Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater: Progress in resource and energy recovery improvement approaches.

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) offer promise in municipal wastewater treatment, with potential benefits including high-quality effluent, energy recovery, sludge reduction, and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. However, AnMBR face hurdles like membrane fouling, low energy recovery, etc. In light of net-zero carbon target and circular economy strategy, this work sought to evaluate novel AnMBR configurations, focusing on performance, fouling mitigation, net-energy generation, and nutrients-enhancing integrated configurations, such as forward osmosis (FO), membrane distillation (MD), bioelectrochemical systems (BES), membrane photobioreactor (MPBR), and partial nitrification-anammox (PN/A). In addition, we highlight the essential role of AnMBR in advancing the circular economy and propose ideas for the water-energy-climate nexus. While AnMBR has made significant progress, challenges, such as fouling and cost-effectiveness persist. Overall, the use of novel configurations and energy recovery strategies can further improve the sustainability and efficiency of AnMBR systems, making them a promising technology for future sustainable municipal wastewater treatment.

Characterization of reciprocation membrane bioreactor on treatment performance, energy consumption and membrane fouling.

Two reciprocating membranes (rMBR) with two frequencies of 0.46 Hz (rMBR-0.46) and 0.3 Hz (rMBR-0.3) were operated to compare the treatment performance and gross energy consumption with a conventional MBR. The average organic removal rates of MBR, rMBR-0.46 and rMBR-0.3 were maintained 295 ± 51; 823 ± 296; and 397 ± 129 mgCOD/gVSS.d, respectively. Nitrogen removal was enhanced in rMBR phases compared to conventional MBR phase due to anoxic membrane chamber. Further, fouling rate was found to be highest of 16.5 mbar/day (at conventional MBR phase), which was and much decreased to1.0 mbar/day (at rMBR-0.46 phase) and then 0.2 mbar/day (rMBR-0.3 phase). The reciprocation membrane also showed energy potential by saving 10.6% electricity for each treated cubic meter of wastewater compared to the conventional MBR.