Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: a single-center study.

BACKGROUND: To improve outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain an unmet clinical need. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of G2-DESs and BP-DESs in patients with and without DM in a single center in China. METHODS: A total of 7666 consecutive patients who exclusively had G2-DES or BP-DES implantation throughout 2013 in our center were studied. The primary efficacy endpoint was any target lesion revascularization (TLR), whereas the primary safety endpoint was a composite of death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: G2-DESs had a similar occurrence of death, non-fatal MI, TLR, stroke, and stent thrombosis compared with BP-DESs in patients with DM (all P > 0.05). The incidence of TVR and TLR was lower for G2-DESs than for BP-DESs in patients without DM (3.2% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.002; 2.2% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis also showed better TVR- and TLR-free survival rates for G2-DESs than for BP-DESs in patients without DM. Multivariate analysis showed that a BP-DES was an independent risk factor for TLR (hazard ratio 1.963, 95% confidence interval 1.390-2.772, P < 0.001) in patients without DM, which was not predictive of other components of major adverse cardiac events (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: G2-DESs have better efficacy, represented by a reduced risk of TLR, and similar safety compared with BP-DESs in patients without DM. G2-DESs have similar efficacy and safety compared with BP-DESs in patients with DM at 2-year follow-up.

Randomized comparison of novel biodegradable polymer and durable polymer-coated cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stents: Three-Year Outcomes of the I-LOVE-IT 2 Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of the novel biodegradable polymer cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) versus the durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (DP-SES) in the I-LOVE-IT2 trial. BACKGROUNDS: Comparisons of the long-term safety and efficiency of the BP-DES versus the DP-DES are limited. METHODS: A total of 2,737 patients eligible for coronary stenting were randomized to the BP-SES or DP-SES group at a 2:1 ratio. The primary endpoint of target lesion failure (TLF) was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: A three-year clinical follow-up period was available for 2,663 (97.3%) patients. There were no significant differences in TLF (8.9% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.81), patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) (15.2% vs.14.5%, P = 0.63), or individual components between the BP-SES and DP-SES. Definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) was low and similar at 3 years (0.8% vs. 1.0%, P = 0.64). Landmark analysis of 1-3 years showed that the TLF (2.7% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.81), PoCE (6.2% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.28), and definite/probable ST (0.4% vs. 0.4%, P = 1.00) were comparable between the 2 arms. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective randomized trial, the BP-SES showed similar clinical results versus the DP-SES in terms of safety and efficacy outcomes over a 3-year follow-up period.

Efficacy and safety of a biodegradable polymer Cobalt-Chromium sirolimus-eluting stent (EXCROSSAL) in treating de novo coronary artery disease: A pooled analysis of the CREDIT II and CREDIT III trials.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of the second-generation biodegradable polymer Cobalt-Chromium sirolimus-eluting stent (EXCEL2) in daily clinical practice remains unknown. Additionally, to meet the China Food and Drug Administration requirements, we conducted an objective performance criterion study from the CREDIT II and CREDIT III trials. METHODS: CREDIT II was a randomized trial comparing the EXCEL2 versus EXCEL stent in patients with up to 2 de novo coronary lesions. CREDIT III was a prospective, single-arm study evaluating the efficacy and safety of EXCEL2 in broad types of de novo coronary artery lesions. This pooled analysis included patients in the CREDIT III and EXCEL2 arm of the CREDIT II trial. The primary outcome was 12-month target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and clinical indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR). The patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) of all-cause death, all MI, or any revascularization was also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 833 patients were included, consisting of 625 in the CREDIT III trial and 208 in the EXCEL2 arm of the CREDIT II trial. Twelve-month TLF occurred in 6.1% patients, cardiac death in 0.4%, TV-MI in 5%, and CI-TLR in 1.1%. Additionally, 64 (7.7%) PoCE and 3 probable late stent thromboses (0.4%) were recorded. CONCLUSION: EXCEL2 stent met the objective performance criterion on efficacy and safety with a low level of 12-month TLF as well as stent thrombosis when treating patients with de novo coronary lesions. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Two-year results and subgroup analyses of the PEPCAD China in-stent restenosis trial: A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: The PEPCAD China ISR trial investigated the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty in an Asian patient population with coronary drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (DES-ISR). METHODS: A total of 220 patients with coronary DES-ISR were treated with PCB angioplasty or with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). This randomized (1:1), single-blind prospective multicenter trial in a Chinese population used 9-month in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included the 24-month clinical event rates. RESULTS: Both treatment groups were similar in terms of patient, lesion, or procedural characteristics. After the 12-month follow-up evaluation, additional clinical events only occurred in the PES study group. The combined rate of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) in the PCB group was significantly lower than that in the PES group (3.7% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.03). Additional subgroup analyses of 9-month in-segment LLL and 2-year target lesion failure in patients with diabetes, small vessels, diffuse ISR, and stent margin restenosis did not show more favorable results for one specific treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year follow-up demonstrated sustained long-term clinical efficacy for both devices. PCB angioplasty was associated with significantly lower overall and cardiovascular mortality/MI rates in patients with DES-ISR lesions while avoiding the use of additional metal layers for drug release (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 01622075).

Safety and efficacy of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions: two-year results from a prospective patient-level pooled analysis of TARGET trials.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting FIREHAWK stent (MicroPort Medical, Shanghai, China) in a large cohort of patients. BACKGROUND: Trials on the FIREHAWK stent allowing targeted sirolimus release were not individually powered to reliably estimate low-frequency safety endpoints such as stent thrombosis (ST) or to examine long-term safety and efficacy. Additionally, the China Food and Drug Administration requires an objective performance criterion (OPC) study for new drug-eluting stents. METHODS: The primary endpoint, target lesion failure (TLF), was defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization at 12 months. Patient-level data from 1,007 patients with de novo native coronary lesions exclusively treated with the FIREHAWK stent in the TARGET serial studies (I and II) were prospectively collected, pooled and analyzed throughout a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The 12-month rate of TLF in 1,003 patients (follow-up rate, 99.6%) was 3.9% (upper 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.3%), which was significantly lower than the performance goal of 9.0% (P < 0.0001). The 24-month rates of TLF, PoCE (a composite of all-cause death, all MI, or any revascularization), and ARC definite or probable ST were 4.6%, 7.8% and 0.1%, respectively. In subgroup analysis, long lesion (≥ 30 mm) was an independent predictor of TLF within 2 years (hazard ratio [95%CI]: 2.44 [1.32, 4.53], P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This pooled, patient-level analysis indicates that the FIREHAWK stent exhibits a promising 2-year efficacy and safety profile.

Biodegradable polymer-coated versus durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents: the final 5-year outcomes of the I-LOVE-IT 2 trial.

AIMS: This analysis presents the final five-year results of the I-LOVE-IT 2 trial, a non-inferiority study comparing a biodegradable polymer (BP) sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with a durable polymer (DP) SES in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 2,737 Chinese patients eligible for coronary stenting were treated with BP-SES or DP-SES in a 2:1 ratio. Patients who were randomised to the BP-SES group were additionally re-randomised to receive either six-month or 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was 12-month target lesion failure (TLF: cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation). At five years, the overall follow-up rate was 90.8%, and the cumulative incidence of TLF as the primary endpoint was similar between BP-SES and DP-SES (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79 to 1.28), as was that for the patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE: all-cause death, all MI and any revascularisation) (HR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.23), or definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) (HR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.77). Cumulative events were also similar between the six-month DAPT and 12-month DAPT groups after BP-SES implantation. CONCLUSIONS: I-LOVE-IT 2 showed that the five-year safety and efficacy of BP-SES and DP-SES were similar, as were those between six months and 12 months of DAPT after BP-SES implantation.

Comparison of the Ultrathin Strut, Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-eluting Stent in a Chinese Population: The Randomized BIOFLOW VI Trial.

