Combination therapy with telaprevir for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in patients with HIV: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Telaprevir (TVR) plus peginterferon-α2a (PEG-IFN-α2a) and ribavirin substantially increases treatment efficacy for genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection versus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin alone. Its safety and efficacy in patients with HCV and HIV-1 are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of TVR plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin in patients with genotype 1 HCV and HIV-1 and to evaluate pharmacokinetics of TVR and antiretrovirals during coadministration. DESIGN: Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00983853). SETTING: 16 international multicenter sites. PATIENTS: 62 patients with HCV genotype 1 and HIV-1 who were HCV treatment-naive and receiving 0 or 1 of 2 antiretroviral regimens were randomly assigned to TVR plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin or placebo plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin for 12 weeks, plus 36 weeks of PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin. MEASUREMENTS: HCV RNA concentrations. RESULTS: Pruritus, headache, nausea, rash, and dizziness were higher with TVR plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin during the first 12 weeks. During this period, serious adverse events occurred in 5% (2 in 38) of those receiving TVR plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin and 0% (0 in 22) of those receiving placebo plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin; the same number in both groups discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Sustained virologic response occurred in 74% (28 in 38) of patients receiving TVR plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin and 45% (10 in 22) of patients receiving placebo plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin. Rapid HCV suppression was seen with TVR plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin (68% [26 in 38 patients] vs. 0% [0 in 22 patients] undetectable HCV RNA levels by week 4). Two patients had on-treatment HCV breakthrough with TVR-resistant variants. Patients treated with antiretroviral drugs had no HIV breakthroughs; antiretroviral exposure was not substantially modified by TVR. LIMITATION: Small sample size and appreciable dropout rate. CONCLUSION: In patients with HCV and HIV-1, more adverse events occurred with TVR versus placebo plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin; these were similar in nature and severity to those in patients with HCV treated with TVR. With or without concomitant antiretrovirals, sustained virologic response rates were higher in patients treated with TVR versus placebo plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin.

Comparison of high ribavirin induction versus standard ribavirin dosing, plus peginterferon-α for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients: the PERICO trial.

BACKGROUND: Ribavirin (RBV) exposure seems to be critical to maximize treatment response in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. METHODS: HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals naive to interferon were prospectively randomized to receive peginterferon-α-2a (180 µg/d) plus either RBV standard dosing (1000 or 1200 mg/d if <75 or ≥ 75 kg, respectively) or RBV induction (2000 mg/d) along with subcutaneous erythropoietin ß (450 IU/kg/wk), both during the first 4 weeks, followed by standard RBV dosing until completion of therapy. Early stopping rules at weeks 12 and 24 were applied in patients with suboptimal virological response. RESULTS: A total of 357 patients received ≥ 1 dose of the study medication. No differences in main baseline characteristics were found when comparing treatment arms. Sustained virological response (SVR) was attained by 160 (45%) patients, with no significant differences between RBV induction and standard treatment arms (SVR in 72 of 169 patients [43%] vs 88 of 188 [47%], respectively). At week 4, undetectable HCV RNA (29% vs 25%) and mean RBV trough concentration (2.48 vs 2.14 µg/mL) were comparable in both arms, whereas mean hemoglobin decay was less pronounced in the RBV induction plus erythropoietin arm than in the RBV standard dosing arm (-1.7 vs -2.3 mg/dL; P < .005). Treatment discontinuation occurred in 91 (25%) patients owing to nonresponse and in 29 (8%) owing to adverse events. HCV relapse occurred in 34 patients (10%). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified HCV genotype 2 or 3 (odds ratio [OR], 10.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.08-50.2; P = .004), IL28B CC variants (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.33-6.41; P = .007), nonadvanced liver fibrosis (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.06-5.01; P = .03), and rapid virological response (OR, 40.3; 95% CI, 5.1-314.1; P < .001) as predictors of SVR. CONCLUSIONS: A 4-week course of induction therapy with high RBV dosing along with erythropoietin does not improve SVR rates in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Preemptive erythropoietin might blunt the benefit of RBV overdosing by enhancing erythrocyte uptake of plasma RBV.

