RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the quality of life of nursing undergraduate students and factors associated with socioeconomic variables and internship field. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in an educational institution located in the northern region of the state of Ceará, Brazil, involving 309 nursing undergraduates from the 1st to the 10th semester. The WHOQOL-bref instrument was used to evaluate the quality of life. Each domain and total score of the instrument were considered as outcome variables. Results: 69.3% of the individuals were women, the mean age of the sample was 28 years, and 67.7% defined their quality of life as "good" or "very good." Undergraduates who consumed well water and those with lower income had a higher chance of presenting lower scores in the physical domain and environmental domain of quality of life, respectively (p < 0.05), and of having a lower total quality of life score. Conclusion: The students considered their quality of life to be good/very good, and sociodemographic factors influenced the lower quality of life score.
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a qualidade de vida de graduandos de enfermagem e fatores associados a variáveis socioeconômicas e campo de estágio. Métodos: Estudo transversal realizado em uma instituição de ensino localizada na região norte do estado do Ceará, Brasil, envolvendo 309 graduandos de enfermagem do 1º ao 10º semestre. O instrumento WHOQOL-bref foi utilizado para avaliar a qualidade de vida. Cada domínio e escore total do instrumento foram considerados como variáveis de desfecho. Resultados: 69,3% dos indivíduos eram mulheres, a média de idade da amostra foi de 28 anos e 67,7% definiram sua qualidade de vida como "boa" ou "muito boa". Universitários que consumiam água de poço e aqueles com menor renda tiveram maior chance de apresentar menores escores no domínio físico e meio ambiente de qualidade de vida, respectivamente (p < 0,05), e de ter menor escore total de qualidade de vida. Conclusão: Os estudantes consideraram sua qualidade de vida boa/muito boa, e fatores sociodemográficos influenciaram o menor escore de qualidade de vida.
RESUMEN
Abstract COVID-19 pandemic implied new biosafety recommendations to avoid dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 virus within healthcare centers. Changes on recommended personal protective equipment (PPE), decontamination protocols and organization of patient demand resulted may result in cost variation. Based on this, the present study aimed to evaluate the economic impact of new biosafety recommendations for oral healthcare assistance during COVID-19. An Activity Based Costing evaluation was used to calculate the acquisition of PPE and decontamination solutions recommended for dental practice during COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. PPE and decontamination solutions quantity and frequency of use were based on the newly COVID-19 recommendations. Costs (in Brazilian Real - R$) for biosafety recommendations pre- and post-COVID-19 were outlined and calculated for each patient, service shift and year. A sensitivity analysis considered 20% variation of direct costs. Previously to COVID-19 pandemic, direct costs of biosafety recommendations consisted of R$0.84 per patient, R$6.69 per service shift and R$3,413.94 per year. Post-COVID-19 costs of biosafety recommendations resulted in R$16.01 per patient, R$128.07 per service shift, and R$32,657.96 per year. Yearly costs can vary between R$26,126.37 and R$39,189.56. The annual budget increase necessary to adopt post-COVID biosafety recommendations was R$29,244.02. Newly biosafety recommendations increased significantly the costs of oral healthcare assistance during COVID-19 pandemic. Decision making of healthcare managers must consider rational and equity allocation of financial resources.