Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
2.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 126(10): 1345-8, 2006 May 11.
Artículo en Noruego | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16691273

RESUMEN

Syphilis was previously termed "the great imitator" because so many of the signs and symptoms are indistinguishable from those of other diseases. This role has been taken over by drugs, and this also applies to adverse drug reactions in the oral region. Accordingly, a careful drug history, including identification of any prescription, over-the-counter, or herbal medicines used, may give an important clue to the differential diagnosis of oral diseases when the aetiology is not apparent. Virtually all drugs have the potential to cause oral adverse reactions, but some have a greater ability to do so than others. Among the numerous adverse oral manifestations are xerostomia, taste disturbances and ulceration. The reactions are often non-specific, but they may mimic specific disease states such as erythema multiforme, lichen planus and pemphigus. Drug-induced gingival hyperplasia is an example of a quite characteristic and easily recognisable oral side effect. This article briefly describes some of the presentations and mechanisms of oral manifestations of drug therapy and the drugs that most commonly are responsible. Just like approved pharmaceuticals, herbal medicines are also associated with adverse oral manifestations. Finally we comment on some of the more recent reports on osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with the use of bisphosphonates.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Enfermedades de la Boca/inducido químicamente , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Hiperplasia Gingival/inducido químicamente , Hiperplasia Gingival/patología , Humanos , Enfermedades de la Boca/patología , Mucosa Bucal/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Bucal/patología , Osteonecrosis/inducido químicamente , Osteonecrosis/patología , Preparaciones de Plantas/efectos adversos , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/patología , Trastornos del Gusto/inducido químicamente , Xerostomía/inducido químicamente , Xerostomía/patología
3.
Pain ; 61(2): 215-220, 1995 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7659431

RESUMEN

We examined the analgesic effect of racemic ketamine and its 2 enantiomers in 16 female patients (age: 20-29 years) suffering acute pain after oral surgery and in 7 female patients (age: 42-79 years) suffering chronic neuropathic orofacial pain. All 3 forms of ketamine consistently relieved postoperative pain, (S)-ketamine being 4 times more potent than (R)-ketamine. The analgesic effect was maximal 5 min after i.m. injection and lasted for about 30 min. The 7 patients with neuropathic pain received ketamine at one or several occasions. Four patients (age: 54-79 years) who had suffered pain for more than 5 years did not experience an analgesic effect, whereas 3 patients (age: 42-53 years) who had suffered pain for less than 3 years reported pain relief lasting from 24 h to 3 days. The individual type of response did not depend on the form of ketamine used. The mental side effects were qualitatively similar for the 3 forms of ketamine. Relative to the analgesic effect (S)-ketamine caused more disturbing side effects than did (R)-ketamine. The mean serum concentration of each form of ketamine at the time of maximal effect was close to the approximate Kd value for PCP site occupancy by that particular form. This is in concert with the hypothesis that the effect of ketamine on acute nociceptive pain is due to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor inhibition and adds to the evidence that NMDA receptors are important for the perception of acute, nociceptive pain in humans.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Asunto(s)
Dolor Facial/tratamiento farmacológico , Ketamina/farmacología , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores de N-Metil-D-Aspartato/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neuralgia del Trigémino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Dolor Facial/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Umbral del Dolor , Umbral Sensorial , Estereoisomerismo , Cirugía Bucal , Síndrome , Neuralgia del Trigémino/etiología
6.
Evid Based Dent ; 6(3): 66, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16184156

RESUMEN

DATA SOURCES: Dental trials were sought among systematic reviews of randomised, double-blind studies of analgesics in acute pain, which were identified from the Cochrane Library, Biological Abstracts, MEDLINE, PubMed and the Oxford Pain Relief database. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Dichotomous information from active and placebo treatments was used, first to calculate the statistical significance using relative risk, and then to evaluate the clinical relevance using number-needed-to-treat (NNT). RESULTS: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors had the lowest (best) NNT for the outcome of pain at least halved over 4-6 h compared with placebo. With the best performing analgesics, 50-70 patients out of 100 had good pain relief compared with about 10 out of 100 with placebo. Only paracetamol (600/650 mg) plus codeine (60 mg) was associated with any significant increase in any patient experiencing an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: NSAID and COX-2 inhibitors have the lowest (best) NNT. These may also have fewer adverse effects after third molar surgery, but conclusive evidence is lacking. At least 80% of analgesic prescribing by UK dentists is in line with the best available evidence on efficacy and safety.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA