Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Oral Rehabil ; 51(7): 1207-1212, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572841

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most of the respiratory events in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) occurs in supine position. It has been reported that the contraction of masseter muscles is dependent on the occurrence of arousals rather than on the occurrence of respiratory events. OBJECTIVES: This study had two aims: (1) to compare the rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA) index in supine position (RMMA_sup) and in non-supine positions (RMMA_nsup) in adults with OSA; and (2) to determine the associations between RMMA index in both supine position and non-supine positions on the one hand, and several demographic and polysomnographic variables on the other hand. METHODS: One hundred OSA participants (36 females and 64 males; mean age = 50.3 years (SD = 10.5)) were selected randomly from among patients with a full-night polysomnographic recording. RMMA_sup index and RMMA_nsup index were compared using Mann-Whitney U-test. Multivariate linear regression analyses were used to predict RMMA index both in supine and non-supine positions based on several demographic and polysomnographic variables. RESULTS: In patients with OSA, the RMMA_sup index was significantly higher than the RMMA_nsup index (p < .001). RMMA_sup index was significantly associated with the arousal index (p = .002) and arousal index in supine position (p < .001). RMMA_nsup index was only significantly associated with the arousal index in non-supine positions (p = .004). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, RMMAs occur more frequently in supine position than in non-supine positions in patients with OSA. In both sleep positions, RMMAs are associated with arousals.


Asunto(s)
Polisomnografía , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Bruxismo del Sueño , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bruxismo del Sueño/fisiopatología , Bruxismo del Sueño/complicaciones , Posición Supina/fisiología , Adulto , Músculo Masetero/fisiopatología , Electromiografía
2.
Sleep Breath ; 27(5): 1857-1864, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36867294

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and mandibular advancement appliance (MAA) therapy on rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA), a biomarker of sleep bruxism (SB), and to compare the effects of CPAP with MAA in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: This cohort study included individuals with OSA who received treatment with CPAP or MAA. Polysomnographic recordings with and without therapy were performed in each individual. Statistical analyses were performed with repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: A total of 38 individuals with OSA were enrolled, 13 on CPAP and 25 with MAA, mean age 52.6 ± 10.6 years, 32 men, mean baseline apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 26.5 ± 15.2 events/hour, mean RMMA index 3.5 ±events/hour. In the total group, the RMMA index decreased significantly with CPAP and MAA therapies (P < 0.05). The changes in the RMMA index with therapy did not differ significantly between CPAP and MAA (P > 0.05). The RMMA index decreased in 60% of the individuals with OSA, and the changes ranged widely, with a median of 52% and an interquartile range of 107%. CONCLUSIONS: Both CPAP and MAA therapies significantly reduce SB in individuals with OSA. However, the interindividual differences in the effects of these therapies on SB are large. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://trialsearch.who.int (NL8516); April 08, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Avance Mandibular , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Bruxismo del Sueño , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Proyectos Piloto , Bruxismo del Sueño/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Polisomnografía , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Sleep Breath ; 27(3): 983-989, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35941318

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown a wide range of efficacy (29 to 71%) of a mandibular advancement device (MAD) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Currently, the ability to preselect suitable patients for MAD therapy based on individual characteristics related to upper airway collapsibility is limited. We investigated if the use of non-custom interim MAD during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) could be a valuable screening tool to predict MAD treatment outcome. METHODS: In a single-center prospective study including a consecutive series of patients with OSA, we compared DISE outcomes with a MAD in situ with polysomnography results after 3 months of using the same MAD that was used during DISE. RESULTS: Of 41 patients who completed the study, the median apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 16.0 events/h [IQR 7.4-23.4]. Respiratory outcomes on polysomnography, including apnea index (AI), total AHI, AHI in supine position, and oxygen desaturation index, all significantly improved after 3 months of MAD treatment. With complete improvement of the upper airway obstruction with the MAD in situ during DISE in supine position, patients were 6.3 times more likely to be a responder to MAD treatment compared to patients with a persisting complete obstruction, although not statistically significant (OR 6.3; 95%CI 0.9-42.7; p = 0.060). CONCLUSION: The potential predictive value with regard to MAD therapy outcomes of the use of an interim MAD during DISE would be an important finding, since the prediction of MAD therapy outcome is of great clinical and scientific interest. A study with a larger cohort should be performed to further investigate our findings.


Asunto(s)
Avance Mandibular , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Ferulas Oclusales , Avance Mandibular/métodos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Endoscopía/métodos , Sueño
4.
J Oral Rehabil ; 50(3): 203-209, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36357333

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mandibular Advancement Devices (MAD's) are oral appliances commonly used in treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). OSA severity and certain other factors, such as BMI and neck circumference, correlate with MAD therapy success. So far, the predictive value of dental parameters, such as dental profile, molar-classification, overjet, overbite, maximal retrusion, maximal protrusion and protrusive range, has not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate whether dental parameters influence OSA severity and MAD therapy outcome and could therefore be helpful in phenotyping OSA patients. Furthermore, we studied the predictive power of dental parameters for OSA severity and successful MAD therapy. We hypothesise that specific dental parameters correlate with more severe OSA and with more successful MAD treatment. METHODS: We performed a cohort study, including OSA patients diagnosed by polysomnography (PSG). Dental parameters were collected. Objective treatment outcome was collected by performing a PSG with MAD after three months of therapy. Differences between OSA severity groups and MAD treatment outcomes were analysed and dental parameters were correlated between groups. RESULTS: The relation between dental parameters and OSA severity was analysed in 143 patients, fifty patients had a PSG with MAD in situ after a 3-month therapy. The median baseline Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) significantly reduced from 17.6 (8.7-29.3) to 11.1 (5.5-17.5). Overbite and maximal retrusion differed significantly between mild, moderate and severe OSA. Other dental parameters did not differ significantly between the groups, nor correlated with OSA severity or MAD treatment outcome. CONCLUSION: In this study, no correlation between dental parameters and OSA severity or MAD treatment outcomes was found. Therefore, screening patients for OSA and MAD treatment outcome based on dental parameters is currently not possible.


Asunto(s)
Maloclusión Clase II de Angle , Avance Mandibular , Sobremordida , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios de Cohortes , Ferulas Oclusales , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J Oral Rehabil ; 50(5): 416-428, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36691754

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is important for dentists to know if the presence of snoring is associated with the presence of other dental sleep conditions (e.g. obstructive sleep apnea [OSA], sleep bruxism [SB], gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD], xerostomia and oro-facial pain). If so, dentists could play a significant role in the early recognition and management of these conditions. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to: (i) investigate the associations between the presence of snoring and the presence of other dental sleep conditions; and (ii) determine if it is clinically relevant that dentists assess snoring in their population. METHODS: The literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase.com in collaboration with a medical librarian. Studies were eligible if they employed regression models to assess whether snoring was associated with other dental sleep conditions, and/or investigated the incidence of snoring in patients with other dental sleep conditions and vice versa. RESULTS: Of the 5299 retrieved references, 36 eligible studies were included. The available evidence indicates that the presence of snoring is associated with higher probabilities of OSA, GERD and headache. Due to limited evidence and conflicting findings, the currently available articles are not indicative of associations between the presence of snoring and the presence of SB and oral dryness. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the presence of snoring is associated with higher probabilities of OSA, GERD and headache. Therefore, it is clinically relevant that dentists assess snoring in their patient population.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Bruxismo del Sueño , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Xerostomía , Humanos , Ronquido/complicaciones , Ronquido/epidemiología , Sueño , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/epidemiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Cefalea , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/complicaciones , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/epidemiología
6.
Sleep Breath ; 26(3): 1237-1243, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34709563

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Depending on the severity of pre-treatment obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and the criteria used to define treatment success, the efficacy of mandibular advancement devices (MADs) ranges from 30 to 69%. Identifying suitable candidates is the key to increasing the efficacy of a MAD. Positive predictors include a low body mass index, a low apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and low age. Another consideration is whether or not a patient's OSA is position dependent. To evaluate the effect of such dependency on MAD treatment success, we studied the following: treatment success across the patient's total AHI and in the supine and non-supine sleeping positions; the influence of pre-treatment position dependency on MAD treatment success; and the effect of MAD treatment on post-treatment shifts in position dependency. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of patients with OSA. Patients were diagnosed through an overnight polysomnography and treated with a MAD between February 2015 and January 2018. They were defined as being positional if the AHI in supine sleeping position was at least twice as high as in the non-supine position. RESULTS: Complete treatment success was achieved in 32% of study population (n = 96) and partial success in 54%. Complete treatment success was significantly higher (p = 0.004) when a patient was sleeping in the non-supine position. Treatment success did not differ significantly between patients who were position dependent and those who were not. When treated with a MAD, patients did not spend significantly more time in supine position. Neither did we find any post-treatment shifts in position dependency. CONCLUSION: A MAD is an effective treatment modality that may significantly reduce the total AHI, supine, and non-supine AHI. Since position dependency has no impact on MAD treatment success, it does not determine whether or not a patient is a suitable candidate for MAD treatment.


Asunto(s)
Avance Mandibular , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Ferulas Oclusales , Polisomnografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Oral Rehabil ; 49(10): 970-979, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35789500

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: By being aware of the associated factors of primary snoring (PS) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in sleep bruxism (SB) patients, dentists may contribute to the screening and early recognition of SB patients with PS or OSA. OBJECTIVE: To identify the associated factors of PS and OSA from questionnaire-based data in SB patients. METHODS: A total of 968 self-reported SB patients (31.6% men; median age 44.5 years) were retrospectively enrolled. Self-reported sleep-related breathing status (viz., no sleep-related breathing condition, PS and OSA) was the dependent variable. Independent variables were questionnaire-based data on demographics, lifestyle, psychological status, pain and sleep. RESULTS: For PS, no statistically significant associated factor was identified in analyses. For OSA, increased age (OR = 1.04 [1.03-1.06]), male gender (OR = 3.33 [2.17-5.00]), daily alcohol consumption (OR = 1.96 [1.18-3.33]), depression (OR = 1.10 [1.06-1.14]), daytime sleepiness (OR = 2.94 [1.85-4.76]) and high risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; OR = 2.63 [1.52-4.76]) were found to be significant risk factors, while high risk of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain (OR = 0.51 [0.30-0.86]) and chronic pain (OR = 0.73 [0.59-0.90]) were significant protective factors. These results were confirmed in the subsequent network analysis. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, no associated factor is identified for PS. For OSA, dentists should keep in mind that increased age, male gender, daily alcohol consumption, depression, daytime sleepiness and high GERD risk are associated with increased OSA risk in SB patients, while high TMD-pain risk and chronic pain are associated with decreased OSA risk in this population.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Bruxismo del Sueño , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular , Adulto , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/complicaciones , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/epidemiología , Bruxismo del Sueño/complicaciones , Bruxismo del Sueño/epidemiología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/complicaciones , Ronquido/complicaciones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/complicaciones
8.
Sleep Breath ; 22(2): 441-450, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28913630

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) is a new option for treating patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA). This study investigated long-term efficacy, adherence, and quality of life during use of the SPT device compared with oral appliance therapy (OAT) in patients with POSA. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter trial randomized patients with mild to moderate POSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 5-30/h) to SPT or OAT. Polysomnography was performed at baseline and after 3 and 12 months' follow-up. The primary endpoint was OSA severity; adherence, quality of life, and adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were randomized and 58 completed the study (29 in each group). Median AHI in the SPT group decreased from 13.2/h at baseline to 7.1/h after 12 months (P < 0.001); corresponding values in the OAT group were 13.4/h and 5.0/h (P < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference (P = 1.000). Improvements throughout the study were maintained at 12 months. Long-term median adherence was also similar in the two treatment groups; the proportion of patients who used their device for ≥ 4 h for 5 days in a week was 100% in the SPT group and 97.0% in the OAT group (P = 0.598). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of SPT therapy was maintained over 12 months and was comparable to that of OAT in patients with mild to moderate POSA. Adherence was relatively high, and similar in the two groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02045576).


