Metaproteomics Characterizes the Human Gingival Crevicular Fluid Microbiome Function in Periodontitis.

Periodontitis is the leading cause of tooth loss in adults worldwide. The human proteome and metaproteome characterization of periodontitis is not clearly understood. Gingival crevicular fluid samples were collected from eight periodontitis and eight healthy subjects. Both the human and microbial proteins were characterized by liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry. A total of 570 human proteins were found differentially expressed, which were primarily associated with inflammatory response, cell death, cellular junction, and fatty acid metabolism. For the metaproteome, 51 genera were identified, and 10 genera were found highly expressed in periodontitis, while 11 genera were downregulated. The analysis showed that microbial proteins related to butyrate metabolism were upregulated in periodontitis cases. In particular, correlation analysis showed that the expression of host proteins related to inflammatory response, cell death, cellular junction, and lipid metabolism correlates with the alteration of metaproteins, which reflect the changes of molecular function during the occurrence of periodontitis. This study showed that the gingival crevicular fluid human proteome and metaproteome could reflect the characteristics of periodontitis. This might benefit the understanding of the periodontitis mechanism.

A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the human gingival crevicular fluid proteome and metaproteome.

Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) is an integral part of oral fluid that plays a special role in maintaining the structure of junctional epithelium and defending against bacterial infection. In this study, we comprehensively analysed the composition of the human GCF proteome and metaproteome simultaneously to obtain multidimensional information about GCF. A total of 3680 human proteins (2540 with at least two unique peptides) were identified in the normal GCF sample, and their functions were mainly associated with immune function and inflammation. Among these proteins, 1874 proteins could be quantified by the iBAQ algorithm, and their abundances spanned a dynamic range of six orders of magnitude. For the GCF metaproteome, a total of 3082 proteins and 69 genera were found. In addition, 16 genera were not identified by GCF metagenomic analysis. Compared to the saliva metaproteome, 32 genera were found to be in common. The protein quantitative analysis showed that the abundance of GCF metaproteome contributed to approximately 4.17% of the total GCF proteome. The top three most abundant genera were Fusobacterium, Corynebacterium, and Leptotrichia. The above data will be useful for future research on GCF-related diseases.

Ear Reconstruction with the Combination of Expanded Skin Flap and Medpor Framework: 20 Years of Experience in a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: In ear reconstruction, the difficulty lies in reestablishing the ear's bionic form with adequate skin coverage and an appropriate framework. Skin expansion and a porous polyethylene (i.e., Medpor) framework are often used for ear reconstruction. However, a long-term review of the combined application of the expanded skin and Medpor framework has not been reported. This article reviews ear reconstruction combining these two factors over the past 20 years in the authors' center to summarize the surgical technique and analyze the postoperative results and complications. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed that included all patients who underwent ear reconstruction with expanded skin and Medpor framework in the authors' center between 1998 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients with microtia who were admitted to the authors' center for surgical ear reconstruction were included, and 70 ears were reconstructed. Fifty-seven of the patients (83.82 percent) felt satisfied with their reconstructed ear, five patients (7.35 percent) were not satisfied with the reconstructed ear, and six patients (8.82 percent) had the frameworks removed. Fifteen patients (22.06 percent) developed complications, including framework exposure (13.24 percent), infection (4.41 percent), scar hypertrophy (4.41 percent), and hematoma (2.94 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Framework exposure limits the combined application of expanded skin flap and Medpor framework when reconstructing the ear without additional fascial interposition. Using a temporoparietal fascia or postauricular fascia flap during the operation is effective to decrease the exposure rate; however, this complication cannot be completely avoided. Using postauricular fascia and skin graft may lead to scar hypertrophy; thus, these techniques should be used with caution. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.