Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Plast Surg ; 76(4): 406-10, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101973

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative fistulae and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) are 2 important complications after cleft palate repair. The effects of preoperative cleft width on outcomes after cleft palate repair have been rarely studied. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing primary cleft palatoplasty by a single surgeon between 2004 and 2011 was performed. Primary outcomes were palatal fistula and VPI, defined as the need for corrective surgery after failing conservative speech-language therapy. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the primary outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven patients (84 men and 93 women) were identified. Median age at repair was 10 months with median follow-up of 3.80 years. Preoperative cleft width was 10 mm or less for 72 (41%) patients, 11 to 14 mm for 54 (30%) patients, and 15 mm or greater for 51 (29%) patients. Palatal fistula was observed in 8 (4.5%) patients, but required surgical repair in only 2 (1.1%). Fistula was overall associated with Veau IV classification (odds ratio, 8.13; P < 0.01) but not with cleft width. Velopharyngeal insufficiency needing surgical intervention occurred in 9 patients (7.38% of patients older than 4 years) and was associated with increasing cleft width (odds ratio, 1.29; P = 0.011). Outcomes were similar for patients undergoing surgery in the earlier and later halves of the study. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review is one of the first from the United States to explore the associations between measured cleft width and outcomes after palatoplasty. Overall rates of palatal fistula and VPI were low, corroborating previous studies showing good outcomes with the 2-flap palatoplasty. After adjusting for multiple variables including Veau type, cleft width was associated with higher VPI rates but not with fistula formation. Cleft width is a unique preoperative factor that should be considered and studied as a potential predictor of outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Fisura del Paladar/patología , Fisura del Paladar/cirugía , Fístula Oral/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Insuficiencia Velofaríngea/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Fístula Oral/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Insuficiencia Velofaríngea/epidemiología
2.
Ann Plast Surg ; 75(3): 302-5, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25046662

RESUMEN

Most surgeons recommend cleft palate repair between 6 and 12 months of age. Internationally adopted patients often undergo delayed repair due to social circumstances. There are few outcomes studies on this population. We conducted a 13-year retrospective review of all patients undergoing primary cleft palate repair at a single tertiary-care academic medical center between 1993 and 2006. The primary outcome was velopharyngeal insufficiency, defined as the recommendation for corrective surgery after multiple formal speech assessments. Two hundred one patients (102 males and 99 females) were identified. One hundred eighty-three repairs were performed before 18 months of age (standard repair group). Eighteen repairs were performed after 18 months of age (delayed repair group), with international adoption being a circumstance in 16 cases. The delayed and standard repair groups were similar with regard to sex, presence of craniofacial syndrome, Veau class, cleft size and laterality, type of repair, and operating surgeon. Mean follow-up was 9.3 years, with minimum follow-up of 5.0 years. Six (33%) of 18 patients in the delayed repair group developed velopharyngeal insufficiency compared to 23 (13%) of 183 in the standard repair group (P = 0.03 by Fisher exact test). These data demonstrate that internationally adopted patients undergoing delayed palate repair suffer especially poor speech outcomes. Physiologic differences in patients undergoing late repair, as well as social factors including adaptation to a new language and culture, may be factors. Early repair should be performed when possible.


Asunto(s)
Adopción , Fisura del Paladar/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos , Insuficiencia Velofaríngea/etiología , Factores de Edad , Preescolar , Fisura del Paladar/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Cooperación Internacional , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Insuficiencia Velofaríngea/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Velofaríngea/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA