Combining physico-chemical analysis with a Daphnia magna bioassay to evaluate a recycling technology for drinking water treatment plant waste residuals.

Recycling water treatment plant (WTP) waste residuals is considered to be a feasible method to enhance the efficiency of pollutant removal. This study also evaluated the safety and water quality of a pilot-DWTP waste residuals recycling technology by combining physical-chemistry analysis with a Daphnia magna assay. The water samples taken from each treatment step were extracted and concentrated by XAD-2 resin and were then analyzed for immobilization and enzyme activity with D. magna. The measured parameters, such as the dissolve organic carbon (DOC), UV254 and THM formation potential (THMFPs) of the recycling process, did not obviously increase over 15 days of continuous operation and were even lower than typical values from a conventional process. The extract concentration ranged from 0 to 2 Leq/ml as measured on the 7th and 15th days and the immobilization of D. magna exposed to water treated by the recycling process was nearly equivalent to that of the conventional process. Both the superoxide dismutase (SOD) and the catalase (CAT) activity assay indicated that a lower dose of water extract (0.5, 1, 1.5 Leq/ml) could stimulate the enzyme activity of D. magna, whereas a higher dose (2 Leq/ml at the sampling point C3, R3, R4 ) inhibits the activity. Moreover, the SOD and CAT activity of D. magna with DOC and UV254 showed a strong concentration-effect relationship, where the concentration range of DOC and UV254 were 4.1-16.2 mg/L and 0.071-4.382 cm(-1), respectively. The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the conventional and recycling treatment processes and the toxicity of water samples in the recycling process did not increase during the 15-day continuous recycling trial.

Individual Dimensions of Pain Catastrophizing Do Not Mediate the Effect of Sociodemographic and Psychological Factors on Chronic Orofacial Pain Severity, Interference, and Jaw Limitation: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Pain catastrophization (PC), involving rumination, magnification, and helplessness, can be viewed as a coping strategy associated with chronic pain. PC is considered a driving force in mediating pain-related outcomes, but it is still unclear whether PC mediates the relationship between psychological and sociodemographic factors with chronic pain when considered in a single model. Using baseline data from a parent study, this study examined the effect of positive and negative psychological and sociodemographic factors on pain severity, interference, and jaw limitation mediated by the PC dimensions in a sample of 397 temporomandibular disorder (TMD) participants using structural equation modeling (SEM). SEM revealed that pain severity regressed on age, sex, education, and income; interference regressed on positive and negative psychological factors, education, and income; and jaw limitation regressed on age. The PC dimensions did not individually mediate these relationships. Although they jointly mediated the relationships between negative psychological factors and pain severity and between age and pain interference, the effect size was small, suggesting that PC is not a critical factor in mediating TMD pain outcomes. Reducing negative cognitions, not just PC, may be of greatest benefit to the most vulnerable TMD populations. PERSPECTIVE: This study examines sociodemographic and psychological factors that affect orofacial pain, finding that the pain catastrophizing dimensions do not mediate these relationships. Understanding which factors most strongly affect pain outcomes will help identify targets for intervention to produce the greatest benefit for the most vulnerable persons suffering from pain.