Influence of a single nucleotide polymorphism at the main ribavirin transporter gene on the rapid virological response to pegylated interferon-ribavirin therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

The equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1) is the main protein involved in ribavirin cellular uptake. Polymorphisms at the ENT1 gene may influence ribavirin activity as part of hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy. A retrospective study was conducted in 109 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients who were infected with HCV genotypes 1 or 4 who had received pegylated interferon (pegIFN)-ribavirin. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the ENT1 gene were examined using TaqMan 5'-nuclease assays. In the study population, allelic frequencies at rs760370 were as follows: A3 (43 [39%] of 109 patients), AG (50 [46%] of 109 patients), and GG (16 [15%] of 109 patients). Achievement of rapid virological response was more frequent in GG carriers than in AA/AG carriers (50% vs 17%, respectively; P = .007). In multivariate analysis, the GG genotype (odds ratio [OR], 15.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-92.2; P < .002), a baseline serum HCV-RNA level <600,000 IU/mL (OR, 45.7; 95% CI, 8.7-240.5; P <.001) and a serum ribavirin trough concentration >2.5 µg/mL (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.3-17.1; P < .016) were associated with rapid virological response. When 2 or more of these factors were present, positive and negative predictive values of rapid virological response were 65% and 91%, respectively. In summary, a SNP rs760370A→G at the ENT1 gene influences the chance of rapid virological response to pegIFN-ribavirin therapy in HIV-infected patients with chronic HCV infection due to HCV genotypes 1 or 4, most likely modulating intracellular ribavirin exposure within hepatocytes.

Modeling the probability of sustained virological response to therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus and HIV.

BACKGROUND: A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) near the IL28B gene (rs12979860) strongly predicts sustained virological response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (pegIFN-RBV) treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Given that therapy is poorly tolerated and rates of response are lower in patients coinfected with HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the recognition of predictors of response is a high priority in this population. METHODS: A baseline noninvasive index was derived on the basis of the probability of achieving sustained virological response in a group of 159 HIV-HCV-coinfected patients treated at one clinic in Spain. The index was then validated using data from a separate cohort of 86 coinfected individuals. Only individuals who had completed a course of pegIFN-RBV therapy and had validated outcomes were considered. RESULTS: The final score included 4 variables: 2 host-related variables (IL28B SNP rs12979860 and liver stiffness) and 2 HCV-related variables (genotype and viral load). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 in the derivation group and 0.85 in the validation group. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of achieving sustained virological response with pegIFN-RBV therapy in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients can be reliably estimated prior to initiation of therapy using an index that includes 4 noninvasive parameters.

Plasma ribavirin trough concentrations at week 4 predict hepatitis C virus (HCV) relapse in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients treated for chronic hepatitis C.

The influence of ribavirin trough concentrations (RBV C(trough)) on the risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) relapse was retrospectively analyzed in 99 HIV-HCV-coinfected patients who achieved end-of-treatment response with pegylated alpha interferon plus weight-based RBV. The independent predictors (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]) of HCV relapse were RBV plasma C(trough) of <2.5 microg/ml (4.5 [1.3 to 15.5]), baseline serum HCV RNA (2.5 [1.2 to 5.1]), and HCV genotype 1 or 4 (13.3 [2.6 to 66.7]). Monitoring of RBV C(trough) may permit early adjustment of RBV dosage to avoid HCV relapse.

Rate and timing of hepatitis C virus relapse after a successful course of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients.

Information on the rate and timing of hepatitis C virus (HCV) relapse after treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is scarce. Among 604 patients treated for chronic hepatitis C, the 386 who were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive attained an end-of-treatment response less frequently and experienced relapse more often than did the 218 who were HIV negative. However, episodes of HCV relapse occurred before week 12 in most cases, regardless of HIV status.

Hepatitis B in HIV patients: what is the current treatment and what are the challenges?

