Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 136(1): 18-24, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25281492

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCR) in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) remains controversial. The overall survival (OS) benefits for surgery reported in observational studies may be due to the selection of patients with better prognosis. METHODS: Using data from the CALYPSO trial, OS of patients who had SCR was compared to those treated with chemotherapy alone. Multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for prognostic factors. We also tested for an interaction between baseline prognostic groupings and the benefit of surgery. RESULTS: Of the 975 patients randomised in CALYPSO, 19% had SCR and 80% had chemotherapy alone. OS was longer for the SCR group than for chemotherapy alone (median, 49.9 vs. 29.7 months; adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.68; P = 0.004). For patients with SCR, the 3-year OS was 72% for those with no measurable disease, and 28% if residual tumour was larger than 5 cm. Patients with good prognostic features benefited the most from SCR (HR 0.43; P < 0.001). The benefit of SCR was less in patients with poorer prognostic features (test of trend P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: SCR was associated with improved OS in platinum-sensitive ROC, particularly in patients with favourable prognostic characteristics. However, these findings may be due to selection bias, and hence randomised trials are still essential.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
2.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 25(2): 257-62, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25611899

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Recurrent/advanced endometrial carcinoma carries a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy usually consists of cisplatin/doxorubicin and paclitaxel or the doublet of carboplatin and paclitaxel.We report on final results of the Austrian phase 2 AGO trial of nonpegylated doxorubicin citrate and carboplatin in 39 patients with primary advanced or relapsed endometrial cancer. The main primary end point is response rate, and the main secondary end point is feasibility. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients received 60 mg/m nonpegylated doxorubicin citrate and carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) every 3 weeks for 6 to 9 cycles or until progression. Best response during therapy, progression-free survival, and the toxicity profile were recorded. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (33%) had primary advanced disease, and 26 patients (67%) had recurrent disease. Seventy-five percent of the tumors were adenocarcinomas, 15% were serous carcinomas, and 5% were clear cell and mixed müllerian carcinomas. We observed 1 complete response (3%) and 16 partial responses (41%) in the intention-to-treat population. The median progression-free survival was 7.2 months, and the median overall survival was 14.7 months. Overall, 177 cycles were administered; the mean number of cycles per patient was 4.5. Ten percent of patients received 9 cycles of chemotherapy, and 44% of patients received 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 17%, grade 3/4 anemia in 5%, and grade 3/4 thrombopenia in 12% of the cycles. In 6% of the cycles, febrile neutropenia was noticed. Grade 3/4 nausea was seen in 5% of cycles. One patient (3%) experienced cardiac toxicity and had a reduction in the left ventricular ejection fraction to below 50%. CONCLUSIONS: The reported combination demonstrates considerable activity and should be evaluated further.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Austria , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/tratamiento farmacológico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Wien Med Wochenschr ; 165(19-20): 387-94, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26471371

RESUMEN

We reviewed the status of the use of the prophylactic long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) pegfilgrastim and lipegfilgrastim in gynecologic malignancies. Long-acting G-CSFs should not be used in weekly regimens. Filgrastim is not indicated in patients with febrile and/or severe neutropenia after administration of long-acting G-CSF in the same cycle. One study has shown a moderate effect on febrile neutropenia of ciprofloxacin when co-administered with pegfilgrastim. There is broad evidence from meta-analyses that pegfilgrastim effectively reduces severe neutropenia. In parallel, its adverse effects have been studied extensively. All-cause mortality was significantly reduced by pegfilgrastim. The glycopegylated long-acting G-CSF, lipegfilgrastim has demonstrated antineutropenic efficacy similar to that of pegfilgrastimin in one breast cancer study. In another pivitol non-small cell lung cancer study, impaired survival was observed in the lipegfilgrastim group during the first 30 days of study. The European Medicines Agency claimed more profound safety data to be provided for lipegfilgrastim by 2017.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Causas de Muerte , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Contraindicaciones , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Filgrastim , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/mortalidad , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/mortalidad , Polietilenglicoles , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Análisis de Supervivencia
4.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 122(21-22): 649-52, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21072604

RESUMEN

The Calypso trial showed an improved progression-free survival with PEG-liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and carboplatin (P) as compared with the standard regimen paclitaxel (PCLTX) and P in the second- or third-line treatment of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer [1]. A panel of Austrian gynecologic oncologists discussed the clinical consequences of the data from the Calypso study for the routine practice. PLD + P had a significantly lower rate of alopecia and neuropathy than the taxane regimen, both toxicities which compromise the quality of life. Due to possible significant thrombocytopenia, the blood counts of patients undergoing PLD + P therapy should be monitored weekly. Patients receiving PLD/P are at higher risk of nausea and vomiting. Palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia (hand-foot syndrome) is a significant toxicity of PLD + P most prevalent after the third or fourth cycle. Prophylaxis consists of avoiding pressure on feet and hands and other parts of the body. Similarly, prophylaxis of mucositis seems important and includes avoiding consumption of hot, spicy and salty foods and drinks. Mouth dryness should be avoided. Premedication with antiemetics and dexamethasone dissolved in 5% glucose is done to prevent hypersensitivity to PLD. In conclusion, the therapeutic index is more favorable for PLD + P than for PCTX + P.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Testimonio de Experto , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Austria/epidemiología , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Prevalencia , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA