Infants With Trigonocephaly Treated With Fronto-Orbital Remodelling and Endocortical Positioning of Resorbable Plates-A Retrospective Cohort Study Including 101 Patients.

PURPOSE: Fronto-orbital remodeling is the gold standard for surgical treatment of metopic synostosis in many craniofacial centers. For fixation, resorbable materials are widely used. Because of swelling during resorption, the positioning of the plates can be relevant. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate whether there are limitations to endocortical positioning of resorbable plates. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all patients with metopic craniosynostosis resulting in trigonocephaly, who were treated with a standardized fronto-orbital remodeling and endocortical positioning of resorbable plates, between February 2012 and December 2019 were included. The endpoint of this study was the postoperative complications that can be attributed to the material used. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients, who were treated at our unit, could be included with a male predominance, 81 (80.2%) boys versus 20 (19.8%) girls. Surgery was performed at a median age of 9 months (±2.56). No complications were seen related to resorbable plates. All patients of our study population were categorized as Whitaker classification I and II. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the risk level in using endocortical resorbable plates positioned on the inner surface of the bone is low. From an aesthetic point of view, we could not detect any disadvantage.

Comparing the Influence of Surgical and Conservative Therapy on Quality of Life in Patients with Early-Stage Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw-A Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgical and conservative, non-surgical treatment on general health-related (QoL) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients suffering from AAOMS stage I MRONJ. Materials and Methods: In the course of this prospective clinical study, QoL and OHRQoL using QLQ-C30 and QHIP G14 questionnaire were longitudinally assessed in N = 174 prospectively enrolled patients with indication of treatment of MRONJ stage I over a period of 12 months. Patients received conservative or surgical treatment. The measurement time points were preoperatively (T0), 12 weeks (T1), 6 months (T2) and 1 year after operation (T3). Results: For OHRQoL, no significant (p > 0.05) differences were found between both treatment groups for all timepoints (T0-T3). In the surgical treatment group, OHIP scores of T1, T2 and T3 were significantly lower than baseline measures (T0) (T0-T1 (2.99, p = 0.024), T0-T2 (5.20, p < 0.001), T0-T3 (7.44, p < 0.001)). For conservative treatment group OHIP, scores of T2 and T3 were significantly lower than baseline measures (T0) (T0-T2 (9.09, p = 0.013), T0-T3 (12.79, p < 0.001)). There was no statistically significant effect of time on QLQ-C30 scores in both groups (surgical treatment: F(3, 174) = 1.542, p < 0.205, partial η2 = 0.026; conservative treatment: F(3, 30) = 0.528, p = 0.667, partial η2 = 0.050). QLQ-C30 scores turned out to be significantly lower in the non-surgical group at T1 (p = 0.036) and T3 (p = 0.047) compared to the surgical treatment group. Conclusions: Surgical and conservative treatment of MRONJ stage I significantly improves patients' OHRQoL. Surgical treatment is superior to conservative treatment of MRONJ stage I regarding general QoL. Therefore, surgical treatment of MRONJ stage I should not be omitted for QoL reasons.

Impact of Salvage Surgery on Health-Related Quality of Life in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Multi-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have limited treatment options. Salvage surgery offers potential curative therapy. The need for extensive ablative surgery together with microvascular reconstruction implies invasive and painful treatment with questionable functional outcome. To address the impact of salvage surgery on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients suffering from recurrent OSCC, a multi-center prospective analysis was initiated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent OSCC from 2015 to 2022 at two German cancer centers were included. Interdisciplinary tumor board decisions determined surgery as the only curative treatment modality. HRQoL, was assessed via a EORTC questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-EORTC: QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35) in dependence of the recurrent tumor stage. Patients completed the questionnaires once before surgery (baseline) and then every 3 months during follow-up or up to the end of treatment. RESULTS: In total, 55 patients were included. The mean follow-up period was 26.7 ± 19.3 months. Global health status showed superior mean scores after 12 months (60.83 ± 22.58) compared to baseline (53.33 ± 26.41) in stage 1 and 2 recurrent tumors. In advanced recurrent tumors' mean scores for global health showed only minor positive differences after 12 months (55.13 ± 22.7) compared to baseline (53.2 ± 25.58). In terms of the mouth pain, mean scores were lower after salvage surgery in small recurrent tumors after 12 months (20.37 ± 17.73) compared to baseline (41.67 ± 33.07; Wilcoxon two-sample signed-rank test p = 0.028). In advanced recurrent tumors, a significant reduction in mean scores was detected 3 months after salvage surgery (29.7 ± 22.94) compared to baseline (47.76 ± 25.77; Wilcoxon two-sample signed-rank test p = 0.003). Up to 12 months, swallowing function was evaluated inferior compared to baseline independent of tumor stage (Mean score recurrent stage I/II: 12-months 48.15 ± 27.57, baseline 28.7 ± 22.87; stage III/IV: 12-months 49.36.42 ± 27.53; baseline 30.13 ± 26.25). CONCLUSION: Improved HRQoL could be obtained in advanced recurrent OSCC after salvage surgery despite reduced swallowing function. In small recurrent tumors, overall, HRQoL was superior to baseline. Salvage surgery positively affected pain burden. For advanced recurrent tumors, important pain relieve could be observed as soon as 3 months after surgery.