Chronic hepatitis B affects 5-10% of HIV patients in Western countries. Lamivudine should no longer be used as a single anti-HBV agent in HIV-HBV co-infected patients, given its limited antiviral potency and high risk of selection of resistance, which further results in wide cross-resistance to all other nucleoside analogues. Recent reports of transmission of lamivudine-resistant HBV in HIV patients are of especial concern, and large surveillance studies suggest that it may occur in up to 10% of new HBV infections in Western countries. Another worrisome aspect of the selection of lamivudine-resistant HBV is the potential for selection of vaccine escape mutants. Currently, tenofovir must be viewed as the drug of choice in HIV-HBV co-infected patients in whom antiretroviral therapy is advised. Its co-formulation with emtricitabine (Truvada) is particularly convenient for treating both HIV and HBV in co-infected individuals. While pegIFN-alpha monotherapy for 1 year may be considered for HIV-HBV coinfected individuals with good spontaneous HIV control (elevated CD4 cell count, low plasma HIV-RNA), and certain HBV features (genotype A, HBeAg+, low serum HBV-DNA and elevated ALT), it is clear that very few coinfected patients fulfill these criteria. In HBeAg-negative HIV patients, adefovir may be an option but the relatively low antiviral potency of this drug discourages its wide use. Given its potential anti-HIV activity, both entecavir and telbivudine must only be prescribed with antiretroviral agents. Lack of information about potential pharmacodynamic interactions between entecavir and abacavir (both are guanosine analogues) or between telbivudine and zidovudine or stavudine (all are thymidine analogues) further discourages their concomitant use. At this time, most experts agree that early introduction of anti-HBV active HAART is the best strategy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in HIV patients, and Truvada must be part of the triple regimen.

Management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected patients.

The management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients coinfected with the human immunodeficiency virus poses a significant challenge. Treatment is influenced by a number of viral and host characteristics, including hepatitis C virus genotype, baseline viremia, and adherence to medication regimen. Accelerated progression of liver disease, immunodeficiency, and hepatotoxicity of antiretroviral drugs are additional concerns in coinfected patients. According to the results of 5 randomized clinical trials, 27%-55% of coinfected patients who received therapy with pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin attained a sustained virologic response. These studies also confirm the importance of early virologic response as a predictor of treatment outcome and reveal the considerable proportion of patients who experience hematologic tolerability issues. Effective management strategies that encompass patient and viral factors are necessary to improve the long-term outlook for coinfected patients.

Distinct hepatitis C virus kinetics in HIV-infected patients treated with ribavirin plus either pegylated interferon alpha2a or alpha2b.

BACKGROUND: Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alpha2a and alpha2b differ in their pharmacokinetic properties, which might have an effect on their antiviral effects against hepatitis C virus (HCV). Differences between PEG-IFN-alpha molecules could be more pronounced in HIV-coinfected individuals, in whom response to HCV treatment is impaired. METHODS: All HCV-HIV-coinfected patients included in PRESCO and EXTENT trials recruited at one referral centre were retrospectively analysed. In both trials, ribavirin (RBV) 1,000-1,200 mg/day was prescribed together with standard doses of PEG-IFN-alpha2a or -alpha2b. The attainment of serum HCV RNA <10 IU/ml at weeks 4, 12 and 24 was assessed. On-treatment analyses were made to estimate the intrinsic potency of PEG-IFN-alpha2a versus -alpha2b. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were examined, 138 on PEG-IFN-alpha2a and 80 on PEG-IFN-alpha2b. Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. Undetectable serum HCV RNA at weeks 4, 12 and 24 was more frequently attained using PEG-IFN-alpha2a than -alpha2b (45% versus 27% [P=0.02]; 65% versus 45%/ [P=0.01]; and 75% versus 55%/ [P=0.01], respectively), regardless of HCV genotype. Plasma RBV levels did not differ between groups. In multivariate analysis, HCV genotypes 2/3 (odds ratio [OR] 12.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.45-33.33; P<0.001), use of zidovudine (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.11-0.85; P=0.02) and treatment with PEG-IFN-alpha2a (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.02-4.54; P=0.04) were independent predictors of undetectable HCV RNA at week 24. Conversely, the incidence of serious adverse events was more common with PEG-IFN-alpha2a than -alpha2b (13.2% versus 3.6%; P=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The antiviral effect against HCV seems to be greater for PEG-IFN-alpha2a than -alpha2b in the HIV setting. A shorter half-life of PEG-IFN-alpha2b could explain this finding.

Low response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with abacavir.

