Polysomnographic airflow shapes and site of collapse during drug-induced sleep endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Differences in the pharyngeal site of collapse influence efficacy of non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Notably, complete concentric collapse at the level of the palate (CCCp) during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is associated with reduced efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation, but CCCp is currently not recognisable using polysomnography. Here we develop a means to estimate DISE-based site of collapse using overnight polysomnography. METHODS: 182 OSA patients provided DISE and polysomnography data. Six polysomnographic flow shape characteristics (mean during hypopnoeas) were identified as candidate predictors of CCCp (primary outcome variable, n=44/182), including inspiratory skewness and inspiratory scoopiness. Multivariable logistic regression combined the six characteristics to predict clear presence (n=22) versus absence (n=128) of CCCp (partial collapse and concurrent tongue base collapse excluded). Odds ratios for actual CCCp between predicted subgroups were quantified after cross-validation. Secondary analyses examined complete lateral wall, tongue base or epiglottis collapse. External validation was performed on a separate dataset (ntotal=466). RESULTS: CCCp was characterised by greater scoopiness (ß=1.5±0.6 per 2sd, multivariable estimate±se) and skewness (ß=11.4±2.4) compared with non-CCCp. The odds ratio for CCCp in predicted positive versus negative subgroups was 5.0 (95% CI 1.9-13.1). The same characteristics provided significant cross-validated prediction of lateral wall (OR 6.3, 95% CI 2.4-16.5), tongue base (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.3) and epiglottis (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.5-12.4) collapse. CCCp and lateral wall collapse shared similar characteristics (skewed, scoopy), diametrically opposed to tongue base and epiglottis collapse characteristics. External validation confirmed model prediction. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides a means to recognise patients with likely CCCp or other DISE-based site of collapse categories using routine polysomnography. Since site of collapse influences therapeutic responses, polysomnographic airflow shape analysis could facilitate precision site-specific OSA interventions.

Mandibular advancement device therapy in patients with epiglottic collapse.

PURPOSE: Epiglottic collapse is a specific sleep-endoscopic finding that can prove challenging to treat in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Its effect on mandibular advancement devices (MAD) remains largely unknown. Therefore, this study assessed whether or not epiglottic collapse affects treatment outcome with MAD. METHODS: Patients with diagnosed OSAD underwent drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and were treated with a titratable MAD. Two age- and gender-matched controls were selected for every subject with primary epiglottic collapse (i.e., complete closure without involvement of other upper airway structures). Treatment response was defined as a reduction in oxygen desaturation index (ODI) of ≥ 50% following MAD therapy. RESULTS: Of 101 patients who underwent DISE, twenty (20%) showed primary epiglottic collapse (mean [SD]: 17 men; age 49.8 [10.1]; body mass index 28.3 [2.9] kg/m2; apnea-hypopnea index 27.0 [16.9] events/h). There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between cases and controls. MAD therapy was equally effective in patients with and without epiglottic collapse (mean [SD]; ODI with MAD, 8.7 [7.7] events/h vs. 7.8 [7.5] events/h, P = .62; ΔODI, 53.3 [29.6]% vs. 50.6 [37.7]%, P = .82; responder status, 10/20 vs. 22/40, P = .79). Logistic regression analysis revealed no associations between epiglottic collapse and treatment outcome. CONCLUSION: The presence of epiglottic collapse during DISE does not impair the effectiveness of MAD. Therefore, MAD therapy should be considered in patients with predominant epiglottic collapse.

The prevalence of treatment-emergent central sleep apnea with mandibular advancement device therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) describes the appearance or persistence of central sleep apnea while undergoing treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. TECSA is well studied in continuous positive airway pressure therapy with an estimated prevalence of 8%. Based on a few case reports, mandibular advancement devices (MAD) may also provoke TECSA. This study aims to gain insight into the prevalence of TECSA with MAD therapy. METHODS: This retrospective study includes a total of 129 patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea who were treated with a custom-made titratable MAD. Baseline and follow-up sleep studies were compared to identify patients with TECSA. Since different diagnostic criteria to define TECSA are used in literature, prevalence was calculated according to three definitions (TECSA-1, -2, and -3). Demographics, MAD treatment variables, and findings of the diagnostic polysomnography were compared between TECSA and non-TECSA patients to identify possible predictors. RESULTS: Depending on the definition used, TECSA was found in 3.1%-7.8% of patients undergoing MAD therapy. TECSA patients had a higher apnea index (9.2 vs 2.0 events/h, P = .042), central apnea-hypopnea index (4.1 vs 0.2 events/h, P = .045) and oxygen desaturation index (23.9 vs 16.3 events/h, P = .018) at baseline compared to non-TECSA patients. No differences were found in demographics and treatment variables. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that TECSA also occurs in patients starting MAD treatment. Patients with TECSA had a higher apnea index, central apnea-hypopnea index, and oxygen desaturation index at baseline compared to non-TECSA patients. CITATION: Hellemans S, Van de Perck E, Braem MJ, Verbraecken J, Dieltjens M, Vanderveken OM. The prevalence of treatment-emergent central sleep apnea with mandibular advancement device therapy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(12):2035-2041.

