Polysomnographic airflow shapes and site of collapse during drug-induced sleep endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Differences in the pharyngeal site of collapse influence efficacy of non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Notably, complete concentric collapse at the level of the palate (CCCp) during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is associated with reduced efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation, but CCCp is currently not recognisable using polysomnography. Here we develop a means to estimate DISE-based site of collapse using overnight polysomnography. METHODS: 182 OSA patients provided DISE and polysomnography data. Six polysomnographic flow shape characteristics (mean during hypopnoeas) were identified as candidate predictors of CCCp (primary outcome variable, n=44/182), including inspiratory skewness and inspiratory scoopiness. Multivariable logistic regression combined the six characteristics to predict clear presence (n=22) versus absence (n=128) of CCCp (partial collapse and concurrent tongue base collapse excluded). Odds ratios for actual CCCp between predicted subgroups were quantified after cross-validation. Secondary analyses examined complete lateral wall, tongue base or epiglottis collapse. External validation was performed on a separate dataset (ntotal=466). RESULTS: CCCp was characterised by greater scoopiness (ß=1.5±0.6 per 2sd, multivariable estimate±se) and skewness (ß=11.4±2.4) compared with non-CCCp. The odds ratio for CCCp in predicted positive versus negative subgroups was 5.0 (95% CI 1.9-13.1). The same characteristics provided significant cross-validated prediction of lateral wall (OR 6.3, 95% CI 2.4-16.5), tongue base (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.3) and epiglottis (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.5-12.4) collapse. CCCp and lateral wall collapse shared similar characteristics (skewed, scoopy), diametrically opposed to tongue base and epiglottis collapse characteristics. External validation confirmed model prediction. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides a means to recognise patients with likely CCCp or other DISE-based site of collapse categories using routine polysomnography. Since site of collapse influences therapeutic responses, polysomnographic airflow shape analysis could facilitate precision site-specific OSA interventions.

Anthropometric 3D evaluation of the face in patients with sleep related breathing disorders.

PURPOSE: To evaluate craniofacial measurements on 3D-stereophotogrammetry and see if particular measurements are more typical in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and have a correlation with its severity. METHODS: Subjects included were adults undergoing a diagnostic polysomnography. Age, BMI, neck, abdominal and hip circumference (cm) were recorded. 3D-stereophotogrammetry was performed and landmarks were placed on the 3D-image. Different linear, angular and volume measurements were performed to gauge facial and neck anatomy. The relationship between these measurements and the severity of OSA, based on the obstructive apnea/hypopnea index (OAHI, events/h), was assessed by multiple linear regression, and adjusted for BMI and sex. RESULTS: Of 91 subjects included (61 male), mean age was 46 ± 12 years, BMI 30.1 ± 6.5 kg/m2, OAHI 19.3 ± 18.8/h. BMI was higher (p = 0.0145) in females (32.9 ± 7.7) than in males (28.6 ± 5.3). This was also true for hip circumference (118 ± 15 vs 107 ± 10, p = 0.0006), while the neck circumference was higher (p < 0.0001) in males (41 ± 4 vs 37 ± 4). The following parameters could predict the logOAHI (r2-adjusted = 0.51): sex (p < 0.0001), BMI (p = 0.0116), neck-depth/mandibular-length (p = 0.0002), mandibular-width angle (p = 0.0118), neck-depth euclidean distance/surface distance (E/S) (p = 0.0001) and the interaction terms between sex and neck-depth/mandibular-length (p = 0.0034), sex and neck-depth E/S (p = 0.0276) and BMI and neck-depth E/S (p = 0.0118). The interaction between sex and neck-depth/mandibular-length showed a steeper linear course in females. This is also true for the interaction term BMI with neck-depth E/S in patients with a higher BMI. With a same neck-depth ratio, the OAHI is larger in men. CONCLUSION: Measurements involving the width of the face and addressing the soft tissue in the upper neck were found to have a significant relation with OSA severity. We found remarkable differences between non-obese/obese subjects and between males and females.

