Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 26(5): 3843-3852, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35482084

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relation between the severity of periodontitis and osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) occurrence among different cancer locations and estimate the effect of dental care on ONJ prevention in cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This population-based cross-sectional study was conducted through the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database, Taiwan. Patients with malignancies were collected and subdivided into groups according to their different cancer locations, the severity of periodontitis, and dental care. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the associations between ONJ and ONJ-related factors. RESULTS: A total of 8,234 ONJ patients and 32,912 control patients were investigated. Lip, oral cavity, and pharynx malignancies had the highest ONJ risk among all cancer locations (OR from 3.07 to 9.56, P < 0.01). There is a linear relationship between different severities of periodontitis and ONJ. Patients with radiotherapy and severe periodontitis had the highest ONJ risk (adjusted OR, 9.56; 95% CI, 5.34-17.1). Patients with good dental care had a lower ONJ risk. CONCLUSIONS: The periodontal condition and cancer location showed a significant impact on the risk of developing ONJ after adjusting for bisphosphonate use. Good dental care could decrease the risk of ONJ in cancer patients. The severity of periodontitis might be a target to predict the potency of ONJ. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dentists must be vigilant about the increased risk of ONJ in cancer patients with periodontitis, especially in the head and neck cancer population. Good dental care is advised for cancer patients with severe periodontitis.


Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Osteonecrosis , Periodontitis , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/epidemiología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Osteonecrosis/inducido químicamente , Periodontitis/complicaciones , Periodontitis/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
2.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(6): 1180-1188.e2, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35131390

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Posterior-stabilized antibiotic cement articulating spacers (PS spacers) reduce spacer mechanical complications in prosthetic knee infections (PKIs); however, joint dislocation after femoral cam fracture has been reported. We hypothesized that the rate of post-cam mechanical complications is lower in PS spacers with an endoskeleton-reinforced cam. METHOD: A retrospective study of PKIs using PS spacers with or without a Kirschner wire-reinforced cam (K-PS or nK-PS spacers, respectively) was conducted between 2015 and 2019. The rates of post-cam mechanical complications and reoperation, as well as risk factors for post or cam failure, were analyzed. RESULTS: The cohort included 118 nK-PS and 49 K-PS spacers. All patients were followed up for 2 years. The rate of joint subluxation/dislocation after femoral cam fracture was lower in K-PS (0%) than in nK-PS spacers (17.8%; P = .002). The reoperation rate for spacer mechanical complications was lower in K-PS (0%) than in nK-PS spacers (11.9%; P = .008). The identified risk factors for femoral cam fractures were body mass index ≥25 kg/m2, femoral spacer size ≤2, and surgical volume ≤12 resection arthroplasties per year. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study highlights that K-PS spacers have a lower rate of post-cam mechanical complications than nK-PS spacers. We recommend the use of PS spacers with endoskeleton-reinforced cam when treating PKIs performed by surgeons with lower surgical volumes, especially in patients with higher body mass index and smaller femoral spacer sizes.


Asunto(s)
Prótesis de la Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cementos para Huesos , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(6): 3163-3171, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33074358

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study investigated the impact of dental prophylaxis on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-related oral mucositis (OM) according to the head and neck cancer (HNC) locations and treatment times. METHODS: A total of 13,969 HNC participants, including 482 5-FU-related OM subjects and 13,487 comparisons were enrolled from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database for Catastrophic Illness Patients of Taiwan between 2000 and 2008. All subjects were stratified into subgroups based on the times to perform chlorhexidine use, scaling, and fluoride application before 5-FU administration. The dental prophylaxis related to 5-FU-related OM was estimated by multiple logistic regression and represented with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Fluoride gel application and scaling significantly impacted on OM development (p < 0.001), and the joint effect of fluoride gel and scaling induced 5-FU-related OM (OR = 3.46, 95% CI = 2.39-5.01). The risk of OM was raised 2.25-fold as scaling within 3 weeks before 5-FU-related chemotherapy (95% CI = 1.81-2.81), and a 3.22-fold increased risk of OM while fluoride gel was applied during 5-FU-related treatment (95% CI = 1.46-7.13). CONCLUSION: Dental prophylaxis significantly affected 5-FU-related OM in the HNC population. A short interval between dental scaling or fluoride application and 5-FU administration may be associated with higher prevalence of OM. Scaling simultaneously combined with chlorohexidine promoted 5-FU-related OM in specific HNC patients excluding the oral cancer and nasopharyngeal cancer population. Proper timing of the prophylactic dental treatments prior to 5-FU therapy could reduce the risk to develop 5-FU-related OM.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Dental/efectos adversos , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Profilaxis Dental/métodos , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
4.
Clin Oral Investig ; 24(1): 455-463, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31111283

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate the timeline association with specific dental therapy and osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in oral cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 7394 oral cancer patients, including 198 ORN subjects, were retrieved from a Longitudinal Health Insurance Database for Catastrophic Illness Patients of Taiwan and were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard regression to compare the ORN risk of individual dental treatments under different dental treatments. RESULTS: The initial dental treatment time significantly impacted on the risk of ORN in oral cancer patients (P<0.05). Pre-radiotherapy endodontic treatment and post-radiotherapy scaling or subgingival curettage increased ORN prevalence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.28 and 1.77, respectively). Endodontic treatment within 2 weeks to 1 month prior to radiotherapy increased the ORN risk by 5.83-fold. Dental scaling or subgingival curettage initialized from three to 6 months post-radiotherapy raised the ORN prevalence by 2.2-fold. Exodontia initialized within 2 weeks before radiotherapy (HR=1.49) or 1 to 3 months after radiotherapy (HR=2.63) greatly increased ORN prevalence. To perform oral surgery from 3 months pre-radiotherapy to 6 months after radiotherapy increased the 1.85-fold ORN risk. The chemotherapy combined oral surgery increased the ORN prevalence by 2.55-fold. CONCLUSIONS: Timing of dental treatment, including pre-radiotherapy endodontic treatment, post-radiotherapy scaling or subgingival curettage, and oral surgery or exodontia before and after radiotherapy, could closely relate to ORN development in oral cancer patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Choosing right time to perform appropriate dental treatment could effectively reduce oral infection and ORN risk.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Osteorradionecrosis , Estudios de Cohortes , Atención Odontológica , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Osteorradionecrosis/complicaciones , Osteorradionecrosis/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Taiwán/epidemiología
5.
Clin Oral Investig ; 23(2): 585-593, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29725850

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Determine the association between sialadenitis and osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients with varying severity of sialadenitis, treatment modalities, and cancer locations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40,168 HNC patients, including 1907 ONJ subjects and 7559 matched comparisons, were enrolled from a Longitudinal Health Insurance Database for Catastrophic Illness Patients of Taiwan between 2000 and 2006. The association with sialadenitis and ONJ was estimated by logic regression and presented as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The occurrence of sialadenitis increased the risk of ONJ by 2.55-fold in HNC patients (95% CI = 2.20-2.95). The ONJ incidence was proportion to sialadenitis severity (OR = 2.53 to 4.43). Irradiated HNC patients had a higher tendency to develop jaw necrosis (osteoradionecrosis, ORN) (OR = 5.05, 95% CI = 4.39-5.80). When combined with irradiation exposure, sialadenitis significantly induced the occurrence of ORN (OR = 8.94, 95% CI = 7.40-10.8), especially in oral cancer patients (OR = 15.9 95% CI = 12.5-20.3). The risk of ONJ increased with radiotherapy dosage and duration, except for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients. CONCLUSIONS: There was a close association between sialadenitis and ONJ in the HNC population. The severity of sialadenitis was positive correlated to ONJ risk. Radiotherapy combined with sialadenitis significantly raised ORN incidence in HNC patients except for NPC patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: HNC patients complained that xerostomia from sialadenitis might increase the risk to develop ONJ, especially among those who received radiotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/epidemiología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Osteorradionecrosis/epidemiología , Sialadenitis/epidemiología , Xerostomía/epidemiología , Anciano , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteorradionecrosis/etiología , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Factores de Riesgo , Sialadenitis/complicaciones , Taiwán/epidemiología , Xerostomía/etiología
6.
Cells ; 11(18)2022 09 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36139399

RESUMEN

Numerous studies have demonstrated that biological compounds and trace elements such as dopamine (DA) and copper ions (Cu) could be modified onto the surfaces of scaffolds using a one-step immersion process which is simple, inexpensive and, most importantly, non-cytotoxic. The development and emergence of 3D printing technologies such as selective laser melting (SLM) have also made it possible for us to fabricate bone scaffolds with precise structural designs using metallic compounds. In this study, we fabricated porous titanium scaffolds (Ti) using SLM and modified the surface of Ti with polydopamine (PDA) and Cu. There are currently no other reported studies with such a combination for osteogenic and angiogenic-related applications. Results showed that such modifications did not affect general appearances and microstructural characteristics of the porous Ti scaffolds. This one-step immersion modification allowed us to modify the surfaces of Ti with different concentrations of Cu ions, thus allowing us to fabricate individualized scaffolds for different clinical scenarios. The modification improved the hydrophilicity and surface roughness of the scaffolds, which in turn led to promote cell behaviors of Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells. Ti itself has high mechanical strength, therefore making it suitable for surgical handling and clinical applications. Furthermore, the scaffolds were able to release ions in a sustained manner which led to an upregulation of osteogenic-related proteins (bone alkaline phosphatase, bone sialoprotein and osteocalcin) and angiogenic-related proteins (vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-1). By combining additive manufacturing, Ti6Al4V scaffolds, surface modification and Cu ions, the novel hybrid 3D-printed porous scaffold could be fabricated with ease and specifically benefited future bone regeneration in the clinic.


Asunto(s)
Titanio , Oligoelementos , Fosfatasa Alcalina , Aleaciones , Angiopoyetina 1/farmacología , Regeneración Ósea , Cobre/farmacología , Dopamina , Indoles , Sialoproteína de Unión a Integrina , Osteocalcina , Polímeros , Porosidad , Impresión Tridimensional , Titanio/química , Titanio/farmacología , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/farmacología
7.
Oral Oncol ; 128: 105827, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35364549

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate how different timelines of various dental therapies were related to osteoradionecrosis development under consideration of radiotherapy dosage in patients with oral cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 7,107 oral cancer patients were enrolled, including 88 osteoradionecrosis patients treated with low radiotherapy dosages (<60 Gy) or high radiotherapy dosages (≥60 Gy), from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database for Catastrophic Illness Patients of Taiwan. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare the osteoradionecrosis risk of various dental treatment timelines under different irradiation dosages. RESULTS: In the oral cancer population with low irradiation dosages (<60 Gy), performing periodontal therapy combined with irradiation significantly raised the risk of osteoradionecrosis by 2.21-fold. Starting radiotherapy within three months after dental surgery greatly increased the risk of developing osteoradionecrosis by 1.87-fold. The oral cancer patients treated with high radiation doses (≥60 Gy) receiving dental surgery within one month prior to radiotherapy had a significantly raised osteoradionecrosis occurrence by 1.60-fold. While the dental surgery was performed during the radiotherapy course, the risk of osteoradionecrosis was greatly increased by 2.21-fold. CONCLUSION: For oral cancer patients, performing dental surgery within three months before radiotherapy might significantly induce osteoradionecrosis. Patients that were treated with high irradiation dosages (≥60 Gy) had a higher tendency to develop osteoradionecrosis if they received dental surgery during radiotherapy. Those who were treated with low radiation dosages (<60 Gy) and received periodontal therapy during radiotherapy might have an increased risk in developing osteoradionecrosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias de la Boca , Osteorradionecrosis , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Boca/cirugía , Osteorradionecrosis/epidemiología , Osteorradionecrosis/etiología , Dosis de Radiación , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Factores de Riesgo
8.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 22(4): 246-50, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19494743

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the use of platelet glue enhances fusion in instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Platelet gel is an osteoinductive material that has been used to enhance fusion rates in lumbar fusion surgery. There are questions, however, regarding the less adhesive property of platelet gel, and whether it is sufficient to ensure appropriate attachment of bone grafts. In the present study, we used fibrin gel with the adhesive property to reinforce the platelet gel structure and to deliver growth factors. We hypothesized that the platelet gel/fibrin glue composite (platelet glue) would increase fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar fusion. METHODS: The control group consisted of 33 consecutive patients who received instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion with artificial bone expander and laminectomy autograft. Thirty-four patients in the study group were treated as above with the additional platelet glue. There was no significant difference between 2 groups in the demography of patients. The amount of postoperative drainage on the first and second day was recorded. Fusion rates were also assessed. Diagnosis of union was based on flexion-extension dynamic lateral radiography and fine-cut computerized tomography. All patients have been monitored for at least 2 years. RESULTS: The nonunion rate in the platelet glue group was 15% as compared with 10% in the control group. The mean postoperative drainage on the first and second day was 362 mL in the control group and 395 mL in the platelet glue group. There were no significant differences in either fusion rate or postoperative blood loss volume between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the use of a platelet gel/fibrin glue composite (platelet glue) could not be proved to increase fusion rates in instrumented lumbar posterolateral fusion. Further investigation is warranted to find an adequate carrier of growth factors for use in instrumented lumbar posterolateral fusion.


