HBsAg and HBeAg in the prediction of a clinical response to peginterferon α-2b therapy in Chinese HBeAg-positive patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive values of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in 171 Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B who received a 48-week course of pegylated interferon alfa-2b therapy at 1.5 mcg/kg. METHODS: HBsAg, HBeAg, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were measured at baseline and weeks 12, 24, 48, and 72. Clinical responses were defined as a combined response (CR, HBeAg seroconversion [sustained response, SR] combined with HBV DNA level <2,000 IU/mL at week 72). The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for HBsAg alone and/or combined with HBeAg and HBV DNA at weeks 12 and 24. RESULTS: Of 171 patients included, 58 (33.9 %) achieved a SR. Of patients who achieved a SR, 33 (56.9 %) achieved a CR. Totally 19.3 % (33/171) patients achieved CR and 80.7 % (138/171) patients did not. Patients with HBsAg <1500 IU/mL at week 12 had a 47.4 % chance of achieving an off-treatment SR and patients with a HBsAg decrease >1.5 logIU/mL at week 12 had a 54.5 % chance. Patients with HBsAg >20,000 IU/mL at weeks 12 and 24 had a 93.8 and 100.0 % chance, respectively, of not achieving a CR. An HBsAg level or changes at weeks 12 and 24, combined with HBeAg or HBV DNA, increased the chance for a SR and CR. CONCLUSIONS: On-treatment HBsAg quantification, alone or in combination with HBeAg or HBV DNA, predicted off-treatment SR and CR after 48 weeks of PEG-IFNα-2b therapy, and thus, may guide clinicians in making a therapeutic decision to continue or terminate the therapy.

[Efficacy of pegylated-interferon alpha-2a treatment in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B and partial viral response to nucleoside analogue therapy].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and related factors of pegylated-interferon alpha-2a (PEG-IFN-2a) treatment in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who achieved partial viral response with nucleoside analogue (NA) therapy. METHODS: Patients with HBeAg-positive CHB and partial viral response to NA treatment were administered a PEG-IFN-2a therapy regimen of 180 g subcutaneous injection once weekly for a personlized duration of time. The existing NA therapy was continued in combination with the new PEG-IFN-2a treatment for 12 weeks. Measurements of serum HBV DNA load, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), HBeAg and hepatitis B e antibody (anti-HBe) were taken at baseline (prior to addition of the PEG-IFN-2a therapy) and every 3 months afterwards.For determining response to treatment, primary efficacy was defined as undetectable HBsAg and seroconversion, and secondary efficacy was defined as HBsAg less than 10 IU/mL and HBeAg seroconversion.Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 81 consecutive patients with an average of 12.0 months (range: 6.0-24.0 months) of NA therapy were included in the study and received an average of 19.6 months (range: 15.5-33.3 months) of PEG-IFN-2a treatment. At the end of PEG-IFN-2a therapy, 7 (8.6%) of the patients achieved undetectable HBsAg and seroconversion, and 14 (17.3%) showed HBsAg less than 10IU/mL. In addition, 40.7% achieved undetectable HBeAg and seroconversion, a rate that was slightly higher than that (38.3%) seen in treatment-naive patients who received PEG-IFN-2a. Statistical analyses suggest that baseline level of HBsAg at less than 1500 IU/mL may predict end of PEG-IFN-2a treatment response for HBsAg less than 10 IU/mL, as evidenced by the area under the curve measure of 0.747, sensitivity measure of 87.3%, specificity measure of 33.3%, positive predictive value of 82.1% and negative predictive value of 42.8%. CONCLUSION: Patients with HBeAg-positive CHB and partial viral response to NA therapy can achieve undetectable HBsAg and HBeAg seroconversion after switching to PEG-IFN-2a treatment. Baseline HBsAg level may be predictive of response to this therapeutic strategy.

[High rates of HBsAg loss and seroconversion result from prolonged course of pegasys treatment].

