A novel volume-reduced CT colonography regimen using hypertonic laxative (polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid): randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of bowel preparation using a hypertonic laxative (polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid, PEG + Asc) for CT colonography (CTC) and to examine the volume limit of laxative. METHODS: In one institution, patients who met the indications for CTC were enrolled and randomly assigned to CTC with regimen A (800 ml PEG + Asc), B (600 ml PEG + Asc), or C (400 ml PEG + Asc). Sodium diatrizoate was given orally for fecal tagging. On the previous day, patients ate low-residue meals and took the assigned lavage solution after dinner. A reader blinded to the preparation graded residual stool/fluid and fecal tagging quality in six segments of the colorectum. The primary outcome was a proportion of colon segments without stool. One hundred twenty segments in 20 patients with each regimen were needed to show a non-inferiority margin of 15%, assuming 85% of no stool. RESULTS: A total of 360 segments in 60 patients were analyzed. There were 83% of segments with no stool in regimen A, 89% in regimen B, and 88% in regimen C. Using the delta method, the 95% confidence interval of the risk difference (6.7%) between regimens A and B was - 2.2% to 15.6%, and the risk difference (5.0%) between regimens A and C was - 4.1% to 14%, both within the non-inferiority margin. Residual fluid and fecal tagging quality were also within the non-inferiority margin. No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: A novel CTC regimen using hypertonic laxative demonstrated optimal colon cleansing effectiveness even with the lowest volume of laxative (UMIN000022851). KEY POINTS: • A novel CTC regimen using a hypertonic laxative is feasible. • The lowest volume of laxative provides excellent colon imaging. • However, the lowest volume of laxative did not improve patient acceptance.

Bowel cleansing before CT colonography: comparison between two minimal-preparation regimens.

AIM: To compare two regimens of reduced bowel preparation and faecal tagging for CT colonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single centre, prospective, randomized, noninferiority study, in which 52 consecutive adults underwent routine CT colonography. Patients, following a three-day low-fibre diet, received one of the two reduced preparations: 1-L polyethylene glycol and four tablets of bisacodyl in association with 90 mL of Iopamidol for faecal tagging administered on the same day as CTC examination (group 1); or a standard "iodine-only" preparation, consisting in 180 ml of Iopamidol the day before the examination (group 2). Primary outcome was the overall quality of bowel preparation. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients per group were included. Per segment analysis showed preparation of diagnostic quality in 97.4% of segments in group 1 and in 95.5% in group 2 (p = ns). Per-patient analysis showed optimal quality of preparation in 76.9% of patients in group 1 and in 84.6% in group 2 (p = ns). Patient tolerability to both preparations was not different. CONCLUSION: A limited bowel preparation consisting of 1-L PEG and four tablets of bisacodyl in association with 90 mL of Iodine for faecal tagging administered on the same day as CTC examination is feasible and offers bowel cleansing comparable to "iodine-only" preparation. KEY POINTS: • Low-dose PEG bisacodyl and Iopamidol preparation is feasible, providing adequate bowel cleansing. • Faecal tagging is not different from the two limited preparations. • Patient tolerability to the two colon cleansing regimens is similar.

An interview study analysing patients' experiences and perceptions of non-laxative or full-laxative preparation with faecal tagging prior to CT colonography.

AIM: To compare patients' experiences of either non- or full-laxative bowel preparation with additional faecal tagging and subsequent computed tomographic (CT) colonography using in-depth interviews to elicit detailed responses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received CT colonography after non- (n = 9) or full-laxative (n = 9) preparation participated in a semi-structured telephone interview at least 2 days after the investigation. Full-laxative preparation consisted of magnesium citrate and sodium picosulphate administered at home (or polyethylene glycol, if contraindicated), followed by hospital-based faecal tagging with iohexol. Non-laxative preparation was home-based barium sulphate for faecal tagging. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed to identify recurrent themes on patients' perceptions and experiences. RESULTS: Experiences of full-laxative preparation were usually negative and characterized by pre-test diarrhoea that caused significant interference with daily routine. Post-test flatus was common. Non-laxative preparation was well-tolerated; patients reported no or minimal changes to bowel habit and rapid return to daily routine. Patients reported worry and uncertainty about the purpose of faecal tagging. For iohexol, this also added burden from waiting before testing. CONCLUSION: Patients' responses supported previous findings that non-laxative preparation is more acceptable than full-laxative preparation but both can be improved. Faecal tagging used in combination with laxative preparation is poorly understood, adding burden and worry. Home-based non-laxative preparation is also poorly understood and patients require better information on the purpose and mechanism in order to give fully informed consent. This may also optimize adherence to instructions. Allowing home-based self-administration of all types of preparation would prevent waiting before testing.

Detection of flat colorectal polyps at screening CT colonography in comparison with conventional polypoid lesions.

BACKGROUND: Although the screening of small, flat polyps is clinically important, the role of CT colonography (CTC) screening in their detection has not been thoroughly investigated. PURPOSE: To evaluate the detection capability and usefulness of CTC in the screening of flat and polypoid lesions by comparing CTC with optic colonoscopy findings as the gold standard. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated the CTC detection capability for flat colorectal polyps with a flat surface and a height not exceeding 3 mm (n = 42) by comparing to conventional polypoid lesions (n = 418) according to the polyp diameter. Four types of reconstruction images including multiplanar reconstruction, volume rendering, virtual gross pathology, and virtual endoscopic images were used for visual analysis. We compared the abilities of the four reconstructions for polyp visualization. RESULTS: Detection sensitivity for flat polyps was 31.3%, 44.4%, and 87.5% for lesions measuring 2-3 mm, 4-5 mm, and ≥6 mm, respectively; the corresponding sensitivity for polypoid lesions was 47.6%, 79.0%, and 91.7%. The overall sensitivity for flat lesions (47.6%) was significantly lower than polypoid lesions (64.1%). Virtual endoscopic imaging showed best visualization among the four reconstructions. Colon cancers were detected in eight patients by optic colonoscopy, and CTC detected colon cancers in all eight patients. CONCLUSION: CTC using 64-row multidetector CT is useful for colon cancer screening to detect colorectal polyps while the detection of small, flat lesions is still challenging.

Rh-I-UEA-1 polymerized liposomes target and image adenomatous polyps in the APC(Min/+) mouse using optical colonography.

Mutated adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) genes predispose transformations to neoplasia, progressing to colorectal carcinoma. Early detection facilitates clinical management and therapy. Novel lectin-mediated polymerized targeted liposomes (Rh-I-UEA-1), with polyp specificity and incorporated imaging agents were fabricated to locate and image adenomatous polyps in APC(Min/+) mice. The biomarker α-L-fucose covalently joins the liposomal conjugated lectin Ulexeuropaeus agglutinin (UEA-1), via glycosidic linkage to the polyp mucin layer. Multispectral optical imaging (MSI) corroborated a global perspective of specific binding (rhodamine B 532 nm emission, 590-620 nm excitation) of targeted Rh-I-UEA-1 polymerized liposomes to polyps with 1.4-fold labeling efficiency. High-resolution coregistered optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) reveal the spatial correlation of contrast distribution and tissue morphology. Freshly excised APC(Min) bowels were incubated with targeted liposomes (UEA-1 lectin), control liposomes (no lectin), or iohexol (Omnipaque) and imaged by the three techniques. Computed tomographic quantitative analyses did not confirm that targeted liposomes more strongly bound polyps than nontargeted liposomes or iohexol (Omnipaque) alone. OCT, with anatomic depth capabilities, along with the coregistered FMI, substantiated Rh-I-UEA-1 liposome binding along the mucinous polyp surface. UEA-1 lectin denotes α-l-fucose biomarker carbohydrate expression at the mucin glycoprotein layer; Rh-I-UEA-1 polymerized liposomes target and image adenomatous polyps in APC(Min) mice.

Partial preparation computed tomographic colonography: a feasibility study.

We retrospectively evaluated computed tomographic colonography examinations of patients who have had a partial bowel preparation and compared the quality of their preparation with patients who have had a full bowel preparation. In total, 27 patients undergoing computed tomographic colonography examination (10 patients with partial bowel preparation and 17 with full bowel preparation) had their examinations retrospectively reviewed by three independent radiologists in a blinded manner, with evaluation of residual stool, distention, residual fluid, and overall bowel preparation quality. Six colon segments were evaluated individually and independently for these four variables (a total of 161 segments tested). Comparisons were made with the Mann-Whitney test between the partial preparation group and the full preparation group. Partial preparation included stool and fluid tagging plus 20 mg of bisacodyl orally; full preparation included stool and fluid tagging plus 2 L of polyethylene glycol solution. No significant clinical difference was found in colon preparation between the partial and full bowel preparation groups--when evaluated with individual colon segments or by independent readers. Interreader correlation was high. This pilot study indicates that full bowel preparation is not required for diagnostic-quality computed tomographic colonography examination. Further evaluation of this partial bowel preparation regimen is warranted.

