Improving oncology biosimilar launches in the EU, the USA, and Japan: an updated Policy Review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions.

The EU, the USA, and Japan account for the majority of biological pharmacotherapy use worldwide. Biosimilar regulatory approval pathways were authorised in the EU (2006), in Japan (2009), and in the USA (2015), to facilitate approval of biological drugs that are highly similar to reference products and to encourage market competition. Between 2007 and 2020, 33 biosimilars for oncology were approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), 16 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and ten by the Japan Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). Some of these approved applications were initially rejected because of manufacturing concerns (four of 36 [11%] with the EMA, seven of 16 [44%] with the FDA, none of ten for the PMDA). Median times from initial regulatory submission before approval of oncology biosimilars were 1·5 years (EMA), 1·3 years (FDA), and 0·9 years (PMDA). Pharmacists can substitute biosimilars for reference biologics in some EU countries, but not in the USA or Japan. US regulation prohibits substitution, unless the biosimilar has been approved as interchangeable, a designation not yet achieved for any biosimilar in the USA. Japan does not permit biosimilar substitution, as prescribers must include the product name on each prescription and that specific product must be given to the patient. Policy Reviews published in 2014 and 2016 in The Lancet Oncology focused on premarket and postmarket policies for oncology biosimilars before most of these drugs received regulatory approval. In this Policy Review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions, we identify factors preventing the effective launch of oncology biosimilars. Introduction to the market has been more challenging with therapeutic than for supportive care oncology biosimilars. Addressing region-specific competition barriers and educational needs would improve the regulatory approval process and market launches for these biologics, therefore expanding patient access to these products in the EU, the USA, and Japan.

Periodontal status, inflammation, and malnutrition in hemodialysis patients - is there a link?

BACKGROUND: Periodontal disease (PDD) was associated with inflammation, malnutrition, and higher mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVE: Cross-sectional observational study, aiming to assess the prevalence of PDD and the possible relationship among PDD, inflammation, and malnutrition in HD patients. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Single HD center, 263 patients (age: 57.4 ± 12.3 years; 60% males; HD vintage 6.6 ± 4.9 years; the primary renal diseases were mainly primary glomerular nephropathies in 34% cases, with 11% diabetic nephropathy). MEASUREMENTS: Oral health status was assessed by the Silness and Loe plaque index, loss of clinical attachment level, periodontal pocket depth according to World Health Organization recommendations, by a single examiner. Patients were stratified by periodontal pocket depth (PPD): normal oral status/mild PDD (PPD < 4 mm), moderate PDD (PPD 4-5 mm), and severe PDD (PPD ≥ 6 mm). Demographic, smoking status, hematologic, dialysis-related data and parameters of the nutritional (Subjective Global Assessment score, anthropemetrical, and biochemical) and inflammatory status were collected. RESULTS: Poor periodontal status was shown by 75% of patients, 23% of them with severe PDD. Patients with PDD were older; higher percentages of them were smokers, diabetics, had malnutrition, and inflammation. Subjects with severe PDD had higher HD vintage, lower hemoglobin, and required higher darbepoetin doses than those with healthy periodontium. Darbepoetin resistance index was higher in patients with severe PDD than in those with normal periodontium. Models of multivariable linear logistic regression for the potential promoters and for the consequences of PDD revealed smoking and HD duration as significant contributors; increased C-reactive protein was associated with severe PDD. LIMITATION: Cross-sectional observational design. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired periodontal health is highly prevalent in HD patients. PDD is more frequent in elderly diabetic smokers and in those with longer HD vintage; smoking and HD duration seems to be the most important determinants. The prevalence is higher in malnourished and in inflamed patients; inflammation seems to accompany PDD and to influence anemia response to treatment.

