HBcrAg values may predict virological and immunological responses to pegIFN-α in NUC-suppressed HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.

OBJECTIVE: Selected populations of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may benefit from a combined use of pegylated interferon-alpha (pegIFN-α) and nucleos(t)ides (NUCs). The aim of our study was to assess the immunomodulatory effect of pegIFN-α on T and natural killer (NK) cell responses in NUC-suppressed patients to identify cellular and/or serological parameters to predict better T cell-restoring effect and better control of infection in response to pegIFN-α for a tailored application of IFN-α add-on. DESIGN: 53 HBeAg-negative NUC-treated patients with CHB were randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive pegIFN-α-2a for 48 weeks, or to continue NUC therapy and then followed up for at least 6 months maintaining NUCs. Serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels as well as peripheral blood NK cell phenotype and function and HBV-specific T cell responses upon in vitro stimulation with overlapping HBV peptides were measured longitudinally before, during and after pegIFN-α therapy. RESULTS: Two cohorts of pegIFN-α treated patients were identified according to HBsAg decline greater or less than 0.5 log at week 24 post-treatment. PegIFN-α add-on did not significantly improve HBV-specific T cell responses during therapy but elicited a significant multispecific and polyfunctional T cell improvement at week 24 post-pegIFN-α treatment compared with baseline. This improvement was maximal in patients who had a higher drop in serum HBsAg levels and a lower basal HBcrAg values. CONCLUSIONS: PegIFN-α treatment can induce greater functional T cell improvement and HBsAg decline in patients with lower baseline HBcrAg levels. Thus, HBcrAg may represent an easily and reliably applicable parameter to select patients who are more likely to achieve better response to pegIFN-α add-on to virally suppressed patients.

Peginterferon-α does not improve early peripheral blood HBV-specific T-cell responses in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The effect of IFN-α therapy on HBV-specific T-cell responses in HBeAg-negative, genotype D, chronic hepatitis B is largely undefined. Understanding to what extent IFN-α can modulate HBV-specific T-cells is important to define strategies to optimize IFN efficacy and to identify immunological parameters to predict response to therapy. METHODS: HBV-specific T-cell responses were analyzed longitudinally ex vivo and after expansion in vitro in 15 patients with genotype D, HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B treated with peginterferon-α-2a. HBV proteins and synthetic peptides were used to stimulate T-cell responses. Analysis of the CD4 and CD8 T-cell functions was performed by ELISPOT, intracellular cytokine and tetramer staining. The effect of anti-PD-L1 on T-cell functions was also analyzed. RESULTS: Ex vivo IFN-γ production by total HBV-specific T-cells was significantly greater before therapy in patients who showed HBV DNA <50 IU/ml at weeks 24 and/or 48 of therapy. No significant improvement of T-cell proliferation, Th1 cytokine production and cytotoxicity was observed during IFN therapy by both ex vivo and in vitro analysis. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade showed a modest improvement of cytokine production in a total of 15% of T-cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: IFN-α did not improve peripheral blood HBV-specific T-cell responses in the first 24 weeks of treatment, consistent either with a predominant antiviral/antiproliferative effect or with an immunomodulatory activity on other arms of the immune system which were not analyzed in our study. A better pre-treatment ex vivo IFN-γ production was associated with better chances to control HBV replication during therapy and represents a promising predictor of IFN efficacy.

HCV-specific T-cell response in relation to viral kinetics and treatment outcome (DITTO-HCV project).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The second slope of viral decline induced by interferon treatment has been suggested to be influenced mainly by the hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific T-cell response; however, this hypothesis needs to be validated by results derived from experimental studies. METHODS: To address this issue, the HCV-specific T-cell response of 32 genotype-1-infected patients of the 270 patients enrolled in the dynamically individualized treatment of hepatitis C infection and correlates of viral/host dynamics phase III, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial was studied in relation to viral kinetics and treatment outcome. RESULTS: Greater proliferative responses by HCV-specific CD8 cells were found before treatment in patients with a fast viral decline and with a sustained viral response. However, no significant improvement of HCV-specific CD8 responses was observed in the first weeks of therapy in both rapid viral responder and non-rapid viral responder patients. A mild enhancement of proliferative T-cell responses and a partial restoration of the cytotoxic T-cell potential was expressed only late during treatment, likely favored by HCV clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Early restoration of an efficient T-cell response does not seem to be an essential requirement for a rapid viral decline in the first weeks of treatment. However, patients presenting a better HCV-specific CD8 cell proliferative potential at baseline are more likely to present a rapid and sustained viral response. Therefore, future treatment protocols should consider the development of strategies aimed at improving HCV-specific T-cell responses.