RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and complications of hydrogel spacer implantation. METHODS: This single-center historical cohort study retrospectively analyzed cases of hydrogel spacer implantation between October 2018 and March 2022. The survey items were the rates of possible hydrogel injection implementation, the success rate of hydrogel implantation including asymmetry, higher position, rectal wall infiltration, subcapsular injection, and other adverse events, and width created by the spacer. To investigate the learning curve, 1, 2, and 3 points were assigned to adverse event grades G1, G2, and G3, respectively. Spacer effectiveness obstruction, such as asymmetry was assigned 3 points. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to assess statistically significant differences. RESULTS: The study included a total of 200 patients with a median (range) age of 70 (44-85) years. In 10 (5%) patients, hydrogel injection implementation was not possible. Of 190 patients who underwent hydrogel spacer placement, 168 (88%) received a satisfactory placement. The median (range) width of hydrogel spacers was 13.1 (4.4-18.7) mm. Spacer asymmetry, higher position, rectal wall infiltration, and prostate subcapsular infiltration occurred in 7 (3.7%), 5 (2.6%), 12 (6.3%), and 1 (0.5%) patients, respectively. G1 and G3 adverse events occurred in 13 (7%) and 4 (2%) patients, respectively. Practitioner #1 who performed the highest number of procedures had significantly (p = 0.04) lower total scores in group B. CONCLUSION: Spacer implantation yielded favorable outcomes with a high percentage of appropriate spacer implantation, and few major complications.
Asunto(s)
Hidrogeles , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hidrogeles/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Órganos en Riesgo , Recto/cirugía , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Hidrogel de Polietilenoglicol-Dimetacrilato/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Purpose: To identify the induced radionuclides produced from dental metals in proton beam therapy and investigate the accuracy of the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation by comparing the measured radioactivity. Methods and Materials: Two dental metals of pure titanium and gold-silver-palladium alloy, commonly used in Japan, were used in this study. The dental metal placed at the center of Spread-out Bragg Peak was irradiated by 150-MeV passive scattering proton beam. The gamma rays emitted from the activated dental metals were measured using a high purity germanium (HPGe) detector. The induced radionuclides were identified from the measured gamma-ray energies. Furthermore, the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System v.3.24 and DCHAIN were used for the MC simulation. The measured radionuclides and their radioactivity were compared with the simulation results. Results: In the MC simulation for the activated titanium, vanadium-47, with a half-life of 32.6 minutes had the strongest radioactivity among the induced radionuclides. The energy peaks of gamma rays emitted from titanium-51, scandium-43, scandium-44, and annihilation gamma rays were observed for the activated titanium in the HPGe detector. In the MC simulation for the activated gold-silver-palladium alloy, silver-108, with a half-life of 2.4 minutes had the strongest radioactivity. The energy peaks of gamma rays emitted from silver-104, silver-104 m, silver-108, and annihilation gamma rays were observed for the activated gold-silver-palladium alloy in the HPGe detector. Furthermore, the induced radionuclides and their radioactivity in the MC simulation were consistent with the measurement results for both dental metals, except for a few radionuclides. Conclusions: We identify the induced radionuclides produced from 2 dental metals and compared their radioactivity between the measurements and the MC simulation. Although the identification of the induced radionuclides using the MC simulation remains uncertain, the MC simulation can be clinically effective for pre-estimating the induced radionuclides in proton beam therapy.
RESUMEN
Ameloblastic carcinoma (AC) is a very rare malignant odontogenic tumor. Although surgical resection is generally performed, treatment approaches have not been established for recurrent cases. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are positioned as adjunctive therapies, and few studies investigated definitive non-operative therapy. We present the case of a 71-year-old male with recurrent secondary-type AC arising from the right maxilla, who was treated with proton beam therapy (PBT; 71.4 Gy relative biological effectiveness in 32 fractions) combined with continuous intra-arterial infusion of cisplatin (40 mg/m2) and docetaxel (8 mg/m2). The patient experienced acute grade 3 mucositis, dermatitis and neutropenia, which were resolved within 3 months of treatment. Late adverse events were grade 1 skin atrophy, and grade 2 right optic nerve disorder and retinopathy. After ~8 years of treatment, the patient died from another cause but did not experience any relapse or metastasis during the follow-up period of 94 months. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of recurrent AC treated with PBT and intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy without any severe late adverse events. This combination therapy approach may be considered as an effective therapeutic option for inoperable AC.
RESUMEN
This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect and toxicity of proton beam therapy in combination with intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary gingiva. Between December 2010 and March 2016, 30 patients with T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary gingiva were treated with radiotherapy and retrograde intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy using cisplatin (20â»40 mg/m², 4â»6 times). Radiotherapy was basically administered using boost proton beam therapy for primary tumor and neck lymph node tumors, following 36â»40 Gy photon radiation therapy delivered to the prophylactic area, to a total dose of 70.4â»74.8 Gy. The median follow-up was 33 months. The 3-year local control and overall survival rates were 69% and 59%, respectively. Major grade 3 or higher acute toxicities included mucositis, neutropenia, and dermatitis in 12 (40%), 5 (17%), and 3 (10%) patients, respectively. No grade 3 or higher late toxicities were observed. These results suggested that proton beam therapy in combination with intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy was not inferior to other treatment protocols and should be considered as a safe and effective option in patients with T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary gingiva.