Multimodal phenotypic labelling using drug-induced sleep endoscopy, awake nasendoscopy and computational fluid dynamics for the prediction of mandibular advancement device treatment outcome: a prospective study.

Mandibular advancement device (MAD) treatment outcome for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is variable and patient dependent. A global, clinically applicable predictive model is lacking. Our aim was to combine characteristics obtained during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE), awake nasendoscopy, and computed tomography scan-based computational fluid dynamic (CFD) measurements in one multifactorial model, to explain MAD treatment outcome. A total of 100 patients with OSA were prospectively recruited and treated with a MAD at fixed 75% protrusion. In all, 72 underwent CFD analysis, DISE, and awake nasendoscopy at baseline in a blinded fashion and completed a 3-month follow-up polysomnography with a MAD. Treatment response was defined as a reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of ≥50% and deterioration as an increase of ≥10% during MAD treatment. To cope with missing data, multiple imputation with predictive mean matching was used. Multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for body mass index and baseline AHI, was used to combine all potential predictor variables. The strongest impact concerning odds ratios (ORs) was present for complete concentric palatal collapse (CCCp) during DISE on deterioration (OR 28.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-704.35; p = 0.0391), followed by a C-shape versus an oval shape of the soft palate during wakefulness (OR 8.54, 95% CI 1.09-67.23; p = 0.0416) and tongue base collapse during DISE on response (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.02-10.64; p = 0.0464). Both logistic regression models exhibited excellent and fair predictive accuracy. Our findings suggest DISE to be the most robust examination associated with MAD treatment outcome, with tongue base collapse as a predictor for successful MAD treatment and CCCp as an adverse DISE phenotype.

Mandibular advancement device therapy in patients with epiglottic collapse.

PURPOSE: Epiglottic collapse is a specific sleep-endoscopic finding that can prove challenging to treat in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Its effect on mandibular advancement devices (MAD) remains largely unknown. Therefore, this study assessed whether or not epiglottic collapse affects treatment outcome with MAD. METHODS: Patients with diagnosed OSAD underwent drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and were treated with a titratable MAD. Two age- and gender-matched controls were selected for every subject with primary epiglottic collapse (i.e., complete closure without involvement of other upper airway structures). Treatment response was defined as a reduction in oxygen desaturation index (ODI) of ≥ 50% following MAD therapy. RESULTS: Of 101 patients who underwent DISE, twenty (20%) showed primary epiglottic collapse (mean [SD]: 17 men; age 49.8 [10.1]; body mass index 28.3 [2.9] kg/m2; apnea-hypopnea index 27.0 [16.9] events/h). There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between cases and controls. MAD therapy was equally effective in patients with and without epiglottic collapse (mean [SD]; ODI with MAD, 8.7 [7.7] events/h vs. 7.8 [7.5] events/h, P = .62; ΔODI, 53.3 [29.6]% vs. 50.6 [37.7]%, P = .82; responder status, 10/20 vs. 22/40, P = .79). Logistic regression analysis revealed no associations between epiglottic collapse and treatment outcome. CONCLUSION: The presence of epiglottic collapse during DISE does not impair the effectiveness of MAD. Therefore, MAD therapy should be considered in patients with predominant epiglottic collapse.