Asunto(s)
Avance Mandibular , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Sleep Breath ; 19(2): 637-44, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25335642

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the additional effect of a chest-worn sleep position trainer (SPT) in patients with residual supine-dependent obstructive sleep apnea (sdOSA) under mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy. METHODS: Baseline and follow-up polysomnography with MAD were performed. Twenty patients with sdOSA under MAD therapy underwent two consecutive randomized polysomnographies: one with SPT and one with combination of SPT + MAD. Data are presented as median (quartile 1, quartile 3). RESULTS: The SPT reduced the time spent in supine sleeping position compared to baseline and MAD therapy. Both MAD and SPT were individually effective in reducing the overall apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) significantly when compared to baseline from 20.8 (15.1; 33.6)/h at baseline to 11.0 (6.7; 13.8)/h and to 11.1 (3.5; 17.7)/h with MAD or SPT, respectively. The combination of SPT + MAD further reduced the overall AHI to 5.7 (3.6; 7.4), which was significantly lower than with MAD alone (p < 0.001) and SPT alone (p < 0.008), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that combination of SPT + MAD leads to a higher therapeutic efficacy in patients with sdOSA under MAD therapy when compared to one of the treatment modalities alone.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Combinada , Avance Mandibular/instrumentación , Ferulas Oclusales , Posicionamiento del Paciente/instrumentación , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/instrumentación , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Posición Supina/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polisomnografía
10.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 20(8): 1331-1337, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38607243

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of sleep bruxism (SB) in adults with primary snoring (PS). METHODS: This study included 292 adults with PS (140 males, 152 females; mean age ± standard deviation = 42.8 ± 12.2 years; mean body mass index ± standard deviation = 26.7 ± 4.7 kg/m2) without previous treatment for snoring. SB was diagnosed based on the frequency of the biomarker of SB: rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (SB when rhythmic masticatory muscle activity ≥ 2 episodes/h). Logistic regression was performed, with SB as the dependent variable and with age, sex, body mass index, and sleep- and respiratory-related polysomnographic parameters as the independent variables to identify the risk factors for SB. RESULTS: The prevalence of SB was 44.6% in adults with PS. Younger age (odds ratio = 0.965 [0.944, 0.987]) and shorter total sleep time (odds ratio = 0.760 [0.609, 0.948]) significantly increased the risk of SB (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: SB is highly prevalent in adults with PS. Younger age and shorter sleep time are significant risk factors for SB in adults with PS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: onderzoekmetmensen.nl; Name: A Large Sample Polysomnographic Study on Sleep Bruxism; URL: https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL-OMON19947; Identifier: NL8516. CITATION: Li D, Lobbezoo F, Hilgevoord AAJ, de Vries N, Aarab G. Prevalence and risk factors of sleep bruxism in adults with primary snoring: a large-scale polysomnographic study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(8):1331-1337.


Asunto(s)
Polisomnografía , Bruxismo del Sueño , Ronquido , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polisomnografía/métodos , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Bruxismo del Sueño/epidemiología , Bruxismo del Sueño/complicaciones , Bruxismo del Sueño/fisiopatología , Ronquido/epidemiología , Ronquido/complicaciones , Ronquido/fisiopatología , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 19(3): 443-451, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36448332

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim was to determine the prevalence and risk factors of sleep bruxism (SB) and to investigate the relationships between SB episodes, arousals, and respiratory events in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: This prospective study included 914 adults with OSA (305 females, 609 males; age = 53 years [interquartile range = 17]; apnea-hypopnea index = 13.9 events/h [interquartile range = 21]). The diagnosis of SB was made when the rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA) index was at least 2 episodes/h of sleep based on a full polysomnographic recording. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for SB. Network analysis was performed to determine the relations between RMMA, respiratory event, sleep arousal, and other factors. Further, the percentage of RMMA time-related to arousal was calculated. RESULTS: The prevalence of SB in adults with OSA was 49.7%. Male sex, lower body mass index, and higher percentage of N1 sleep increased the odds of having SB (odds ratios = 1.425, 0.951, and 1.032, respectively; all P < .05). Network analysis showed that there were no direct associations between RMMA and apnea-hypopnea index, nor between RMMA and arousal, although 85.7% of RMMA was time-related to arousals. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of adults with OSA have comorbid SB. Male sex, lower body mass index, and a higher percentage of light sleep increase the risk of having SB. Although RMMAs do not directly correlate with respiratory events and arousals, most RMMAs are time-related to arousals in adults with OSA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Netherlands Trial Register; Name: A Large Sample Polysomnographic Study on Sleep Bruxism; URL: https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL8516; Identifier: NL8516. CITATION: Li D, Kuang B, Lobbezoo F, de Vries N, Hilgevoord A, Aarab G. Sleep bruxism is highly prevalent in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: a large-scale polysomnographic study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(3):443-451.


Asunto(s)
Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Bruxismo del Sueño , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculos Masticadores , Polisomnografía , Estudios Prospectivos , Bruxismo del Sueño/diagnóstico
12.
J Clin Med ; 11(22)2022 Nov 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36431259

RESUMEN

This systematic review aimed to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) and upper airway stimulation (UAS) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment. A MEDLINE and Embase database search of articles on MMA and/or UAS for OSA was conducted. Twenty-one MMA studies and nine UAS studies were included. All the MMA studies demonstrated a reduction in apnea hypopnea index (AHI) postoperatively, and success rates ranged from 41.1% to 100%. Ten MMA studies reported pre- and postoperative Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), and all but one study demonstrated a reduction in ESS. In the UAS studies, all but one demonstrated a reduction in AHI, and success rates ranged from 26.7% to 77.8%. In the eight UAS studies reporting pre- and postoperative ESS, an ESS reduction was demonstrated. No studies reported any deaths related to MMA or UAS. The most common postoperative complications after MMA and UAS were facial paresthesia in the mandibular area and discomfort due to electrical stimulation, respectively. This systematic review suggests that both MMA and UAS are effective and generally safe therapies for OSA. However, due to the limitations of the included studies, there is no evidence yet to directly compare these two procedures in OSA treatment.

13.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 18(4): 1073-1081, 2022 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34877928

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: (1) To investigate if drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) findings are predictive of surgical response for patients undergoing maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and (2) to investigate the predictive value of the jaw thrust maneuver during DISE in terms of surgical response to MMA. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with OSA who underwent a baseline polysomnography (PSG) and DISE followed by MMA and a 3- to 6-month follow-up PSG between September 1, 2011, and September 30, 2020. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with OSA (50 males [78.1%]; mean ± SD age = 51.7 ± 9.5 years; mean ± SD apnea-hypopnea index = 49.0 ± 20.8 events/h) were included. Thirty-nine patients were responders, and 25 were nonresponders. Adjusting for baseline characteristics and surgical characteristics (eg, age, baseline apnea-hypopnea index, degree of maxillary advancement), patients with complete anteroposterior epiglottic collapse had 0.239 times lower odds for response to MMA (95% confidence interval, 0.059-0.979; P = .047). No significant relationship was found between complete concentric velum collapse and MMA response. There was no statistically significant association between effect of jaw thrust maneuver during DISE on upper airway patency and treatment outcome of MMA. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that DISE is a promising tool to identify patients who will or will not respond to MMA for treating OSA. Patients with complete anteroposterior epiglottic collapse may be less suitable candidates for MMA. CITATION: Zhou N, Ho J-PTF, de Vries N, Bosschieter PFN, Ravesloot MJL, de Lange J. Evaluation of drug-induced sleep endoscopy as a tool for selecting patients with obstructive sleep apnea for maxillomandibular advancement. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(4):1073-1081.


Asunto(s)
Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Adulto , Endoscopía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sueño , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/cirugía
14.
Sleep Med ; 89: 31-47, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34879286

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Systematic reviews on sleep bruxism (SB) as a comorbid condition of other sleep-related disorders are lacking. Such reviews would contribute to the insight of sleep clinicians into the occurrence of SB in patients with other sleep-related disorders, and into the underlying mechanisms of such comorbid associations. This systematic review aimed: 1. to determine the prevalence of SB in adults with other sleep-related disorders; and 2. to determine the associations between SB and other sleep-related disorders, and to explain the underlying mechanisms of these associations. METHODS: A systematic search on SB and sleep-related disorders was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify eligible studies published until May 15, 2020. Quality assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies. RESULTS: Of the 1539 unique retrieved studies, 37 articles were included in this systematic review. The prevalence of SB in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea, restless leg syndrome, periodic limb movement during sleep, sleep-related gastroesophageal reflux disease, REM behavior disorder (RBD), and sleep-related epilepsy was higher than that in the general population. The specific mechanisms behind these positive associations could not be identified. CONCLUSIONS: SB is more prevalent in patients with the previously mentioned disorders than in the general population. Sleep arousal may be a common factor with which all the identified disorders are associated, except RBD and Parkinson's disease. The associations between SB and these identified sleep-related disorders call for more SB screening in patients with the abovementioned sleep-related disorders.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Bruxismo del Sueño , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Adulto , Humanos , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/complicaciones , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/epidemiología , Sueño , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Bruxismo del Sueño/complicaciones , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/complicaciones , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/epidemiología
15.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 18(9): 2155-2165, 2022 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35532113

