A phase 2 study of dasatinib in recurrent clear cell carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, peritoneum or endometrium: NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study 0283.

OBJECTIVE: Gynecologic cancers are traditionally managed according to their presumed site of origin, without regard to the underlying histologic subtype. Clear cell histology is associated with chemotherapy refractoriness and poor survival. Mutations in SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex member ARID1A, which encodes for BAF250a protein, are common in clear cell and endometriosis-associated endometrioid carcinomas. High-throughput cell-based drug screening predicted activity of dasatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in ARID1A-mutant clear cell carcinoma. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2 clinical trial of dasatinib 140 mg once daily by mouth in patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian and endometrial clear cell carcinoma. Patients with measurable disease were enrolled and then assigned to biomarker-defined populations based on BAF250a immunohistochemistry. The translational endpoints included broad next-generation sequencing to assess concordance of protein expression and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients, 15 of whom had tumors with retained BAF250a and 13 with loss of BAF250a were evaluable for treatment response and safety. The most common grade 3 adverse events were anemia, fatigue, dyspnea, hyponatremia, pleural effusion, and vomiting. One patient had a partial response, eight (28%) had stable disease, and 15 (53.6%) had disease progression. Twenty-three patients had next-generation sequencing results; 13 had a pathogenic ARID1A alteration. PIK3CA mutations were more prevalent in ARID1A-mutant tumors, while TP53 mutations were more prevalent in ARID1A wild-type tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Dasatinib was not an effective single-agent treatment for recurrent or persistent ovarian and endometrial clear cell carcinoma. Studies are urgently needed for this rare gynecologic subtype.

Evaluation of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin dose on the adverse drug event profile and outcomes in treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine factors that may increase the likelihood of adverse drug events (ADEs) in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) as well as this agent's impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The treatment records of patients with endometrial cancer who received PLD at The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, from 1996 to 2006 were reviewed. Patient demographics, PLD dose, ADEs, use of supportive care interventions, disease progression, and survival were extracted. Logistical regression analysis was used to identify factors that were associated with higher incidence of ADEs and that influenced survival. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients with recurrent endometrial cancer were identified who experienced 122 ADEs. The most commonly reported ADEs were nausea (18.9%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE; 16.4%), muscle weakness (12.3%), mucositis (10.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (9.8%). Seventeen patients (28%) required a dose reduction because of ADEs. However, only 5 (8.3%) patients discontinued therapy because of toxicity. Cooling mechanisms were used in 19 patients to prevent PPE, although 9 of these patients still experienced PPE. Treatment with 6 or more cycles of PLD was associated with increased incidence of neutropenia (P = 0.045), peripheral neuropathy (P = 0.004), and PPE (P < 0.001). No differences in progression-free survival or time to progression were found between the doses of PLD; however, there was an assessable trend toward increased survival with doses of 40 mg/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no association with dose level and ADEs, more cycles received increased the incidence of toxicities, including PPE and neuropathy. There was no association between different doses of PLD and progression-free survival or time to progression.

A phase I study of oral topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxil) in platinum-resistant ovarian and peritoneal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of a second-line combination therapy for oral topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with platinum-resistant or refractory epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or tubal carcinoma were investigated in this phase I trial. METHODS: A fixed dose of oral topotecan 2.3 or 1.53 mg/m(2) on days 1 through 5 and escalating doses of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin on day 1 of a 28-day cycle were administered. Dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated doses were recorded. Safety was assessed by adverse event monitoring, and complete and partial responses were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received a total of 61 courses of therapy. The maximum tolerated dose of combination therapy was 1.53 mg/m(2) of topotecan on days 1 through 5 and 40 mg/m(2) of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin on day 1 of a 28-day cycle. Because of cumulative thrombocytopenia, the dose of topotecan was decreased by one-third from 2.3 to 1.53 mg/m(2) in an effort to increase the dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Only 5 patients completed >4 cycles of therapy. The most common grade 4 adverse events at dose level 4 were neutropenia (5/9 patients) and leukopenia (2/9 patients). Overall responses were observed in 2 of 22 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Oral topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin can be combined at doses that are active as monotherapies. However, the overall response rates after monotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer are comparable to or higher than those observed in this phase I study of combination therapy.

Second-line chemotherapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin is highly effective in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in late relapse: a GINECO phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard second-line treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) in late relapse. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has significant single-agent activity in this setting. Therefore, we evaluated the use of PLD plus carboplatin in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PLD 30 mg/m(2) followed by carboplatin at area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg.min/ml, repeated every 28 days for a maximum of nine cycles, was administered to 104 women with AOC relapsing >or=6 months after completion of first- or second-line therapy with platinum-taxane-based regimens. RESULTS: Overall response was 63%, with a 38% complete response, median progression-free survival of 9.4 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 32 months. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 51% of patients, but febrile neutropenia in only 3%. Nonhematologic toxic effects were primarily grades 1 and 2, with low rates of alopecia and neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: PLD plus carboplatin is highly effective, prolongs OS, and is well tolerated in women with AOC in late relapse previously treated with both platinum and taxanes. Evaluation of this regimen in phase III trials is warranted.

A multicentre phase II study of carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: the END-1 study of the MITO (Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies) group.

Anthracyclines and platinum derivates are active drugs for advanced endometrial carcinoma (AEC), but new schedules with higher efficacy and better tolerability are needed. A phase II study was conducted to describe activity and tolerability of carboplatin (C)+pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with AEC. Patients with chemonaive AEC, PS < or = 2, aged < 75 years, with at least one measurable lesion were eligible. Treatment was C (area under curve 5)+PLD (40 mg m(-2)) on day 1 every 4 weeks, up to six cycles. Forty-two patients were needed in a single-stage design, with at least 13 objective responses to define the treatment active. Forty-two patients were enrolled. Median age was 64 years (31-74). A total of 64% of patients were recurrent while 36% were advanced. Three complete (7%) and 22 partial responses (52%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 59.5% (95% exact CI: 43.3-74.3). One death potentially related to treatment was recorded (death at home for unknown reasons after 6th cycle). Other relevant toxicities (% of patients) were grade 3/4 neutropaenia 33%/14%, febrile neutropaenia 5%, grade 3/4 thrombocytopaenia 17%/5%, grade 3/4 anaemia 31%/2%. Skin toxicity was mild: grade 1 14%, grade 2 10%, grade 3 5%. Hair loss: complete 5%, partial 12%. The combination of carboplatin and PLD shows good activity and favourable toxicity as first-line chemotherapy of patients with AEC, deserving further studies in this setting.