Performing an additional decubitus series at CT colonography.

PURPOSE: To determine the rate and associated factors for acquiring a decubitus series at CT colonography (CTC), in addition to the standard supine and prone series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CTC examinations read centrally at one institution but performed at three different centers in 6,380 adults were reviewed to determine the frequency of an additional decubitus series. Results were analyzed according to study indication (primary screening vs. diagnostic for incomplete colonoscopy), practice site (academic vs. community), patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and temporal variation. At all sites, the CT technologist determined the need for an additional decubitus series, with infrequent radiologist input in select cases. RESULTS: The frequency for the CT technologist to obtain a decubitus series at screening was 9.7% (578/5,952), compared with 22.9% (98/428) following failed colonoscopy (P < 0.001). The decubitus rate for screening at the academic center (9.4%, 550/5,871) was significantly lower than the community hospitals (34.6% combined, 28/81) (P < 0.001). The rate progressively increased with age, from 5.0% under age 50 to 28.0% over age 80. No significant difference was seen between men and women (10.3 vs. 9.2%), but a strong correlation existed with increased BMI, rising to >25% for BMI over 40. Marked temporal variation existed at the academic center, with quarterly rates ranging from 0 to 17%. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency for performing a third series at CTC varies considerably according to indication, practice site, patient age, BMI, and time. These results have important implications for clinical practice, including the need for improved training and feedback for CT technologists.

Patients' preferences about follow-up of medium size polyps detected at screening CT colonography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patients' preferences regarding follow-up of medium size polyps detected at screening CT colonography (CTC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: 193 C-RADS2 asymptomatic patients were asked to fill in a form explaining the indications, technique and potential complications of CTC, and were invited to choose their preferred examination technique (CTC or optical colonoscopy: OC) and their follow-up interval by repeated consultations at 3-month intervals. The follow-up interval for CTC and OC was recorded. RESULTS: 87/193 C-RADS2 patients (45.1%) accepted follow-up. Average time interval for follow-up was comparable between CTC and OC (9.00 ± 4.24 vs. 9.00 ± 4.39 months, respectively; P = 0.7188). No patients chose to undergo a 3-year follow-up with either CTC or OC. Most patients elected to have follow-up with either CTC or OC before 18 months rather than later (P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial fraction of C-RADS2 patients prefer to undergo immediate OC and polyp removal rather than follow-up, and the majority of those accepting follow-up are willing to wait for less than 18 months. Such findings may suggest a revision of the proposed C-RADS2 category.

Post-surgical follow-up of colorectal cancer: role of contrast-enhanced CT colonography.

AIM: To evaluate the role of CT colonography (CTC) in the follow-up of patients having received partial colectomy for colorectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CTC was performed in 72 subjects with history of partial colectomy for colorectal cancer. Colectomy had been performed in the right colon (n = 18), descending colon (n = 15), sigmoid colon (n = 21), and rectum (n = 18). Patients underwent CTC following incomplete conventional colonoscopy due to intolerance to endoscope insertion or luminal stenosis. In 70 cases pneumocolon was obtained through a rectal tube, and in 2 cases through a cutaneous anastomosis. CTC datasets were analyzed in combined 2D and 3D mode. All patients in whom CTC was suggestive for or raised the suspicion of disease recurrence underwent colonoscopy in sedation for confirmation of CTC findings. RESULTS: CTC detected 7 cases of anastomotic stenosis. In 6/7 patients the stenosis was located in the sigmoid colon and in 1/7 patients at the level of the ileo-colic junction in the transverse colon. Out of these cases, four were fibrotic and three were neoplastic stenoses. In none of these cases was the CT appearance of the stenoses specific for disease recurrence, and conventional colonoscopy together with biopsy was necessary in order to characterize such findings. However, sensitivity of CTC in detecting anastomotic stenosis was 100% (7/7). One colonic mass (5 cm largest diameter) was detected in one case at the level of the proximal transverse colon in a patient with left colectomy performed 2 years before. The study of the residual colon showed 3 polyps in three patients (8, 6, and 5 mm, respectively). All CT findings were confirmed and characterized by conventional colonoscopy. In all cases the residual colon was entirely visualized by CTC with a completion rate of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: CTC is a feasible and minimally invasive method for full exploration of the colon after surgical resection allowing detection of cancer recurrence, metachronous disease, and distant metastases in one single study, and represents a valid alternative to conventional colonoscopy in this patient population.