OBJECTIVE: HBsAg loss and seroconversion in patients with chronic hepatitis B leads to long-lasting good clinical outcomes. The aim of this paper was to investigate to improve the rate of HBsAg loss and seroconversion in chronic hepatitis B patients by prolonged treatment of PEG-IFNa-2a. 217 cases of HBeAg-positive or negative patients were collected from inpatient and outpatient in Beijing Ditan Hospital from May 2005 to October 2009 and subcutaneous injection of 135 ug or 180 ug PEGASYS were given once a week according to body weights. The drug doses were adjusted according to the neutrophilic granulocyte and platelet counts during treatment course. Quantitative HBV DNA test was conducted using a commercially available real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR kit. The serum HBsAg/anti-HBs and HBeAg/anti-HBe were quantitatively detected by Abbott i 2000 chemiluminescent kit before and during treatment every three months. Patients with HBsAg steadily decreased and reached serum HBsAg level below 200 IU/ml after 48 weeks of treatment would receive prolonged treatment. Patients with more than 12 weeks of treatment entered into analysis. Main efficacy of prolonged treatment was evaluated by the incidences of HBsAg loss and seroconversion. RESULTS: The treatment courses of the 217 patients ranged from 12.0 to 197.6 weeks with an average of 53.1+/-33.4 weeks, 118 cases took more than 48 weeks and another 89 cases less than 48 weeks. 13.4% (29/217) of patients achieved HBsAg loss or HBsAg seroconversion with treatment courses from 17.6 to 197.6 weeks (average 75.4+/-42.8 weeks). Among these 29 patients 24 (82.8%) received more than 48 weeks of treatment, but the treatment courses of HBV DNA reached undetectable level were 20.8+/-8.9 weeks. In this study, 9.5% (14/148) of HBeAg-positive patients achieved HBsAg loss or seroconversion, all of them treated more than 48 weeks, from 48 to 194 weeks, average 81.32+/-39.36 weeks. 21.7% (15/69) of HBeAg-negative patients achieved HBsAg loss or seroconversion, significantly higher than that of HBeAg-positive patients (9.5%) (x2 = 6.129, P = 0.013). The average treatment course for HBeAg-negative patients with HBsAg loss was 70.2+/-48.0 weeks, shorter than that of HBeAg-positive patients with HBsAg loss (81.3+/-39.4 weeks), but no significant difference (t = -0.522, P = 0.602) found between. CONCLUSION: Higher rate of HBsAg loss and seroconversion could be obtained by individual extended treatment courses in patients with rapid HBV DNA and HBsAg response to PEG-IFNa-2a treatment and the HBeAg-negative patients could got higher rate of HBsAg loss than HBeAg-positive patients.

[Prediction of sustained viral response to combinational therapy with interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C by rapid viral response].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the rapid viral response (RVR) to combinational therapy with interferon and rabavirin can be used to predict the sustained viral response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C patients. METHODS: According to their clinical characteristics, all patients in this study were given pegylated or conventional interferon injection and different dose of ribavirin according to their weight. Patients were injected Pegasys (pegierferon alpha-2a) 180 microg or 135 microg once a week, or pegyintron 50-80 microg once a week, or conventional interferon 3-5 MU every two days, in combination with a dose of 600-1500 mg/d ribavirin. The serum HCV RNA load was determined at 0, 4, 12 week, and then every 12 weeks. After the viral response obtained, the patients were treated for another 24-72 weeks and followed up 24 weeks. The main parameter to evaluate the efficacy was SVR rate. The influence factors associated with rapid viral response were investigated. RESULTS: RVR was obtained at week 4 in 84.2% of the 120 patients. The HCV RNA baseline of RVR group was (5.883+/-1.246) lg copies/ml, which was significantly lower than that of the group without RVR [(6.502+/-0.693) lg copies/ml, t=2.15, P=0.034]. 97 patients with RVR who finished treatment and follow-up, 90.7% of these patients obtained SVR, but the SVR rate in patients (82.4%) without RVR was lower than that in patients with RVR (x2=0.371, P=0.543). In this study, RVR rate was not associated with HCV genotype and the dose of interferon used. In the naive patients, the RVR to pegylated interferon was 87.8%, which was significantly higher than that in retreat patients (x2=4.651, P=0.031). CONCLUSION: High RVR rate could be obtained in chronic hepatitis C patients treated combined with interferon and ribavirin. RVR rate is associated with the HCV RNA baseline load in both naive and retreat patients but not correlated to HCV genotype. RVR could predict the SVR.