PURPOSE: The BIOFLOW-VI (Biotronik-Safety and Clinical Performance of the Drug Eluting Orsiro Stent in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions-VI) study evaluates the angiographic efficacy, clinical safety, and effectiveness of the ultrathin strut, biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) compared with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES). This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to enable approval of new drug-eluting stents in China. METHODS: A total of 440 eligible patients from 11 sites with up to 2 de novo native coronary artery lesions were randomly assigned to receive either BP-SES (n = 220) or DP-EES (n = 220) from July 2014 to September 2016 in this prospective, multicenter, noninferiority trial. FINDINGS: The primary end point of 9-month in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) was 0.05 (0.02) mm in the BP-SES group versus 0.07 (0.02) mm in the DP-EES group, with a mean difference of -0.02 mm (95% CI, -0.06 to 0.03; P = 0.44; Pnoninferiority < 0.0001). At 1 year, the target lesion failure rate (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) was similar between the 2 groups (BP-SES 2.3% vs DP-EES 1.4%; P = 0.50). No definite or probable stent thrombosis had occurred in any of the 2 treatment arms. IMPLICATIONS: The randomized BIOFLOW-VI trial showed that BP-SES was noninferior to DP-EES with regard to the primary end point of 9-month in-stent LLL in a Chinese population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02870985.

The association between osteocalcin gene polymorphism and dental fluorosis among children exposed to fluoride in People's Republic of China.

Excessive fluoride intake has been shown to affect dentin and cementum mineralization throughout life. Some studies indicated that a HindIII polymorphism, of osteocalcin (OC) gene, was associated with bone metabolism-related diseases. Therefore, it is possible that the variation in OC genotypes will be associated with dental fluorosis (DF) status and/or serum caciotropic hormone level. A case-control study was conducted among children aged 8-12 years in Henan Province, PR China to investigate the association between dental fluorosis, serum calciotropic hormone level, and polymorphisms in the OC gene. HindIII polymorphism in OC gene was genotyped using the PCR-RFLP procedure. OC and calcitonin (CT) level in serum was detected using radioimmunoassay. No significant difference was observed for OC HindIII genotypes among the cases with dental fluorosis, the controls from endemic fluorosis area (EFA) and the controls from non-endemic fluorosis area (NEFA). A significant negative correlation was observed between serum calcium and OC level. No significant relationship was found between OC HindIII polymorphisms and the level of OC and CT. In conclusion, OC HindIII polymorphisms may not be a useful genetic marker for differential risk of dental fluorosis among children in PR China.

Immediate and long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: comparison with bare-metal stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease remain to be established in different clinical settings. METHODS: Elective DES implantation for unprotected LMCA stenosis was performed in 220 patients at the Fu Wai Hospital, China, from April 2003 to February 2006. Data derived from the latter group were compared with those derived from 224 patients treated with bare-metal stents (BMSs) before March 2003 in a Chinese registry of unprotected LMCA stenting. RESULTS: Compared with the historical BMS control group, the DES group had more multivessel disease and underwent more bifurcation stenting. The inhospital major adverse cardiac events were significantly higher in the DES than in the BMS recipients (4.1% vs 0.9%, P = .030) because of more complex lesions and procedures in the DES group. During the 15-month mean follow-up period, cumulative cardiac death (0.5% vs 4.9%, P = .004), target-vessel revascularization (5.9% vs 11.6%, P = .034), and major adverse cardiac event (9.5% vs 16.5%, P = .029) rates were significantly lower in the DES than in the BMS group. There was no significant difference in clinical efficacy between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 46.4% of DES and 45.7% of BMS recipients, respectively; and the binary restenosis rate was significantly lower in the DES versus the BMS control group (16.7% vs 31.4%, P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this comparison with a historical control, DES implantation for unprotected LMCA appears safe in selected patients and might be more effective in preventing major adverse cardiac events compared with BMS implantation over a mean follow-up period of 15 months.

Sirolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stents: two-year clinical results from first-in-man study on the Firebird 2 stent.