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Numerous types of mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are available to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea, varying from noncustom to custom devices. Only a limited number of studies have been performed to determine whether a noncustom MAD could be used to predict treatment success of a custom MAD. In this study, we investigated the potential of a new-generation noncustom MAD, by comparing its effectiveness with a custom MAD. We hypothesized that the effectiveness of the devices is similar with regard to both objective (polysomnography) and self-reported (questionnaires, adherence, and patient satisfaction) outcomes. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective randomized crossover study including a consecutive series of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Patients were randomized to start either with the noncustom or custom MAD. Both MADs were applied for 12 weeks, followed by polysomnography with MAD in situ and questionnaires. After the first 12 weeks of follow-up, a washout period of 1 week was applied. Equal effectiveness was defined as no significant differences in both objective and self-reported outcomes between both devices. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included; 40 completed the full follow-up. The median apnea-hypopnea index significantly decreased from 16.3 (7.7, 24.8) events/h to 10.7 (5.6, 16.6) events/h with the custom MAD (P = .010) and to 7.8 (2.9, 16.1) events/h with the noncustom MAD (P < .001). Self-reported outcomes significantly improved in both groups. No significant differences were found between both devices. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of a noncustom and custom MAD is comparable, which suggests that a noncustom MAD can be used as a selection tool for MAD treatment eligibility to improve MAD treatment outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Netherlands Trial Register; Name: The Use of a Boil and Bite Mandibular Advancement Device vs a Custom Mandibular Advancement Device in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Management; URL: https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7249; Identifier: NL64738.100.18. CITATION: Bosschieter PFN, Uniken Venema JAM, Vonk PE, et al. Equal effect of a noncustom vs a custom mandibular advancement device in treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(9):2155-2165.


Asunto(s)
Avance Mandibular , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Estudios Cruzados , Humanos , Ferulas Oclusales , Estudios Prospectivos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 268(8): 1233-1236, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21614467

RESUMEN

The surgical evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea is designed to characterize the pattern of upper airway obstruction in order to develop an effective treatment plan for an individual patient. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is one evaluation technique that involves assessment of individuals under pharmacologic sedation designed to simulate natural sleep, utilizing fiberoptic endoscopy to examine the upper airway. Developed in multiple centers throughout Europe, DISE was first described in 1991 and is performed widely around the world. Although multiple studies support a potential role for DISE in evaluation for treatment with surgery and mandibular repositioning appliances, important clinical questions remain unanswered. A major limitation in advancing our understanding of drug-induced sleep endoscopy has been the multiplicity and, in many cases, the complexity of classification systems that prevent the comparison of results across the studies and centers. We present the VOTE classification, a method for characterizing DISE findings that focuses on its core feature, the specific structures that contribute to obstruction.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía/clasificación , Propofol/farmacología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/cirugía , Sueño/efectos de los fármacos , Endoscopía/métodos , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Polisomnografía , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología
17.
Sleep Med Rev ; 60: 101557, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34662769

RESUMEN

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is often treated with Mandibular Advancement Devices (MADs). It is unclear whether particular design features are superior to others in terms of OSA alleviation. In order to facilitate clinical decision-making, this systematic review summarizes the objective and subjective outcomes of different available MAD designs. Studies comparing different MAD designs in OSA treatment were searched. After screening 1887 titles and abstracts, 20 original RCTs and six cohort studies were included. 14 articles were systematically reviewed in a meta-analysis. The decrease in AHI was significantly different between some of the MAD designs. The clinical relevance of the observed differences was however limited. Monoblock appliances performed more favorable, compared to bilateral thrust (effect size:-0.37; CI:-1.81 to 0.07). Midline traction appliances performed more favorable, compared to other designs. Custom appliances performed more favorable, compared to thermoplastic appliances (effect size:0.86; CI:-0.62 to 2.35). Furthermore, there were no clinically relevant differences between MAD designs in reduction of ESS, compliance, preference, side effects, and cost effectiveness. With respect to the included trials, presently there is not one superior custom MAD design in OSA treatment regarding the effect on AHI reduction, ESS improvement, compliance, preference, side effects, cost effectiveness, and other disease-related outcomes. We confirm custom MAD designs perform superior to thermoplastic MAD designs.


Asunto(s)
Avance Mandibular , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Humanos , Ferulas Oclusales , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Sleep Med Rev ; 57: 101471, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33831676

RESUMEN

Multilevel surgery (MLS) and maxillomandibular advancement surgery (MMA) are two established options in surgical management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which target different levels of airway obstruction. The objective of this review was to comparatively evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of MMA and MLS in the treatment of OSA. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for studies on MMA and/or MLS in OSA patients. Twenty MMA studies and 39 MLS studies were identified. OSA patients who underwent MMA showed significant improvements in AHI, LSAT, ODI, and ESS by -46.2/h, 13.5%, -30.3/h, and -8.5, respectively. The pooled rates of surgical success and cure for MMA were 85.0% and 46.3%, respectively. Patients who underwent MLS showed significant improvements in AHI, LSAT, ODI, and ESS by -24.7/h, 8.7%, -19.1/h, and -5.8, respectively. The pooled surgical success and cure rates for MLS were 65.1% and 28.1%, respectively. The rates of major complication of MMA and MLS were 3.2% and 1.1%, respectively, and the rate of minor complication of MMA was higher than that of MLS. We conclude that both MMA and MLS are effective treatment options for OSA. Compared to MLS, MMA may be more effective in improving OSA. However, the complication rate of MMA is higher.


Asunto(s)
Avance Mandibular , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Nat Sci Sleep ; 12: 1173-1179, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33363423

RESUMEN

Dental sleep medicine traditionally focuses on sleep-related breathing disorders, such as snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. However, everyday practice shows that also other sleep disorders touch on dentistry, including sleep-related orofacial pain, xerostomia, hypersalivation, gastroesophageal reflux disease and bruxism. A new definition, which covers all the diagnostic and treatment aspects of these disorders, has therefore been formulated for dental sleep medicine. This article describes why this development started and sketches the current state of affairs regarding the discipline of dental sleep medicine. The different dental sleep disorders are also described briefly, with special focus on the more remarkable associations between them.

20.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 16(1): 73-80, 2020 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31957656

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: (1) To evaluate surgical success in patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) stratifying for the reduction of both the total apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and the AHI in the supine and nonsupine position; (2) to evaluate the influence of position dependency on surgical outcome; and (3) to analyze the prevalence of residual position-dependent obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in nonresponders after MMA. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study including a consecutive series of patients with OSA undergoing MMA between August 2011 and February 2019. RESULTS: In total, 57 patients were included. The overall surgical success was 52.6%. No significant difference in surgical success between nonpositional patients (NPP) and positional patients (PP) with OSA was found. Surgical success of the supine AHI was not significantly different between NPP and PP, but surgical success of the nonsupine AHI was significantly greater in NPP than in PP. Of the 17 preoperative NPP, 13 of them moved to being PP with less severe OSA postoperatively. In total, 21 out of 27 nonresponders (77.8%) were PP postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in surgical success between NPP and PP undergoing MMA was found. However, the improvement of total and nonsupine AHI in NPP was significantly greater compared to PP. In nonresponders, a postoperative shift from severe OSA in NPP to less severe OSA in PP was found, caused by a greater reduction of the nonsupine AHI than the supine AHI postoperatively. In patients with residual OSA in the supine position after MMA, additional treatment with positional therapy can be indicated.


Asunto(s)
Avance Mandibular , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Índice de Masa Corporal , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/cirugía , Posición Supina , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA