[A multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase â ¢ clinical study of PEG-rhG-CSF for preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the safety and efficacy of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to provide the basis for clinical application. METHODS: According to the principle of open-label, randomized, parallel-group controlled clinical trial, all patients were randomized by 1∶1∶1 into three groups to receive PEG-rhG-CSF 100 µg/kg, PEG-rhG-CSF 6 mg, or rhG-CSF 5 µg/kg, respectively. The patients with breast cancer received two chemotherapy cycles, and the NSCLC patients received 1-2 cycles of chemotherapy according to their condition. All patients were treated with the combination chemotherapy of TAC (docetaxel+ epirubicin+ cyclophosphamide) or TA (docetaxel+ epirubicin), or the chemotherapy of docetaxel combined with carboplatin, with a 21 day cycle. RESULTS: The duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia in the PEG-rhG-CSF 100 µg/kg and PEG-rhG-CSF 6 mg groups were similar with that in the rhG-CSF 5 µg/kg group (P>0.05 for all). The incidence rate of grade 3-4 neutropenia in the PEG-rhG-CSF 100 µg/kg group, PEG-rhG-CSF 6 mg group, and G-CSF 5 µg/kg group were 69.7%, 68.4%, and 69.5%, respectively, with a non-significant difference among the three groups (P=0.963). The incidence rate of febrile neutropenia in the PEG-rhG-CSF 100 µg/kg group, PEG-rhG-CSF 6 mg group and G-CSF 5 µg/kg group were 6.1%, 6.4%, and 5.5%, respectively, showing no significant difference among them (P=0.935). The incidence rate of adverse events in the PEG-rhG-CSF 100 µg/kg group, PEG-rhG-CSF 6 mg group and G-CSF 5 µg / kg group were 6.7%, 4.1%, and 5.5%, respectively, showing a non-significant difference among them (P=0.581). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing TAC/TA chemotherapy, a single 100 µg/kg injection or a single fixed 6 mg dose of PEG-rhG-CSF at 48 hours after chemotherapy show definite therapeutic effect with a low incidence of adverse events and mild adverse reactions. Compared with the continuous daily injection of rhG-CSF 5 µg/kg/d, a single 100 µg/kg injection or a single fixed 6 mg dose of PEG-rhG-CSF has similar effect and is more advantageous in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer (registration number: ChiCTR1900023052).

Anthracyclines have a profound effect on breast cancer. However, at higher dosages, there are many toxic side effects associated with their use; these include bone marrow suppression, alopecia, gastrointestinal reactions and cardiotoxicity. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LG) has been demonstrated to achieve equivalent efficacy to conventional doxorubicin, with significantly lower cardiotoxicity. We conducted an open-label, multicenter, single-armed clinical trial useing an NAC regimen based on four cycles of PEG-LD 40 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide (CPM) 600 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 21 day schedule, followed by four cycles of docetaxel (DTX) 85 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 21 day schedule. The primary endpoint analysed was the pathological complete response rate (pCR) in the breast, while treatment toxicities and safety were also assessed. The results showed that the breast pCR rate was 18.75% (95% CI 11.5-26.0%). Among the different molecular cancer types, the triple negative breast cancer patients had the highest pCR, at 43.75%. No significant decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction was observed. Our data tends to draw the conclusion that this regimen is a viable option for the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with LABC, especially in the triple-negative subtype and patients with heart abnormalities. We believe the efficacy and the safety of this regimen is likely to be the same based on published data from other studies but that this cannot be certain without a randomized trial.