Analysis of adjacent vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty: do radiological or surgical features matter?

PURPOSE: To report the incidence and risk factors of adjacent vertebral fracture (AVF) after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). We focused to investigate effect of radiological or surgical features on AVF. METHODS: All patients with OVCFs who were treated with PVP between January 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were followed up at least 12 months after procedure according to treatment protocol. AVF was defined as postoperatively recurrent intractable back pain and subsequently presence of fracture on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in adjacent levels. Clinical, radiological, and surgical factors potentially affecting occurrence of AVF were recorded and analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Totally, 1077 patients with 1077 fractured vertebrae who underwent PVP were enrolled in the study, after inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. Mean follow-up time was 24.3 ± 11.9 months (range, 12-59 months). AVF was identified in 98 (9.1%) patients. Univariate analysis showed that seven significant factors related to AVF were older age, non-traumatic fracture, cortical disruption on anterior wall, cortical disruption on lateral wall, basivertebral foramen, type-B leakage and type-C leakage. In multivariate analysis, two clinical factors, older age (P = 0.031) and non-traumatic fracture (P = 0.002), were significantly associated with AVF. However, any radiological or surgical factor did not reach significance in final model analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of AVF after PVP in patients with OVCFs was 9.1% (98/1077). Older age and non-traumatic fracture were two clinical risk factors for AVF. Neither radiological nor surgical feature was significantly correlated with AVF.

The impact of intravertebral cleft on cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of intravertebral cleft (IVC) on cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) has been discussed. However, the results were conflicting, as the study population and cement leakage classification were heterogeneous. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of IVC on the incidence of leakage through vein, leakage through cortex as well as general leakage in PVP for OVCFs. METHODS: All patients with OVCFs who underwent PVP between January 2016 and June 2019 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were eligible for this case-control study if they were diagnosed as single level fracture in spine. After inclusive and exclusive criteria were met, a total of 139 patients with IVC were enrolled as the study group. Non-IVC controls were matched in a 1:1 ratio in age (within 3 years), sex and fracture severity with patients in study group. Cement leakage were classified into four types [type B (through basivertebral vein), type S (through segmental vein), type-C (through a cortical defect), and type D (intradiscal leakage)], furtherly into two types [venous type (type-B or/and type S) and cortical type (type-C or/and type-D)]. A general leakage rate and a specific leakage rate per each type were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Each group included 139 patients. Groups were homogenous for age, sex, fracture severity, fracture location, fracture type, cement volume, puncture approach and property of cement. Compared with control group, IVC group had a significantly lower rate of type-B (20.9% vs. 31.7%, P = 0.041), type-S (24.5% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.000), and venous type leakage (37.4% vs. 67.6%, P = 0.000), a significantly higher rate of type-C (25.9% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.004), type-D (16.5% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.009), and cortical type leakage (40.3% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.000), no significant difference on the rate of general leakage (67.6% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.109). CONCLUSION: IVC decreased the risk of cement leakage through vein and increased the risk of cement leakage through cortex. However, it had no significant effect on the occurrence of general leakage.

Risk Factors for Cement Leakage in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: An Analysis of 1456 Vertebrae Augmented by Low-Viscosity Bone Cement.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) using low-viscosity bone cement for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cement leakage is the most common complication for PVP and its risk factors have been discussed. However, data in previous series were heterogeneous. Additionally, relative smaller patient sample or more types of cement leakage classified in those studies made the results conflicting. METHODS: A total of 1090 patients who underwent PVP with low-viscosity bone cement for OVCFs in 1456 levels between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Parameters potentially affecting the occurrence of cement leakage were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Cement leakage was assessed using postoperative computed tomography scanning, and classified into two types (cortical leakage and venous leakage) considering the mechanism. RESULTS: The incidence of cortical and venous leakage were 20.3% (295/1456) and 56.2% (819/1456), respectively. Cortical disruption, basivertebral foramen were the strongest risk factors for cortical leakage (P = 0.000), venous leakage (P = 0.000), respectively. Greater cement volume is one risk factor for both cortical leakage and venous leakage. The intravertebral cleft, solid type of cement distribution were significant risk factors for cortical leakage, and they both were protective factors for venous leakage. For cortical leakage, older age and trauma were another two risk factors. For venous leakage, female was another one risk factor, and higher grade of fracture severity is the strongest protective factor. CONCLUSION: Both cortical leakage and venous leakage are prevalent. Adequate known of risk factors could help balance the incidence of two type leakage in unique vertebra and reduce the incidence of leakage in general in PVP for OVCFs.Level of Evidence: 3.