[Factors associated with HBeAg seroconversion in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with interferon alfa-2a].

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to investigate the factors associated with viral response and HBeAg seroconversion and the relationship between them at different stages of interferon treatment in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients. METHODS: PEG-IFN alfa-2a was injected subcutaneously in doses of 180 microg once a week for 48 weeks to HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients, and the patients were followed for another 24 weeks after the treatment. The serum HBV DNA load was measured by real-time quantitative PCR assay. Microparticle enzyme immunoassay analysis (MEIA) was then carried out by an automatic enzyme immunoassay analysis instrument to measure HBeAg and anti-HBe. Virological response and HBeAg seroconversion rates, and the factors associated with them were analyzed. RESULTS: The differences in ALT baselines between viral responding and non-responding groups were significant at treatment time and at the end of the follow-up period. These differences were also significant in patients with HBeAg seroconversion at 12 weeks and at the end of the follow-up period compared with the non-conversion group. No significant difference of HBV DNA baseline was observed between the HBeAg seroconversion and non-conversion group. At 12, 24 and 48 weeks, in patients with viral response during the treatment, their HBeAg seroconversion rates were 43.8%, 21.4% and 18.9% respectively; their respective HBeAg seroconversion rates remaining at 72 weeks were 42.9%, 33.3% and 27.6%. HBeAg seroconversion was related to HBV DNA negativity at 48 weeks treatment in the multivariate analysis (OR=2.15, 95.0% CI=1.744-2.664, P less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Viral response and early and sustained HBeAg seroconversion were associated with pretreatment ALT levels. HBeAg seroconversion was related to viral response during IFN treatment, but not to the baseline HBV DNA load.

[Retreatment with interferon of relapsed chronic hepatitis C patients].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and investigate the influencing factors of the interferon (IFN) retreatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C relapsed after a previous IFN treatment. METHODS: A retrospective study was designed to analyze the retreatment with IFN of 60 relapsed chronic hepatitis C patients. All patients were from a randomized, opened and multi-center clinical trial about the efficacy and security of PEG-IFNalpha-2a compared to CIFNalpha-2a in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in China. There were 35 patients treated with PEG-IFNalpha-2a and 25 with CIFNalpha-2a. The main parameter to evaluate the efficacy was sustained viral response (SVR) rate. The influence of viral concentration in serum, genotype and drug categories on the responses to IFN were analyzed. RESULTS: For all the patients, the end of treatment virus response (ETVR) and SVR rates were 55.00% and 35.00% respectively. ETVR rate of PEG-IFNalpha-2a was significantly higher than that of CIFNalpha-2a (74.29% and 28.00% respectively, P < 0.01). SVR rate of PEG-IFNalpha-2a was also markedly higher than that of CIFNalpha-2a (45.71% and 20.00% respectively, P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the high and low viral load groups. Among the patients with genotype 1, ETVR and SVR rates of PEG-IFNalpha-2a (75.00%, 45.83%) were significantly higher than those of CIFNalpha-2a (22.22%, 11.11%), (P < 0.01, P < 0.05 respectively), but in patients with genotype non-1, there were no such differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Some relapsed patients were not responsive to the IFN retreatment. The efficacy of PEG-IFNalpha-2a was superior to CIFNalpha-2a. The conventional IFN was not suggested to be used in the relapsed cases with genotype 1. The viral load was not associated with the efficacy of IFN retreatment.

Predictive factors for sustained response to interferon treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a randomized, open, and multi-center controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to investigate the predictive factors of sustained viral response in roferon-A or pegasys treated chronic hepatitis C patients after logistic regression analysis of the factors that might be associated with the therapeutic effects of interferon (IFN). METHODS: All patients enrolled into this randomized, open and multi-center controlled trial were divided into two groups randomly and treated with pegasys and roferon-A for 24 weeks, then followed up for another 24 weeks. Before treatment, hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype was determined, and HCV-RNA in serum was detected before and at the end of treatment and follow-up. HCV-RNA turning negative was considered the major index for evaluating the therapeutic effect. The clinical characteristics including gender, age, infection route of HCV, treatment with IFN, platelet count, AST/ALT ratio and treatment drugs were analyzed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Intention to treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) population groups have 208 and 197 patients respectively. In the PP group, after treatment for 24 weeks, the response rates of female patients aged less than 50 years, infected through non-transfusion, relapsed after IFN treatment, and presented with a AST/ALT ratio/=1, virus load equal or more than 8 x 10(5) IU/ml, and genotype 1 infection, and treated finally with roferon-A. But, at the end of follow-up, the patients with a AST/ALT ratio>/=1 and virus load more than 8 x 10(5) IU/ml had a higher rate of sustained response than did those with a AST/ALT ratio

Impact of virus genotype on interferon treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C: a multicenter controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Some factors have been reported to be associated with a greater likelihood of sustained viral response (SVR) in the interferon (IFN) treatment of chronic hepatitis C. The factors include HCV genotype, HCV RNA level in serum, state of liver disease, baseline body weight, age, sex, and race. The aim of this trial was to investigate the influence of HCV genotype on the IFN treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: The genotypes of HCV virus were determined in the patients with chronic hepatitis C from several hospitals of China enrolled into the randomized, opened and controlled trial of Peg-IFN alpha-2a (pegasys) treatment, controlled with IFN-alpha-2a (roferon-A). The serum ALT levels and HCV RNA concentrations of the patients were detected before and at the end of treatment and during the follow-up. The influence of HCV genotype on the IFN treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C was analyzed in intention-to-treat (ITT) population. RESULTS: The HCV genotypes of 202 patients were determined. Of these patients, 158(78.22%) were infected with genotype 1 HCV and 44(21.78%) with genotype non-1. The viral response at the end of treatment (ETVR) and sustained viral response (SVR) rates were 53.80% and 25.32% respectively in patients with genotype 1 HCV, but they were 61.36% and 43.18% in patients with genotype non-1. The difference of SVR between patients with genotype 1 HCV and those with genotype non-1 was significant (P=0.021). After being grouped by the used drugs, the ETVR rates of patients infected with genotype 1 and non-1 HCV were 76.83% and 80.95% in the patients treated with pegasys (P=0.686); but their SVR rates were 35.37% and 66.67% (P=0.01). The viral relapse rate of genotype 1 HCV (55.56%) was significantly higher than that of genotype non-1 HCV (23.53%) (P=0.02). In roferon-A group, the ETVR and SVR rates of patients with genotype 1 HCV were 28.95% and 14.47% respectively, which were lower but not more significant than those of patients with genotype non-1 HCV (43.48% and 21.74%). Moreover, the viral relapse rate of genotype 1 HCV (72.73%) was higher but not more significant than that of genotype non-1 HCV (50.00%) (P=0.21). CONCLUSION: HCV genotype could affect the efficacies, mainly sustained responses, of IFN treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C, and the effects of IFN are related to drugs and therapeutic course.

