A novel ultra-low-volume regimen combining 1 L polyethylene glycol and linaclotide versus 2 L polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy cleansing in low-risk individuals: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The single dose of 2 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) has shown high cleaning efficacy and tolerability in low-risk patients. However, the dosage of this regimen is still challenging for many patients. We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of a novel ultra-low-volume regimen using 1 L PEG and linaclotide (1 L PEG+L) versus a single dose of 2 L PEG in low-risk patients. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, multicenter study, low-risk adult patients scheduled for colonoscopy were enrolled and randomized (1:1) to receive the 1 L PEG+L regimen or the 2 L PEG regimen. The primary outcome was the effectiveness of bowel cleansing according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Secondary outcomes included cecal intubation rate, cecal insertion time, withdrawal time, polyp detection rate and adenoma detection rate, tolerability, adverse events, and willingness to repeat bowel preparation. The full analysis set (FAS) and per-protocol set (PPS) were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: A total of 548 patients comprised the FAS, and 522 patients comprised the PPS. Noninferiority on adequate bowel cleansing of 1 L PEG+L vs 2 L PEG was established both in FAS (90.5% vs 91.6%, P = .644) and PPS (90.3% vs 92.4%, P = .390). There were no significant differences regarding the total score and each segment scores of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, cecal intubation rate, cecal insertion time, withdrawal time, polyp detection rate, and adenoma detection rate (all, P > .05). However, patients in the 1 L PEG+L group reported less nausea (7.7% vs 17.1%, P < .01) and vomiting (4.0% vs 10.9%, P < .01) and had a higher willingness to repeat bowel preparation (95.2% vs 82.2%, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The regimen of 1 L PEG+L was not inferior to 2 L PEG on colon cleansing, with better tolerability and higher willingness to repeat the bowel preparation in a low-risk population. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100053273.).

Design and validation of performance-oriented injectable chitosan thermosensitive hydrogels for endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a challenging procedure. The use of biomaterials to improve the operator's convenience (operating affinity) has received little attention. We prepared two thermosensitive hydrogels, lactobionic acid-modified chitosan/chitosan/ß-glycerophosphate thermosensitive hydrogel (hydrogel 1) and its lyophilized powders (hydrogel 2), characterized their physicochemical properties and evaluated their performance in ESD experiments on large animals, by comparing with the commonly used normal saline (NS) and glycerin fructose (GF). These hydrogels showed good low-temperature fluidity; their viscosities at 4 °C were 92.2 mPa.s and 26.9 mPa.s, respectively. The hydrogels provided significantly better viscoelastic properties than NS and GF. The relaxation moduli of hydrogels were higher than those of NS and GF when the strains were 1 %, 5 %, and 10 %. The hydrogels can be maintained for seven days, even at pH 1, after which they degrade entirely. In pig model experiments, we performed submucosal injection and ESD procedures in the stomach and esophagus. The cushion height produced by the hydrogels was higher than those of NS and GF 30 min after injection. The ESD operation time for hydrogels was significantly shorter. Postoperative wound observation and histological analysis showed that the hydrogels promoted wound healing. The two hydrogels differed in fluidity, viscoelasticity, and other properties, which makes it possible to select the hydrogels according to the size and location of the lesion during ESD operation, and hydrogel 2 may be more suitable for use in lengthier procedures. In general, the hydrogels showed good performance, facilitated the intraoperative operation of ESD, shorten the operation time and promoted wound healing, which is of great significance for reducing the complications and reducing the threshold of ESD operation and further promoting the popularity of ESD.