Antiviral Therapy in Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Liver Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major risk factor for the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Key Messages: In patients with advanced liver fibrosis or liver cirrhosis, antiviral therapy is mandatory to slow down, halt or reverse disease progression and possibly reduce the risk of HCC development. As in patients without advanced fibrosis, PEG-interferon and nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NUCs) are available for antiviral therapy. NUC therapy should be performed indefinitely as the rates of HBs-Ag loss are low. Entecavir or tenofovir should be preferred due to their strong antiviral potency and their high barrier to resistance. PEG-interferon therapy can be administered to patients with compensated liver disease but should not be offered to patients with signs of hepatic decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: Antiviral therapy in chronic HBV infection can reduce liver fibrosis and even revert overt cirrhosis. Whether it also reduces the risk of HCC development in cirrhotic patients remains elusive and might vary in different countries and ethnicities.

Restoration of HCV-specific CD8+ T cell function by interferon-free therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is characterised by a failure of virus-specific CD8+ T cells that is mainly caused by viral escape and T cell exhaustion. Constant antigen stimulation has been suggested to contribute to HCV-specific CD8+ T cell exhaustion. However, IFN-based therapies failed to recover HCV-specific CD8+ T cell function suggesting that the damage to CD8+ T cells may be permanent even after antigen removal. It was therefore the objective of this study to analyse the impact of inhibition of ongoing viral replication by IFN-free therapy with direct acting antivirals (DAA) on the phenotype and function of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells. METHODS: Virus-specific CD8+ T cells obtained from a patient cohort of 51 previously untreated chronically infected patients undergoing IFN-free therapy with a combination of faldaprevir (a protease inhibitor) and deleobuvir (a non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor) with or without ribavirin were analysed ex vivo and after in vitro expansion at baseline, wk4, wk 12, and after treatment. RESULTS: Our results show the rapid restoration of proliferative HCV-specific CD8+ T cells in the majority of patients with SVR12 within 4 weeks of therapy suggesting that IFN-free therapy mediated antigen removal may restore CD8+ T cell function. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates a specific restoration of proliferative HCV-specific CD8+ T cells under IFN-free therapy. This is in contrast to PegIFN-based therapies that have been shown not to restore T cell function during and after chronic infection.

Rapid and strong antiviral activity of the non-nucleosidic NS5B polymerase inhibitor BI 207127 in combination with peginterferon alfa 2a and ribavirin.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: BI 207127 is a potent non-nucleoside hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5B polymerase inhibitor in vitro. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 57 HCV genotype (GT)-1 patients (n=27 treatment-naïve [TN]; n=30 treatment-experienced [TE]) with compensated liver disease were randomised for 28-day treatment with 400, 600, or 800 mg BI 207127 three times daily (TID) or placebo (only TN) in combination with peginterferon alfa 2a and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV). Plasma HCV RNA was measured by Roche COBAS TaqMan assay. RESULTS: HCV RNA decreased in a dose-dependent manner with little difference between 600 mg (TN 5.6 log(10), TE 4.2 log(10)) and 800 mg (TN 5.4 log(10), TE 4.5 log(10)). Rapid virological response (RVR; HCV RNA <15 IU/ml) at day 28 occurred in 11/19 TN and 4/30 TE patients treated with BI 207127. GT-1b patients had stronger reductions in HCV RNA than GT-1a (RVR: TN 64% vs. 43%; TE 33% vs. 5%). There were no breakthroughs (HCV RNA rebound >1 log(10) from nadir) in the TN groups, whereas 3/30 TE patients experienced breakthrough due to P495-mutations. Gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) and rash were the major AEs and most frequent at higher doses. One and four patients discontinued due to AEs in the 600 and 800 mg groups, respectively. Overall, tolerability was good and better at 600 mg than 800 mg. CONCLUSIONS: BI 207127 in combination with PegIFN/RBV demonstrated strong antiviral activity with a favourable safety and tolerability profile. The best benefit/risk ratio was observed at 600 mg.