[The pegasys using and HCV genotype were the independent predictors of the response to antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the predictors of IFN therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C through making the multivariate logistic regression analysis. METHODS: The patients in the opened, randomized and controlled trial were enrolled into two group, pegasys and Roferon-A group, and were given 24 weeks of pegasys (injection of 180 microg a week), and Roferon-A (injection three times of Roferon-A 3 MU a week) therapy, and followed 24 weeks. The HCV RNA content was determined at the time before, end of treatment and at the followed-up. The association of the response to the treatment with the clinical characteristics including age, gender, way of HCV infection, history of IFN treatment, planet count, AST/ALT ratio, HCV RNA level, HCV genotype and treatment drugs was made trough multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The PP population containing 197 cases was analyzed. After controlling for age, gender, way of HCV infection, history of IFN treatment, planet count, AST/ALT ratio, HCV RNA level and treatment, the HCV genotype was not predictor of the end of treatment viral response (ETVR) to IFN therapy (OR 0.604, 95% CI 0.271-1.349, P = 0.219), but was the independent predictor of sustained viral response (SVR) (OR 0.408, 95% CI 0.189-0.881, P = 0.023). After controlling for other characteristics, the treatment drug was the predictors of ETVR (OR 0.105, 95% CI 0.052-0.212, P < 0.001) and SVR (OR 0.255, 95% CI 0.123-0.529, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The pegasys using and HCV genotype were the independent predictors of the response to antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C.

[The influence of HCV genotype on the IFN treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of HCV genotype on the IFN treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: The genotypes of HCV virus were determined in the patients enrolled into the Randomized, opened and controlled trial of Peg-IFN alpha-2a (Pegasys) treatment, controlled with IFN-alpha-2a (Roferon-A), on chronic hepatitis C patients in China. The serum ALT levels and HCV RNA concentration of the patients were detected in the time of before treatment, the end of therapy and follow-up. The influence of HCV genotype on the IFN treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C was analyzed in intention to treat (ITT) population. RESULTS: The HCV genotypes of 202 cases were determined. 158 (78.2%) cases infected with genotype 1 HCV and 44 (21.8%) cases with genotype non-1. For overall patients, the viral response at the end of treatment (ETVR) and sustained viral response (SVR) rates were 53.8% and 25.3% respectively in patients with genotype 1 HCV, but in genotype non-1 patients those was 61.4% and 43.2%, and the difference of SVR between genotype 1 and non-1 was significant (P=0.021). After grouped by the used drugs, in the patients given Pegasys treatment, the ETVR rates of patients with genotype 1 and non-1 HCV infection were 76.8% and 81.0%, the difference was not significant (P=0.686), but the difference of SVR rates, which were 35.4% and 66.7%, of the patients was significant (P=0.01). The viral relapse rate of genotype 1 was 55.6%; it was significant higher than that of genotype non-1 (23.5%) (P=0.02). In Roferon-A group, the ETVR and SVR rates of patients with genotype 1 HCV were 29.0% and 14.5%, which were lower, but not significant, than those of patients with genotype non-1 (43.5% and 21.7%). The viral relapse rate of genotype 1 was 72.7% and higher, but not significant, than that of genotype non-1 also (50.0%) (P=0.21). CONCLUSION: HCV genotype could affects the efficacies, mainly the sustained responses, of IFN treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C, and the effects of IFN were related to the kinds of drugs and therapeutic course.

Peginterferon alfa-2b in the treatment of Chinese patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: In mainland China, peginterferon (PEG-IFN) alfa-2b 1.0µg/kg/wk for 24 weeks is the approved treatment for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, randomized trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of regimens utilizing increased dose or treatment duration in treatment-naive Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B. STUDY DESIGN: 670 HBeAg-positive patients from China, Malaysia, Taiwan area, Singapore, and Thailand were enrolled. Patients received PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.0µg/kg/wk (arm A) or 1.5µg/kg/wk (arm B) for 24 weeks, or 1.5µg/kg/wk for 48 weeks (arm C). The primary end point was loss of HBeAg 24 weeks after end of treatment. RESULTS: At the end of follow-up, HBeAg loss was significantly greater in arm C compared with arm A (31.3% vs. 17.3%; P=0.001) and arm B (31.3% vs. 18.1%; P=0.001). No significant difference in the rate of HBeAg loss was observed between arms A and B. The proportions of patients with HBe seroconversion, HBV DNA levels <20,000IU/mL, and ALT normalization at the end of follow-up were significantly higher in arm C compared with arm A and arm B. In arms A, B, and C, rates of early treatment discontinuation were 6.3%, 4.9%, and 8.9%; of discontinuation due to an AE, 2%, 3%, and 3%; and of AEs requiring dose modification, 3%, 6%, and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Chinese patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.5µg/kg/wk for 48 weeks is more efficacious compared with 1.0 and 1.5µg/kg/wk for 24 weeks.

[Study on retreatment of CHC patients with initial treatment failure].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the retreatment of CHC patients with initial treatment failure and how to achieve SVR. METHODS: 54 patients who had experienced treatment failure were enrolled and retreated with standard treatment of pegylated interferon and ribavirin or intensive treatment, respectively. Their SVR rates were statistically compared, to decide two therapies' application. RESULTS: 54 patients had been retreated, and total SVR rate was up to 75.92%, with 88.46% in relapsed patients and 64.29% in non-responders. After retreatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin, SVR rate was 95.45% in patients with prior interferon monotherapy, and 64.71% in patients with prior interferon and ribavirin, and 60% in patients with prior pegylated interferon alpha-2a monotherapy. SVR rate of relapsed patients was significantly higher than that of non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: In CHC patients with treatment failure, SVR rate of retreatment with standard treatment or intensive treatment still can be up to 60%-90%. Retreatment with standard therapy can be applied to patients who had received interferon monotherapy or interferon plus ribavirin. Three types of patients who need intensive retreatment were as following: patients nonresponsive to interferon plus ribavirin or pegylated interferon alpha-2a monotherapy, and patients with treatment failure who had received prior standard treatment.

[Study on effect of intensive treatment for refractory chronic hepatitis C patients].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of intensive treatment for refractory chronic hepatitis C, and to improve the sustained viral response (SVR) rate of treatment with interferon plus ribavirin by optimizing therapeutic dose and course. METHODS: Patients who did not acquire response or partial response by standard therapy (PEG-IFN alpha subcutaneous injection weekly plus Ribavirin 10.5 mg/kg) every day were enrolled and retreated with intensive treatment of 10 MU interferon every other day or 360 microg pegylated interferon alpha-2a weekly according to patients' wishes, and ribavirin 15 mg/kg every day. Serum HCV RNA was detected at baseline,treatment week 4, 12 and every 12 weeks succedent and 24 weeks after treatment end. Course of treatment was 72 to 96 weeks according to viral response. SVR was the mark of therapeutic effect. RESULTS: 18 patients completed whole range therapy and follow-up, in which 12 patients acquired SVR, 5 patients treatment failure and 1 relapse. 3 patients acquired rapid viral response (RVR), and they all got complete Early Viral Response (cEVR) and SVR. RVR Patients' viral loads were significantly lower than that of patients who did not acquire RVR (t = 4. 687, P < 0.001). In 15 patients who did not acquire RVR, 8 patients acquired cEVR, and 9 acquired SVR. SVR rate of patients who were administered PEG-IFN alpha-2a was 4/5, 11 patients who acquired cEVR all acquired SVR, while in 7 patients who did not acquire cEVR, only 1 patient acquired SVR. CONCLUSIONS: High percent patients, who did not acquire response or partial response by previous standard antiviral therapy, could gain SVR by intensive dose interferon plus Ribavirin. In intensive treatment procedure, adjusting and prolonging course according to viral response after HCV RNA turned negative were important measures to improve refractory Chronic Hepatitis C SVR rate.