A pilot study on comparison of subjective titration versus remotely controlled mandibular positioning during polysomnography and drug-induced sleep endoscopy, to determine the effective protrusive position for mandibular advancement device therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of subjective titration versus objectively guided titration during polysomnography (PSG) and drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) in mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: In this pilot cross-over study, patients underwent three titration procedures in randomized order: (1) subjective titration, (2) PSG-guided titration using a remotely controlled mandibular positioner (RCMP) and (3) DISE-assisted titration using RCMP. After each titration procedure, patients used the MAD for 1 month at the targeted protrusion obtained according to the preceding titration procedure. For each procedure, a follow-up PSG was performed after 1 month of MAD use in order to evaluate the efficacy of the MAD. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in the study. Overall, no significant differences in targeted optimal protrusion compared to maximal comfortable protrusion among the three titration methods were observed. There was no significant difference in reduction in AHI. In this study, PSG titration correctly classified 50% of patients as 'responder'. A higher predictive accuracy was found for DISE titration with a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot randomized cross-over trial showed no differences in optimal mandibular positioning and corresponding efficacy of MAD between subjective titration, DISE titration or PSG titration.

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: Evaluation of a Selection Tool for Treatment Modalities for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a very common disorder with important day and nighttime symptoms and long-term effects on health. Different treatment modalities such as positive airway pressure (PAP), oral appliance therapy using custom-made, titratable mandibular advancement devices (MAD), different types of surgery and positional therapy have been introduced over the years, with patient preference and adherence to therapy being key elements in improving treatment outcomes. Several patient selection tools to improve treatment outcomes have been introduced and evaluated over the years. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a procedure that provides real-time upper airway evaluation of the sites of flutter and upper airway collapse. This review focuses on the indications and contraindications for DISE, methods of sedation and evaluation, add-on maneuvers, and the results on patient selection and treatment outcomes. A PICO approach was used to clarify the aims of this review. DISE has the advantage of being easily accessible in most ENT practices and being 3-dimensional, dynamic, site specific, safe and it is valuable in selecting patients for upper airway surgery and oral appliance therapy. There is a strong interest for further standardization and exploration of the predictive value of this evolving technique.

A promising concept of combination therapy for positional obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the additional effect of a chest-worn sleep position trainer (SPT) in patients with residual supine-dependent obstructive sleep apnea (sdOSA) under mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy. METHODS: Baseline and follow-up polysomnography with MAD were performed. Twenty patients with sdOSA under MAD therapy underwent two consecutive randomized polysomnographies: one with SPT and one with combination of SPT + MAD. Data are presented as median (quartile 1, quartile 3). RESULTS: The SPT reduced the time spent in supine sleeping position compared to baseline and MAD therapy. Both MAD and SPT were individually effective in reducing the overall apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) significantly when compared to baseline from 20.8 (15.1; 33.6)/h at baseline to 11.0 (6.7; 13.8)/h and to 11.1 (3.5; 17.7)/h with MAD or SPT, respectively. The combination of SPT + MAD further reduced the overall AHI to 5.7 (3.6; 7.4), which was significantly lower than with MAD alone (p < 0.001) and SPT alone (p < 0.008), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that combination of SPT + MAD leads to a higher therapeutic efficacy in patients with sdOSA under MAD therapy when compared to one of the treatment modalities alone.

Comparative analysis of two custom-made mandibular advancement devices with varied designs for treating moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea.