BACKGROUND: There is little information about the influence of antiretroviral drugs on the antiviral activity of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) against hepatitis C virus (HCV). METHODS: All HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C who received first-line PEG-IFN plus RBV were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients in whom virological stopping rules were applied and who did not change their antiretrovirals were chosen. Plasma RBV concentrations were measured at week 4. RESULTS: A total of 493 patients (78% males, mean age 41 years, 78% on antiretroviral therapy, mean CD4+ T-cell count 561 cells/microl) fit the study inclusion criteria. Mean baseline serum HCV RNA was 5.89 log10 IU/ml, 65% were infected by genotypes 1 or 4 and 40% had advanced liver fibrosis (Metavir F3F4). The overall rate of sustained virological response (SVR) was 38%. Factors associated with lack of SVR in the multivariate analyses (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], P-value) were higher baseline serum HCV RNA (2.42 per log10 IU/ml [1.31-4.46], 0.005), HCV genotypes 1 or 4 (5.95 [2.50-14.29], < 0.001) and lower RBV plasma trough concentrations (1.74 per microg/ml [1.15-2.63], 0.009). Interestingly, a trend was noticed for abacavir use (2.22 [0.91-5.40], 0.08), which become significant when only considering the subset of patients with RBV plasma levels < 2.3 microg/ml (7.63 [1.39-41.67], 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The use of abacavir might interfere with the anti-HCV activity of PEG-IFN plus RBV. As both antivirals are guanosine analogues, an inhibitory competition between abacavir and RBV might explain this observation, which is more prominent in patients with lower RBV exposure.

Efficacy of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment in HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients receiving abacavir plus lamivudine or tenofovir plus either lamivudine or emtricitabine as nucleoside analogue backbone.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV co-infected patients receiving a nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor [N(t)RTI] backbone consisting of abacavir plus lamivudine with that observed in subjects who receive tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine. METHODS: A total of 256 subjects, enrolled in a cohort of 948 HIV-infected patients who received pegylated interferon and ribavirin from October 2001 to January 2006, were included in this study. All patients were taking one protease inhibitor or one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and abacavir plus lamivudine or tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as N(t)RTI backbone during HCV therapy. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates in both backbone groups were compared. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, 20 out of 70 (29%) individuals under abacavir and 83 out of 186 (45%) under tenofovir showed SVR (P = 0.02). N(t)RTI backbone containing tenofovir was an independent predictor of SVR in the multivariate analysis [adjusted odds ratio (95% CI), 2.6 (1.05-6.9); P = 0.03]. The association between abacavir use and lower SVR was chiefly seen in patients with plasma HCV-RNA load higher than 600 000 IU/mL and genotype 1 or 4. Among patients treated with ribavirin dose <13.2 mg/kg/day, 3 (20%) of those under abacavir versus 22 (52%) under tenofovir reached SVR (P = 0.03), whereas the rates were 31% and 38% (P = 0.4), respectively, in those receiving >/=13.2 mg/kg/day. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-infected patients who receive abacavir plus lamivudine respond worse to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin than those who are given tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as N(t)RTI backbone, especially in those receiving lower ribavirin doses.

Update on the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients.

Liver disease is currently the second leading cause of death in HIV-infected persons in Western countries. Hepatitis C virus infection accounts for the majority of cases of hepatic illness in this population. Although great progress has been made in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-positive patients, many challenges still remain unsolved. The combination of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is the current treatment of choice in hepatitis C virus/HIV-coinfected patients, regardless of hepatitis C virus genotype. However, the limited efficacy of this therapy in the HIV setting makes necessary the development of new strategies and/or drugs for the treatment of hepatitis C infection. Several anti-hepatitis C virus compounds are currently under investigation, although most are still in the early stages of clinical development. There is a relatively large group of patients who will be unable to be treated with the current hepatitis C virus medication based on interferon, mainly due to contraindications such as serious neuropsychiatric or cardiovascular history. However, for those without contraindications, treatment should be provided with no restrictions at the start (e.g. asking unnecessarily for a liver biopsy), and reassessed at weeks 4 and 12, considering virologic responses. Treatment should only be continued in early virologic responders. The use of standard doses of ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) and for at least 12 months seems crucial to maximize the effect of current hepatitis C treatment in the HIV setting, while no further benefit seems to derive from using higher than recommended pegylated interferon dosages. In patients with rapid virologic response (undetectable viremia at week 4) to anti-hepatitis C therapy, shorter periods of therapy (24 weeks) may be advisable in hepatitis C genotypes 2 and 3. Finally, adequate selection of candidates and careful selection of concomitant antiretroviral medications must be encouraged. Patients with low CD4 percentages (< 15%) should be deferred for treatment and HAART prioritized in order to improve CD4 counts. When possible, nucleoside analogs such as zidovudine, stavudine, and abacavir should be replaced by others having no deleterious interactions with ribavirin (e.g. tenofovir, lamivudine, or emtricitabine). Didanosine should never be coadministered with ribavirin due to potential life-threatening complications.

