Mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty: influence of cement type, BMD, fracture severity, and disc degeneration.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures can be treated by injecting bone cement into the damaged vertebral body. "Vertebroplasty" is becoming popular but the procedure has yet to be optimised. This study compared the ability of two different types of cement to restore the spine's mechanical properties following fracture, and it examined how the mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty depends on bone mineral density (BMD), fracture severity, and disc degeneration. METHODS: A pair of thoracolumbar "motion-segments" (two adjacent vertebrae with intervening soft tissue) was obtained from each of 15 cadavers, aged 51-91 years. Specimens were loaded to induce vertebral fracture; then one of each pair underwent vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement, the other with another composite material (Cortoss). Specimens were creep loaded for 2 h to allow consolidation. At each stage of the experiment, motion segment stiffness in bending and compression was measured, and the distribution of compressive loading on the vertebrae was investigated by pulling a miniature pressure transducer through the intervertebral disc. Pressure measurements, repeated in flexed and extended postures, indicated the intradiscal pressure (IDP) and neural arch compressive load-bearing (F(N)). BMD was measured using DXA. Fracture severity was quantified from height loss. RESULTS: Vertebral fracture reduced motion segment stiffness in bending and compression, by 31% and 43% respectively (p<0.001). IDP fell by 43-62%, depending on posture (p<0.001), whereas F(N) increased from 14% to 37% of the applied load in flexion, and from 39% to 61% in extension (p<0.001). Vertebroplasty partially reversed all these effects, and the restoration of load-sharing was usually sustained after creep-consolidation. No differences were observed between PMMA and Cortoss. Pooled results from 30 specimens showed that low BMD was associated with increased fracture severity (in terms of height loss) and with greater changes in stiffness and load-sharing following fracture. Specimens with low BMD and more severe fractures also showed the greatest mechanical changes following vertebroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Low vertebral BMD leads to greater changes in stiffness and spinal load-sharing following fracture. Restoration of mechanical function following vertebroplasty is little influenced by cement type but may be greater in people with low BMD who suffer more severe fractures.

Is kyphoplasty better than vertebroplasty at restoring form and function after severe vertebral wedge fractures?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The vertebral augmentation procedures, vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, can relieve pain and facilitate mobilization of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Kyphoplasty also aims to restore vertebral body height before cement injection and so may be advantageous for more severe fractures. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty to restore vertebral height, shape, and mechanical function after severe vertebral wedge fractures. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a biomechanical and radiographic study using human cadaveric spines. METHODS: Seventeen pairs of thoracolumbar "motion segments" from cadavers aged 70-98 years were injured, in a two-stage process involving flexion and compression, to create severe anterior wedge fractures. One of each pair underwent vertebroplasty and the other kyphoplasty. Specimens were then compressed at 1 kN for 1 hour to allow consolidation. Radiographs were taken before and after injury, after treatment, and after consolidation. At these same time points, motion segment compressive stiffness was assessed, and intervertebral disc "stress profiles" were obtained to characterize the distribution of compressive stress on the vertebral body and neural arch. RESULTS: On average, injury reduced anterior vertebral body height by 34%, increased its anterior wedge angle from 5.0° to 11.4°, reduced intradiscal (nucleus) pressure and motion segment stiffness by 96% and 44%, respectively, and increased neural arch load bearing by 57%. Kyphoplasty caused 97% of the anterior height loss to be regained immediately, although this reduced to 79% after consolidation. Equivalent gains after vertebroplasty were significantly lower: 59% and 47%, respectively (p<.001). Kyphoplasty reduced vertebral wedging more than vertebroplasty (p<.02). Intradiscal pressure, neural arch load bearing, and motion segment compressive stiffness were restored significantly toward prefracture values after both augmentation procedures, even after consolidation, but these mechanical effects were similar for kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: After severe vertebral wedge fractures, vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty were equally effective in restoring mechanical function. However, kyphoplasty was better able to restore vertebral height and reverse wedge deformity.

Discogenic origins of spinal instability.

STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric motion segment experiment. OBJECTIVE: To show how two physical aspects of disc degeneration (dehydration and endplate disruption) contribute to spinal instability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The origins of spinal instability and its associations with back pain are uncertain. METHODS.: Twenty-one cadaveric thoracolumbar motion segments aged 48 to 90 years were secured in cups of dental plaster and loaded simultaneously in bending and compression to simulate full flexion, extension, and lateral bending movements. Vertebral movements, recorded using a two-dimensional "MacReflex" motion analysis system, were analyzed to calculate neutral zone (NZ), range of motion (ROM), bending stiffness (BS), horizontal translational movements, and the location of the center of rotation (COR). Intradiscal "stresses" were measured by pulling a miniature pressure transducer through the disc along its midsagittal diameter. All experiments were repeated after each of two treatments, which simulated physical aspects of disc degeneration: creep loading to dehydrate the disc and compressive overload to disrupt the endplate. Results were analyzed using ANOVA and linear regression. RESULTS: Motion segment height was reduced by 1.0 (SD 0.3) mm during creep and by a further 1.7 (0.6) mm after endplate disruption. In flexion and lateral bending, the combined treatments increased NZ and ROM by 89% to 298%, and increased the "instability index" (NZ/ROM) by 43% to 61%. Translational movements increased by 58% to 86%, whereas BS decreased by 42% to 48%. In extension, ROM and NZ were little affected, although the COR moved closer to the apophyseal joints. Measures of instability increased most in lateral bending, and following endplate disruption. Stress concentrations in the posterior anulus fibrosus increased markedly after endplate disruption. CONCLUSIONS: Two physical aspects of disc degeneration (dehydration and endplate disruption) cause marked segmental instability. Back pain associated with instability may be attributable to stress concentrations in degenerated discs.

Can vertebroplasty restore normal load-bearing to fractured vertebrae?

STUDY DESIGN: Cadaver motion segments were used to evaluate the effects of vertebroplasty on spinal loading following vertebral fracture. OBJECTIVES: To determine if vertebroplasty reverses fracture-induced changes in the distribution of compressive stress in cadaver motion segments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebroplasty involves reinforcement of vertebrae by injection of cement and is now being used increasingly to treat osteoporotic vertebral fractures. However, its effects on spinal load-bearing are largely unknown. We hypothesize that vertebroplasty, following vertebral fracture, helps to equalize stress acting on the intervertebral disc and adjacent vertebral bodies. METHODS: Nineteen cadaver thoracolumbar motion segments (age 64-90 years) were induced to fracture by compressive overload. Specimens were then subjected to vertebroplasty, and subsequently creep loaded for 1 hour at 1.5 kN. The compressive stress acting on the intervertebral disc was measured before and after fracture, after vertebroplasty, and after creep, by pulling a pressure transducer mounted in a 1.3-mm needle across the disc's midsagittal diameter. This information was then used to calculate neural arch load-bearing. At each time point, measurements were also made of compressive stiffness. RESULTS: Vertebral fracture reduced motion segment compressive stiffness, decompressed the adjacent nucleus, increased stress concentrations in the posterior anulus, and increased neural arch load-bearing, all by a significant amount. Vertebroplasty partially, but significantly, reversed all of these fracture-induced changes. CONCLUSIONS: Vertebroplasty reduces stress concentrations in the anulus and neural arch resulting in a more even distribution of compressive stress on the intervertebral disc and adjacent vertebral bodies.