Asunto(s)
Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intercelular/administración & dosificación , Vértebras Lumbares/efectos de los fármacos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
9.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 14(1): 136, 2019 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31096988

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In comparison to static spacers, articulating spacers have been shown to result in a similar infection eradication rate in two-stage revision of periprosthetic knee infections. However, the optimal construct for articulating spacers has not been identified yet. The aim of this study was to present a preliminary result of treatment for periprosthetic knee infection using a novel computer-aided design (CAD)-articulating spacer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 32 consecutive cases of chronic periprosthetic knee infection occurring from January 2015 to December 2015. In these cases, we used an antibiotic-loaded, optimized CAD-articulating spacer based on the retrieved knee prosthesis. Evaluation included infection eradication rate, the Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, range of motion (ROM), and spacer-related mechanical complications. All cases were regularly followed-up for 2 years minimum. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of 32 patients (87.5%) had infection eradication; 18 patients (56.3%) received reimplantation successfully. The mean interval between spacer insertion and reimplantation was 8.8 months (range 4.0-12.5 months). The mean HSS knee score and ROM significantly increased during each interval (p < 0.0001 for both). The mean HSS knee scores were 31.2 (range 20-48) at initial visit, 65.4 (range 60-78.8) at 1 month after spacer insertion, and 84.2 (range 78-90) at 3 months after reimplantation (p < 0.0001). The mean ROM were 72.0° (range 15-100°), 85.6° (range 35-110°), and 102.0° (range 80-122°), respectively (p = 0.002). Two (6.3%) spacer-related mechanical complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The CAD-articulating spacer in two-staged revision of periprosthetic knee infection significantly controlled infection, improved clinical outcomes, increased ROM, and decreased mechanical complications in the preliminary study. Further larger clinical studies are needed to confirm the findings presented here.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Cementos para Huesos , Diseño Asistido por Computadora , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Liberación de Fármacos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/microbiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 95(6): e2348, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26871767

RESUMEN

Both periodontitis and osteoporosis have similar sign of bone resorption in nature. However, the relationship of the severity between these 2 bone-loss diseases is still uncertain.The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the severity of osteoporosis and periodontitis regarding the impact of oral hygiene maintenance. In total, 35,127 osteoporosis patients and 50,498 comparisons were derived from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database of Taiwan between 2000 and 2010. The population was subdivided into groups according to the different level oral hygiene maintenance and the severity of periodontitis and osteoporosis. The association between osteoporosis and periodontitis was estimated by multinomial logistic regression and rank correlation by Kendall rank correlation test, presented by odds ratio (OR), and 5% confidence intervals (CIs).After controlling the age, sex, and comorbidities, variables in the good oral hygiene maintenance population, we found that periodontitis raised 1.29-fold risk of osteoporosis (95% CI = 1.12-1.49); the risk of osteoporosis was increased with the elevated severity of periodontitis from 1.27 (95% CI = 1.08-1.48) to 1.38 (95% CI = 1.01-1.89). There is a positive correlation between the severity of periodontitis and osteoporosis occurrence in this population (OR = 1.27-1.46; Kendall rank correlation test P = 0.0003). In the poor oral hygiene maintenance population, periodontitis patients had 6.02-fold risk of osteoporosis than those who without periodontitis (95% CI = 4.65-7.81); the risk of osteoporosis was increased with periodontitis severity from 5.96 (95% CI = 4.48-7.92) to 6.37 (95% CI = 3.36-12.1).This result indicated the periodontitis and osteoporosis are conjunctive. The sudden periodontal breakdown of those who with good oral hygiene maintenance might be an indicator for the risk of osteoporosis; if those who were diagnosed as osteoporosis must pay more attention to their periodontal health. Good oral hygiene maintenance might be a crucial factor for preventing the deterioration of osteoporosis progressing; the oral hygiene maintenance plays a significant influence on the association between periodontitis and osteoporosis.


Asunto(s)
Higiene Bucal , Osteoporosis/etiología , Periodontitis/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodontitis/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Taiwán
11.
PLoS One ; 10(4): e0120756, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25880208

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Little is currently known about the risk of developing bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). This study sought to determine the incidence of BRONJ in osteoporotic patients. We also sought to identify the nature and types of risk factors of osteonecrosis of jaw (ONJ) related to the use of oral bisphosphonates (BPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the National Health Insurance system of Taiwan. This cohort study included 19,399 adult osteoporosis patients received dental extraction in 2000-2010 (osteoporosis cohort) and 38,669 age and gender matched comparisons selected from dental extraction people without osteoporosis and osteonecrosis history (comparison cohort). All study subjects were followed from the date of their dental extraction (index date) to the development of ONJ and were included in the study up to 2011 or were lost to the study, whichever occurred first. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals for the two cohorts. RESULTS: Patients with osteoporosis had a significantly higher risk to develop ONJ than healthy persons (adjusted HR, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-2.65). The risk of ONJ increased with the severity of osteoporosis, no matter whether patient with cancer or not. A cumulative effect of dental extraction frequency may increase the risk of ONJ. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that ONJ is caused by a number of factors. Osteoporosis and past dental history play the very important roles, while BPs play the synergistic effect.


Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/fisiopatología , Extracción Dental , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Taiwán , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA