Light-cured calcium hydroxide vs formocresol in human primary molar pulpotomies: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective study was to compare light-cured calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) with diluted formocresol (FC) for its success as a primary molar pulpotomy medicament METHODS: Selection criteria included at least 2 matching, asymptomatic, contralateral primary molars requiring vital pulpotomies. Matched teeth in each patient were randomized to receive either Ca(OH)2 or FC as a pulpotomy medicament. All teeth were restored with prefabricated metal crowns. Twenty patients (34 pairs of teeth) were followed clinically and radiographically for > or =1 year. Two blinded, standardized, and calibrated examiners evaluated and scored each radiograph for signs of pathology, based upon a modified scale previously proposed. RESULTS: Findings were grouped in: (a) 0 - 6; (b) 7 - 12; and (c) 13 - 24 month intervals. Radiographic scoring favored the FC group of the 7- to 12- and 13- to 24-month intervals (P<.05). Clinical success was similar for Ca(OH)2 (94%) and FC (97%) at 12 months or less. Beyond 12 months, clinical success varied more (Ca(OH)2=84%, FC=97%), but not significantly (P=.08). Combined success rates were lower for Ca(OH)2 (56%) than FC (94%). CONCLUSIONS: Light-cured calcium hydroxide does not appear to be a viable alternative to diluted formocresol as a pulpotomy agent.

Attitudes and practices of nurses on a pediatric cancer and stem cell transplant ward: adaptation of an oral care protocol.

This study evaluated nurses' current practices and understanding of oral health for hematology and oncology patients. A written questionnaire administered to 33 nurses on the pediatric cancer and blood disorders unit of Children's Medical Center of Dallas included questions on oral evaluation, oral hygiene, and case-based questions. Information gathered was used to develop an oral care protocol. The study found that nurses were proficient in diagnosing obvious conditions including mucositis and pseudomembranous candidiasis, but they were less than proficient when diagnosing less easily recognizable conditions such as xerostomia. The nurses were found to have inadequate knowledge of the treatment and oral hygiene protocols for conditions that they could and could not diagnose. The protocol based on the questionnaire results included information gathering, oral hygiene protocol, evaluation of viral infection, evaluation of fungal infection, oral assessment guide, and treatment protocol. Through information gathering, an oral health care policy may be developed and implemented to aid in the treatment of children undergoing care for malignancies.