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been shown to significantly reduce clinical events and angiographic restenosis in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study was conducted to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of the polymer-based sirolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium Firebird 2 stents in the treatment of patients with CAD. METHODS: This first-in-man study using the Firebird 2 stent is a prospective, historically-controlled multicenter clinical study, which enrolled 67 patients with CAD who were treated with the sirolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stent (Firebird 2, Microport Shanghai, Firebird 2 group), compared to another 49 patients treated with a bare cobalt alloy stent (Driver, Medtronic, control group). Continued 2-year clinical follow-up was performed after getting the initial 6-month angiographic and 1-year clinical follow-up. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiac death, reinfarction and target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: All patients in the Firebird 2 group (100.0%) and 48 patients in the control group (98.0%) completed the 2-year clinical follow-up. At the 1-year follow-up the use of the Firebird 2 stent was highly effective, resulting in a significant 94% decrease of TLR (26.5% in the control group and 1.5% in the Firebird 2 group, P<0.0001). A significant difference in TLR was maintained at 2-year follow-up, Firebird 2 group 1.5% and the control group 31.3% (P<0.0001). Between 1- and 2-year post-stenting, no more TLR occurred in the Firebird 2 group compared with two cases in the control group (P>0.05). There was a 1.5% incidence of MACE at 1- and 2-year follow-up in the Firebird 2 group, compared with 26.5% and 33.3% in the control group, respectively (all P<0.0001). The cumulative 1- and 2-year MACE free survival rates were 98.5% in the Firebird 2 group vs 73.5% and 66.7% in the control group (log rank P<0.0001). No case of stent thrombosis occurred during 2-year follow-up in the Firebird 2 group, compared with one case that suffered a definite stent thrombosis in the control group at 19-month post-stenting: this patient presented with unstable angina pectoris and was treated by balloon angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the bare cobalt alloy stent, the Firebird 2 sirolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stent is safe and effective in treating patients with CAD. The use of this stent was associated with a sustained clinical benefit and significantly lower rate of TLR and MACE up to 2 years post-stenting.

A comparison of clinical and angiographic outcomes after Excel bioabsorbable polymer versus Firebird durable polymer rapamycin-eluting stent for the treatment of coronary artery disease in a "real world" setting: six-month follow-up results.

BACKGROUND: Several clinical trials have shown that rapamycin-eluting stents significantly reduce the risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The Firebird stent and the Excel stent (coated with bioabsorbable polymer) are two different types of rapamycin-eluting stents made in China, both have been recently approved for clinical use in China by State Food and Drug Administration. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in safety and efficacy between the two types of stents in daily practice. METHODS: In the month of June 2006, a total of 190 consecutive patients were treated exclusively with Firebird stents (n = 93, Firebird group) or Excel stents (n = 97, Excel group) in our center and were included in this study. The frequency of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization), binary restenosis, and late lumen loss and stent thrombosis during a six-month follow-up period were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Patient and lesion characteristics were comparable between the groups. Major adverse cardiac event rates were low in hospital and at 6 months (2.1% in the Excel group and 0% in the Firebird group, P > 0.05). The 6-month angiographic in-stent restenosis rate was 0% in both groups, with an associated late loss of (0.15 +/- 0.21) mm versus (0.14 +/- 0.20) mm (P = 0.858) and the in-segment restenosis rate was also 0% for the Excel group and the Firebird group. There was no definite stent thrombosis identified in either group during the six-month follow-up period and only one patient in the Excel group had probable stent thrombosis in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this mid-term, single-center study showed that both of the Firebird and the Excel rapamycin eluting stent had similar effects on reducing the incidence of MACE and the risk of restenosis (both in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis) after PCI in daily practice.

A randomised comparison of biodegradable polymer- and permanent polymer-coated platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting coronary stents in China: the EVOLVE China study.

AIMS: The EVOLVE China randomised study sought to evaluate the clinical safety and effectiveness of the SYNERGY bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent (EES) for the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease in China. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions were randomised (1:1) to receive the SYNERGY or PROMUS Element Plus stent. The primary endpoint was in-stent late loss at nine months. Secondary endpoints included death, MI, revascularisation, and stent thrombosis up to 12 months. A total of 412 subjects were randomised (205 SYNERGY; 207 PROMUS Element Plus) at 14 sites in China from October 2013 to July 2014. SYNERGY was non-inferior to PROMUS Element Plus for the primary endpoint of nine-month in-stent late loss: SYNERGY 0.20±0.33 mm vs. PROMUS Element Plus 0.17±0.38 mm with an upper one-sided 97.5% confidence interval of the difference (0.10 mm), significantly less than the non-inferiority margin (0.15 mm; p<0.0008). Clinical adverse event rates were low and not significantly different between groups at nine and 12 months (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the EVOLVE China trial, the SYNERGY bioabsorbable polymer-coated EES was noninferior to the PROMUS Element Plus permanent polymer-coated EES for the primary endpoint of late loss at nine months.

Biodegradable Polymer-Based Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Differing Elution and Absorption Kinetics: The PANDA III Trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether the rate of drug elution and polymer absorption affects clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer-based drug-eluting stents (DES) is unknown. The widely used polylactide polymer-based Excel stent (JW Medical, Weihai, China) elutes sirolimus within 180 days, and the polylactide polymer is completely absorbed within 6 to 9 months. In contrast, the poly-lactide-co-glycolide polymer-based BuMA stent (Sino Medical, Tianjin, China) elutes sirolimus within 30 days, and the poly-lactide-co-glycolide polymer is completely absorbed within 3 months. Thus, both metallic DES elute sirolimus, isolating major differences to the polymer and elution kinetics. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness between the BuMA sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and Excel SES in an "all-comers" population. METHODS: PANDA III was a multicenter trial with few exclusion criteria, powered for sequential noninferiority and superiority testing. The primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: Between December 2013 and August 2014, 2,348 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with BuMA (n = 1,174) or Excel SES (n = 1,174). The 1-year primary endpoint of TLF occurred in 6.4% of patients in each group (difference: 0.06%; 95% confidence interval: 1.93% to 2.04%; pnoninferiority = 0.0003; psuperiority = 0.95). There were no significant between-group differences in any of the secondary endpoints other than the incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis, which occurred less frequently with the BuMA stent (0.5% vs. 1.3%; log-rank p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: The BuMA SES was demonstrated to be noninferior to the Excel SES for 1-year TLF, with a lower incidence of stent thrombosis. (Comparison of BuMA eG Based BioDegradable Polymer Stent With EXCEL Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent in "Real-World" Practice [PANDA-III]; NCT02017275).

Comparison of long-term in-stent vascular response between abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 3-year OCT follow-up from the TARGET I trial.

The study sought to compare long-term optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based in-stent vascular response between the abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and the durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in the TARGET I trial. The TARGET I trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial which enrolled 458 patients with single de novo lesions treated by abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer SES and EES. A subset of 43 patients underwent angiography and OCT examinations at 3 years. All OCT images were analyzed at 0.4 mm intervals. A similar increase in angiographic late lumen loss was observed in SES and EES (from 0.05 ± 0.05 vs. 0.05 ± 0.05 mm [p = 0.84] at 9 months to 0.25 ± 0.37 vs. 0.26 ± 0.19 mm [p = 0.99] at 3 years, respectively), without significant differences at 3 years in mean neointimal thickness of stent struts (SES: 0.13 ± 0.02 mm vs. EES: 0.13 ± 0.02 mm, p = 0.80); mean percentage of covered struts (SES: 99.2 % vs. EES: 99.3 %, p = 0.53), or malapposed strut rates (SES: 0.08 % vs. EES: 0.06 %, p = 0.15). The OCT-based in-stent vascular response evaluation found similar vascular healing for the two studied devices, indicating that the luminal loss in EES from 9 months to 3 years cannot be imputed on its coated biocompatible polymer.

A randomized comparison of novel biodegradable polymer- and durable polymer-coated cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stents.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that a novel biodegradable polymer-coated, cobalt-chromium (CoCr), sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) is noninferior in safety and efficacy outcomes compared with a durable polymer (DP)-SES. BACKGROUND: No randomized trials have the compared safety and efficacy of BP-SES versus DP-SES on similar CoCr platforms, thereby isolating the effect of the polymer type. METHODS: In this prospective, single-blind, randomized trial conducted at 32 Chinese sites, 2,737 patients eligible for coronary stenting were treated with BP- or DP-SES in a 2:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was 12-month target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. Secondary endpoints included TLF components, and definite/probable stent thrombosis. RESULTS: At 12 months, the difference in the primary endpoint of TLF between BP-SES (6.3%) and DP-SES (6.1%) groups was 0.25% (95% confidence interval: -1.67% to 2.17%, p for noninferiority = 0.0002), demonstrating noninferiority of BP-SES to DP-SES. Individual TLF components of cardiac death (0.7% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.62), target vessel myocardial infarction (3.6% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.39), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (2.6% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.50) were similar, as were low definite/probable stent thrombosis rates (0.4% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale real-world trial, BP-SES was noninferior to DP-SES for 1-year TLF. (Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of the Tivoli ® DES and the Firebird ® DES for Treatment of Coronary Revascularization; NCT01681381).

Safety and efficacy of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions: 12-month results from the TARGET II trial.

BACKGROUND: In the TARGET I randomized controlled trial, the novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent FIREHAWK proved non-inferior to the everolimus-eluting stent in nine-month in-stent late loss in single de novo coronary lesions. This study was aimed at evaluating clinical safety and effectiveness of FIREHAWK in a moderately complex population (including patients with small vessels, long lesions and multi-vessels), and at validating the ability of the SYNTAX score (SS) to predict clinical outcomes in patients treated with this latest generation drug-eluting stent. METHODS: TARGET II was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study with primary outcome of 12-month target lesion failure (TLF), including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Stent thrombosis was defined according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definition. Patients were grouped by tertiles of SS (≤6, >6 to ≤12, and >12). All patients were exclusively treated with the FIREHAWK stent and were followed up at 1, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter up to five years. RESULTS: A total of 730 patients were included in this registry study. The 12-month incidence of TLF was 4.4% and the incidence of TLF components were, cardiac death 0.5%, TV-MI 3.2%, and TLR 2.2%. One definite/probable stent thrombosis was observed at 12-month follow-up. Mean SS was 10.87±6.87. Patients in the SS >12 tertile had significantly higher TLF (P = 0.02) and TLR (P < 0.01) rates than those in lower SS groups. In COX proportional-hazards regression analyses, TLF incidence was strongly related to lesion length (long lesion vs. non-long lesion patients; HR 3.416, 95% CI, 1.622-7.195), but unrelated to diabetic, small vessel, and multivessel subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The low TLF incidence in this study indicates that FIREHAWK is safe and effective in the treatment of moderately complex coronary disease. SS is also able to predict adverse clinical outcomes in FIREHAWK treated patients.

A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of paclitaxel-coated balloon versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis: results from the PEPCAD China ISR trial.

OBJECTIVES: The intention of the PEPCAD China ISR (A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel-Coated versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis) was to demonstrate the efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty in a non-European patient population with coronary drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (DES-ISR). BACKGROUND: The treatment of DES-ISR is still challenging with no established best strategy. Moreover, there is no study on the effect of PCB in the treatment of ISR in the Chinese population. METHODS: PEPCAD China ISR was a 220-patient randomized (1:1), single-blind prospective multicenter trial conducted in China. Patients with coronary DES-ISR received either PCB (SeQuent Please, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) or paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus Liberté, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) treatment. The primary endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss at 9 months. RESULTS: There were no significant baseline differences between both treatment groups in terms of patient, lesion, or procedural characteristics. At 9 months, in-segment late lumen loss in the PCB group was noninferior to that of the paclitaxel-eluting stent group (0.46 ± 0.51 mm vs. 0.55 ± 0.61 mm; difference: -0.06 mm with 95% confidence interval: -0.23 to 0.10; p for noninferiority = 0.0005). The 9-month rate of binary restenosis and 12-month composite clinical event rates were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized trial of 220 patients, angioplasty with a PCB was noninferior to paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation when used to treat DES-ISR. On the basis of these, as well as previous randomized trial data, PCB angioplasty offers an effective treatment for DES-ISR without the necessity of implanting additional metal layers for drug release. (A Safety and Efficacy Study of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon to Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent [PEPCAD]; NCT01622075).

Optical coherence tomography assessment of a PLGA-polymer with electro-grafting base layer versus a PLA-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent at three-month follow-up: the BuMA-OCT randomised trial.

AIMS: To compare stent strut coverage using optical coherence tomography (OCT) at three-month follow-up between a PLGA-polymer with electro-grafting base layer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) (BuMA) and a PLA-polymer SES (EXCEL). METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective, single-centre, non-inferiority randomised BuMA-OCT trial enrolled patients with de novo coronary artery lesions, treated with either the BuMA or the EXCEL stent. The study primary endpoint was OCT-evaluated stent strut coverage at three months. Secondary endpoints were neointimal thickness of stent struts, and incomplete stent apposition evaluated with OCT. A total of 80 patients were randomly assigned to receive the BuMA (n=40) or the EXCEL (n=40) stent. In OCT follow-up (achieved in 86.3% of cases: BuMA, n=33; EXCEL, n=36), the percentage of stent strut coverage was significantly higher in the BuMA vs. the EXCEL group (strut level: 94.2% vs. 90.0%, p<0.01; p(non-inferiority)<0.0001; p(superiority) <0.0001), while the proportion of malapposed struts (strut level: 1.28% vs. 1.80%, p=0.51) and the mean neointimal thickness (strut level: 0.07±0.03 mm vs. 0.06±0.02 mm, p=0.31) were similar. Rates of myocardial infarction (periprocedural non-Q-wave, 7.5% vs. 7.5%, p=1.00) and target lesion failure (7.5% vs. 7.5%, p=1.00) were similar between groups, with no cardiac death or stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: In the BuMA-OCT randomised trial, the novel BuMA PLGA-polymer with electro-grafting base layer SES was superior to the EXCEL PLA-polymer SES in the primary endpoint of stent strut coverage at three-month follow-up.

A randomised comparison of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: clinical and angiographic follow-up of the TARGET I trial.

AIMS: The study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FIREHAWK, a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) for treating patients with single de novo coronary lesions compared with the durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) XIENCE V. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 458 patients with single de novo native coronary lesions ≤24 mm in length and a coronary artery ≥2.25 to ≤4.0 mm in diameter were enrolled in the TARGET I study, a prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial. The primary endpoint was in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at nine-month follow-up. The secondary endpoint, target lesion failure (TLF), was defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (iTLR). Patients were centrally randomised to treatment with either biodegradable polymer SES (n=227) or durable polymer EES (n=231). The nine-month in-stent LLL of the biodegradable polymer SES was comparable to the EES group (0.13 ± 0.24 mm vs. 0.13 ± 0.18 mm, p=0.94; difference and 95% confidence interval 0.00 [-0.04, 0.04] mm; p for non-inferiority <0.0001). Cardiac death (0.4% vs. 0.0%), TVMI (1.3% vs. 1.7%), iTLR (0.4% vs. 0.4%) and TLF (2.2% vs. 2.2%) were similar between the biodegradable polymer SES and durable polymer EES groups at 12-month follow-up (all p>0.05). No definite/probable stent thrombosis was observed in both of these groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the multicentre TARGET I trial, the novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer SES FIREHAWK was non-inferior to the durable polymer EES XIENCE V with respect to the primary endpoint of in-stent LLL at nine months for treating patients with single de novo coronary lesions. The incidences of clinical endpoints were low in both of the stents at 12-month follow-up. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01196819).

Nine-month angiographic and 2-year clinical follow-up of the NOYA biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions: the NOYA I trial.

AIMS: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the NOYA stent which is a cobalt chromium-based sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with DL-polylactide biodegradable polymer (Medfavour Medical, Beijing, China) in treating de novo coronary artery lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: The NOYA I trial was designed to compare the NOYA stent with the FIREBIRD2™ stent, a durable polymer SES widely used in China (MicroPort Medical, Shanghai, China); the trial was a non-inferiority trial with a primary angiographic endpoint of the in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at nine-month follow-up. The secondary endpoints were binary restenosis rates within nine months, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target lesion revascularisation (TLR), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) at 24-month follow-up. A total of 300 patients (n=150 in each group) were enrolled in the study from 16 Chinese centres. The LLL in the NOYA group at nine-month follow-up was similar to the FIREBIRD2 group (0.11±0.18 mm vs. 0.14±0.23 mm, p=0.16; non-inferiority p<0.001). The rates of MACE, death, MI and TLR at 24-month follow-up were comparable between these two devices (p>0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The biodegradable polymer NOYA stent was non-inferior to the FIREBIRD2 durable polymer stent with respect to the primary non-inferiority endpoint of in-stent LLL at nine-month follow-up. Clinical outcomes at 24-month follow-up were comparable between the two stents. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01226355).