European dental students' opinions on their local anaesthesia education.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate students' opinion about theoretical and clinical training in local anaesthesia at different European dental schools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to collect information about local anaesthesia teaching. Students' opinion was quantified with five-point Likert scales. The web-based questionnaire was distributed through European Dental Students Association contacts amongst students of 25 different dental schools. Eight hundred and eighteen completed questionnaires from students of 12 dental schools were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Dental schools showed a wide variation in the beginning of the theoretical teaching of local anaesthesia and the practical teaching. A preclinical training model was used by a small number of students, but these students found it a useful preparation. Many students felt insufficiently prepared when they administered their first injection in a human (17-81%). In dental schools from the UK, Ireland, Sweden and the Netherlands, this first injection is administered to a fellow dental student, whilst in the other countries the first injection is usually performed in a patient. Instruction in mandibular block anaesthesia was frequently reported (81-100%) as well as in infiltration anaesthesia of the upper and lower jaws (78-100% and 30-93% respectively). Many students expressed that they like to receive teaching in intraligamentary anaesthesia (13-70%). Other changes in the curriculum were also frequently suggested (33-100%), especially the introduction of preclinical training models and practical teaching earlier in the curriculum. CONCLUSION: Local anaesthesia teaching programmes and the rating of this teaching by dental students show a considerable variation across European dental schools. Students considered better preparation highly desirable. The variability in programmes may have implications for mobility of students between European dental schools.

[Dental students on instruction in local anaesthesia]. / Tandheelkundestudenten over onderwijs in lokale anesthesie.

In order to find out how dental students feel about their education in the application of local anaesthesia, a questionnaire was distributed via e-mail among all dental students in the Netherlands. A total of 397 completed questionnaires were analyzed statistically. At all 3 dental schools in the second year instruction in theoretical aspects of local anaesthesia began. Practical teaching began in the second or third study year. A preclinical training model was used by 15% of the students in Amsterdam, 20% of the students in Nijmegen and 35% of the students in Groningen. When they administered their first injection in a human, a fellow dental student in 91-98% of all cases, 24-74% of the students felt that they were insufficiently prepared. 35-52% of the students said that they would also like to receive instruction in intraligamentary anaesthesia in the dental curriculum. Other changes in the curriculum were also frequently suggested, especially the introduction of preclinical training models (29%, 55% and 56% for Groningen, Nijmegen and Amsterdam respectively).

The preparation, cytocompatibility, and in vitro biodegradation study of pure beta-TCP on magnesium.

Biodegradable and bioactive beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) coatings were prepared on magnesium (Mg) in order to improve its biocompatibility by a chemical method. The tensile bonding strength of beta-TCP coating and Mg substrate was measured by the standard adhesion test (ISO 13779-4). And the cytocompatibility of beta-TCP coated Mg was studied by using human osteoblast-like MG63 cells. It was found that the MG63 cells could grow well on the surface of beta-TCP coated Mg and the cell viability on beta-TCP coated Mg was above 80% during the cocultivation of MG63 cells and beta-TCP coated Mg for 10 days, indicating no cytotoxicity. It was concluded that the beta-TCP coated Mg had good cytocompatibility. The degradation of Mg substrate with beta-TCP coating in vitro was studied in detail by XRD, EDX, SEM, and ICP. The results showed that a bone-like apatite continually formed on the surface of the sample with the degradation of both Mg substrate and beta-TCP coating in Hank's solution (a simulated body fluid). The biodegradation mechanism was preliminarily analyzed in the paper.

An animal experimental study of porous magnesium scaffold degradation and osteogenesis.

Our objective was to observe the biodegradable and osteogenic properties of magnesium scaffolding under in vivo conditions. Twelve 6-month-old male New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into two groups. The chosen operation site was the femoral condyle on the right side. The experimental group was implanted with porous magnesium scaffolds, while the control group was implanted with hydroxyapatite scaffolds. X-ray and blood tests, which included serum magnesium, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine (CREA), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were performed serially at 1, 2, and 3 weeks, and 1, 2, and 3 months. All rabbits were killed 3 months postoperatively, and the heart, kidney, spleen, and liver were analyzed with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. The bone samples were subjected to microcomputed tomography scanning (micro-CT) and hard tissue biopsy. SPSS 13.0 (USA) was used for data analysis, and values of P<0.05 were considered to be significant. Bubbles appeared in the X-ray of the experimental group after 2 weeks, whereas there was no gas in the control group. There were no statistical differences for the serum magnesium concentrations, ALT, BUN, and CREA between the two groups (P>0.05). All HE-stained slices were normal, which suggested good biocompatibility of the scaffold. Micro-CT showed that magnesium scaffolds degraded mainly from the outside to inside, and new bone was ingrown following the degradation of magnesium scaffolds. The hydroxyapatite scaffold was not degraded and had fewer osteoblasts scattered on its surface. There was a significant difference in the new bone formation and scaffold bioabsorption between the two groups (9.29 ± 1.27 vs 1.40 ± 0.49 and 7.80 ± 0.50 vs 0.00 ± 0.00 mm3, respectively; P<0.05). The magnesium scaffold performed well in degradation and osteogenesis, and is a promising material for orthopedics.

An animal experimental study of porous magnesium scaffold degradation and osteogenesis

Our objective was to observe the biodegradable and osteogenic properties of magnesium scaffolding under in vivo conditions. Twelve 6-month-old male New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into two groups. The chosen operation site was the femoral condyle on the right side. The experimental group was implanted with porous magnesium scaffolds, while the control group was implanted with hydroxyapatite scaffolds. X-ray and blood tests, which included serum magnesium, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine (CREA), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were performed serially at 1, 2, and 3 weeks, and 1, 2, and 3 months. All rabbits were killed 3 months postoperatively, and the heart, kidney, spleen, and liver were analyzed with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. The bone samples were subjected to microcomputed tomography scanning (micro-CT) and hard tissue biopsy. SPSS 13.0 (USA) was used for data analysis, and values of P<0.05 were considered to be significant. Bubbles appeared in the X-ray of the experimental group after 2 weeks, whereas there was no gas in the control group. There were no statistical differences for the serum magnesium concentrations, ALT, BUN, and CREA between the two groups (P>0.05). All HE-stained slices were normal, which suggested good biocompatibility of the scaffold. Micro-CT showed that magnesium scaffolds degraded mainly from the outside to inside, and new bone was ingrown following the degradation of magnesium scaffolds. The hydroxyapatite scaffold was not degraded and had fewer osteoblasts scattered on its surface. There was a significant difference in the new bone formation and scaffold bioabsorption between the two groups (9.29±1.27 vs 1.40±0.49 and 7.80±0.50 vs 0.00±0.00 mm3, respectively; P<0.05). The magnesium scaffold performed well in degradation and osteogenesis, and is a promising material for orthopedics.