Mitochondrial DNA depletion in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C and effect of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy.

BACKGROUND: The metabolic stress derived from high levels of virus replication in both HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections results in mitochondrial DNA depletion, which seems to be enhanced in co-infected patients. The use of nucleoside analogues to treat HIV infection may further increase mtDNA depletion by inhibiting gamma DNA polymerase. Information on the impact of therapy with pegylated interferon (pegIFN) plus ribavirin on mtDNA is scarce and conflicting results have been reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine HCV/HIV-co-infected patients (43 on and 16 off antiretroviral therapy) who initiated treatment with pegIFN plus ribavirin were retrospectively analysed. The amount of mtDNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was measured at baseline and at the end of HCV therapy. RESULTS: Mean baseline serum HCV-RNA was 5.8 log IU/ml and 56% of patients were infected by HCV genotype 1. An inverse correlation between serum HCV-RNA levels and PBMC mtDNA content was recognized at baseline (r = -0.370; P = 0.006). HCV-RNA suppression at the end of HCV therapy was associated with a significant increase in mtDNA, particularly in patients with baseline HCV-RNA levels greater than 6 log IU/ml (+61 mtDNA copies/cell) and in subjects not taking antiretroviral therapy (+133 mtDNA copies/cell). CONCLUSION: HCV replication correlates with the extent of mtDNA depletion in PBMC, and treatment of chronic hepatitis C is associated with a significant improvement in mtDNA content. This benefit, however, is not recognized when HCV medications are used along with antiretroviral therapy, probably because of a deleterious interaction of these drugs on mitochondria.

Evolution of T-cell responses to hepatitis C virus (HCV) during pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment in HCV-monoinfected and in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients.

BACKGROUND: The role of T-cell immunity in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains controversial. As in HIV infection, virus replication could drive or be contained by T-cell immunity. We have examined the effect of HIV coinfection and of suppression of HCV replication with therapy on HCV-specific T-cell responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with chronic hepatitis C (17 coinfected with HIV) initiating anti-HCV therapy were analysed. HCV-specific responses were assessed at different time points using intracellular interferon-gamma staining in response to a panel of overlapping peptides comprising E2, NS3, NS5a and NS5b HCV proteins. RESULTS: At baseline, HCV-specific responses were significantly lower in HIV-coinfected patients. At week 12 of therapy, CD8+ T-cell responses against all HCV proteins significantly decreased in HCV-monoinfected patients and this was maintained throughout the follow-up period. Although the same trend occurred in the HIV-coinfected group, differences were not significant. CD4+ T-cell responses against NS3 significantly diminished in the HCV-monoinfected group, whereas in coinfected patients CD4+ T-cell responses were low at baseline and did not experience any significant variation. CONCLUSIONS: HCV-specific T-cell responses are lower in HIV-coinfected patients and vanish following complete suppression of HCV replication under successful HCV therapy, suggesting that they are dependent on continuous antiqenic stimulation.