A randomized controlled trial evaluating the erythropoiesis stimulating agent sparing potential of a vitamin E-bonded polysulfone dialysis membrane.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin E (VE) bonded polysulfone dialysis membranes have putative erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA)-sparing and anti-inflammatory properties based on data from a small number of studies. We sought to investigate this in a large, prospective 12-month randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Two-hundred and sixty prevalent haemodialysis (HD) patients were randomized to dialysis with VE-bonded polysulfone membranes or non-VE-bonded equivalents. All ESA-dosing was performed by means of a computer-based anaemia management decision support system. Monthly data were used to calculate the ESA resistance index (ERI) and blood tests were performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months for measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. RESULTS: Of the 260 patients, 123 were randomized to dialysis with the VE-membrane and 12-month data was available for 220 patients. At the study population level, no beneficial effect of the VE membranes on the ERI or CRP levels was observed. Post hoc analyses indicated that there was a significant fall in ERI for patients with the highest baseline ESA resistance dialysed with the VE (9.28 [7.70-12.5] versus 7.70 [5.34-12.7] IU/week/kg/g/dL Hb, P = 0.01) but not the control membranes (9.45 [7.62-12.3] versus 8.14 [4.44-15.6] IU/week/kg/g/dL Hb, P = 0.41); this was not attributable to changes in CRP levels. CONCLUSIONS: Wholesale switching of all chronic HD patients to dialysis with VE-bonded polysulfone membranes appears not to be associated with improvements in ESA-responsiveness or CRP. These membranes may have utility in patients with heightened ESA resistance.

Darbepoetin for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are used to treat anaemia in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Several agents are available including epoetin alfa or beta as well as agents with a longer duration of action, darbepoetin alfa and methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of darbepoetin alfa to treat anaemia in adults and children with CKD (stages 3 to 5, 5D, and kidney transplant recipients). SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register (to 13 January 2014) through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of any darbepoetin alfa treatment of at least three months duration in adults or children with CKD (any stage). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by two independent investigators. Patient-centred outcomes (need for blood transfusion, iron therapy, progression of kidney disease, total and cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular events, cancer, hypertension, seizures, and health-related quality of life) and other outcomes (haemoglobin levels) were assessed using random effects meta-analysis. We calculated risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes, both with 95% confidence intervals. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 32 studies comprising 9414 participants; 21 studies in 8328 participants could be included in our meta-analyses. One study (4038 participants) compared darbepoetin alfa to placebo, 16 studies (2955 participants) compared darbepoetin alfa to epoetin alfa or beta, four studies (1198 participants) compared darbepoetin alfa to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, three studies (420 participants) compared more frequent with less frequent darbepoetin alfa administration and four studies (303 participants) compared intravenous with subcutaneous darbepoetin alfa administration.In a single large study, darbepoetin alfa reduced the need for blood transfusion and iron therapy compared with placebo in adults with CKD stage 3 to 5, but had little or no effect on survival, increased risks of hypertension, and had uncertain effects on quality of life. Data comparing darbepoetin alfa with epoetin alfa or beta or methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta were sparse and inconclusive. Comparisons of differing dosing schedules and routes of administration were compared in small numbers of participants and studies. Evidence for treatment effects of darbepoetin alfa were particularly limited for children with CKD, adults with CKD stage 5D, and recipients of a kidney transplant.Studies included in this review were generally at high or unclear risk of bias for all items (random sequence generation, allocation concealment, incomplete outcome data, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, selective outcome reporting, intention to treat analysis and other sources of bias). One large study comparing darbepoetin alfa with placebo was at low risk of bias for most items assessed. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that darbepoetin alfa effectively reduces need for blood transfusions in adults with CKD stage 3 to 5, but has little or no effect on mortality or quality of life. The effects of darbepoetin alfa in adults with CKD stage 5D and kidney transplant recipients and children with CKD remain uncertain as do the relative benefits and harms of darbepoetin alfa compared with other ESAs (epoetin alfa or beta and methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta).

