regression model was designed for identifying the contributing factors. Statistical significance was set at p < .05, with Bonferroni correction if necessary (p < .0167). RESULTS: A total of 187 implants demonstrated deviations of 0.65 [0.56, 0.75] mm (mean [95% confidence interval]) vertically, 3.59° [3.30°, 3.89°] angularly, 1.16 [1.04, 1.28] mm at platform, and 1.50 [1.36, 1.65] mm at apex. Implants placed in the mandible showed larger angular, platform, and apex deviations compared with those in the maxilla (p = .049, p = .014 and p = .003, respectively). Implants placed at the third or fourth nearest sites from the most-distal tooth had larger deviations than those placed at the first or second nearest sites, in vertical, platform, and apical aspects (p = .015, p = .011 andp = .018, respectively). This was only applicable to free-ending-supported templates (p < .0167), and anchor pin-supported free-ending templates (p < .0167). CONCLUSION: Using a three-dimensionally printed surgical template with a nonmetal sleeve in the partial edentulous ridge resulted in larger deviations in implants placed in the mandible or distal free-end third or fourth nearest site.

Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Although studies have reported the trueness and precision of intraoral scanners (IOSs), studies addressing the accuracy of IOSs in reproducing inlay preparations are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of representative IOSs in obtaining digital scans of inlay preparations and to evaluate whether the IOSs had sufficient depth of field to obtain accurate images of narrow and deep cavity preparations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Digital scans of a bimaxillary typodont with cavity preparations for inlay restorations on the maxillary first premolar, first and second molar, mandibular second premolar, and first molar were obtained using 6 IOSs (CEREC Omnicam, E4D, FastScan, iTero, TRIOS, and Zfx IntraScan). Standard tessellation language (STL) data sets were analyzed using the 3-dimensional analysis software (Geomagic Verify). Color-coded maps were used to compare the magnitude and pattern of general deviation of the IOSs with those of a reference scan. Each tooth prepared for inlay restoration was digitally cut out, and the trueness and precision of each IOS were measured using the superimposition technique. Statistical analyses were conducted using statistical software (α=.05). RESULTS: The trueness values were lowest with the FastScan (22.1 µm), followed by TRIOS (22.7 µm), CEREC Omnicam (23.2 µm), iTero (26.8 µm), Zfx IntraScan (36.4 µm), and E4D (46.2 µm). In general, the digital scans of more complicated cavity design showed more deviation. Color-coded maps showed positive vertical discrepancy with the E4D and negative vertical discrepancy with the Zfx IntraScan, especially on the cavity floor. Regarding precision, the highest value was observed in the E4D (37.7 µm), while the lowest value was observed with the TRIOS (7.0 µm). However, no significant difference was found between teeth with different inlay preparations. Scanning errors were more frequently seen in the cervical area. CONCLUSIONS: Different IOSs and types of cavity design influenced the accuracy of the digital scans. Scans of more complex cavity geometry generally showed higher deviation. The E4D exhibited the most deviation in both trueness and precision, followed by the Zfx IntraScan. The E4D and Zfx IntraScan appeared to have less depth of field than the others to obtain digital scans for inlay preparation with different heights.

Wear resistance of 3D-printed denture tooth resin opposing zirconia and metal antagonists.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Additive manufacturing technology can be used for denture bases and also denture teeth. Therefore, the mechanical properties of 3D-printed resin denture teeth should be evaluated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the wear resistance of 3D-printed denture tooth resin with that of conventionally prefabricated denture teeth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty substrate specimens were prepared with 5 kinds of resin denture teeth: 3D-printed denture tooth resin (DENTCA denture tooth resin; DENTCA, Inc), Artic 6 (Kulzer GmbH), Preference (Candulor AG), Premium 6 (Kulzer GmbH), and Surpass (GC Corp). The 3D-printed denture tooth specimens were made of methacrylate-based photopolymerized resin by stereolithography 3D printing. Antagonistic surfaces were made from zirconia by milling and from cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloy by 3D printing and casting. The specimens were loaded at 49 N for 30 000 cycles under thermocycling conditions in a mastication simulator. Wear resistance was measured by calculating the volume of substance lost. Wear surface characteristics were observed by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data (α=.05). RESULTS: The influence of the resin denture teeth and the type of antagonist were both statistically significant. The wear volume loss of the 3D-printed denture tooth resin was higher than that of Artic 6 and Preference when opposing the zirconia and the metal antagonists (P<.05). The 3D-printed denture tooth resin did not show a significant difference from Premium 6 with the zirconia and the metal antagonists or Surpass with the zirconia antagonist. From the SEM images, the specimens of the 3D-printed denture tooth resin showed a relatively smooth surface with the zirconia antagonist and exhibited cracks when opposed by the metal antagonist. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that 3D-printing by using resin materials provides adequate wear resistance for denture tooth use.

Effects of Scanning Strategy and Scanner Type on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: A New Approach for Assessing the Accuracy of Scanned Data.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the most reliable scanning strategy and scanner type, using a new protocol for assessing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of intraoral scan data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five different maxillary and mandibular typodont pairs (n = 10) and 2 intraoral scanners were used for the study. A reference scan for each arch was obtained with an industrial scanner. Scanning strategies were classified into 2 continuous methods-continuous scan in horizontal direction (CH group) and continuous scan with vertical rotation in anterior region (CV group)-and 1 segmental method (S group). In the CH group, the scanner head was maintained mostly in a horizontal position. In the CV group, the scanners were rotated 180° around the anterior tooth region to allow smooth scanning through the area. The intraoral scan data were individually superimposed over their corresponding reference scan data. Raw data of the distances between paired surface points were extracted from the superimposed pairs of datasets, with (original distance values) or without consideration (absolute distance values) of the value signs. Trueness values were calculated using absolute distance values, while precision values were obtained from original distance values. Data were analyzed with a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance using α = 0.05 as the level of significance. RESULTS: The CV group produced significantly inferior outcomes compared to the CH and S groups in terms of trueness (p < 0.001, F = 24.67), whereas no significant differences were observed among the 3 scanning strategies with respect to precision (p = 0.451, F = 0.83). Scanner type did not produce significant differences in terms of either trueness (p = 0.058, F = 4.72) or precision (p = 0.742, F = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The segmental approach for scanning the region of interest first and continuous scanning with the scanner head held mostly in a horizontal position are both acceptable as full-arch scanning strategies. However, vertical rotation of intraoral scanners should be minimized.

Digital workflow to provide an immediate interim restoration after single-implant placement by using a surgical guide and a matrix-positioning device.

This article describes a workflow based on a top-down approach to provide a fixed-type immediate interim restoration after placing a single implant using a digitally driven surgical guide and a matrix-positioning device. A characteristic of the technique is that both the surgical guide and the matrix-positioning device are fabricated from a single diagnostic virtual trial restoration designed on computer-aided design (CAD) software. This workflow may shorten the time required for chairside placement of an interim restoration and enhance esthetics when rehabilitating anterior teeth.

Integration of intraoral digital scans with a 3D facial scan for anterior tooth rehabilitation.

This article describes a digital technique that combines intraoral digital scans with a 3-dimensional facial scan to predict the outcome of prosthodontic treatment of anterior teeth at the treatment planning phase. This approach may increase patient acceptance of the definitive treatment, as the altered facial appearance is visualized with definitive prosthodontic restorations, thereby improving communication before treatment begins.