Premature treatment discontinuation in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients receiving pegylated interferon plus weight-based ribavirin.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C therapy in HIV patients is often penalized by more frequent premature treatment discontinuations. It is unclear what the relative contribution of more adverse events and/or early virological failures are. METHODS: PRESCO was a prospective, multicentre, comparative trial, in which 389 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with CD4+ T-cell counts >300 cells/ml and elevated aminotransferases received pegylated interferon-alpha2a (peg IFN-alpha2a) 180 mg per week plus ribavirin (RBV) 1,000-1,200 mg daily. Patients with HCV genotypes 1 or 4 were treated for 48 or 72 weeks while HCV genotypes 2 or 3 carriers were treated for 24 or 48 weeks. Use of didanosine was not allowed. RESULTS: Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved by 193 (49.6%), and was significantly greater in HCV-2/3 than in HCV-1/4 patients (72.4% versus 35%; P<0.0001). Premature treatment discontinuations occurred in 174 patients (44.7%). This was due to early virological failure in 66 (17%), serious adverse events in 32 (8.2%), loss-to-follow-up in 12 (3.1%) and voluntary withdrawal in 64 (16.4%). Only 10 patients (2.6%) stopped HCV therapy due to severe anaemia. Two patients stopped HCV medication due to symptomatic mitochondrial toxicity. There were no episodes of hepatic decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with RBV 1,000-1,200 mg/day plus peg IFN-alpha2a is relatively safe and provided SVR in nearly half of the HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, twice as many amongst the HCV-2/3 than HCV-1/4 carriers. Avoidance of didanosine, limited use of zidovudine and therapy restricted to patients with CD4+ T-cell counts >300 cells/ml most probably explains the lower and different spectrum of serious adverse events in PRESCO compared with prior trials conducted in coinfected patients.

Role of weight-based ribavirin dosing and extended duration of therapy in chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients: the PRESCO trial.

The response to pegylated interferon (pegIFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) as treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is lower in HIV-coinfected than in HCV-monoinfected patients and could be due to suboptimal RBV dosing and/or insufficient duration of therapy in prior trials. In a prospective, multicenter, open, comparative trial, HCV/HIV-coinfected patients received pegIFN plus weight-based RBV for 48 or 72 weeks (HCV genotypes 1 and 4) and 24 or 48 weeks (HCV genotypes 2 and 3). Use of didanosine was not allowed. Out of 389 patients included in the trial, 61% were infected by HCV-1/4 and 67% had serum HCV-RNA >500,000 IU/ml. Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved by 49.6%, significantly higher in HCV-2/3 than HCV-1/4 (72.4% vs. 35%; p < 0.0001). A high drop-out rate in the longer treatment arms precluded obtaining definitive conclusions about the efficacy of prolonging therapy. Premature treatment discontinuations due to serious adverse events occurred in 8.2%. Infection with HCV-2/3, lower baseline HCV-RNA, and negative HCV-RNA at week 12 were all independent predictors of SVR in the multivariate analysis. The use of RBV 1000-1200 mg/day plus pegIFN is relatively safe and provides SVR in nearly half of coinfected patients, twice as high in HCV-2/3 than HCV-1/4.

Mitochondrial DNA depletion in HIV-infected patients is more pronounced with chronic hepatitis C and enhanced following treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin.

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage seems to be responsible for many of the toxicities associated with the long-term use of nucleoside analogues in HIV-infected patients. These adverse effects, mainly lipoatrophy, seem to be even more pronounced in subjects with hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection. However, there is no information about a possible additive effect of HCV on mtDNA depletion nor about the impact of ribavirin use in HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: mtDNA was measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected from 192 individuals classified into 4 groups: HIV-neg/HCV-neg (control group, n = 11), HIV-pos/HCV-neg (56), HIV-neg/HCV-pos (18) and HIV-pos/HCV-pos (107). A duplex real-time NASBA assay was used to quantify mtDNA on maximal platelet-depleted specimens and all experiments were run in duplicate. The mtDNA copy number per cell was estimated taking as reference the nuclear DNA copy number. RESULTS: The mean mtDNA values in the control group was 757 copies/cell, while it was 428, 349 and 296 for HIV-pos, HCV-pos and HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals, respectively (P < 0.001 for all groups relative to the control group). No significant differences were observed when comparing patients with HIV or HCV infections alone, but coinfected individuals showed a lower mtDNA copy number than patients infected with HIV (P < 0.001) or with HCV (P = 0.089). In a subset of 18 patients with HIV/HCV-coinfection, treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin produced a further reduction in mtDNA (mean value, 189 copies/cell; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: HIV and HCV may independently cause mtDNA depletion in PBMC. Coinfection may result in more pronounced mtDNA depletion. The administration of interferon plus ribavirin may further enhance mtDNA depletion. These findings may explain the greater risk of lipoatrophy of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients with HCV coinfection and why anti-HCV therapy may aggravate this effect.

Characteristics and prospects for hepatitis C therapy of an HIV-HCV coinfected population followed at a reference HIV center.

PURPOSE: A cross-sectional study was performed during 2004 at a large HIV clinic in Spain to identify HIV-HCV coinfected individuals who might be candidates for HCV therapy. METHOD: Plasma HCV RNA levels were measured in 405 anti-HCV antibody positive patients. Spontaneous HCV clearance had occurred in 11.4%. Overall, 165 (40.1%) of HCV-HIV coinfected patients had already been exposed to interferon (IFN)-based therapies. Excluding those currently on treatment, the majority of them had either failed (64/142; 45.1%) or not completed therapy (25/142; 17.6%). Other 103 (25.4%) chronic HCV carriers refused treatment or were not considered as appropriate candidates, most often due to low CD4 counts or severe neuropsychiatric conditions. Treatment was deemed feasible and planned in the near future in 91 (22.5%) patients. Unfavorable HCV genotypes (1 and 4) were significantly more frequent in this group of individuals ready for HCV treatment compared to those who had cleared HCV in the past following IFN-based therapies. RESULTS: Spontaneous clearance of the HCV infection was low in HIV-coinfected patients. One third of our HIV-HCV coinfected population had already been exposed to HCV therapy, but only a minority had achieved sustained HCV clearance. Half of patients with active HCV replication never exposed to IFN were not considered as appropriate candidates for HCV therapy. CONCLUSION: More flexible criteria would considerably increase the number of patients to be treated with IFN-based therapy. The majority of patients ready to initiate HCV therapy have a poor therapeutic profile.

Hepatic and renal safety profile of tenofovir in HIV-infected patients with hepatitis C, including patients on interferon plus ribavirin.

The liver safety of tenofovir (TDF) was investigated in 142 HIV+ patients exposed to the drug for longer than 12 months. No evidence of liver enzyme elevations were seen, even in 66 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection. Given that TDF is an adenosine analogue, like didanosine, exposure to ribavirin might increase intracellular phosphorylated TDF metabolites, which could result in a higher risk of nephrotoxicity. Signs of tubular dysfunction in blood or urine were not recognized in 17 HCV-HIV co-infected patients exposed to TDF during interferon plus ribavirin therapy.

Long-term survival and liver-related events after pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Sustained HCV clearance after hepatitis C therapy is associated with reduced liver-related complications and death. It is unknown if treatment may provide any clinical benefit in patients that fail therapy. This could be particularly relevant in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients, in whom liver disease progresses more rapidly. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of clinical end points in a large cohort of HIV-HCV-coinfected patients with compensated liver disease followed since 2004. Patients were stratified into three groups: treated and cured, treatment failures and non-treated. Follow-up ended at the time of last visit, first liver decompensation event or death. RESULTS: A total of 527 HIV-HCV-coinfected patients were examined, of whom 339 (64.3%) had been treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin. During a mean follow-up of 70.5 months, hepatic decompensation events or liver-related deaths occurred less frequently in cured patients (4/138; 2.9%) than in treatment failures (28/201; 13.9%) or untreated (25/188; 13.3%) patients (P<0.001). Interestingly, in the subset of patients with baseline advanced liver fibrosis (Metavir F3-F4), those with treatment failure experienced less hepatic decompensation events or deaths than untreated patients (19% versus 42%; P=0.005) and this finding was more pronounced in patients harbouring IL28B-CC alleles (15.8% versus 47.4%; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Sustained HCV clearance following pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy is associated with a reduced incidence of liver complications and death in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients. In the subset of patients with baseline advanced liver fibrosis, treatment provides clinical benefit despite lack of sustained virological response. The transient antiviral and/or anti-inflammatory effect of interferon, more recognizable in IL28B-CC carriers, could explain this finding.