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are available for treating anaemia in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Their relative efficacy (preventing blood transfusions and reducing fatigue and breathlessness) and safety (mortality and cardiovascular events) are unclear due to the limited power of head-to-head studies. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of ESAs (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa, or methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, and biosimilar ESAs, against each other, placebo, or no treatment) to treat anaemia in adults with CKD. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 11 February 2014 through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that included a comparison of an ESA (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa, methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, or biosimilar ESA) with another ESA, placebo or no treatment in adults with CKD and that reported prespecified patient-relevant outcomes were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent authors screened the search results and extracted data. Data synthesis was performed by random-effects pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. We assessed for heterogeneity and inconsistency within meta-analyses using standard techniques and planned subgroup and meta-regression to explore for sources of heterogeneity or inconsistency. We assessed our confidence in treatment estimates for the primary outcomes within network meta-analysis (preventing blood transfusions and all-cause mortality) according to adapted GRADE methodology as very low, low, moderate, or high. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 56 eligible studies involving 15,596 adults with CKD. Risks of bias in the included studies was generally high or unclear for more than half of studies in all of the risk of bias domains we assessed; no study was low risk for allocation concealment, blinding of outcome assessment and attrition from follow-up. In network analyses, there was moderate to low confidence that epoetin alfa (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.59), epoetin beta (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.38), darbepoetin alfa (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.57), and methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.70) prevented blood transfusions compared to placebo. In very low quality evidence, biosimilar ESA therapy was possibly no better than placebo for preventing blood transfusions (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.47) with considerable imprecision in estimated effects. We could not discern whether all ESAs were similar or different in their effects on preventing blood transfusions and our confidence in the comparative effectiveness of different ESAs was generally very low. Similarly, the comparative effects of ESAs compared with another ESA, placebo or no treatment on all-cause mortality were imprecise.All proprietary ESAs increased the odds of hypertension compared to placebo (epoetin alfa OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.27 to 4.23; epoetin beta OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.23 to 5.39; darbepoetin alfa OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.21; methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.98 to 3.92), while the effect of biosimilar ESAs on developing hypertension was less certain (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.99). Our confidence in the comparative effects of ESAs on hypertension was low due to considerable imprecision in treatment estimates. The comparative effects of all ESAs on cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and vascular access thrombosis were uncertain and network analyses for major cardiovascular events, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), fatigue and breathlessness were not possible. Effects of ESAs on fatigue were described heterogeneously in the available studies in ways that were not useable for analyses. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In the CKD setting, there is currently insufficient evidence to suggest the superiority of any ESA formulation based on available safety and efficacy data. Directly comparative data for the effectiveness of different ESA formulations based on patient-centred outcomes (such as quality of life, fatigue, and functional status) are sparse and poorly reported and current research studies are unable to inform care. All proprietary ESAs (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa, and methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) prevent blood transfusions but information for biosimilar ESAs is less conclusive. Comparative treatment effects of different ESA formulations on other patient-important outcomes such as survival, MI, stroke, breathlessness and fatigue are very uncertain.For consumers, clinicians and funders, considerations such as drug cost and availability and preferences for dosing frequency might be considered as the basis for individualising anaemia care due to lack of data for comparative differences in clinical benefits and harms.

[Comparison of the iron metabolism and effectiveness of anemia treatment in patients on maintenance hemodialysis performed based on polysulfone and helixone dialyzers]. / Prównanie gospodarki zelazem i skutecznosc leczenia niedokrwistosci u chorych hemodializowanych w oparciu o dializatory polisulfonowe i helixonowe.

INTRODUCTION: Anemia is a common complication in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) especially on maintenance hemodialysis. There are some data that the use of biocompatible high-flux dialyzers is more efficient than low-flux dialyzers in controlling some uremia related diseases including anemia. The aim of the study was to assess the iron metabolism and degree of anemia correction in patients on maintenance hemodialysis performed based on low-flux dialyzers (HD-LF), with polysulfone membrane and high- flux dialyzers (HD-HF), with helixone membrane. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The observation lasted 12 months and involved 60 patients (23 F and 37 M) aged from 24 to 84 years, mean 60.73 ± 15.75 treated on maintenance HD. RESULTS: It was demonstrated a higher mean Hb and Ht values during period of HD-HF as compared with the HD-LF (LF-Hb = 11.09 ± 0.89 vs. HF-Hb = 11.42 ± 0.98; p < 0.01 and LF- Ht = 33.7 ± 2.87% vs. HF-Ht = 34.45 ± 3.08%). Higher values of Hb and Ht during HD-HF were obtained at a comparable average doses of darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp) used in both periods (LF-Aranesp = 8.29 ± 4.17 µg vs. HF-Aranesp = 8.25 ± 3.92 µg; p ≤ 0.29) and statistically significantly lower average doses of intravenous iron administered during HD-HF (LF-iron iv = 17.59 ± 10.44 mg vs. HF-iron iv 12.16 ± 9.04 mg; p < 0.01). It was also shown a statistically significant higher mean corpuscular volume of red blood cells (MCV) in patients during HD-HF (LF-MCV = 91.15 ± 6.6 µm3 vs. HF- MCV = 95.03 ± 5.38 µm3; p ≤ 0.001) and lower mean ferritin values (LF-ferritin = 636.33 ± 704.57 ng/ml vs. HF-ferritin = 538 ± 475.92 ng/ml; p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lower intravenous iron use during HD-HF, with higher Hb values in these period may indicate on may indicate an increased loss of folates during HD-HF and the necessity of its increased supplementation.

Effect of conversion from ESA with shorter half-life to CERA once monthly for maintaining Hb concentration in pre-dialysis CKD patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to identify whether hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations can be maintained, and to investigate changes in biomarkers, when switching from erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) with shorter half-life to once-monthly subcutaneous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin ß (CERA) in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. METHODS: Pre-dialysis CKD patients (n=191) aged ≥18 years who maintained their Hb level 10-12 g/dL through use of epoetin-α, epoetin-ß, or darbepoetin-α were enrolled. Hb levels and CERA dose was assessed prospectively for 24 weeks. Serum biomarkers related to coagulation, endothelial function, and iron metabolism were measured at weeks 0 and 24. RESULTS: Baseline Hb concentration was 10.8±0.6 g/dL Twelve and 24 weeks after conversion, mean Hb levels were 11.9±0.9 and 11.2±0.9 g/dL, respectively. The mean monthly CERA dose required to maintain Hb levels was gradually reduced. Of total 387 dose adjustments, dose increases and decreases occurred in 35 (9.0%) and 352 (91.0%) episodes, respectively. Hb overshoot occurred in 14 (9.7%) patients. P-selectin was significantly decreased, whereas VCAM was significantly increased 24 weeks after conversion (P < 0.05). Serum soluble transferrin receptor E-selectin and prohepcidin levels were similar before and after switching to CERA (P=N-S). CONCLUSION: Conversion from ESA with shorter half-life to subcutaneous once-monthly CERA in pre-dialysis CKD patients can efficaciously maintain Hb. The CERA dose requirement decreased significantly. The conversion ratio may need to be reduced when switching from ESA with shorter half-life to CERA. CERA may change biomarkers associated with platelet reactivity and endothelial microenvironment.

Dosing regimen and tolerability of methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta in Chinese dialysis patients.

AIM: To investigate methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta dosing regimen in treatment naïve subjects and dose conversion in darbepoetin alpha treated subjects, in Chinese dialysis patients. METHODS: Adult Chinese patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) or haemodialysis (HD), with no prior treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and haemoglobin below 8 g/dL (Group I) or receiving darbepoetin alpha and had stable haemoglobin at 10-12 g/dL (Group II) were included in this prospective open-label study. In Group I methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta was started at 0.6 µg/kg subcutaneously fortnightly till haemoglobin reached 10 g/dL, after which it was given monthly. A dose conversion table was devised for Group II. Follow-up was 36 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included. Haemoglobin in Group I (n=23, PD/HD:19/4) increased from 7.5 ± 0.9 g/dL at baseline to 10.7 ± 1.0 g/dL after 16 weeks, while it remained stable at 10.4 ± 1.0 g/dL after conversion in Group II (n=22, PD/HD:15/7). Actual dose required after stabilization was 1.7 µg/kg per month in Group I and 2.3 µg/kg per month in Group II. Median number of dose adjustment was three in Group I and one in Group II, while haemoglobin overshoot to 13 g/dL or above occurred in 4.4% and 9.1%, respectively. No significant side-effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our dosing regimen for methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, for treatment naïve subjects or for conversion from darbepoetin alpha, is safe and effective. The dose required to achieve a haemoglobin concentration of 10-11 g/dL in Chinese dialysis patients is approximately 2 µg/kg monthly.

