Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BJU Int ; 100(3): 579-87, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17669143

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare solifenacin succinate (5 and 10 mg once-daily) to placebo and propiverine hydrochloride (20 mg once-daily), respectively, in Japanese patients with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicentre, 12-week, double-blind phase III trial randomized men and women aged > or = 20 years with OAB to solifenacin 5 or 10 mg, propiverine 20 mg, or placebo. Changes at endpoint in number of voids/24 h, urgency, incontinence, urgency incontinence and nocturia episodes, volume voided/void, restoration of continence and quality of life (QoL) were examined. RESULTS: Of 1593 patients randomized, 1584 were treated; at the endpoint there were greater reductions in mean (sd) voids/24 h with solifenacin 5 mg, at -1.93 (1.97), and 10 mg, at -2.19 (2.09), and propiverine 20 mg, at -1.87 (2.70), than with placebo, at -0.94 (2.29) (P < 0.001 for all). Solifenacin (5 and 10 mg) was superior to placebo, and no worse than propiverine 20 mg, for this variable. There were significantly fewer mean (sd) urgency, incontinence and urgency incontinence episodes with solifenacin and propiverine than with placebo, with respective changes on placebo of - 1.28 (2.90), - 0.72 (1.95) and - 0.69 (2.00); solifenacin 5 mg, - 2.41 (2.88), -1.59 (2.12) and -1.45 (1.89) (P < 0.001 for all), and 10 mg, -2.78 (2.82), - 1.60 (1.81) and - 1.52 (1.77) (P < 0.001 for all), and propiverine 20 mg, -2.30 (3.08), -1.25 (2.79) and - 1.19 (2.20) (P < 0.001, = 0.002 and = 0.002 respectively). All active treatments vs placebo improved the volume voided (P < 0.001 for all) and QoL; solifenacin 10 mg reduced nocturia episodes (P = 0.021) and significantly improved urgency episodes (P = 0.012) and volume voided (P = 0.009) vs propiverine 20 mg, and solifenacin 5 mg caused less dry mouth (P = 0.003). Solifenacin 10 mg caused more dry mouth (P = 0.012) and occurrences of constipation (P = 0.004) than propiverine 20 mg, but discontinuation rates between both treatment groups were similar. Continence was restored at endpoint in more than half of the patients on active treatment. CONCLUSION: Solifenacin 5 and 10 mg once daily significantly improved the symptoms of OAB compared with placebo. Solifenacin therapy at 5 mg once daily is well-tolerated; 10 mg can be given if additional efficacy is required.


Asunto(s)
Bencilatos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapéutico , Quinuclidinas/uso terapéutico , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Urodinámica/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Bencilatos/efectos adversos , Estreñimiento/inducido químicamente , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Quinuclidinas/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Succinato de Solifenacina , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Xerostomía/inducido químicamente
2.
BJU Int ; 94(3): 381-3, 2004 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15291872

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the long-term outcome of endoscopic surgery to correct vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR) using different injected substances, i.e. autologous blood, hyaluronan/dextranomer copolymer (HDC), PTFE and glutaraldehyde cross-linked bovine dermal (GAX) collagen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment results on 270 ureters of 185 patients followed for >5 years (mean 8.5) were summarized according to the injected substances. The substances were injected into the 6 o'clock position of the ureteric orifice endoscopically. "Success" was defined as the absence of VUR for >5 years after a single injection. RESULTS: The treatment was successful in two of 24 patients (8%) with autologous blood, 17 of 32 (53%) with HDC, 108 of 171 (63%) with PTFE and 24 of 43 (56%) with GAX collagen. The success rate was lower in patients with higher grades of VUR. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous blood is unsuitable for clinical application because of its poor durability. We will no longer use PTFE because its safety is not well established. The overall success rates of endoscopic surgery with GAX collagen and HDC were insufficient compared with surgical reimplantation, but it is advantageous that this procedure is less invasive and can be repeated. The cure rate could be improved by excluding high-grade VUR from the indications for endoscopic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Colágeno/análogos & derivados , Cistoscopía/métodos , Ureteroscopía/métodos , Reflujo Vesicoureteral/cirugía , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Transfusión de Sangre Autóloga/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Colágeno/administración & dosificación , Reactivos de Enlaces Cruzados/administración & dosificación , Dextranos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Glutaral/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Ácido Hialurónico/administración & dosificación , Lactante , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Politetrafluoroetileno/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA