Pegylated filgrastim is comparable with filgrastim as support for commonly used chemotherapy regimens: a multicenter, randomized, crossover phase 3 study.

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a single subcutaneous injection of pegylated filgrastim with daily filgrastim as a prophylaxis for neutropenia induced by commonly used chemotherapy regimens. Fifteen centers enrolled 337 chemotherapy-naive cancer patients with normal bone marrow function. All patients randomized into AOB and BOA arms received two cycles of chemotherapy. Patients received a single dose of pegylated filgrastim 100 µg/kg in cycle 1 (AOB) or cycle 2 (BOA) and daily doses of filgrastim 5 µg/kg/day in cycle 1 (BOA) or cycle 2 (AOB). Efficacy and safety parameters were recorded. The primary end point was the rate of protection against grade 4 neutropenia after chemotherapy [defined as the rate at which the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) remained >0.5×10(9)/l throughout the entire cycle]. Ninety-four percent of patients receiving pegylated filgrastim or filgrastim did not develop grade 4 neutropenia. The incidence of ANC<1.0×10(9)/l was 16.0% (50/313) after support with either pegylated filgrastim or filgrastim. The incidences of febrile neutropenia and antibiotic administration were similar in both groups. Notably, faster ANC recovery was observed with pegylated filgrastim support. The ANC nadir was also earlier with pegylated filgrastim (day 7) support than with filgrastim support (day 9), although the depth of nadir was not significantly different. A single subcutaneous injection of pegylated filgrastim 100 µg/kg provided adequate and safe neutrophil support comparable with daily subcutaneous injections of unmodified filgrastim 5 µg/kg/day in patients receiving commonly used standard-dose mild-to-moderate myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens.

Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Adults With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Plinabulin is a novel, non-granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) small molecule with both anticancer and neutropenia-prevention effects. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of plinabulin compared with pegfilgrastim for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia following docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with non-small lung cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial of 4 treatment arms that was conducted in 19 cancer treatment centers in the United States, China, Russia, and Ukraine. Participants were adult patients with non-small cell lung cancer whose cancer had progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. Data were collected from April 2017 through March 2018 and analyzed from August 2019 through February 2020. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 doses of plinabulin (5, 10, or 20 mg/m2) on day 1 or to pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 2. Patients were treated every 21 days for 4 chemotherapy cycles. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the determination of the recommended phase 3 dose of plinabulin based on the days of severe neutropenia during chemotherapy cycle 1. Daily complete blood cell counts and absolute neutrophil counts were drawn during times of anticipated neutropenia during cycle 1. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients randomized and evaluated, the mean (SD) age was 61.3 (10.2) years, and 38 (69.1%) were men. With each escalation of the plinabulin dose, the incidence of any grade of neutropenia decreased. There were no significant differences in mean (SD) days of severe neutropenia among those treated with pegfilgrastim (0.15 [0.38] days) when dosed at day 2 vs plinabulin 20 mg/m2 (0.36 [0.93] days; P = .76) when dosed at day 1, and no safety signals were detected. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Single dose-per-cycle plinabulin has a similar neutropenia protection benefit as pegfilgrastim. Plinabulin 40 mg fixed dose, which is pharmacologically equivalent to 20 mg/m2, will be compared with pegfilgrastim 6 mg in the phase 3 portion of this trial. Noninferior days of severe neutropenia will be the primary end point, and bone pain reduction, thrombocytopenia reduction, and quality of life maintenance will be secondary end points. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102606.

[Treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a multi-center randomized controlled phase II clinical study].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of daily administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), and a single subcutaneous injection of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), a sustained-duration rhG-CSF, in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. METHODS: In the present randomized, open-label, match and cross-over study, enrolled 104 patients with previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and with normal bone marrow function from 13 centers were randomly divided into 2 matched groups, AB and BA group. Each patient received two cycles of chemotherapy of identical regimen. In the study cycle, the patients received a single subcutaneous injection of PEG-rhG-CSF 100 microg/kg on day 3; and in control cycle, daily subcutaneous infection of rhG-CSF 5 microg x kg(-1) x d(-1) began on day 3 and continued for 14 days or until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) became > or = 5.0 x 10(9)/L twice after it decreased to the nadir. Efficacy and safety parameters were monitored. RESULTS: The incidence rates of ANC < 1.5 x 10(9)/L in the 103 evaluable study cycles and 100 evaluable control cycles were 30.00% and 20.00% with the duration of 2.39 days and 2.35 days respectively. The incidence rates of grade 3 neutropenia were 7.77% and 7.00%; and that of grade 4 neutropenia were 5.80% and 4.00% respectively in the trial and control cycles. However, all the difference mentioned above did not reached statistical significance. None of the patients experienced febrile neutropenia. The ANC nadir was (7.55 +/- 5.25) x 10(9)/L and (8.42 +/- 5.57) x 10(9)/L (P = 0.257) respectively after receiving PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF. Compared with that of rhG-CSF group, the ANC profile of PEG-rhG-CSF group exhibited limited "overshoot" of neutrophils after the nadir. Subgroup analysis according to disease type yielded similar results. The safety profiles of the PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF groups were similar. Musculoskeletal pain or arthralgia occurred in 16.5% of the study cycles and 26.00% of the control cycles (P = 0.963), mostly mild or moderate. Other adverse effects such as fever, fatigue, dizziness, gastrointestinal effects and injection-site pain, were transient and easily manageable. CONCLUSION: A single subcutaneous injection of PEG-rhG-CSF 100 microg/kg provides neutrophil support and a safety profile comparable to regimen of daily subcutaneous injection of rhG-CSF 5 microg x kg(-1) x d(-1) in Chinese patients receiving a variety of myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens.

[Phase I clinical trail of intravenous pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) is effective in the prophylaxis and management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, but requires daily administration because of its short half-life. Pegylated rhG-CSF (PEG-rhG-CSF) is a long-acting reagent that permits less frequent injection. This study was to evaluate the safety and tolerance of PEG-rhG-CSF in Chinese patients, and to explore its efficacy of enhancing absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood. METHODS: Naïve non-small lung cancer or breast cancer patients with normal bone marrow function were eligible for this open-labeled, dose-escalation trial. All patients received 2 cycles of chemotherapy of identical regimen. In cycle 1, rhG-CSF (150 microg/day) was administrated in case of febrile neutropenia or grade 4 neutropenia; in cycle 2, patients received a single injection of PEG-rhG-CSF (30 microg/kg, 60 microg/kg, 100 microg/kg, or 200 microg/kg) 48 h after administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin. RESULTS: All the 16 patients enrolled (4 in each dose group) were evaluable for safety and efficacy of PEG-rhG-CSF. Main adverse events related to PEG-rhG-CSF were musculoskeletal pain or arthralgia (13/16), fatigue (10/16), dizziness (2/16), and injection-site pain (1/16). All adverse events were mild to moderate, and most of them were reversible without treatment. PEG-rhG-CSF enhanced ANC in a dose-dependent manner to some extent, and PEG-rhG-CSF at 60 microg/kg or higher doses prevented chemotherapy-induced neutropenia with sustained effect; CD34+ cells in peripheral blood were also increased. CONCLUSIONS: PEG-rhG-CSF is well tolerated, with no serious adverse event in this trial. The recommended dose of PEG-rhG-CSF for phase II trial is 100 microg/kg because of its adequate efficacy and less adverse events than those of 200 microg/kg.