Improved responses to pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin by individualizing treatment for 24-72 weeks.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidelines recommend that patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection be treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for 24, 48, or 72 weeks, based on their virologic response to treatment. We investigated the effects of treating patients for individualized durations. METHODS: We treated 398 treatment-naïve patients who had HCV genotype 1 infections with pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 60, or 72 weeks (mean of 39 weeks, termed individualized therapy); the duration of therapy was determined based on baseline viral load and the time point at which HCV RNA levels became undetectable (measured at weeks 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 30). Results were compared with those of 225 patients who received standard treatment for 48 weeks (mean of 38 weeks). RESULTS: Rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) were 55% among patients who received individualized treatment and 48% among those who received standard treatment (P < .0001 for noninferiority). SVR rates, according to the time point at which HCV RNA levels became undetectable, did not differ significantly between groups. Patients with a rapid virologic response (undetectable levels of HCV RNA at week 4) who were treated for 24 to 30 weeks achieved high rates of SVR (86%-88%). Rates of SVR increased among slow responders who first tested negative for HCV RNA at week 24 and were treated for 60 to 72 weeks compared with those treated for 48 weeks (60%-68% vs 43%-44%). The CC polymorphism at IL28B rs129797860 was associated with an increased rate of SVR compared with the CT/TT polymorphism (P < .0001) at baseline but not among patients who had undetectable levels of HCV RNA following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Individualizing treatment of patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infections for 24 to 72 weeks results in high rates of SVR among rapid responders and increases SVR among slow responders.

Comparison of the Covered Self-Expandable Viatorr CX Stent with the Covered Balloon-Expandable BeGraft Peripheral Stent for Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Creation: a Single-Centre Retrospective Study in Patients with Variceal Bleeding.

PURPOSE: This study compares the safety and efficacy of the ePTFE-covered self-expansible nitinol stent (VIATORR® Controlled Expansion, Gore, Flagstaff, USA) with the ePTFE-covered, balloon-expandable, metallic stent (BeGraft peripheral, Bentley, Hechingen, Germany) for the creation of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From September 2016 to December 2020, 72 consecutive patients receiving TIPS for acute variceal bleeding (rescue and early TIPS, n = 15) or for prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding (n = 57) were enrolled. The main contraindications were patients with vascular liver disease (portal vein thrombosis and Budd-Chiari syndrome). Forty patients (55.6%) received a Viatorr CX stent and 32 patients (44.4%) a BeGraft peripheral stent. Safety endpoints were technical and clinical adverse events and early deaths within 30 days after TIPS implantation. Efficacy endpoints were rebleeding rates, recurrence of large varices requiring endoscopic band ligation, or TIPS revision. RESULTS: Groups receiving the Viatorr CX or BeGraft peripheral stent were comparable in all respects except the TIPS indication for acute variceal bleeding (5% vs. 25%, p = 0.015). All patients had a successful intervention, and the physical variables of stent implantation (intervention and fluoroscopy time, reduction of the portosystemic pressure gradient) as well as adjunctive embolization of varices were similar in both groups. Severe clinical complications (Viatorr CX: 5% vs. BeGraft peripheral: 3.1%, p = 0.692), post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (12.5% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.743) and death (5% vs. 0%, p = 0.793) were not different between Viatorr CX and BeGraft peripheral groups. With respect to efficacy, freedom from rebleeding and from variceal band ligation during follow-up (100% vs. 100%, p = 1.0), as well as the need for shunt revision (10.5% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.327), was comparable. CONCLUSION: Compared to the present gold standard, the Viatorr CX stent, the balloon-expandable BeGraft peripheral stent, showed similar results with respect to safety and efficacy.

Scavenger receptor class B is required for hepatitis C virus uptake and cross-presentation by human dendritic cells.

Class B scavenger receptors (SR-Bs) bind lipoproteins and play an important role in lipid metabolism. Most recently, SR-B type I (SR-BI) and its splicing variant SR-BII have been found to mediate bacterial adhesion and cytosolic bacterial invasion in mammalian cells. In this study, we demonstrate that SR-BI is a key host factor required for hepatitis C virus (HCV) uptake and cross-presentation by human dendritic cells (DCs). Whereas monocytes and T and B cells were characterized by very low or undetectable SR-BI expression levels, human DCs demonstrated a high level of cell surface expression of SR-BI similar to that of primary human hepatocytes. Antibodies targeting the extracellular loop of SR-BI efficiently inhibited HCV-like particle binding, uptake, and cross-presentation by human DCs. Moreover, human high-density lipoprotein specifically modulated HCV-like particle binding to DCs, indicating an interplay of HCV with the lipid transfer function of SR-BI in DCs. Finally, we demonstrate that anti-SR-BI antibodies inhibit the uptake of cell culture-derived HCV (HCVcc) in DCs. In conclusion, these findings identify a novel function of SR-BI for viral antigen uptake and recognition and may have an important impact on the design of HCV vaccines and immunotherapeutic approaches aiming at the induction of efficient antiviral immune responses.

Adjuvant Transjugular Variceal Occlusion at Creation of a Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS): Efficacy and Risks of Bucrylate Embolization.

Adjuvant embolization of varices may reduce rebleeding in patients with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and the risks of adjuvant variceal embolization at TIPS implantation using bucrylate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective study evaluated 104 of 237 cirrhotic patients with TIPS for variceal bleeding who received adjuvant bucrylate embolization. For TIPS creation, bare stents were used in 35 patients (33.7%) and covered stents in 69 patients (66.3%) patients. Isolated gastric varices were seen in 10 patients (9.6%). RESULTS: Six patients (5.8%) rebled during a median follow-up time of 26 months (1-57 months). Rebleeding occurred in 14% (5/35) of patients with a bare stent but only in 1.4% (1/69) of patients with a covered stent. The 1- and 2-year rebleeding rates of all patients were 0.9 and 2.9% and of patients receiving a bare stent were 2.9 and 8.6%, respectively. Bucrylate migration was seen in 13 patients (12.5%). In 9 of these patients (8.7%), asymptomatic lung embolization occurred. This was rare in patients with esophageal varices (3.1%) but frequent (60%) in patients with isolated gastric varices and a spontaneous splenorenal shunt. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that adjuvant embolization using bucrylate is effective and delays variceal rebleeding. The general use of covered stents, however, alleviates the utility of adjuvant bucrylate embolization which may be restricted to patients with a high risk of rebleeding indicated by large varices, active, acute or recent variceal bleeding and advanced cirrhosis. Bucrylate should not be used in isolated gastric varices because it bears a high risk of migration into the lungs.

Vitamin D levels vary during antiviral treatment but are unable to predict treatment outcome in HCV genotype 1 infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Different parameters have been determined for prediction of treatment outcome in hepatitis c virus genotype 1 infected patients undergoing pegylated interferon, ribavirin combination therapy. Results on the importance of vitamin D levels are conflicting. In the present study, a comprehensive analysis of vitamin D levels before and during therapy together with single nucleotide polymorphisms involved in vitamin D metabolism in the context of other known treatment predictors has been performed. METHODS: In a well characterized prospective cohort of 398 genotype 1 infected patients treated with pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin for 24-72 weeks (INDIV-2 study) 25-OH-vitamin D levels and different single nucleotide polymorphisms were analyzed together with known biochemical parameters for a correlation with virologic treatment outcome. RESULTS: Fluctuations of more than 5 (10) ng/ml in 25-OH-vitamin D-levels have been observed in 66 (39) % of patients during the course of antiviral therapy and neither pretreatment nor under treatment 25-OH-vitamin D-levels were associated with treatment outcome. The DHCR7-TT-polymorphism within the 7-dehydrocholesterol-reductase showed a significant association (P = 0.031) to sustained viral response in univariate analysis. Among numerous further parameters analyzed we found that age (OR = 1.028, CI = 1.002-1.056, P = 0.035), cholesterol (OR = 0.983, CI = 0.975-0.991, P<0.001), ferritin (OR = 1.002, CI = 1.000-1.004, P = 0.033), gGT (OR = 1.467, CI = 1.073-2.006, P = 0.016) and IL28B-genotype (OR = 2.442, CI = 1.271-4.695, P = 0.007) constituted the strongest predictors of treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: While 25-OH-vitamin D-levels levels show considerable variations during the long-lasting course of antiviral therapy they do not show any significant association to treatment outcome in genotype 1 infected patients.