Reticulocyte dynamic and hemoglobin variability in hemodialysis patients treated with Darbepoetin alfa and C.E.R.A.: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In a simulation based on a pharmacokinetic model we demonstrated that increasing the erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) half-life or shortening their administration interval decreases hemoglobin variability. The benefit of reducing the administration interval was however lessened by the variability induced by more frequent dosage adjustments. The purpose of this study was to analyze the reticulocyte and hemoglobin kinetics and variability under different ESAs and administration intervals in a collective of chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: The study was designed as an open-label, randomized, four-period cross-over investigation, including 30 patients under chronic hemodialysis at the regional hospital of Locarno (Switzerland) in February 2010 and lasting 2 years. Four subcutaneous treatment strategies (C.E.R.A. every 4 weeks Q4W and every 2 weeks Q2W, Darbepoetin alfa Q4W and Q2W) were compared with each other. The mean square successive difference of hemoglobin, reticulocyte count and ESAs dose was used to quantify variability. We distinguished a short- and a long-term variability based respectively on the weekly and monthly successive difference. RESULTS: No difference was found in the mean values of biological parameters (hemoglobin, reticulocytes, and ferritin) between the 4 strategies. ESAs type did not affect hemoglobin and reticulocyte variability, but C.E.R.A induced a more sustained reticulocytes response over time and increased the risk of hemoglobin overshooting (OR 2.7, p = 0.01). Shortening the administration interval lessened the amplitude of reticulocyte count fluctuations but resulted in more frequent ESAs dose adjustments and in amplified reticulocyte and hemoglobin variability. Q2W administration interval was however more favorable in terms of ESAs dose, allowing a 38% C.E.R.A. dose reduction, and no increase of Darbepoetin alfa. CONCLUSIONS: The reticulocyte dynamic was a more sensitive marker of time instability of the hemoglobin response under ESAs therapy. The ESAs administration interval had a greater impact on hemoglobin variability than the ESAs type. The more protracted reticulocyte response induced by C.E.R.A. could explain both, the observed higher risk of overshoot and the significant increase in efficacy when shortening its administration interval. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01666301.

Concentration-guided ribavirin dosing with darbepoetin support and peg-IFN alfa-2a for treatment of hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation.

Relapse of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation is universal. Standard-of-care (SOC) treatment for relapse offers less satisfactory treatment response than in nontransplanted patients. Tolerance for treatment is suboptimal and withdrawals owing to adverse events induced by treatment frequent. To improve tolerance for SOC, and ribavirin (RBV) in particular, concentration-guided RBV dosing calculated by a formula taking renal function and weight into consideration was utilized. A serum RBV concentration of 10 µm was set as the goal. All patients were given maintenance darbepoetin therapy from 2 weeks prior to initiation of treatment. In total, 21 patients with a mean age of 52 (range 25-64) years were included. The mean RBV concentration at week 4 was 10.2 and 7.36 µm in genotype 1/4 and non-1/4 patients, respectively, and 11.7 and 9.42 at week 12. The mean haemoglobin drop was 25 g/L vs 21 g/L in the genotype 1/4 and non-1/4 group, respectively, a nonsignificant difference. With this treatment approach, 80-90% of patients could be kept adherent to treatment. Sustained viral response was achieved 8/16 (50%) with low-grade fibrosis (fibrosis stage ≤ 2) vs in none of five patients with advanced fibrosis (Fibrosis stage 3 and 4), P < 0.05. We conclude that a treatment algorithm utilizing concentration-guided RBV dosing during darbepoetin maintenance therapy substantially improves tolerance and allows high adherence to a SOC treatment schedule, and that therapy needs to be initiated before advanced fibrosis is developed.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in renal medicine.

The four currently available erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), the main drugs for correcting anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), are epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa, and continuous erythropoietin receptor activator. The last two have much longer half-lives, which means they can be administered less frequently. The expiry of the patents for epoetin alfa and epoetin beta some years ago opened up the way for the production of a number of biosimilars that are now marketed in the European Union. Because biosimilars cannot be identical to their originator, a complex and still-evolving regulatory policy has been generated, but there are still a number of issues concerning international naming, automatic substitution, and safety. All ESAs are effective in correcting renal anemia and increasing hemoglobin levels, but the choice of which to use should also take into account their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, their administration route, and economic issues. Following the publication of a number of trials indicating no benefit (and even possible harm) when ESAs are used to aim at near-normal hemoglobin levels in CKD patients, the hemoglobin target has become a major subject of discussion. According to the position statement of the Anemia Group of the European Renal Best Practice, it should generally be about 11-12 g/dL; however, a risk-benefit evaluation is warranted in individual patients, and high ESA doses driven by hyporesponsiveness should be avoided.

PREPARE trial: a randomized phase III trial comparing preoperative, dose-dense, dose-intensified chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF versus a standard-dosed epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel ± darbepoetin alfa in primary breast cancer--results at the time of surgery.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemotherapy is a recommended treatment of both primary operable and locally advanced breast cancer. Strategies to improve efficacy include the use of anthracyclines, taxanes, and intensified dose with bone marrow support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received neoadjuvant epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (EC→T), each 3-weekly for four cycles (n = 370), or epirubicin 150 mg/m(2) followed by paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) with pegfilgrastim followed by CMF (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), methotrexate 40 mg/m(2), fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 (E(dd)→T(dd)→CMF), each 2-weekly and for three cycles (n = 363). Patients were randomly allocated to either simultaneous darbepoetin alfa (DA) (n = 356) or none (n = 377). RESULTS: Pathological complete response (pCR) rate (breast) was higher with E(dd)→T(dd)→CMF, 18.7% versus 13.2% with EC→T; P = 0.043, ypT0/Tis; ypN0 was reported in 20.9% versus 14.3% respectively; P = 0.019. Patients with grade 3 tumors and negative hormone receptor status had a significantly higher pCR rate. Mean hemoglobin values maintained higher with DA (13.6 versus 12.6 g/dl). E(dd)→T(dd)→CMF regimen showed more grade 3-4 mucositis, sensory neuropathy, and neurological complaints. Thromboembolic events were more frequent on DA (3% versus 6%; P = 0.055). CONCLUSION: Dose-dense and -intensified neoadjuvant chemotherapy with E(dd)→T(dd)→CMF was potentially superior to EC→T in terms of pCR. Primary use of DA did not affect pCR.

Synthesis, characterisation, and mass spectrometric detection of a pegylated EPO-mimetic peptide for sports drug testing purposes.

Erythropoietin (EPO) and other erythropoiesis-stimulating agents possess a high misuse potential in elite sport due to their ability to increase the oxygen transport capacity, which plays a vital role in enhancing endurance performance. Currently, a new generation of EPO-mimetic peptides is under development from which peginesatide (also referred to as Hematide™), a pegylated homodimeric peptide of approximately 45 kDa with no structural relationship to erythropoietin, is the most advanced drug candidate undergoing phase-III clinical trials. Since preventive doping research aims at the development of detection methods before a drug receives clinical approval, a selective and sensitive assay has to be established knowing that conventional doping control assays for EPO will not succeed in detecting peginesatide. Thus, a pegylated EPO-mimetic peptide simulating the structure and properties of the lead drug candidate peginesatide was synthesised as a model compound for this new class of emerging drugs and characterised by means of gel electrophoresis, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation (MALDI) mass spectrometry, as well as liquid chromatography/electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS/MS) after proteolytic digestion. Based on these results, a mass spectrometric detection method of the product in plasma was developed targeting a pentapeptide fragment after protein precipitation and subtilisin digestion. Its fitness for purpose was evaluated by the determination of selected method characteristics focusing particularly on specificity, recovery (ca. 60%), and limit of detection (1 ng/mL).

Successful management of gelatinous transformation of the bone marrow in anorexia nervosa with hematopoietic growth factors.

Serous atrophy or gelatinous transformation of the bone marrow (GMT), often seen with severe nutritional deprivation in Anorexia Nervosa (AN), is characterized by hypocellularity and patchy or diffuse replacement of the bone marrow with hyaluronic acid-like mucopolysaccharide material. Treatment with nutritional support alone is often temporary due to the relapsing nature of AN. We present the case of a patient with pancytopenia due to GMT who had multiple prior hospitalizations for infections and blood transfusions. Nutritional support was inadequate in restoring her bone marrow function. She was successfully treated with hematopoietic growth factors and achieved a sustained hematopoietic recovery. In addition, use of growth factors resulted in a 91% reduction in the cost of health care delivered to this patient.

Fewer dose changes with once-monthly C.E.R.A. in patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Frequent dosing and requirements for dose adjustments of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) create significant burdens for healthcare providers and have been associated with hemoglobin (Hb) cycling, hampering maintenance of target Hb levels. We compared the frequency of dose changes in dialysis patients who received methoxy polyethylene glycolepoetin beta; (a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.)) or a shorter-acting ESA. METHODS: Data were analyzed from three Phase III maintenance trials, using almost identical protocols, in dialysis patients treated with C.E.R.A. every 2 weeks (q2w) or every 4 weeks (q4w) or a comparator ESA (epoetin or darbepoetin alpha; at their previous dose/administration interval). Dosage was adjusted to maintain Hb ± 1 g/dl of baseline and 10 - 13.5 g/dl during titration (28 weeks) and evaluation (8 weeks), and 11 - 13 g/dl during follow-up (16 weeks). RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 564 patients treated with C.E.R.A. q2w, 410 with C.E.R.A. q4w and 572 with comparator ESA at their usual dosing interval. Significantly fewer dose changes were needed in patients receiving C.E.R.A. q2w (p < 0.05) or C.E.R.A. q4w (p < 0.001) than in patients treated with comparator ESAs. CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis suggests that C.E.R.A. q4w maintains Hb levels in dialysis patients and requires fewer dose changes compared with other ESAs.

Dosing strategies for conversion of haemodialysis patients from short-acting erythropoiesis stimulating agents to once-monthly C.E.R.A.: experience from the MIRACEL study.

AIMS: To analyse the impact of dosing decisions for continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.), a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicentre, single-arm study in haemodialysis patients receiving epoetin alfa/beta or darbepoetin alfa. After a 2-month screening phase, patients were converted to monthly C.E.R.A. using pre-filled syringes during a 5-month titration phase and a 2-month evaluation phase. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-four eligible patients were converted to C.E.R.A. Mean Hb were 11.7 ± 0.7, 11.7 ± 0.8 and 11.5 ± 0.8 g/dl during screening, titration and evaluation, respectively. C.E.R.A. starting dose was 125 µg (n = 311) or 200 µg (n = 106), with corresponding final doses of 129 ± 61 µg and 203 ± 58 µg. The mean number of C.E.R.A. dose decreases and increases were 0.9 ± 1.0 and 1.1 ± 1.0 per patient, respectively. Hb rarely exceeded 12.5 g/dl after a C.E.R.A. dose increase (< 8%) and remained ≥ 11 g/dl after a dose reduction on approximately three-quarters of occasions. Among the 53 occasions where Hb decreased ≥ 2 g/dl between two consecutive visits, the previous dose had been withheld (n = 9), concomitant blood loss, coagulopathy or infection was present (n = 13), or iron parameters were low (n = 17). There were 104 adverse events/month during screening, and 45/month during the titration/evaluation phases. Serious adverse events occurred in 18.0 and 21.0 patients/month during the screening and titration/evaluation phases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Switching haemodialysis patients from shorter-acting ESA to once-monthly C.E.R.A. using pre-filled syringes is straightforward, and Hb levels remain stable. Starting dose recommendations and dose changes correlated well with the clinical setting. Collateral factors such as infection or aggravating concomitant medical conditions should be taken into account.

[Erythropoiesis stimulating agents]. / Wachstumsfaktoren - Erythropoetine.

Since the 90's, human erythropoietin is produced recombinantly and used clinically. There are various products from different suppliers, which differ primarily in their production but not in their half-life or effectiveness. 2001 genetically modified darbepoetin alpha was launched, which is characterized by an approximately three times longer half-life. A further extension of the half-life to 130 hours is achieved with the current continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA), which therefore must be applied only once or twice a month. The indication for epoetin therapy is primarily for the symptomatic renal anemia and chemotherapy-associated anemia. Corrections of low hemoglobin levels in asymptomatic patients are not allowed. The generally recommended hemoglobin target range is 10-12 g/dl. Hb values > 13 g/dl should be avoided because they are associated with significant adverse effects and do not improve patient survival.

Confirmatory analysis of continuous erythropoietin receptor activator and erythropoietin analogues in equine plasma by LC-MS for doping control.

Continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) is the third generation of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) medication that retains the effect of promoting red blood cell production but has longer duration of action in the body. CERA, rhEPO, and darbepoetin alpha (DPO) can be misused to enhance performance in both human and equine athletes. To deter such misuse, a very selective and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) method has now been developed for identification of CERA, rhEPO, and DPO in equine plasma. The method employs a new signature tryptic peptide, T8 ((54)MEVGQQAVEVWQGLALLSEAVLR(76), common to the three proteins), and improved immunoaffinity extraction. The analytes were extracted by anti-rhEPO antibodies from plasma samples that were pretreated with polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000. The extracted analytes were digested by trypsin and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The limit of identification was 0.5 ng/mL for CERA, 0.2 ng/mL for rhEPO, and 0.1 ng/mL for DPO in equine plasma; the limit of detection was 0.3 ng/mL for CERA, 0.1 ng/mL for rhEPO, and 0.05 ng/mL for DPO. Specificity of the method was assessed via BLAST and SEQUEST protein database searches, and the T8 is extremely specific at both peptide and product ion levels for the identification of CERA, rhEPO, and DPO. This method was successful in identifying CERA and DPO in plasma samples collected from research horses post the drug administrations. It provides a useful tool in the fight against blood doping with CERA, rhEPO, and DPO in racehorses. Additionally, the following two technical approaches adopted in this study may also be helpful in protein identifications and biomarker discoveries in a broad scope: precipitating plasma proteins with PEG 6000 to improve immunoaffinity extraction efficiency of the target proteins and making a large and more lipophilic peptide detectable at low concentrations by increasing its solubility in the sample solvent.

Maintenance treatment of renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta versus darbepoetin alfa administered monthly: a randomized comparative trial.

BACKGROUND: Several studies with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents claim that maintenance therapy of renal anaemia may be possible at extended dosing intervals; however, few studies were randomized, results varied, and comparisons between agents were absent. We report results of a multi-national, randomized, prospective trial comparing haemoglobin maintenance with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly. METHODS: Haemodialysis patients (n = 490) on stable once-weekly intravenous darbepoetin alfa were randomized to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta once monthly or darbepoetin alfa every 2 weeks for 26 weeks, with dose adjustment for individual haemoglobin target (11-13 g/dL; maximum decrease from baseline 1 g/dL). Subsequently, patients entered a second 26-week period of once-monthly methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained average haemoglobin ≥10.5 g/dL, with a decrease from baseline ≤1 g/dL, in Weeks 50-53; the secondary endpoint was dose change over time. The trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00394953. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. One hundred and fifty-seven of 245 patients treated with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and 99 of 245 patients with darbepoetin alfa met the response definition (64.1% and 40.4%; P < 0.0001). Doses increased by 6.8% with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and 58.8% with darbepoetin alfa during once-monthly treatment. Death rates were equal between treatments (5.7%). Most common adverse events included hypertension, procedural hypotension, nasopharyngitis and muscle spasms, with no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta maintained target haemoglobin more successfully than darbepoetin alfa at once-monthly dosing intervals despite dose increases with darbepoetin alfa.

Conversion of darbepoetin to low doses of CERA maintains hemoglobin levels in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Finding the lowest effective dose of erythropoietin-stimulating agents is critical in the management of renal anemia. We evaluated the efficacy of converting darbepoetin to CERA at doses lower than those usually recommended. METHODS: We selected consecutive non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients treated with darbepoetin doses ≤40 µg/week in absence of iron deficiency, recent blood transfusion, bleeding, neoplasia, myocardial infarction/stroke in the last 3 months. Darbepoetin ≤20 µg/week was shifted to CERA 75 µg/month, while darbepoetin 21-40 µg/week to CERA 100 µg/month. Primary endpoint was the change in hemoglobin (Hb goal, 11-13 g/dl) at month 3, 6, 9 and 12. RESULTS: Studied patients (n = 37) were aged 70 ± 13 years and GFR was 30 ± 12 ml/min/1.73 m(2); prevalence of males, diabetes and prior cardiovascular disease was 43, 45 and 40%, respectively. Before switching, efficacy population received darbepoetin 18 ± 10 µg/week with 28 patients receiving ≤20 µg/week. Prevalence of Hb goal at baseline was 75.7% and did not change at months 3 (70.3%), 6 (70.3%), 9 (72.2%), and 12 (80.0%). CERA dose remained unchanged during the study (81 ± 11, 82 ± 16, 91 ± 30, 90 ± 54 and 88 ± 61 µg/month). Out of the 438 visits performed, CERA dose was increased in 52 (11.9%) and reduced in 36 (8.2%) visits. Blood pressure, Hb, GFR, transferrin saturation and ferritin did not change. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic kidney disease patients treated with darbepoetin doses ≤40 µg/week, CERA can be efficaciously used at doses lower than those recommended.