Quantitative Measurement of Pharyngeal Dimensions During Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy for Oral Appliance Outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively investigate the effect of mandibular advancement devices (MADs) on pharyngeal airway dimensions in a transverse plane as measured during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). METHODS: Data from 56 patients, treated with MAD at 75% maximal protrusion and with baseline Apnea-Hypopnea Index ≥10 events/h, were analyzed. For each patient, three snapshots were selected from DISE video footage at baseline, with MAD presence, and during chin lift, resulting in 498 images (168/168/162, baseline/MAD/chin lift). Cross-sectional areas, anteroposterior (AP) and laterolateral (LL) dimensions on both retroglossal and retro-epiglottic levels were measured. To define the effect of MAD and chin lift on pharyngeal dimensions, linear mixed-effect models were built. Associations between MAD treatment response and pharyngeal expansion (MAD/chin lift) were determined. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between retroglossal cross-sectional areas, AP, and LL dimensions at baseline and with MAD presence. At a retro-epiglottic level, only LL dimensions differed significantly with MAD presence compared to baseline, with significant relation of LL expansion ratio to treatment response (p = 0.0176). After adjusting the response definition for the sleeping position, greater retroglossal expansion ratios were seen in responders (1.32 ± 0.48) compared to non-responders (1.11 ± 0.32) (p = 0.0441). No significant association was found between response and pharyngeal expansion by chin lift. CONCLUSION: Our observations highlight the additional value of quantitative pharyngeal airway measurements during DISE with MAD presence in evaluating MAD treatment outcome. These findings demonstrate an increase in retroglossal airway dimensions during DISE, with MAD presence, and more pronounced increase in retroglossal expansion ratios in MAD treatment responders compared to non-responders after sleeping position correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:3619-3627, 2023.

The relationship between specific nasopharyngoscopic features and treatment deterioration with mandibular advancement devices: a prospective study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The variable efficacy of mandibular advancement device (MAD) treatment necessitates both accessible and accurate methods for patient selection. However, the role of awake nasopharyngoscopy for this purpose remains dubious. We introduced an assessment method based on anatomical upper airway features during tidal breathing for nasopharyngoscopy. The current study aimed to relate these features to MAD treatment outcome. METHODS: One hundred patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea were prospectively recruited for MAD treatment in a fixed 75% degree of maximal protrusion. Nasopharyngoscopic observations during Müller's maneuver and tidal breathing were recorded both with and without MAD. Treatment outcome, confirmed by 3-month follow-up polysomnography with MAD, was classified as (1) apnea-hypopnea index reduction ≥ 50%, (2) treatment apnea-hypopnea index < 5 events/h, and (3) ≥ 10% increase in apnea-hypopnea index compared with baseline (treatment deterioration). RESULTS: A complete dataset was obtained in 65 patients. After adjusting for baseline apnea-hypopnea index, body mass index, and supine dependency, the position of the soft palate (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-11.8; P = .013) and crowding of the oropharynx (odds ratio, 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-41.4; P = .017) were related to treatment deterioration. Addition of both features significantly (P = .031) improved the accuracy of baseline models based on clinical measurements alone. Moreover, with the MAD in situ, a posteriorly located soft palate (odds ratio, 9.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-56.3; P = .010) and a posteriorly located tongue base (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-35.9; P = .013) were associated with treatment deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Awake nasopharyngoscopy might be a valuable office-based examination to exclude the risk of treatment deterioration and improve patient selection for MAD treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Predicting Therapeutic Outcome of Mandibular Advancement Device Treatment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (PROMAD); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01532050; Identifier: NCT01532050.

Correction to: Remotely controlled mandibular positioning of oral appliance therapy during polysomnography and drug-induced sleep endoscopy compared with conventional subjective titration in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: protocol for a randomized crossover trial.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that Fig. 1 had not been corrected based on the reviewer's comments. The correct Fig. 1 is presented below.

Remotely controlled mandibular positioning of oral appliance therapy during polysomnography and drug-induced sleep endoscopy compared with conventional subjective titration in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: protocol for a randomized crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: The amount of mandibular protrusion is a key factor in optimizing the efficacy of mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy in an individual patient diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea. This process is called titration and is generally based on resolution of subjective symptoms like snoring and/or daytime sleepiness as a function of protrusion. An objective approach uses a remotely controlled mandibular positioner (RCMP) during a full-night polysomnography (PSG), in analogy with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration. More recently, the feasibility of RCMP use during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) titration was reported. METHODS: This randomized crossover trial will compare DISE-assisted titration to PSG-guided titration, as well as with the conventional subjective titration method. The primary outcome is the actual mandibular protrusive position found to be the most optimal for each tested titration procedure. Furthermore, the therapeutic efficacy will be compared among the different titration modalities using level 1 sleep studies. DISCUSSION: Currently, the optimal titration of MAD therapy is most often based on 'trial and error'. The conventional method relies on subjective improvement in symptoms, although this may not provide the most accurate indicator for efficient titration. Therefore, relying on objective criteria in the titration process should be advantageous. In analogy with CPAP, titration of the most optimal mandibular protrusion could be performed using RCMP during an overnight titration PSG. Recently, it was shown that titration under direct visualization of upper airway patency and collapsibility is feasible using the RCMP during DISE. However, no clinical results for such a procedure are as yet available. This study is the first to compare the most optimal mandibular protrusive position according to three titration procedures, as well as to compare the therapeutic efficacy of these titration methods. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03716648 . Registered on 23 October 2018.