Influence of tagged fecal material on detectability of colorectal polyps at CT: phantom study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of tagged material on the minimal radiation dose needed to detect colorectal polyps at CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in two phases. In the first, three experienced observers determined the visibility of sessile polyps (6 mm) at five contrast levels (300, 480, 790, and 1,040 HU and air) and five tube charge levels (10, 14, 20, 28, and 40 mAs) in an anthropomorphic phantom. Each polyp was present in one of eight possible locations. The mean tube charge threshold for 90% correct responses was determined for each contrast level. Blinded observers performed independent 2D readings. In the second phase of the study, three 150-cm virtual colons were evaluated at two contrast levels (300 and 480 HU) and at five tube charge levels between 20 and 80 mAs. The three colons contained 18 randomly located polyps. The mean tube charge threshold for 90% sensitivity was determined for each contrast level. RESULTS: In the first phase of the study, the estimated tube charge thresholds for 300, 480, and 790 HU were 24.0, 16.3, and 6.2 mAs. At 1,040 HU and in air, all polyps were detected at the lowest tube charge setting (10 mAs). In the second phase, the tube charge thresholds for 90% sensitivity at 300 and 480 HU were 70 and 35 mAs, respectively. CONCLUSION: If polyps are covered by fecal material, a considerably higher tube charge setting is needed for adequate visualization than is needed for polyps in a completely cleansed colon, especially when the density of the tagged residue is low.

Colon distension, perceived burden and side-effects of CT-colonography for screening using hyoscine butylbromide or glucagon hydrochloride as bowel relaxant.

OBJECTIVE: Compare colonic distension and perceived burden of CT-colonography between participants receiving hyoscine butylbromide (buscopan) and glucagon hydrochloride as bowel relaxant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected within a screening trial. Participants received 20mg buscopan intravenously or 1mg of glucagon intravenously (if buscopan contra-indicated). Colon distension per segment was assessed using a 4-point scale (prone and supine). Data on perceived burden of CT-colonography were collected using a questionnaire two weeks after the examination. Outcome measures between groups were compared using propensity score matching. We used a stratified Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test statistic for quantitative and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistics for categorical variables. RESULTS: 541 participants were included: 336 (62%) received buscopan and 205 received glucagon. All buscopan recipients had an adequately distended colon, compared to 96% in the glucagon group (RR 7.31, 95% CI: 1.61-33.28). More glucagon recipients scored the insufflation as rather or extremely burdensome (25% vs. 16%; overall mean score 2.7 vs. 2.4; p<0.001) and more found the entire CT-colonography rather or extremely burdensome (14% vs. 7%; 2.2 vs. 1.9; p=0.001). Most frequently reported side effects were a dry mouth in the buscopan group (15%) and nausea in the glucagon group (13%). CONCLUSION: Compared to glucagon, premedication with buscopan results in significantly more adequately distended colons and a less burdensome procedure. When buscopan can be used, it is the preferred bowel relaxant.

Oral sodium phosphates solution versus polyethylene glycol for colon cleansing prior to radiological assessment.

A clean bowel environment is essential prior to radiological assessment of the colon. The objectives were to determine patient compliance and acceptability, physician satisfaction, overall clinical effectiveness and tolerability with the use of oral sodium phosphates (Fosfosoda) and polyethylene glycol solutions as bowel cleansing agents in a relatively large cohort of Spanish patients requiring radiologic examination of the colon. This was an observational survey involving 592 patients (> or =18 years and approximately 60% women) who received Fosfosoda or polyethylene glycol solutions according to data sheet instructions. Parameters measured included mucosal cleansing (presence of solid residues), patient acceptability (including any adverse effects to treatment) and compliance with the treatment regimen, and physician-rated satisfaction with the procedure. The date from the study demonstrated that Fosfosoda and polyethylene glycol solutions were found to be equally well tolerated in this study, although patients receiving Fosfosoda found it easier to complete the treatment regimen. Fosfosoda was significantly superior to polyethylene glycol solutions with regards to mucosal cleansing with 52% achieving an 'excellent' result compared with only 36% of the polyethylene glycol group (relative risk:1.43; 95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.82). Physician-rated assessment of the bowel cleansing procedure also significantly favored Fosfosoda (p = 0.014). In conclusion, while Fosfosoda and polyethylene glycol solutions were equally well tolerated when given to patients prior to radiologic examination of the colon, Fosfosoda was shown to be significantly more effective in terms of bowel cleansing. Based upon the available evidence this could provide significant cost benefit for Fosfosoda.

Colorectal screening with single scan CT colonography in children.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of single scan CT colonography (CTC) using polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution with contrast medium (PEG-C) bowel preparation in children. Seven patients suspected of colorectal elevated lesions were subjected to CTC. All patients underwent bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG) at a dose of 32 +/- 3 ml/kgBW before the day of CTC. The water-soluble contrast agent was given to the patients at a dose of 0.6 +/- 0.1 ml/kgBW the next morning. After colonic air insufflation, the patient was scanned axially with a single run. After evaluation of multiplanar reformation images, 3-dimensional images (CT enema and virtual endoscopy image) were reconstructed. CT enema image was composed from air image and contrast-medium image. All studies were performed without complications. CTC showed the entire colon without blind spots in all patients with only single scan. In conclusion, the single scan CTC using PEG-C preparation is safe and less invasive compared to conventional CTC due to the shorter examination time and lower radiation dose.

Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus contrast medium vs PEG alone preparation for CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in preoperative colorectal cancer staging.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the usefulness of combined polyethylene glycol solution plus contrast medium bowel preparation (PEG-C preparation) followed by dual-contrast computed tomography enema (DCCTE) and conventional colonoscopy. The main purpose of these examinations is the preoperative staging of already known tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with colorectal tumors were alternately allocated to either a polyethylene glycol solution preparation (PEG preparation) group (n=50) or a PEG-C preparation group (n=50) before undergoing conventional colonoscopy and computed tomographic (CT) colonography. After conventional colonoscopy, multidetector row CT scans were performed. Air images were reconstructed for both groups; contrast medium images were additionally reconstructed for the PEG-C preparation group. DCCTE images were a composite of air images and contrast medium images without use of dedicated electronic cleansing software. Quality scores (the presence or absence of blind spots of the colon) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Complete tumor images were obtained by DCCTE for all 50 (100%) lesions in the PEG-C preparation group, as compared with only nine of the 50 lesions (18%) in the PEG preparation group (air-contrast CT enema). The overall quality score in the PEG-C preparation group was significantly better than that in the PEG preparation group (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: DCCTE showed the entire colon without blind spots in nearly all patients in the PEG-C preparation group because the areas under residual fluid were reconstructed as contrast medium images. DCCTE and conventional colonoscopy after PEG-C preparation are feasible and safe procedures that can be used for preoperative evaluation in patients with colorectal cancer.

CT colonography in a Korean population with a high residue diet: comparison between wet and dry preparations.

AIM: To compare wet and dry preparation methods for computed tomography colonography (CTC) in terms of preparation quality, interpretation time, and diagnostic performance for polyp detection in a population with a high residue diet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n=24) received a wet preparation of 4l polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution, and group 2 (n=62) received a dry preparation of phosphor-soda. Abnormal findings, including polyps, and the time required to interpret the CTC images in both groups were documented by a radiologist. CTC findings were compared to those of colonoscopy as a reference standard. Two radiologists evaluated the quality of CTC with regard to residual fluid, faeces, and colonic distension using a four-point scale in consensus. Statistical differences for residual fluid, faeces, distensibility on CTC, and interpretation time between the two groups were analysed. The diagnostic performance of CTC in both groups was also compared. RESULTS: One-hundred and ninety polyps in 70 patients were identified using colonoscopy. Regarding the quality of images produced the wet preparation was significantly better than the dry preparation (p<0.05). The average interpretation time was significantly shorter for the wet group (11.7 min) than the dry group (16.4 min) (p<0.05). For per-patient analysis, the positive predictive value (PPV) was significantly better for the wet (100%) than the dry group (79.6%; p=0.025). Sensitivities and PPV for >or=10 mm polyps were comparable between two groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: In a population with a high-residue diet, CTC with wet preparation can be interpreted in a time-efficient manner and is comparable with CTC with dry preparation.

CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction initial observations.

The authors evaluated a computed tomography (CT) colonographic technique with a combination of preexamination orally ingested positive contrast material and postacquisition image processing to subtract out the ingested opacified bowel contents. With this technique, rigorous physical purging of the bowel was not necessary before structural examination of the colon. With images obtained in 20 patients, two readers were able to correctly identify the majority of polyps confirmed at colonoscopy. Their performance for detection of lesions larger than 1 cm was similar to that with conventional CT colonography.