INTRODUCTION: Custom-made titratable mandibular advancement device (MAD) treatment can nowadays be considered a promising first-line treatment in patients with mild to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Specific manufacturing designs and titration mechanisms of MAD are on the market, characterized by their titration approach, vertical opening, and materials selection. The wing-designed MAD (SomnoDent® Flex™, SomnoMed Ltd, Sydney, Australia) has a lateral screw mechanism to advance the lower jaw in incremental steps of 0.1 up to 6.0 mm. The newer uniquely designed custom-made MAD with passive mouth closing (SomnoDent® Avant™ SomnoMed Ltd, Sydney, Australia) has a frontal exchangeable advancement strap of fixed lengths as a specific titration mechanism, all supporting freedom of lateral movement. We aimed to assess the associations between the type of MAD prescribed and OSA treatment outcome. METHODS: Data from 209 patients (165 male, mean age 53.9 (±10.9) years, median baseline BMI and AHI 27.02 [24.8; 29.7] kg/m2 and 22.8 [17.7; 31.6]/hour sleep, respectively) were collected. Of this cohort, 91 patients with the traditional, wing-based SomnoDent® Flex™ and 118 patients with SomnoDent® Avant™. All patients were diagnosed with a type 1 polysomnography demonstrating moderate to severe OSA (15 ≤ AHI ≤65 per hour sleep). The selected MAD was fitted in the so-called maximal comfortable protrusion. After 3 months of subjective titration until resolution of subjective symptoms and/or achieving physical limits, a checkup with validated home sleep monitoring was conducted. Treatment success was defined as "AHI reduction ≥50% with MAD compared to baseline AHI and AHI with MAD <10 events per hour". RESULTS: These real-world data set showed that 67% of patients achieved treatment success, with a statistically significant reduction in AHI from 22.8 [17.7; 31.6] to 7.45 [3.4; 15.0]/h sleep. The SomnoDent® Avant™ achieved 75% treatment success versus 56% for the traditional, wing-based SomnoDent® Flex™ (P < 0.05). Overall, AHI reduction was 70% for SomnoDent® Avant™ (P < 0.05) vs. 63% for SomnoDent® Flex™ (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that choice of MAD design can impact the treatment outcome and could become an important consideration in selecting the type of MAD for personalized treatment for OSA patients. While the results of the traditional wing-based MAD design were comparable to the therapeutic outcome with other titratable, custom-made MADs, the MAD with the passive mouth closing feature showed significantly greater reduction in total AHI potentially due to encouraged nasal breathing, reduced mouth breathing and lesser vertical opening thereby decreasing the probability of tongue base collapse.

The prevalence of treatment-emergent central sleep apnea with mandibular advancement device therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) describes the appearance or persistence of central sleep apnea while undergoing treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. TECSA is well studied in continuous positive airway pressure therapy with an estimated prevalence of 8%. Based on a few case reports, mandibular advancement devices (MAD) may also provoke TECSA. This study aims to gain insight into the prevalence of TECSA with MAD therapy. METHODS: This retrospective study includes a total of 129 patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea who were treated with a custom-made titratable MAD. Baseline and follow-up sleep studies were compared to identify patients with TECSA. Since different diagnostic criteria to define TECSA are used in literature, prevalence was calculated according to three definitions (TECSA-1, -2, and -3). Demographics, MAD treatment variables, and findings of the diagnostic polysomnography were compared between TECSA and non-TECSA patients to identify possible predictors. RESULTS: Depending on the definition used, TECSA was found in 3.1%-7.8% of patients undergoing MAD therapy. TECSA patients had a higher apnea index (9.2 vs 2.0 events/h, P = .042), central apnea-hypopnea index (4.1 vs 0.2 events/h, P = .045) and oxygen desaturation index (23.9 vs 16.3 events/h, P = .018) at baseline compared to non-TECSA patients. No differences were found in demographics and treatment variables. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that TECSA also occurs in patients starting MAD treatment. Patients with TECSA had a higher apnea index, central apnea-hypopnea index, and oxygen desaturation index at baseline compared to non-TECSA patients. CITATION: Hellemans S, Van de Perck E, Braem MJ, Verbraecken J, Dieltjens M, Vanderveken OM. The prevalence of treatment-emergent central sleep apnea with mandibular advancement device therapy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(12):2035-2041.

Quantitative Measurement of Pharyngeal Dimensions During Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy for Oral Appliance Outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively investigate the effect of mandibular advancement devices (MADs) on pharyngeal airway dimensions in a transverse plane as measured during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). METHODS: Data from 56 patients, treated with MAD at 75% maximal protrusion and with baseline Apnea-Hypopnea Index ≥10 events/h, were analyzed. For each patient, three snapshots were selected from DISE video footage at baseline, with MAD presence, and during chin lift, resulting in 498 images (168/168/162, baseline/MAD/chin lift). Cross-sectional areas, anteroposterior (AP) and laterolateral (LL) dimensions on both retroglossal and retro-epiglottic levels were measured. To define the effect of MAD and chin lift on pharyngeal dimensions, linear mixed-effect models were built. Associations between MAD treatment response and pharyngeal expansion (MAD/chin lift) were determined. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between retroglossal cross-sectional areas, AP, and LL dimensions at baseline and with MAD presence. At a retro-epiglottic level, only LL dimensions differed significantly with MAD presence compared to baseline, with significant relation of LL expansion ratio to treatment response (p = 0.0176). After adjusting the response definition for the sleeping position, greater retroglossal expansion ratios were seen in responders (1.32 ± 0.48) compared to non-responders (1.11 ± 0.32) (p = 0.0441). No significant association was found between response and pharyngeal expansion by chin lift. CONCLUSION: Our observations highlight the additional value of quantitative pharyngeal airway measurements during DISE with MAD presence in evaluating MAD treatment outcome. These findings demonstrate an increase in retroglossal airway dimensions during DISE, with MAD presence, and more pronounced increase in retroglossal expansion ratios in MAD treatment responders compared to non-responders after sleeping position correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:3619-3627, 2023.

Non-CPAP therapies in obstructive sleep apnoea: mandibular advancement device therapy.

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) represent the main non-continuous positive airway pressure (non-CPAP) therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The aim of the European Respiratory Society Task Force was to review the evidence in favour of MAD therapy. Effects of tongue-retaining devices are not included in this report. Custom-made MADs reduce apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) and daytime sleepiness compared with placebo devices. CPAP more effectively diminishes AHI, while increasing data suggest fairly similar outcomes in relation to symptoms and cardiovascular health from these treatments. Patients often prefer MADs to CPAP. Milder cases and patients with a proven increase in upper airway size as a result of mandibular advancement are most likely to experience treatment success with MADs. A custom-made device titrated from an initial 50% of maximum mandibular advancement has been recommended. More research is needed to define the patients who will benefit from MAD treatment compared with CPAP, in terms of the effects on sleep-disordered breathing and on other diseases related to OSA. In conclusion, MADs are recommended for patients with mild to moderate OSA (Recommendation Level A) and for those who do not tolerate CPAP. The treatment must be followed up and the device adjusted or exchanged in relation to the outcome.

Central and mixed sleep apnea related to patients treated with maxillomandibular advancement for obstructive sleep apnea: A retrospective cohort study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients with a percentage of central and mixed apnea index in the total apnea-hypopnea index (CMAI%) ≧25%. Patients treated with MMA for OSA were retrospectively evaluated for baseline and postoperative patient data and polysomnographic results. The pre- and postoperative obstructive, central and mixed apnea parameters were compared. Of the included 78 patients, 21 patients (27%) presented with CMAI% ≧25% (median CMAI%, 49.1%; 35.9-63.8) prior to MMA. In 67% of these cases, MMA resulted in CMAI% <25 (median CMAI%, 6.1%; 2.1-8.9) and significantly improved the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (p < 0.001), the lowest oxyhemoglobin saturation (p < 0.001), central and mixed apnea index (p < 0.001), percentage of central and mixed apneas of total AHI (p = 0.004), central apnea index (p < 0.001), and mixed apnea index (p < 0.001). CMAI% ≧25% emerged in 25% of patients after MMA (median CMAI%, 49.1%; 35.9-63.8). Within the undeniable limitations of the study, it seems that the presence of CMAI% ≧25% should not be regarded as a contraindication for MMA in OSA patients.

Non-CPAP therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea.

Treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults is evolving, from a "one treatment fits all" to a more individualised approach. The spectrum of treatment options is broad and heterogeneous, including conservative, technological and pharmaceutical modalities. This raises the questions of which patients these modalities might be useful for, and if there are specific criteria for single or combined treatment. The most commonly used non-CPAP treatment is a mandibular advancement device. Furthermore, it appears from the available evidence that upper airway surgery, bariatric surgery, and maxillomandibular advancement can be effective in particular patient groups and should be indicated more readily in clinical practice. Technically, a tracheotomy is the most effective surgical treatment, but is not socially acceptable and is associated with major side-effects. Other treatment options are emerging, like positional therapy, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, and myofunctional exercises. Drug therapy is also promising when pathophysiological traits are considered. The range of currently available treatment options will be discussed in this review, with emphasis on the selection of appropriate patients, therapeutic efficacy and compliance, and reference to recent guidelines. In the selection process, routine application of drug-induced sleep endoscopy to assess the site(s) of collapse during sleep can increase the success rate of both surgical interventions and oral appliance therapy. Educational aims: To outline recommendations concerning the proper management of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients that cannot be treated adequately with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) due to intolerance, poor adherence or compliance, or CPAP refusal.To provide information about the selection of appropriate patients for alternative non-CPAP treatment options.To better understand the different aspects of OSA treatment with noninvasive approaches, such as oral appliances, positional therapy, drug treatment and myofunctional therapy, including indications, contraindications, and expected short- and long-term results.To discuss the different surgical options for the treatment of OSA and to provide information on the important issue of proper patient selection for surgery, as most OSA surgical outcomes are associated with the pre-operative assessment of the level(s) of upper airway collapse.

Functional imaging improves patient selection for mandibular advancement device treatment outcome in sleep-disordered breathing: a prospective study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are a noninvasive treatment option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and act by increasing the upper airway volume. However, the exact therapeutic mechanism of action remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess MAD mechanisms using functional imaging that combines imaging techniques and computational fluid dynamics and assess associations with treatment outcome. METHODS: One hundred patients with OSA were prospectively included and treated with a custom-made MAD at a fixed 75% protrusion. A low-dose computed tomography scan was made with and without MADs for computational fluid dynamics analysis. Patients underwent a baseline and 3-month follow-up polysomnography to evaluate treatment efficacy. A reduction in apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 50% defined treatment response. RESULTS: Overall, 71 patients completed both 3-month follow-up polysomnography and low-dose computed tomography scan with computational fluid dynamics analysis. MAD treatment significantly reduced the apnea-hypopnea index (16.5 [10.4-23.6] events/h to 9.1 [3.9-16.4] events/h; P < .001, median [quartile 1-quartile 3]) and significantly increased the total upper airway volume (8.6 [5.4-12.8] cm3 vs 10.7 [6.4-15.4] cm3; P = .003), especially the velopharyngeal volume (2.1 [0.5-4.1] cm3 vs 3.3 [1.8-6.0] cm3; P < .001). However, subanalyses in responders and nonresponders only showed a significant increase in the total upper airway volume in responders, not in nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: MAD acts by increasing the total upper airway volume, predominantly due to an increase in the velopharyngeal volume. Responders showed a significant increase in the total upper airway volume with MAD treatment, while there was no significant increase in nonresponders. Findings add evidence to implement functional imaging using computational fluid dynamics in routine MAD outcome prediction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Predicting Therapeutic Outcome of Mandibular Advancement Device Treatment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01532050; Identifier: NCT01532050. CITATION: Van Gaver H, Op de Beeck S, Dieltjens M, et al. Functional imaging improves patient selection for mandibular advancement device treatment outcome in sleep-disordered breathing: a prospective study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(3):739-750.

Mandibular Advancement Device Treatment Efficacy Is Associated with Polysomnographic Endotypes.

Rationale: Mandibular advancement device (MAD) treatment efficacy varies among patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Objectives: The current study aims to explain underlying individual differences in efficacy using obstructive sleep apnea endotypic traits calculated from baseline clinical polysomnography: collapsibility (airflow at normal ventilatory drive), loop gain (drive response to reduced airflow), arousal threshold (drive preceding arousal), compensation (increase in airflow as drive increases), and the ventilatory response to arousal (increase in drive explained by arousal). On the basis of previous research, we hypothesized that responders to MAD treatment have a lower loop gain and milder collapsibility.Methods: Thirty-six patients (median apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], 23.5 [interquartile range (IQR), 19.7-29.8] events/h) underwent baseline and 3-month follow-up full polysomnography, with MAD fixed at 75% of maximal protrusion. Traits were estimated using baseline polysomnography according to Sands and colleagues. Response was defined as an AHI reduction ≥ 50%.Results: MAD treatment significantly reduced AHI (49.7%baseline [23.9-63.6], median [IQR]). Responders exhibited lower loop gain (mean [95% confidence interval], 0.53 [0.48-0.58] vs. 0.65 [0.57-0.73]; P = 0.020) at baseline than nonresponders, a difference that persisted after adjustment for baseline AHI and body mass index. Elevated loop gain remained associated with nonresponse after adjustment for collapsibility (odds ratio, 3.03 [1.16-7.88] per 1-standard deviation (SD) increase in loop gain [SD, 0.15]; P = 0.023).Conclusions: MAD nonresponders exhibit greater ventilatory instability, expressed as higher loop gain. Assessment of the baseline degree of ventilatory instability using this approach may improve upfront MAD treatment patient selection.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01532050).

European Respiratory Society guideline on non-CPAP therapies for obstructive sleep apnoea.

Treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in adults is evolving, as new therapies have been explored and introduced in clinical practice, while other approaches have been refined or reconsidered. In this European Respiratory Society (ERS) guideline on non-continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapies for OSA, we present recommendations determined by a systematic review of the literature. It is an update of the 2011 ERS statement on non-CPAP therapies, advanced into a clinical guideline. A multidisciplinary group of experts, including pulmonary, surgical, dentistry and ear-nose-throat specialists, methodologists and patient representatives considered the most relevant clinical questions (for both clinicians and patients) relating to the management of OSA. Eight key clinical questions were generated and a systematic review was conducted to identify published randomised clinical trials that answered these questions. We used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations. The resulting guideline addresses gastric bypass surgery, custom-made dual-block mandibular advancement devices, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, myofunctional therapy, maxillo-mandibular osteotomy, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and positional therapy. These recommendations can be used to benchmark quality of care for people with OSA across Europe and to improve outcomes.

The relationship between specific nasopharyngoscopic features and treatment deterioration with mandibular advancement devices: a prospective study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The variable efficacy of mandibular advancement device (MAD) treatment necessitates both accessible and accurate methods for patient selection. However, the role of awake nasopharyngoscopy for this purpose remains dubious. We introduced an assessment method based on anatomical upper airway features during tidal breathing for nasopharyngoscopy. The current study aimed to relate these features to MAD treatment outcome. METHODS: One hundred patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea were prospectively recruited for MAD treatment in a fixed 75% degree of maximal protrusion. Nasopharyngoscopic observations during Müller's maneuver and tidal breathing were recorded both with and without MAD. Treatment outcome, confirmed by 3-month follow-up polysomnography with MAD, was classified as (1) apnea-hypopnea index reduction ≥ 50%, (2) treatment apnea-hypopnea index < 5 events/h, and (3) ≥ 10% increase in apnea-hypopnea index compared with baseline (treatment deterioration). RESULTS: A complete dataset was obtained in 65 patients. After adjusting for baseline apnea-hypopnea index, body mass index, and supine dependency, the position of the soft palate (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-11.8; P = .013) and crowding of the oropharynx (odds ratio, 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-41.4; P = .017) were related to treatment deterioration. Addition of both features significantly (P = .031) improved the accuracy of baseline models based on clinical measurements alone. Moreover, with the MAD in situ, a posteriorly located soft palate (odds ratio, 9.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-56.3; P = .010) and a posteriorly located tongue base (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-35.9; P = .013) were associated with treatment deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Awake nasopharyngoscopy might be a valuable office-based examination to exclude the risk of treatment deterioration and improve patient selection for MAD treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Predicting Therapeutic Outcome of Mandibular Advancement Device Treatment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (PROMAD); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01532050; Identifier: NCT01532050.

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Upper Airway Collapse Patterns and Maxillomandibular Advancement.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate upper airway (UA) collapse patterns during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) surgery outcome, paying particular attention to the DISE phenotype complete concentric collapse at the level of the palate (CCCp). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Nineteen patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) prospectively underwent mandibular advancement device (MAD) treatment followed by MMA surgery. UA collapse patterns were evaluated before and after MMA surgery. Baseline apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was compared with AHI during MAD treatment and after MMA surgery. UA collapse patterns and the presence of baseline CCCp were assessed. AHI differences between patients with and without CCCp after MMA surgery were compared. RESULTS: In 14 patients, a full dataset was obtained: 8/6 (male/female), mean age = 51 ± 7 years, body mass index (BMI) = 25.6 ± 3.7 kg/m2 , and baseline AHI = 40.2 ± 25.6 per hour of sleep. MMA surgery reduced AHI to 9.9 ± 7.2 per hour of sleep (P = .0001). Eight patients benefited from additional AHI reduction compared to MAD treatment (P = .0113). Six out of 14 (43%) patients showed baseline CCCp. Baseline patient characteristics (age, BMI, and AHI) did not significantly differ between patients with and without CCCp. AHI was equally reduced after MMA, whether (P = .0145) or not (P = .0075) CCCp was present at baseline. All patients showed resolution of CCCp (P = .0159) during postoperative DISE. CONCLUSIONS: CCCp seems not to be a negative predictor for MMA surgery outcome measured by AHI reduction. Furthermore, MMA is likely to eliminate CCCp. Therefore, MMA might be a solution for OSA patients showing CCCp and broadens the perspective for personalized medicine and combination therapy. However, a large sample is required for definitive results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:E268-E274, 2020.

Correction to: Remotely controlled mandibular positioning of oral appliance therapy during polysomnography and drug-induced sleep endoscopy compared with conventional subjective titration in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: protocol for a randomized crossover trial.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that Fig. 1 had not been corrected based on the reviewer's comments. The correct Fig. 1 is presented below.

Predicting sleep apnea responses to oral appliance therapy using polysomnographic airflow.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Oral appliance therapy is an increasingly common option for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients who are intolerant to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Clinically applicable tools to identify patients who could respond to oral appliance therapy are limited. METHODS: Data from three studies (N = 81) were compiled, which included two sleep study nights, on and off oral appliance treatment. Along with clinical variables, airflow features were computed that included the average drop in airflow during respiratory events (event depth) and flow shape features, which, from previous work, indicates the mechanism of pharyngeal collapse. A model was developed to predict oral appliance treatment response (>50% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] from baseline plus a treatment AHI <10 events/h). Model performance was quantified using (1) accuracy and (2) the difference in oral appliance treatment efficacy (percent reduction in AHI) and treatment AHI between predicted responders and nonresponders. RESULTS: In addition to age and body mass index (BMI), event depth and expiratory "pinching" (validated to reflect palatal prolapse) were the airflow features selected by the model. Nonresponders had deeper events, "pinched" expiratory flow shape (i.e. associated with palatal collapse), were older, and had a higher BMI. Prediction accuracy was 74% and treatment AHI was lower in predicted responders compared to nonresponders by a clinically meaningful margin (8.0 [5.1 to 11.6] vs. 20.0 [12.2 to 29.5] events/h, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A model developed with airflow features calculated from routine polysomnography, combined with age and BMI, identified oral appliance treatment responders from nonresponders. This research represents an important application of phenotyping to identify alternative treatments for personalized OSA management.