Serum ferritin as a predictor of treatment outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVES: Antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) involves ribavirin, a hemolytic agent. We planned a prospective study to evaluate whether drug-induced iron perturbation is clinically relevant as it relates to therapeutic outcome. METHODS: Iron variables were sequentially assessed in 206 CHC patients undergoing antiviral therapy and were correlated with pretreatment iron status and histology, hemolysis, and therapeutic outcome. RESULTS: At week 1 of therapy, serum iron (SI), transferrin saturation (TS), and serum ferritin (SF) increased markedly in all patients. All iron parameters correlated with hemolysis up to week 4; this correlation was lost for SF at later time points. SF rise during treatment was inversely related to baseline SF and iron deposits in hepatic mesenchymal/Kupffer cells. Both baseline SF and mesenchymal iron significantly correlated with fibrosis at multivariate analysis (P=0.015 and 0.008, respectively). Interestingly, baseline SF, despite good specificity (89%), had low sensitivity in predicting siderosis (25%). During therapy, SI, TS, and hemolysis parameters did not correlate with sustained virological response (SVR), whereas SF rise became an independent predictor of therapeutic response: a 2.5-fold increase of SF at week 12 associated with higher likelihood of SVR (odds ratio 1.91, P=0.032). Accordingly, lack of mesenchymal iron deposits at the baseline biopsy correlated with SVR (odds ratio 3.02, P=0.043). CONCLUSIONS: In CHC, SF is a useful marker for assessing disease duration and progression before starting treatment and for predicting therapeutic response while on therapy. SF rise during antiviral therapy is largely independent of hemolysis and likely indicates activation of macrophages in response to antivirals.

What to start with in first line treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients: an Italian multicentre observational cohort, HBV-RER study group.

Treatment options for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) in minimal-mild liver fibrosis and nucleot(s)ide analogues (NUC) in more advanced disease. Since little is known about their use in daily clinical practice, we conducted a multicentre prospective study to investigate treatment regimens applied to naïve CHB patients in real life. HBV-RER is an observational multicentre Italian network that collect clinic and virologic data of patients with CHB. Among the 2527 CHB patients seen during the study period (2009 - 2012), 502 patients started a first line antiviral treatment. Liver biopsy was performed in 30.9% of the patients, with high levels of fibrosis being detected in 19.4% of them. In 216 patients (43%) Peg-IFN was used as first-line therapy while the remaining patients started NUC therapy (entecavir and tenofovir in 75%, lamivudine in 15%, telbivudine and adefovir 10%). By multivariate logistic regression, an age under 40 (OR 0.92, 95%IC 0.90-0.94; p <0.001) and the execution of liver biopsy (OR 3.83; 95%IQR 1.76-8.36; p <0.001) were the only determinants of choice between Peg-IFN vs NUC. Peg-IFN was expected to be used in first-line treatment for CHB in 70% of the patients based on Italian recommendations, but a much lower proportion of patients were actually treated with Peg-IFN with a limited use of the biopsy. Thus, in daily clinical practice physicians prefer to use NUCs, presumably because of their optimal tolerability and anti-viral efficacy, even if they frequently require life-long treatment as opposed to the short duration of Peg-IFN.