Is Le Fort I Osteotomy Associated With Maxillary Sinusitis?

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association between Le Fort I osteotomy and the anatomic, radiologic, and symptomatic modifications of the maxillary sinus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects who had undergone Le Fort I osteotomy from January 2008 to December 2013 were enrolled in a retrospective cohort study. The eligibility criteria were the availability of a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan taken before and 12 to 24 months after the procedure. The exclusion criteria were the unavailability of CBCT scans, the use of tobacco, and previous orthognathic procedures. The primary predictor variable was time (pre-vs postoperative). The primary outcome variables were the sinus volume, mucosal thickening, iatrogenic alterations in the sinus anatomy, and rhinosinusitis symptoms, evaluated using the Sino-Nasal Outcome 20-item Test (SNOT-20). Descriptive statistics were computed for each variable, and paired analyses were used to compare the pre- and postoperative values. RESULTS: The data from 64 subjects (mean age 27; 59.4% were female; median follow-up 32.4 months, range 13 to 66 months) were studied. Postoperatively, 1.6% of the sample (0% preoperatively) had moderate-to-severe and 15.6% (3.1% preoperatively) had mild-to-moderate sinusitis symptoms. The rest of the sample presented with mild to no symptoms. The increase in the SNOT scores after surgery was statistically significant (P = .016). Radiologic evidence of postoperative inflammatory processes affecting the paranasal sinuses was found in 27.3% of the sinuses (9.4% preoperatively). The postoperative Lund-Mackay scores were significantly greater (P = .0005). A 19% decrease was found in the mean postoperative sinus volume, with a 37% incidence of iatrogenic injury. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that Le Fort I osteotomies can have an important impact on sinus health. The postoperative radiologic evidence of maxillary sinus inflammatory processes and the incidence of rhinosinusitis symptoms and iatrogenic damage in these patients have led us to conclude that CBCT scans and the SNOT-20 questionnaire should be used routinely during postoperative monitoring. Larger long-term studies are warranted to clarify the postoperative outcomes and complications.

Are Zygomatic Implants Associated With Maxillary Sinusitis?

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to analyze the relation between zygomatic implants and symptomatic and radiologic modifications of the maxillary sinuses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent zygomatic implant rehabilitation at the Clinic of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery of the University of Verona from January 2005 through May 2014 was designed. The primary predictor variable was time (pre- vs postoperative). Concerning outcome variables, radiologic findings of thickened mucosa or opacification of the maxillary sinuses were evaluated on computed tomograms using the Lund-Mackay Staging System. Clinical symptoms were evaluated using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20). The parameters assessed underwent descriptive statistical analysis. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 41 patients (mean age, 54 yr; 61% women). Preoperatively, 12% had sinus findings. Postoperatively, 46% had sinus findings (P = .0001 by McNemar paired test). Preoperatively, 12% had a SNOT-20 score higher than 11. Postoperatively, 15% had a SNOT-20 score higher than 11 (P = 1 by McNemar paired test). CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with data in the literature data, placement of zygomatic implants does not seem to be associated with severe rhinosinusitis complications. However, in a considerable number of patients, asymptomatic radiologic alterations of the paranasal sinuses were observed. Therefore, it is important to plan assessments of the prosthetic and peri-implant components of the procedure and the postoperative homeostasis of the maxillary sinuses.