RESUMEN
A thorough knowledge of the anatomy of the aging face is essential to a safe and effective operation. Over time, the face undergoes changes in skin and subcutaneous tissues evidenced by rhytides and thinning. There are also changes in the tone and character of facial muscles. Changes in fat structures in the face cause aesthetic changes that can be addressed surgically. Knowledge of the anatomy of the face and neck will aid in understanding the changes that occur with aging and will allow for a more complete strategy in rejuvenating the aging face.
Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/patología , Cara/anatomía & histología , Mejilla/patología , Mentón/patología , Cara/inervación , Músculos Faciales/patología , Nervio Facial/anatomía & histología , Fascia/patología , Frente/patología , Humanos , Cuello/patología , Órbita/patología , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Rejuvenecimiento , Envejecimiento de la Piel/patología , Grasa Subcutánea/patología , Tejido Subcutáneo/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Determine long-term loss of mandible height with use of stress-shielding reconstruction plates for free fibula flap mandible reconstruction. DESIGN: Retrospective single-blinded medical record review. SUBJECTS: Seventy patients who had fibula free flap mandible reconstructions performed for 10 years. Patients who underwent radiotherapy were excluded. METHODS: Review of 70 fibula free flap mandible reconstructions performed for the last 10 years in a city hospital revealed 7 patients (10%) who had resections for benign odontogenic diseases. All had a three-dimensional cast model made, on which the reconstruction plate was bent to the desired shape preoperatively. Free fibula height on panoramic x-ray images taken preoperatively and at 2 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Seven (10%) patients met criteria for the study. Bone height was maintained at 2 months postoperatively, but at 12 months, there was a statistically significant loss of fibular bone height averaging 20% in the anterior, body, and ramus areas (P < 0.05). Despite this, all patients were considered eligible for dental rehabilitation, and 4 of 7 patients have had osseointegrated implants placed. CONCLUSIONS: As opposed to miniplates, increased resorption may have been due to the stress-shielding phenomenon unique to a reconstruction plates. However, this did not seem to affect the ability to place osseointegrated implants.