Comparison of Different Antibiotic Regimes for Preventive Tooth Extractions in Patients with Antiresorptive Intake-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

In the present study, the impacts on success rates between three different antibiotic regimes in patients receiving preventive tooth extraction during/after antiresorptive treatment were compared. For the retrospective analysis, we enrolled patients who had undergone tooth extraction from 2009 to 2019 according to the specified preventive conditions under antiresorptive therapy. Three antibiotic regimens were distinguished: (Group 1) intravenous for 7 days, (Group 2) oral for 14 days, and (Group 3) oral for 7 days of application. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw at 12 weeks after surgery. A total of 760 patients and 1143 extraction regions were evaluated (Group 1 n = 719; Group 2 n = 126; Group 3 n = 298). The primary endpoint showed no significant difference in the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw between the groups studied (Group 1 n = 50/669 (7%); Group 2 n = 9/117 (7%); Group 3 n = 17/281 (6%); p = 0.746). Overall, the success rate was 93% after intervention when preventive measures were followed. With the same success rate, a reduced, oral administration of antibiotics seems to be sufficient regarding the possible spectrum of side effects, the development of resistance and the health economic point of view.

Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw-Comparison between Bone and Soft Tissue Injury and Their Influence on Surgical Outcomes-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Surgical therapy of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORN) is challenging and requires treatment of the affected hard and soft tissue. To understand how tissue injury after irradiation influences surgical outcomes, the objective of this study was to find out whether (a) bone-related, (b) soft tissue-related, and (c) treatment-related parameters influence the surgical success of patients with ORN. A total of 175 patients (324 lesions) were included in this retrospective, single-center study. All patients were diagnosed with ORN and underwent surgical therapy. The primary outcome was complete soft tissue recovery (mucosa/skin) and the absence of symptoms 3 months after surgery. At the time of follow-up, 58% of patients (189 of 324 lesions) had intact intraoral or extraoral soft tissue. The extent of bone destruction had no effect on treatment success, whereas soft tissue injury due to fibrosis (OR: 0.344; CI 0.142-0.834; p = 0.01818) and xerostomia (OR: 0.163; CI 0.064-0.419; p = 0.00016) increased the probability of treatment failure. Soft tissue reconstruction with a microvascular graft improved therapeutic success compared to local wound closure (OR: 2.998; CI 1.371-6.555; p = 0.006). Thus, for the treatment of ORN, it is extremely important to pay attention not only to the extent of bone destruction but especially to soft tissue defects. Because the extent of soft tissue injury is a predictor for therapeutic success, it should influence the choice of surgical treatment.

Influence of Preventive Tooth Extractions on Quality of Life in Patients with Antiresorptive Intake-A Prospective Longitudinal Study.

BACKGROUND: To find out whether preventive tooth extractions in patients on antiresorptive therapy have a direct impact on the patients' overall quality of life (QoL); Methods: QoL using the five-level version of the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D instrument (EQ-5D-5L) was longitudinally assessed in N = 114 prospectively enrolled patients with indication of preventive tooth extraction over a period of 12 months. Patients were stratified as high-risk (malignant disease with bone metastasis or multiple myeloma, with monthly high-dose antiresorptive therapy delivered intravenously [bisphosphonate] or subcutaneously [denosumab]) and low-risk/osteoporosis patients (weekly low-dose antiresorptive therapy administered orally [bisphosphonate] or half-yearly subcutaneously [denosumab]). The measurement time points were 4 weeks preoperatively (T0), 2 months (T1) and 1 year postoperatively (T2), respectively. RESULTS: EQ-5D-5L index scores fell in a range from -0.21 to 1.00 in the low-risk group to 0.15 to 1.00 in the high-risk group. The t-test comparing the baseline index scores of both groups showed EQ-5D-5L index score in the low-risk group (0.708 ± 0.292) to be significantly smaller (p = 0.037) than in the high-risk group (0.807 ± 0.19). ANCOVA showed no significant differences in EQ-5D-5L index scores between the groups at T1 and T2. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive tooth extractions in patients undergoing antiresorptive treatment have no negative effect on QoL. Therefore, if indicated, preventive tooth extraction should not be omitted. Patient-oriented outcome measures are important to obtain a good risk-benefit balance for patient-specific treatment.