Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 33(6): 553-9, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19126129

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of bioactive glass implants and conchal cartilage in reconstructing the posterior canal wall during tympanomastoidectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort clinical study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with clinically diagnosed chronic suppurative otitis media and cholesteatoma awaiting tympanomastoidectomy were recruited. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent tympanomastoidectomy by the same surgeon. A first cohort of 12 patients underwent posterior canal wall reconstruction with autogenous conchal cartilage. A second cohort of 12 patients underwent such reconstruction with prefabricated bioactive glass. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary- All patients underwent out-patient review at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, after which a second-look procedure was performed. Reconstructions were inspected for evidence of epithelialization, granulation, infection, stenosis, depression and extrusion. Secondary- All patients had perioperative serial pure-tone audiometry to check for any change in hearing levels upto 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: By 1 year postoperatively, both reconstructive graft materials showed good epithelialization, no granulation, no infection, no ear canal stenosis, no depression and no extrusion. At operative second-looks, bioactive glass particularly showed good tissue bonding, including both neovascularization and connective tissue integration. Overall clinical outcome was equivalent for both materials. Both graft materials showed no statistically significant difference in postoperative hearing levels. CONCLUSIONS: Bioactive glass and conchal cartilage showed equivalent clinical outcome in reconstructing the posterior canal wall without significantly affecting hearing levels. As bioactive glass does not require second site morbidity and thus also reduces operative time, we prefer it for reconstructing the posterior canal wall following tympanomastoidectomy.


Asunto(s)
Materiales Biocompatibles , Colesteatoma del Oído Medio/cirugía , Vidrio , Cartílagos Nasales/trasplante , Otitis Media Supurativa/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Apófisis Mastoides/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Prótesis e Implantes , Trasplante Autólogo , Cornetes Nasales/trasplante , Membrana Timpánica/cirugía , Adulto Joven
2.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci ; 28(3): 165-72, 2003 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12755749

RESUMEN

Tissue engineering is a multidisciplinary area of research aimed at regeneration of tissues and restoration of organ function. This is achieved through implantation of cells/tissues grown outside the body or by stimulating cells to grow into an implanted matrix. In this short review, we discuss the use of biomaterials, in the form of scaffolds, for tissue engineering and review clinical applications to otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery.


Asunto(s)
Materiales Biocompatibles , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Ingeniería de Tejidos , Materiales Biocompatibles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Humanos , Enfermedades Otorrinolaringológicas/cirugía , Resistencia a la Tracción , Ingeniería de Tejidos/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA